IslamiCity.org Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Religion - Islam > Islam for non-Muslims
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Is Islam violent and intolerant?  What is Islam What is Islam  Donate Donate
  FAQ FAQ  Quran Search Quran Search  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Is Islam violent and intolerant?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 6>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
i s2 islam View Drop Down
Starter
Starter
Avatar
Joined: 11 November 2007
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 3
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote i s2 islam Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Is Islam violent and intolerant?
    Posted: 11 November 2007 at 10:14pm
asalam alakum,
i would just like to add to your understanding of islam if i may.

Islam is religion of peace and submission and stresses on the sanctity of human life.
A verse in the Quran says, [Chapter 5, verse 32], that "anyone who saves one life, it is as if he has saved the whole of mankind and anyone who has killed another person (except in lieu of murder or mischief on earth) it is as if he has killed the whole of mankind."
Islam condemns all the violence which happened in the Crusades, in Spain, in WW II, or by acts of people like the Rev. Jim Jones, David Koresh, Dr. Baruch Goldstein, or the atrocities committed in Bosnia by the Christian Serbs.Islam does not encourage any forms of violence.
Anyone who is doing violence is not practicing his religion at that time. However, sometimes violence is a human response of oppressed people as it happens in Palestine.Unfortunately, the Palestinians who are doing violence are called terrorists, but not the armed Israeli settlers when they do the same sometimes even against their own people. As it turned out to be in the Oklahoma City bombing, sometime Muslims are prematurely blamed even if the terrorism is committed by non-Muslims. Sometimes those who want Peace and those who oppose Peace can be of the same religion.

Back to Top
peacemaker View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar
Male
Joined: 29 December 2005
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 3057
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote peacemaker Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 October 2007 at 10:29am
Originally posted by Tom123 Tom123 wrote:

Originally posted by peacemaker peacemaker wrote:

Assalamu Alaikum and hi everyone,

Islam is not violent nor is it intolerant:

"On that account: We ordained for the Children of Israel that if any one slew a person - unless it be for murder or for spreading mischief in the land - it would be as if he slew the whole people: and if any one saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of the whole people. Then although there came to them Our apostles with clear signs, yet, even after that, many of them continued to commit excesses in the land."

Qur'an 5:32 

Couple of points as a reminder here, in general, and in particular relevant to this section:

Discussions - Islam for non-Muslims
Non-Muslims can ask questions about Islam, discussion for the purpose of learning is allowed but not debate.

http://www.islamicity.com/forum/default.asp

"There is no limit on questions one may ask or repeatedly ask to clarify a point about Islamic faith as long as the purpose is to seek knowledge about Islam. This is the place where only those who believe in Islamic faith and have proper knowledge on the subject should take part to answer, and those who can not positively contribute here should not take part."

http://www.islamicity.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=7684& ; ; ; ;PN=1

And then the guidelines in general:

http://www.islamicity.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4589& ; ; ; ;PN=1

http://www.islamicity.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=10453&am p;am p;am p;PN=1


   Sorry, peacemaker. You are completely correct, I apologize for breaking the rules.

   Cristo Vive!
     - Tomasz

Hi Tom123, it was a general reminder, and it was not aimed at anyone, in particular. I appreciate your receptiveness.

May Allah guide us all.

Peace

Then which of the favours of your Lord will ye deny?
Qur'an 55:13
Back to Top
Tom123 View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 04 July 2007
Location: Gibraltar
Status: Offline
Points: 186
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Tom123 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 October 2007 at 9:40pm
Originally posted by peacemaker peacemaker wrote:

Assalamu Alaikum and hi everyone,

Islam is not violent nor is it intolerant:

"On that account: We ordained for the Children of Israel that if any one slew a person - unless it be for murder or for spreading mischief in the land - it would be as if he slew the whole people: and if any one saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of the whole people. Then although there came to them Our apostles with clear signs, yet, even after that, many of them continued to commit excesses in the land."

Qur'an 5:32 

Couple of points as a reminder here, in general, and in particular relevant to this section:

Discussions - Islam for non-Muslims
Non-Muslims can ask questions about Islam, discussion for the purpose of learning is allowed but not debate.

http://www.islamicity.com/forum/default.asp

"There is no limit on questions one may ask or repeatedly ask to clarify a point about Islamic faith as long as the purpose is to seek knowledge about Islam. This is the place where only those who believe in Islamic faith and have proper knowledge on the subject should take part to answer, and those who can not positively contribute here should not take part."

http://www.islamicity.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=7684& ; ; ;PN=1

And then the guidelines in general:

http://www.islamicity.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4589& ; ; ;PN=1

http://www.islamicity.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=10453&am p;am p;PN=1


   Sorry, peacemaker. You are completely correct, I apologize for breaking the rules.

   Cristo Vive!
     - Tomasz
Back to Top
peacemaker View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar
Male
Joined: 29 December 2005
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 3057
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote peacemaker Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 October 2007 at 10:44am

Assalamu Alaikum and hi everyone,

Islam is not violent nor is it intolerant:

"On that account: We ordained for the Children of Israel that if any one slew a person - unless it be for murder or for spreading mischief in the land - it would be as if he slew the whole people: and if any one saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of the whole people. Then although there came to them Our apostles with clear signs, yet, even after that, many of them continued to commit excesses in the land."

Qur'an 5:32 

Couple of points as a reminder here, in general, and in particular relevant to this section:

Discussions - Islam for non-Muslims
Non-Muslims can ask questions about Islam, discussion for the purpose of learning is allowed but not debate.

http://www.islamicity.com/forum/default.asp

"There is no limit on questions one may ask or repeatedly ask to clarify a point about Islamic faith as long as the purpose is to seek knowledge about Islam. This is the place where only those who believe in Islamic faith and have proper knowledge on the subject should take part to answer, and those who can not positively contribute here should not take part."

http://www.islamicity.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=7684& ; ;PN=1

And then the guidelines in general:

http://www.islamicity.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4589& ; ;PN=1

http://www.islamicity.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=10453&am p;PN=1

Then which of the favours of your Lord will ye deny?
Qur'an 55:13
Back to Top
Tom123 View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 04 July 2007
Location: Gibraltar
Status: Offline
Points: 186
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Tom123 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 October 2007 at 6:02am
Originally posted by Hayfa Hayfa wrote:

Tom,

It is interesting what you wrote. The idea that Jesus was about "peace" and yet they did a poll here in the states that asked people who are Christian what about "love thy neighbor" etc. And they said it goes out the window if you need to defend yourself. And that "war" is justifiable.

So do you think it is justifiable for a Christian woman  to defend herself if she is being raped? Even if it means she kills the man?  Or should she just "submit" and not commit an "act of violence?"

In light of the fact that there is tremendous violence all over the globe, most Christians are then not "true" Christians? Are they not opposing the war? Are they not speaking up? What about the violence in Latin America? Lots of people sit on their hands and say nothing. What about when Pope Pious did not take a more strident rejection of Hitler? Why did he not, himself, risk dying in order to save the Jews of Europe and expecially from his home country of Italy where the Vatican lies? I mean, the Moroccoan king stood up to Hitler and refused to allow the Jewish people of Morocco to be sent. Why not all the good "Christians?"

Does standing up for justice not also mean going to the defense of others? Not just in words? Nonviolence is one tactic. But only one is it not? Would Hitler have been stopped by a few protests? Or did it take war to do so?

You must know about Cambodia and Pol Pot's regime in the 1970s? The only way they were forced out what by an invasion of the Vietnamese. They had lost so many people. Millions died The only way the "killing fields stopped was an act of "aggression."

The only way that Japan's imperialism was stopped in Asia was through "aggression." They had murdered 100s of thousands of Chinese alone. This is not counting people throughout the rest of Asia.

As a person who grew up in Catholicism the "turn the othe cheek" was not the solution to being abused, picked on or bullied. In fact it just made me get abused more and my self-esteem dropped. And in cases of "agression" to do so is actually more dangerous. It clearly shows in statisitcs with self-defense, the more you defend yourself, the less likely people will hurt you.  That is not saying you "bully" back. But in cases of self-defense it is so true. Women who fight back aggressively are less likely to be raped, hurt or killed.

Now about the over15,000 rapes and sexual assualts happening in the Congo? Should we just protest and "love thy neighbor" and wait until the mnosters are done? Or do we go in and stop them??? Even if it means physical force.

Islam to me combines the spirtual with reality. If someone is outright aggresive toward you or innocents, if they are trying to kill you you have a right to use physical force. Makes sense to me.

 

   Hi Hayfa,

   You asked some very good and difficult questions, thank you. In regards to rape or being physically assaulted, I would never condemn people who reacted by physically defended themselves. I have never been raped or seriously beaten up too hard. I do believe that Jesus does call on Christians to not excercise violence, and if I was being attacked I pray that God would give me the courage to not use violence in spite of my instincts to do so.

During the early years of the church, Christian families were arrested en-masse for their beliefs by people like Paul (who himself became a believer) and as we know many were murdered later. They did not fight back, neither did they renounce their faith.

I don't believe in standing by when someone is being hurt, and have as a teacher assistant at times found myself between youth (big young guys, sometimes taller than me) fighting each other. Luckily in all cases they backed off.

If one of my friends or anyone really was being assaulted in my sight, I would move in and stand between the aggressor and the victim. I would also try to stop the attacker in a non-violent way by blocking the blows or trying to restrain them. It is possible to do these things without using violence. In the meantime, I hope the victim would use the oppurtunity to get away.
 
You ask about Hitler. Actually peaceful protests by Germans stopped his euthanasia campaign against the disabled. If every single German Christian (majority of people in the country) stood true to their faith and denounced his crimes and refused to co-operate, he would have no people in his army or SS to commit the mass murders. In fact, he wouldn't have then even been elected.

I have never looked at the Popes or Vatican as examples of Christian action against injustice. In El Salvador PJP2 turned his back on Archbishop Romero. During World War 2 they did little, but there were many priests in Nazi occupied Poland and France and other countries who denounced the crimes of the Nazis and hid their victims from persecution. Many paid the ultimate price for doing so. Don't forget about them.

You say 'Islam to me combines the spirtual with reality.'

   That may be the case in the view of many. The Christian approach (as Jesus commands) may seem to many to be illogical or unrealistic and other words have been used to describe it as well. But as Jesus said, His Kingdom is not of this world. Christians are called to place loyalty to God above anything else, including their own lives. Christian peaceful action has saved many lives, like the CPT in Palestine who often physically blocked Israeli soldiers from opening fire on protesters. Or priests and pastors and Christian laymen in Nazi occupied Europe who hid tens of thousands of Jews (in Poland alone) from the SS.

Non-violence (Hindu) in India was very successful and began the end of the British empire. It toppled the Soviet empire in most of Eastern Europe. And Marcos in the Phillipines. So even on earth, it can often be very successful.

Violence sometimes begins as a tool of self-defence and quickly becomes a weapon of attack. Like Iraqi insurgents who originally began their war targeting only armed US soldiers and now murder Shiite fellow Muslims by the thousands. Pol Pot himself was initially a victim of US imperialism, the Khmer Rouge was formed in response to US crimes in SouthEast Asia and the crimes of their puppets. Even now, some of their loyalists still claim they were 'liberating' Cambodia.

   Cristo Vive!
         - Tomasz


 





Back to Top
Daniel Dworsky View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior  Member
Avatar
Joined: 17 March 2005
Location: Israel
Status: Offline
Points: 777
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Daniel Dworsky Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 October 2007 at 3:30am
Originally posted by Alwardah Alwardah wrote:

Hi Angela


Your answers always amaze me. I still find it difficult to believe that you
are not a Muslim.


May Allah guide you soon Ameen!


Take Care



Wait! She's not a Rabbah (Rabbi fem)? We always want to claim the best as
our own.

DACIC (Dance And Chant In Chair)

Go Angie Go Angie Go Angie....
Back to Top
Hayfa View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior  Member
Avatar
Female
Joined: 07 June 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2368
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Hayfa Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 October 2007 at 6:53am

Tom,

It is interesting what you wrote. The idea that Jesus was about "peace" and yet they did a poll here in the states that asked people who are Christian what about "love thy neighbor" etc. And they said it goes out the window if you need to defend yourself. And that "war" is justifiable.

So do you think it is justifiable for a Christian woman  to defend herself if she is being raped? Even if it means she kills the man?  Or should she just "submit" and not commit an "act of violence?"

In light of the fact that there is tremendous violence all over the globe, most Christians are then not "true" Christians? Are they not opposing the war? Are they not speaking up? What about the violence in Latin America? Lots of people sit on their hands and say nothing. What about when Pope Pious did not take a more strident rejection of Hitler? Why did he not, himself, risk dying in order to save the Jews of Europe and expecially from his home country of Italy where the Vatican lies? I mean, the Moroccoan king stood up to Hitler and refused to allow the Jewish people of Morocco to be sent. Why not all the good "Christians?"

Does standing up for justice not also mean going to the defense of others? Not just in words? Nonviolence is one tactic. But only one is it not? Would Hitler have been stopped by a few protests? Or did it take war to do so?

You must know about Cambodia and Pol Pot's regime in the 1970s? The only way they were forced out what by an invasion of the Vietnamese. They had lost so many people. Millions died The only way the "killing fields stopped was an act of "aggression."

The only way that Japan's imperialism was stopped in Asia was through "aggression." They had murdered 100s of thousands of Chinese alone. This is not counting people throughout the rest of Asia.

As a person who grew up in Catholicism the "turn the othe cheek" was not the solution to being abused, picked on or bullied. In fact it just made me get abused more and my self-esteem dropped. And in cases of "agression" to do so is actually more dangerous. It clearly shows in statisitcs with self-defense, the more you defend yourself, the less likely people will hurt you.  That is not saying you "bully" back. But in cases of self-defense it is so true. Women who fight back aggressively are less likely to be raped, hurt or killed.

Now about the over15,000 rapes and sexual assualts happening in the Congo? Should we just protest and "love thy neighbor" and wait until the mnosters are done? Or do we go in and stop them??? Even if it means physical force.

Islam to me combines the spirtual with reality. If someone is outright aggresive toward you or innocents, if they are trying to kill you you have a right to use physical force. Makes sense to me.

 

 

 

 

When you do things from your soul, you feel a river moving in you, a joy. Rumi
Back to Top
Tom123 View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 04 July 2007
Location: Gibraltar
Status: Offline
Points: 186
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Tom123 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 October 2007 at 4:57pm
Originally posted by Rezz Rezz wrote:

I don't wish to insult anyone, I'm here to try to learn.

This Website describes Islam as "a religion of peace, mercy, and forgiveness".

However, I have just finished reading a book, which appears to demonstrate that Islam is fundamentally an intolerant and violent ideology. The book relies on and quotes only accepted Islamic texts such as the Qu'ran, Hadith and Sunna. It also argues (convincingly in my opinion) that Muhammad was a warlord and bandit who preached violence, ordered the assassinations of his enemies, and used his "divine revelations" for his personal self-aggrandizement.

I have checked the Islamic sources quoted in the book in own Qu'ran and on the Internet and found them to be accurate.

