New U.S. immigration laws causing complaints and hardship
The Patriot Act 2001, passed hurriedly by Congress after the September 11 attacks, which is being strictly implemented since October 1, has led to increasing complaints that people of Middle Eastern and South Asian origins or looks are bearing the brunt of the new law.
The new law, which has come under sharp criticism from civil liberties and immigrant bodies, makes it easier to bring about a more vigilant enforcement of visa laws, arrest and deportation of visa overstays as well as deportation absconders, delay in processing of work permits of aliens, a new and stringent procedure related to grant of student visas, and enforcement of immigration laws relating to students after they enter the United States.
Ironically, like most other immigration policies which have come to the fore now, the necessary procedures were already in place, some since World War II and others since 1998, but they had been suspended for decades in respect to most visiting foreign nationals. "Now, our national interest demands that such procedures be implemented fully to guarantee the safety of all residents of the United States, including US nationals and other visitors," Attorney General John Ashcroft explained. There are three components to the process: first, fingerprinting and photographing at the entry points to the country; second, periodic registration of aliens who stay in the US for 30 days or more and third, exit controls that will help the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) remove aliens who do not comply with the relevant regulations or are found to have been in violation of other US Immigration laws.
The nationals of the following countries are affected by the National Security Entry-Exit Registration System (NSEERS): all nationals of Iran, Iraq, Libya, Sudan, and Syria.
Also affected are other non-immigrant aliens whom the State Department considers to present an elevated national security risk, based on criteria reflecting current intelligence. According to a report in the Washington Post on 24 September, Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) internal memo, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and Yemen have been added to the list of such countries. Intending visitors to be subjected to the new procedures would be picked out by INS inspectors "in their discretion", which means not all arriving Pakistanis may be photographed and fingerprinted. The fingerprints of the aliens undergoing NSEERS would be matched against a database of known criminals and terrorists. According to the Attorney General's office, in the past five months, during a pilot project using the same fingerprint technology to identify wanted criminals , INS was receiving an average of more than 70 fingerprint "hits" a week, resulting in the arrest of 2,000 wanted felons from January through July 2002. Fingerprinting is considered by the Justice Department as a foolproof procedure to identify criminals who have changed identities. Though an undeclared objective, fingerprinting would also help INS identify those illegal immigrants who obtained US nationality or Green Cards by changing the identities through which they entered the United States.
This would further increase the chances of arrests of many intending Pakistani visitors as a substantial number change their names and try to re-enter the United States under a new identity. With fingerprinting, they would all be like sitting ducks at ports of entry. Already, many Pakistanis have been deported from entry airports when their previous instances of visa overstay were discovered during the initial fingerprinting.
The INS inspector at the point of entry is one of the most powerful officials in the US because he has immense discretionary powers, and is not even accountable to an INS District Director. He can only be held judicially accountable and that too with great difficulty.
If a visitor remains in the US for more than 30 days, he must report to an INS office between day 30 and day 40. If a visitor remains in the United States for one year or longer, he must report 10 days before or after the anniversary of his entry into the United States. During the stay, if the visitor changes his address, employer or school after staying in the United States for 30 days or more, he must notify the INS in writing within 10 days of the change.
A tourist would be asked for evidence substantiating his declared purpose of visit, hotel receipts, ticket stubs, or in case he or she has been staying with relatives, documents such as postmarked envelopes showing their address. A visitor who is an employee would have to show payroll stubs, employment contracts and the like. A student would have to produce class schedule, official notification of the grades, student identification card etc. The INS officer could ask other relevant questions, and he could also ask the visitor to come with additional evidence after a period of seven days. Those designated for exit from the United States would have to appear in person before an INS inspecting officer at a designated port of departure and leave from that port the same day. In case of non-compliance, the offender would be deemed to be out of status and subject to arrest, detention, fines, and removal from the United States.
Source: Daily Times
Related Suggestions
He's nothing but a racist ignoramus who is incapable of any real debate in a civilized manner. Mr. Norman is an evasive zionist coward also, i remember when he had nothing to say he started stereotyping me because of my Japanese ancestory in order to dodge the issues.
Iviews.com should ban charlatans like him permenently.
which makes one think which 1 of these writers is 1 to believe & for that matter any of their words. Heb 7:1 by the way contradicts Gen 3:20 & Heb 7:3 calls him like a son of God....
