Election Frenzy: The Unpredictable Battle for America’s Future


Even before US President Joe Biden dropped out of the race on Sunday, November’s presidential election had become a dizzying rollercoaster ride.

In the run-up to this election, the Democratic Party failed to consider the impact a weakened Biden would have on the electorate, assuming that fear of former President Donald Trump would be enough to win.

In just the past few weeks, however, two new factors emerged, wreaking additional havoc on these assumptions: the horrifying mass shooting at a Trump rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, and the growing chorus of prominent Democrats urging Mr. Biden to step down as their party’s presidential nominee.

Even before last week’s Republican National Convention, polls showed Trump commanding the support of his party’s faithful. In the aftermath of the shooting, this support intensified, with some seeing his escape as a sign of divine intervention.

This deification of Trump and the wild enthusiasm seen at the Republican convention made Democrats more concerned about their electoral prospects and more troubled by Biden’s apparent weaknesses.

His frailty was already an issue, having come into sharp focus during the June 27 debate. With polls showing almost two-thirds of Democrats displeased with Biden, senior party officials publicly urged the President to pass the torch to a younger candidate.

Now that Biden has withdrawn his candidacy and endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris as his party’s nominee, the election is once again wide open. Harris isn’t the nominee yet, with various factions in the Democratic Party possibly jockeying for power, but she will be the favorite ahead of the Democratic National Convention in Chicago next month.

It is fair to say that the current election cycle has been topsy-turvy, particularly over the past week. Yet, within the larger American political context, it is still business as usual.

For starters, the stakes are still as high as they were when the campaigns kicked off more than a year ago.

This is truly, as my brother John would say, “an Armageddon election.” No matter who emerges as the Democratic nominee, this will be a contest between two fundamentally different visions of America. Despite Trump’s statement that it was time to unify the country, his convention, choice of a running mate, and the rhetoric used by many of the Republican convention’s speakers made it clear that the leopard hasn’t changed its spots.

The Trump-led GOP continues to prey on the fears and anger of the white working class, using the same exploitation of social and cultural issues and racist and Christian nationalist xenophobia and resentment of “elites” that they have been cultivating for years. This distracts attention from their policies favoring the wealthiest and most entitled at the expense of the safety, security, and prosperity of the middle class and those seeking to become middle class.

Trump will continue to project his frightening dystopian vision of American life, targeting his favorite lineup of evildoers – federal law enforcement, media elites, immigrants. His use of ridicule and hostile language will continue to inflame passions and incite violence.

Democrats, meanwhile, will continue to call for greater economic, social, and political equity. Biden had previously called out the widening income gap between the richest Americans and those struggling to make ends meet. Democrats will call for a fairer tax system, a raised minimum wage, protection of unions and labor rights.

Despite their crackdown to stop the flow of illegal immigrants, they’ll call for a humane approach to those fleeing persecution. They will call for expanded health care, lower drug prices, support of women’s rights to make their own healthcare decisions, and continued progress towards racial justice.

Finally, Democrats will focus this election on the need to protect democracy and the rule of law, warning about the threat posed by Trump supporters’ plans to reject the outcome of this election by using administrative tactics and even violence, as they did in 2020 to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power.

One additional factor that will remain the same is the threat posed by gun violence and the failure of the GOP to support even modest gun control reforms – despite the attempt on Trump’s life.

America now has more than one mass shooting each day, with tens of thousands needlessly losing their lives in these and other shootings. It still hasn’t addressed its obsession with weapons. Nor has it faced up to the fact that political violence is not an aberration, but rather part of American history.

When The New York Times writes an editorial titled “The Attack on Trump Is Antithetical to America,” or when Biden asserts that political violence isn’t who we are or that it’s an aberration, they are ignoring the reality that political violence is “as American as cherry pie.”

Living in denial not only ignores the dozens of attempted assassinations that have defined American history but also means that the country isn’t ready to take much-needed remedial steps to end this plague.


Related Suggestions

 
COMMENTS DISCLAIMER & RULES OF ENGAGEMENT
The opinions expressed herein, through this post or comments, contain positions and viewpoints that are not necessarily those of IslamiCity. These are offered as a means for IslamiCity to stimulate dialogue and discussion in our continuing mission of being an educational organization. The IslamiCity site may occasionally contain copyrighted material the use of which may not always have been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. IslamiCity is making such material available in its effort to advance understanding of humanitarian, education, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.


In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, and such (and all) material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.