AnnieTwo: I do not wish to spoil |
Post Reply | Page 123 9> |
Author | |||
BMZ
Moderator Group Joined: 03 April 2006 Status: Offline Points: 1852 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 13 June 2006 at 8:42am |
||
the Jesus, Paul and Women thread but wish to ask you here, the following: You wrote to Cassandra:"Read everything, think, meditate, decide how it affects you, and then you are in a position to criticise. That's a motto of mine - I do try to make it work." followed by "Don't stop thinking." I have never stopped thinking and I read everything, even the fine print, I meditate and think about the words, etc and then I get ready to criticise. That was a good advice to her, I like it. Could you please explain the following contradiction in the NT when Jesus is arrested? Only John gives this narrative, the other three don't: 18:6When Jesus said, "I am he", they drew back and fell to the ground. What happened, what did they see that made them fall down? Was there any transfiguration of his face? Keep in mind that the other three writers did not know about this at all. Next comes18:8"I told you that I am he," Jesus answered. "If you are looking for me, then let these men go." 9This happened so that the words he had spoken would be fulfilled:"I have not lost one of those you gave me." Before this he had already lost Judas. Immediately after this he had already lost Simon Peter who disowned him three times verified by the cock crowing. He had also lost the doubting Thomas. How was 9 fulfilled?
|
|||
Cassandra
Senior Member Joined: 30 May 2006 Location: Spain Status: Offline Points: 293 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
bmzsp: Actually it was I who wrote: :"Read everything, think, meditate, decide how it affects you, and then you are in a position to criticise. That's a motto of mine - I do try to make it work." followed by Annietwo's rejoinder:"Don't stop thinking." Just a little point of order. I've made a life of thinking. I'm even qualified in it! Both, I think are worth contemplating. Cassandra |
|||
DavidC
Senior Member Male Christian Joined: 20 September 2001 Location: Florida USA Status: Offline Points: 2474 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Commentary on John 18:6-7 adds no facts but does add many opinions. Either the soldiers were struck down by the majesty of God, by the power of their own conscience, or by Jesus' calm and commanding manner in the face of arrest.
John 18:8-9 refers to Jesus submitting voluntarily under the condition that none of his followers were to be arrested. As this came directly after the forced prostration of the soldiers, it clearly shows Jesus willingly gave himself up and was not forcibly arrested. The "loss" refers to the physical safety not any lack of faith on the part of the Apostles. |
|||
Christian; Wesleyan M.Div.
|
|||
AnnieTwo
Senior Member Joined: 26 May 2006 Status: Offline Points: 281 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Could you please
explain the following contradiction in the NT when Jesus is
arrested? Only John gives this narrative, the other three don't: There is no
contradiction.
18:6When Jesus said,
"I am he", they drew back and fell to the ground. What happened, what
did they see that made them fall down? Was there any transfiguration of his
face? Keep in mind that the other three writers did not know about this at all.
John has
already testified to the effect of Jesus' words on temple officials sent to
arrest him (see John 7:45-46). It is
not at all unlikely that some of the same personnel are again involved. If they have been awed by Jesus before, if
they have been dumbfounded by his teaching, his authority, his directness in
the full light of day in the precincts of the temple where they most feel at
home, it is not hard to believe that they are staggered by his open
self-disclosure in the middle of the night.
Their physical ineptitude was another instance of people responding
better than they knew. Jesus' effect
on people was astounding. I think just
looking into his eyes could make one weak in the knees.