"Mark 12:28-29/Deut. 6:4: Jesus affirms that there is but one God. Don't see how this means "taking his own salvation" through God. See John 5:23." What is there that you don't see? You yourself say that Jesus(pbuh) affirms the one God. He affirms what mosses affirmed, 1 God without sons or daughters! And again the word son shouldn't be taken literaly. But if one is to believe in John's gospel then 1 should stop beliving in Mark's gospel & the others since John is the only 1 with these inspirations.(remember its not johan the appostle writing. And Yes people should honour him because God send him as a Prophet same as the others before him! And you had writen that people must take their salvation through Jesus but according to Jesus the salvation is only through one God & not him as was stated in the previous post. "Mark 10:18-19/Matt 19:16-17: Jesus states ..." Please re-read the verses. Its amazing how you can't see the connection to the fact that in Mark & Deut he affirms the one God, the God of adam, Abraham,... & mosses which was 1 God. & how he reminds of the commandments which also were of 1 God. So deny he does
Mark 12:28-29/Deut. 6:4: Jesus affirms that there is but one God. Don't see how this means "taking his own salvation" through God. See John 5:23.
Mark 10:18-19/Matt 19:16-17: Jesus states that only God is good, therefore, if he were good, he is God. Jesus does not deny he is good here--he does not deny that he is God. It is ironic that the man calling him "good" in ignorance was actually correct!
Matt 5:19: Read in context, 5:17: Jesus has come to fulfill the law. The "moral" commandments of God's law remain. By Jesus' sacrifice, he atoned for all who believe.
John 3:16: How can you discount this!?! You better discount all of John.
Matt 5:45,48. Luke 3:38: correct, we are all "children of God", but there is only one Son, one Christ.
Ex 4:22: Speaking of Israel as His firstborn son, a nation, not the "Son".
II Sam 7:14, I Chronicles 22:10: This points to the reign of Jesus Christ, the everlasting kingdom, from the line of David.
Jeremiah 31:9 : (see Gen 48)
Hebrews 7:1,3: The Bible says Melchisedec, King of Salem is a priest, not calling him Son of God. Adam was created by God. Jesus was not created by God (see John 1:1).
Matt 10:34: Jesus is not calling for violence by "bringing the sword". Because he came, he disrupted the sinful lives of those who would follow him. He requires (v 33) that we acknowledge him or else he will disown us before his Father. Many were and will be persecuted because of their belief in him, even within our own families. There is no call to violence at all here only that people will be violent against those who believe in him. Yes this is indeed, an interesting read. Also try Matt 10:14-16
Thanks Peacelover. I mean no disr
Grendizer: back to the insults again, I see. That's your priviledge, altho' it adds nothing to the "debate". In the meantime, either get yourself a book of Yiddish terms or stop misusing them. You only make yourself look like an ignoramus.
John Normon you and holocaust deniers deserve each other. People like you are the <> of the Earth.
You honestly need get out more instead of getting high on zionist terrorist propoganda which you never seem tired of regutjitating like a pavlovian poodle in distress.
Go take some anti-psychotics and feel free to rejoin reality. What a sore loser. Mensch !
And remember, the Israeli Govt is not involved in criminal acts. It's futile to go into it with you since you're the guy who goes around with blinkers on, like some old dray horse whose been pulling wagons for so long that he can no longer remember where the stables are and just plods on regardless until his driver pulls him up short. Who is your driver, incidentally? Some guy in Cairo?
And John...as usual you have much to say but of little merit....if we take your advice every Jew in the US would be held responcible for the criminal actions of the Isreali governments against the US, including spying by jewish organizations like the ADL and ZOA. Should they all be treated as if they have a connection to Johanthan Pollard...remember him ?
However I am all in favor of tossing Zionists out...since they are use other nations to fight their dirty wars....either way they'll move to greener pastures after they've drained the US dry....and you wont have anyone to blame but yourselves for that. How poetic!
These times that we live in are dangerous. America has to do what it can to protect all innocent citizens (including American Muslims)from the threat of terrorists. It's unfortunate that innocent MiddleEastern peoples are under more suspicion than other groups but you can thank the terrorists for that.
This world is a dark world indeed and we need to all pray for God's peace and for His peace to live in our hearts.
It about race, not just immigration. White Supremasicsts aka conservative Christians should quit denying that they have klan sheets in their closets.
Kathy feel free to read up on democracy and freedom of religion when you have some spare time from worshipping the Hallaujah Boys Falwell and Robertson.
Muslims did all they could to condemn 9/11.....so dont give us this CRAP about the Islamic community being silent. They did that while being attacked throughout the country both physically and by the media, and while being detained and deported thanks to Herr Ashcroft.
You so called defenders of "libery and justice" are liars who export terror thru out the world and then complain about being hated...OH BOO HOO HOO ! Your immigration policies are just a reflection of your hypocrisy!
Please don't twist Jesus' words. He is not calling for violence or action. He is merely stating a fact in Matthew 12:30. If you read those verses in context, Jesus continues in verses 31-32 that those speaking against him will be forgiven (should they seek it). Jesus never, ever called for death or punishment for those who spoke against him. GOD is the only judge in these matters, not man. No one can be "forced" to be Christian--salvation through Christ is a gift that can only be freely accepted. If you refuse Christ, that is your own choice--it is not up to any man to judge your decision or attempt to coerce you into accepting him. Shame on any Christians who believe otherwise: they are mistaken.
So-called Christians in history (and, God forbid, today) have violated this for their own ends and so have injured Christianity. Look at the hatred and mistrust that still exists against Christians hundreds of years after the evil persecution caused by the Church of Rome in the name of Christ.
This is much like those who claim to be Muslim but are violent today. If I were Muslim, and understood Islam to be a religion of peace, then I would do what I could to promote that peace and love and not encourage violence and hatred. I would come to the defense of my belief and vocally stand up for the truth.
The evil being perpetrated out there today in the name of religion (at least as far as Christianity and Islam are concerned) seems to me to be pure politics. Violence and hatred is the work of Satan, not God. And from what I understand both Muslims and Christians can agree on that.
Esther, are you a native American?
Without immigration the America wouldnt't exist.
I'm not sure how you get the idea that China's population of more than a billion are all of one race. Maybe to you they're all yellow chinks? Now as to Sam's comments, "slay the indidels"? Your ignorance is extreme. Freedom of the press is anti-islam? From my understanding no one has the right to publicly burn the bible, quran or torah in the U.S. It's like yelling "fire" in a crowded movie theater. Doing it will cause death and injury. But the point is, in Muslim countries they burn the U.S. flag in reaction to our sending a 2,000 pound bomb on their, and their families heads. You should be happy they're ONLY burning a peice of cloth.
However, we must recognize that the USA has a right to act as it wishes against foreigners who may pose a threat to its people. Muslims in some of the countries on the list should have thought about the consequences of their actions before they started dancing in the streets with pictures of Osama bin Laden following the 9-11 attacks.
Sam get your own views before regujitating thrash you learnt from Faux News, or whatever your nutty local preacher fed you. Your banal banter shows you have a thing for cheap polemicsm. You dont believe in freedoms Sam.....you only believe in your right to hate others no matter what....I'll bet you wanna a burn a Quran dont you ? Infact Bible burnings are all the rage in Israel...which right wing "christians" like you support in the hopes of igniting armageddon. You're a fascist phony.
Esther...you as usual show that are quite willing fabricate whatever suits your idiotiic premise. Muslim countries dont allow immigration ?! BS...they sure do...think the 40000 Americans in Saudi Arabia are a figment of state departments immagination ? Muslim countries allow immigration alright so please dont lie, b/c nobody believes you and you end up looking like a bonafide screw-up.
Immigration isnt the issue...its the race of the immigrant which you a problem with. You wouldnt be howling "Death of the West" ala Pat Buchannan if we had a boat load of Scandenavians landing on our shores would you ? Immigration is the source of America's strength....you're just afraid of competition in terms of hard work and changing racial demographics.
Its ironic Sam and Esther that you are the descendents of immigrants yourselves...ILLEGAL ones from Europe ofcourse who engaged in a little matter of genocide.
If you're so scared of immigrants...start mowing your own lawns, start picking your own oranges and get a real education....and if you're still to LAZY to do that...feel free to move back to your European roots...but I doubt even they would want white thrash in their streets.
I hope that burned you good.....that'll teach to blame hard working well-educated immigrants for your own failur
stands for are exactly opposite of what Islam stands for.
Islam teaches it's followers to slay the infidels and
kaffirs. Well, most of America is Infidels and Kaffirs.
One of the basic freedoms we have, freedom of the
press, is totally anti-Islam - for example, in America it is
legal to burn the flag. What would Muslims say if
somebody burned Korans? Would any Muslims stand
up for that person's right to burn the Koran? I don't think
so. America needs to stand tall in the world for it's
freedoms, and Islam and Muslims immigrants are
destroying those freedoms. In any case, Muslims can
stay in Saudi Arabia, Iran, and other "perfect Muslim
countries".
Esther, I disagree with you. Everyone who lives in the United States is an immigrant. Muslim-Americans have proven to be consistently better educated, more law abiding, and more productive in society than other immigrant groups, or with respect to the average American. Go to the hospital, and you'll find that many Muslim doctors. Visit your local technology company, bets are there are many Muslims. The misconception that immigration causes harm to a country is unfounded.