Open challenge to atheistic science

There is no such thing as atheistic or theistic science. There is only science.

Mohammad Shafiq wrote: Einstein changed the paradigm of physics in 1905 and thereby defined a paradigm of physical sciences under which existence of God is not possible. The articles on the basis of which open challenge has been put forward expose the trickeries of Einstein in his articles of 1905. Thus science was converted to atheistic science by Einstein. Now so-called scientists like Stephen Hawking, Lawrence Krauss, Michio Kaku, Tyson & many others are just selling this atheistic science to promote atheism. Their whole knowledge is reduced to trash�as the consequence of�the scientific research articles published in peer-reviewed journals. Under the alternative paradigm of physics which emerges after rectifying the fallacies of Einstein existence of God is obvious & evident.

Can you point out where Einstein said these things? What on earth do you mean by insulting brilliant men in this way, it's absolutely outrageous to call Hawking for example a 'so called scientist'. Can you justify this by telling us who therefore are 'proper scientists'?

Mohammad Shafiq wrote: I have justified every word of what I have stated through scientific research articles published in peer-reviewed journals and following is the list of articles & sites where these articles are available 1. Experimental & Theoretical Evidences of Fallacy of Space-time Concept and Actual State of Existence of the Physical Universe (www.indjst.org; March2012)2. Foundation of Theory of Everything: Non-living Things & Living Things (www.indjst.org; Sep 2010)3.Michelson-Morley Experiment: A Misconceived & Misinterpreted Experiment (www.indjst.org; April 2011)4. Energy Theory of Matter & Cosmology (www.indjst.org; August 2010)5. 'On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies' by Albert Einstein is Based on Trickeries (www.elixirjournal.org Feb.2012)6.Ultimate Proof of Energy Theory of Matter & Cosmology (www.indjst.org; August 2010)7. Theory of Origin & Phenomenon of Life (www.indjst.org; August 2010)These publications are also available on www.gsjournal.net, www.wrldsci.org, viXra, Intellectual Archives & ResearchGate�in my profile.

I have never heard of this journal before and it appears to publish anything from how to mix concrete to flower growing. One wonders who would go there? Any journal worth it's salt would peer review publications so there is nothing special there. As far as I can tell this site is the only place you have visited or know about and you trust it or att least your understanding implicitly. The idea that there is Aetheist science is totally absurd - do you think there are Aetheist versions of Ohms law or gravity? One is sceptical about an article that claims to be an 'ultimate proof' or charge Einstein with trickery. Perhaps you would like to outline one or both of these

The question is not whether God could be seen or not. The question is whether God can exist. No one can physically see God but God has to exist and the existence of universe is the proof of existence God. This is my concern as a theoretical physicist and a theologian. Following is the list of published scientific research articles which substantiate my perspective and the contents of the book 'Natural World Order & The Islamic Thought'.
1. Experimental & Theoretical Evidences of Fallacy of Space-time Concept and Actual State of Existence of the Physical Universe
2. Foundation of Theory of Everything: Non-living Things & Living Things
3.Michelson-Morley Experiment: A Misconceived & Misinterpreted Experiment ( April 2011)
4. Energy Theory of Matter & Cosmology
5. 'On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies' by Albert Einstein is Based on Trickeries
6.Ultimate Proof of Energy Theory of Matter & Cosmology
7. Theory of Origin & Phenomenon of Life
These publications are published in Indian Journal of Science & Technology and are also available on General Science Journal, World Science Database, viXra, Intellectual Archives & ResearchGate in my profile.