Next comes18:8"I
told you that I am he," Jesus answered. "If you are looking for me,
then let these men go." 9This happened so that the words he had spoken
would be fulfilled:"I have not lost one of those you gave me." Before this he had
already lost Judas. Immediately after this he had already lost Simon Peter who
disowned him three times verified by the cock crowing. He had also lost the
doubting Thomas. How was 9 fulfilled? What
did Jesus mean by saying "I have not lost one of those you gave
me." When did Jesus say that? Read John 17:12, 12 While I was with them in the world, I
kept them in Your name. Those whom You gave Me I have kept; and none of them
is lost except the son of perdition [pointing to Judas], that the Scripture
might be fulfilled. Also,
see John 6:39 39 This is the will of the Father who
sent Me, that of all He has given Me I should lose nothing, but should raise it
up at the last day. And
John 10:28 28 And I give them eternal life, and
they shall never perish; neither shall anyone snatch them out of My hand. It
is already understood that Judas was lost by his actions. Peter and Thomas were not lost. Thomas called Jesus, "My Lord and My
God" after he saw Jesus after his resurrection. Peter went on to preach the gospel of Messiah Jesus. Annie |
|||
14If you are reproached for the name of Christ, blessed are you, for the Spirit of glory and of God rests upon you. On their part He is blasphemed, but on your part He is glorified. 1 Peter 4
|
|||
Mishmish
Senior Member Joined: 01 November 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1694 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Annie wrote: "Jesus' effect on people was astounding. I think just looking into his eyes could make one weak in the knees." But this is not true. John did not recognise Jesus and had to be told who he was: John 1:33 I would not have known him, except that the one who sent me to baptize with water told me, 'The man on whom you see the Spirit come down and remain is he who will baptize with the Holy Spirit.' Isaiah states that there was nothing unusual or even beautiful about Jesus: Isaiah 53:2 He grew up before him like a tender shoot, and like a root out of dry ground. He had no beauty or majesty to attract us to him, nothing in his appearance that we should desire him. And we all know that jesus was so indistinguishable from his followers that Judas had to point him out to those who came to arrest him: Matthew 26:47 While he was still speaking, Judas, one of the Twelve, arrived. With him was a large crowd armed with swords and clubs, sent from the chief priests and the elders of the people. 26:48 Now the betrayer had arranged a signal with them: "The one I kiss is the man; arrest him." 26:49 Going at once to Jesus, Judas said, "Greetings, Rabbi!" and kissed him Edited by Mishmish |
|||
It is only with the heart that one can see clearly, what is essential is invisible to the eye. (The Little Prince)
|
|||
AnnieTwo
Senior Member Joined: 26 May 2006 Status: Offline Points: 281 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Annie wrote: "Jesus' effect on people was
astounding. I think just looking into his eyes could make one weak in the
knees." But this is not true. John did not recognise Jesus and had to be
told who he was: John
1:33 I would not have known him, except that the one who sent me to
baptize with water told me, 'The man on whom you see the Spirit come down and
remain is he who will baptize with the Holy Spirit.' Apples and oranges. John
said that he was not worthy to tie Jesus' sandals. People
followed Jesus in droves and hung on his every word. People
brought the sick to him. He spoke like no other prophet either
before him or after him.
Isaiah states that there
was nothing unusual or even beautiful about Jesus: Isaiah 53:2 He grew up before him like a tender
shoot, and like a root out of dry ground. He had no beauty or majesty
to attract us to him, nothing in his appearance that we should desire him.
I am not
speaking of Jesus' outward appearance but his inward appearance.
And we all know that
jesus was so indistinguishable from his followers that Judas had to point him
out to those who came to arrest him: Matthew 26:47
While he was still speaking, Judas, one of the Twelve, arrived. With him
was a large crowd armed with swords and clubs, sent from the chief priests and
the elders of the people. 26:48
Now the betrayer had arranged a signal with them: "The one I kiss
is the man; arrest him." 26:49
Going at once to Jesus, Judas said, "Greetings, Rabbi!" and
kissed him Nope. I am speaking of Jesus inward appearance not his outward appearance. |
|||
14If you are reproached for the name of Christ, blessed are you, for the Spirit of glory and of God rests upon you. On their part He is blasphemed, but on your part He is glorified. 1 Peter 4
|
|||
Mishmish
Senior Member Joined: 01 November 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1694 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Annie: If you are speaking of his inward appearance, then what did they see that made them fall to the ground? "18:6When Jesus said, "I am he", they drew back and fell to the ground. What happened, what did they see that made them fall down? Was there any transfiguration of his face? Keep in mind that the other three writers did not know about this at all." You wrote: "John has already testified to the effect of Jesus' words on temple officials sent to arrest him (see John 7:45-46). It is not at all unlikely that some of the same personnel are again involved. If they have been awed by Jesus before, if they have been dumbfounded by his teaching, his authority, his directness in the full light of day in the precincts of the temple where they most feel at home, it is not hard to believe that they are staggered by his open self-disclosure in the middle of the night." If they had already been awed by him, having come in contact with Jesus before, why would they have needed Judas to point him out to them? |
|||
It is only with the heart that one can see clearly, what is essential is invisible to the eye. (The Little Prince)
|
|||
DavidC
Senior Member Male Christian Joined: 20 September 2001 Location: Florida USA Status: Offline Points: 2474 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Not to be redundant, but John does not say exactly why the soldiers fell.
I reviewed at least a half dozen accepted biblical commentaries for my previous response. There is no agreement; only the speculations I posted. The transfiguration idea is completely without evidence. |
|||
Christian; Wesleyan M.Div.
|
|||
Post Reply | Page 123 9> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |