Election: Past and Future

Category: Americas, World Affairs Topics: Elections Views: 2960
2960

Almost a year and a half ago, I made a presentation about 2004 election to a group of influential Muslim leaders. The presentation was based on a two-year study of the electoral history of the country during the last 40 years. 

I made a case that Muslims could become partners in the forthcoming electoral exercise provided they determine their priorities and goals in advance and mobilize their resources properly. 

Based on my analysis, I suggested that in senatorial races, there will be five very closely watched states, in house districts, there will be some 34 very closely watched races and in presidential election, there will be some 12 battle ground states.

I argued that if Muslim votes are mobilized properly, the community could play an effective role in impacting the electoral outcome of the election 2004.

My proposal was very simple. Let us mobilize Muslim votes in those closely contested districts and states and empower the local communities to take matters in their hands for an intelligent decision. I even suggested that we should not spend our electoral resources in states where the outcome is well known. I argued that this would put us on electoral map as a national community.

I also proposed that in these districts and states, we should work with other national, local and regional electoral groups for voter registration. My idea was to develop a comprehensive list of every Muslim eligible voter in key states and districts and mobilize them for an active role in election. 

However, after lobbying with various Muslim organizations there was little movement in defining a clear and detailed strategy for election 2004.

At various political events the discussion was shallow with very little long-term strategy. Most of the discussions were based on emotionalism. Some people suggested Muslims should elect anyone but Bush. And yet others were suggesting that Muslim votes are not cheap without mentioning where those Muslim votes were and who was selling them if they were to be sold at a higher price.

As we look beyond elections 2004 we need to plan a more effective strategy that expresses our Islamic values and will contribute to Peace, Liberty and Justice for all.

Dr. Aslam Abdullah is Director of the Muslim Electorates' Council of America. He is also the director of the Islamic Society of Nevada.


  Category: Americas, World Affairs
  Topics: Elections
Views: 2960

Related Suggestions

 
COMMENTS DISCLAIMER & RULES OF ENGAGEMENT
The opinions expressed herein, through this post or comments, contain positions and viewpoints that are not necessarily those of IslamiCity. These are offered as a means for IslamiCity to stimulate dialogue and discussion in our continuing mission of being an educational organization. The IslamiCity site may occasionally contain copyrighted material the use of which may not always have been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. IslamiCity is making such material available in its effort to advance understanding of humanitarian, education, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.


In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, and such (and all) material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.


Older Comments:
HUDD FROM CANADA said:
The whole concept of electing candidates is rotten in these places(North America). Personally I would've voted for somebody else, since both Bush and Kerry ain't palatable for my taste. Why do we need to choose between the baddest and the worst? The Republicans and the Democrats anchored themselves in the US political system like incurable cancer! They both do not represent the ideals of the majority of the American people, that's why a great number of elligible voters didn't vote. They weren't represented. In such a huge nation consisting of so many ethnicities we have only two white parties! This is dictatorship and autocracy on the part of either of the two parties. Bush is a notorios moron, a puppet in the hands of the Fanatic Christians and Zionist psychopats. Kerry is a submersive sidewinder not to be trusted by his bosom friend. Where are the people on their agenda? They are subtitles, not realities. The war in Iraq is the greatest blunder in the history of USA, Bush will be mentioned in the history as the rat-brained president of USA, he redifined the concept of moron for modern times. Moron was just a word in the dictionary, now the word has a face: Bush! Deplorable, many Americans I talked to said that they couldn't vote simply because they had nobody to vote for. Why would a Black, a Native , an Oriental, a Hispanic or an Asian(all American ethnicities) vote for a Waspish moron like Bush or for an ambiguous petty bourgeois like Kerry? Do either of them represent these people in any way? I don't think so. They both represent one or all of the following, fundamentalist Christians, Zionist Jews, white supremacists, savage imperialists, unscrupulous opportunists and the political and economical thugs! USA should work on bringing freedom and democracy to her own people! That would be the real challenge for a true president of the USA! "You see the chafe in your brother's eye but you don't see the beam sticking out of yours" What Bible do these people read?
2004-11-09