Further more, I recently had a discussion with a highly religious Muslim on flight from Moscow to the Middle East and was concerned with some of his views concerning the killing of apostates, cartoonists, Israelis, Salman Rushdie, infidels etc.

I've also looked at some of the posts on these discussion forums and concluded that many seem to point more towards a belief in violence, cruelty and hate, than in "peace, mercy, and forgiveness".

I look at the violent actions of so many Muslims in the world today and wonder whether their actions are the result of their religion.

Are there any books I can read that can convince me that Islam really is "a religion of peace, mercy, and forgiveness"?

 


 

Hi Rezz,

   Islam is not a violent religion. Muhammad did indeed use violence against his enemies, but keep in mind that they too used violence against him and Muslims. The Arab pagans and Jewish tribes who early Muslims fought were trying to wipe out the Muslims. It's not like they were innocent victims of 'terrorism', they had a lot of blood on their hands. Muhammad usually showed mercy to his enemies, and I've never heard of his fighters slaughtering women or children. The pagan Arabs he was fighting were sacrificing children on their altars and they did kill civilians.
 

    Terrorists are people who murder civilians. Neither Muhammad or his soldiers did that. In one incident they did kill all male POWs of a Jewish tribe after a battle, after a verdict was passed by their own tribal leaders. I do believe this was wrong, but this was not an example of terrorism. The men who were killed were captured fighters. Aside from this incident, I have not heard of Muhammad ordering killings of unarmed people. In his place, his enemies would have almost certainly killed the women and children as well. In most cases, Muhammad allowed captured POWs to live. His enemies did not. From what I know about Muhammad, I do believe he certainly fought a �clean war� against his enemies, who were trying to kill his people- civilians as well as soldiers.

    Muhammad did certainly believe in God and genuinely wanted to serve Him. Although he was mistaken about certain things (the nature of Jesus, denial of His crucifixion, etc) he also did say many correct things about God (that there is only one God, that adultery is wrong etc) and was a much more ethical person than others in his time.

 Although he was not a terrorist, I do not believe that Muhammad�s answer to his enemies was the correct one. Jesus teaches that violence is wrong and He commanded His followers to love their enemies. Neither He nor His disciples raised swords against the people who mocked, arrested, beat and eventually murdered them. In spite of this, the Christian faith spread across the Roman Empire. The heretical �just war� theory was not adopted until the 4th century. Many church leaders really went astray and for the next few centuries churches used Christianity as an excuse to conquer, invade, plunder, torture and murder millions of people. Look at what happened during the Crusades, the Inquisition, the genocide in the Americas. Some still advocate warfare and bloodshed, like Pat Robertson and the late Jerry Falwell. But you cannot argue that these people were following the Bible. Jesus made it very clear that we are to love our enemies, help the poor, and work for justice and peace. Although God did allow violence in the Old Testament, He made it clear through Jesus that this is not the case anymore. So-called �christians� who spill innocent blood (or anyone�s blood for that matter) are not followers of Christ and do not represent Christianity. Likewise is the case with so-called �muslims� who strap bombs to themselves and murder civilians or destroy villages and murder innocent men, women and children. The perpetrators of the genocide in East Timor or the 9-11 attacks were not following Islam.

 Islam is not a terrorist religion. When it comes to violence, Muslims are allowed to defend themselves when attacked but are to only kill people who are trying to kill them. That is not terrorism, that is warfare in self-defence and limited to only taking the fight to the enemy. Islam allows violence in self defence only. Christianity on the other hand does not allow for violence at all, but instead commands love for enemies and forgiveness to those who have wronged us. Christ died praying for the people who were crucifying Him, and His apostles too chose not to hate or hurt anyone, even as they were being persecuted. This is one of the many reasons why I choose Him and Him alone as my Saviour and Lord.

   Cristo Vive!

       - Tomasz

 

 

  



Edited by Tom123
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 6>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd.