The American Dream

What we lose sight of is the hard work, the fiercely competitive spirit, the ideological drive and the finely honed managerial skills that underpin and define the world's sole superpower. Recently, London's Daily Telegraph ran a long article titled 'The New Empire' in three parts by Graham Turner who had returned to Britain after spending five weeks in America talking to people in an attempt to discover how they viewed their country. 

He came back amazed at the views he encountered: the vast majority of Americans, for instance, are convinced their country is a force for good and acts abroad for altruistic reasons. They are therefore shocked to be told how the rest of the world views them. 

After 9/11, and now more recently in the aftermath of the war on Iraq, trying to fathom what the Americans are going to do next, and why, has become a cottage industry, with pundits from across the world offering their opinions. And if we are all concerned about American intentions, it is with good reason: next year, after the American defense budget will have increased by 16 per cent it will spend more on defense than by the rest of the world put together. 

Consider the implications of this sobering fact for a moment. Apart from the size of its military machine, no other country is now within a generation of the technology the Americans have at their disposal. Sustaining this hi-tech behemoth is an economy that churns out 30 per cent of the entire world's goods and services. To see for himself what made Wal-Mart such a successful retail operation, Turner went to a weekly management meeting of the world's biggest corporation which now has annual sales of around $250 billion. In a practiced ritual, the chief executive yelled to the assembled managers: "Whose Wal-Mart?". Back the resounding reply: "Our Wal-Mart!" Continued the CEO: "And who's Number One?" "The customer's Number One!" 

Many of these false fears are planted by the government to justify its aggressive policies abroad and spread by a compliant, gung-ho media. Indeed, the role of the media has been criticized by perceptive Americans who feel they are not being effectively informed: there is a growing concern, for instance, that they were shown a different war in Iraq than the rest of the world saw. 

Reporters, specially TV journalists, are seen as not being sufficiently critical of official policies. Fox News, in particular, is viewed as a jingoistic drum-beater for the 'American way of life' and is now the most popular news channel in the country. 

Driving this enterprise is an ideology based on the American version of democracy and free enterprise. Just as the Soviets thought Marxism was the best system for the whole world, Americans genuinely believe the rest of us will benefit from their way of life and are surprised when somebody says 'no, thank you'. Not that too many people do: millions around the world would like to be part of the 'American dream', and every year, hundreds of thousands make it to the United States legally or illegally. For most of them, this migration results in a vast improvement in the quality of their life as well as their hopes for a better future for their children. 

Pushing the 'American dream' is a vast entertainment machine that produces a relentlessly upbeat image of life in the United States. Soaps and sitcoms churned out for TV around the globe show clean-cut Americans to whom bad things seldom happen. 

There are large houses and apartments, late model cars, trendy clothes - above all, the good guys win. Unlike the UK, for instance, where TV series often show the grimmer side of life, Hollywood is mostly about the feel-good factor. Few popular movies show the loneliness and grimness of life in big cities; they focus instead on people making good against adversity. 

This glowing image of America makes it much easier to colonize the minds of the have-nots of the world. My theory is that the Americans do not need to bomb Third World armies: all they need to do is to drop 'green cards' on the impoverished soldiers to induce them to desert in large numbers. But this would scarcely allow the Pentagon to dictate its bloated budgets to Congress in the name of the 'war on terror'. 

In Orwell's 1984, there was a concept of perpetual war, and this is where we seem to be heading because there is no way in which the world can ever be free of terror. Each terrorist group has its own agenda against perceived injustices and wrongs, and with the globalization of goods and services, ideologically motivated violence has also gone global. And rightly or wrongly, since America is seen as being behind much of the world's woes, it is inevitable that it will be the biggest target, specially as attacks there would generate the most publicity. 

Graham Turner quotes Richard Parker, professor of religion and ethics at the Harvard Business School: "...This is the seminary which trains the clergy of capitalism. America ... believes its world view is omniscient, omnipotent and omnipresent. Just like Marxism, it's a globalizing system. Just like Marxism, it is highly intolerant of opposition and it brooks no opposition..."