Abrogation? |
Post Reply | Page 123 15> |
Author | |
rememberallah
Senior Member Joined: 08 November 2010 Status: Offline Points: 158 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 02 September 2012 at 10:19am |
agreeing with a lot of people who have posted before me in this topic....i would add this article
<> ABBROGATION ABBROGATED. �O Assembly of jinn�s and men, penetrate ye into the regions of the heavens and the earth, you will not be able to penetrate but without power, Then which of the verses of your Lord will you deny?� � {sura Rehman chapter 55} When we have penetrated heavens and earth we can�t deny any signs of God and verses of Quran are also signs of God. However in the verse of abrogation, the principle drawn out is that some verses have been cancelled by others, i.e. we can deny it�s teaching after the other verse has come. However the verse says, �Then which of the verses of your Lord will you deny?� It means that the verse of abrogation is not about Quranic verses but the other non Quranic ayats of God and the other group of Ulema who hold this view are correct in their judgment. But today we have found ways to deny the verses of our Lord. Well not anymore, not anymore. (16:101)- �When we replace a message with another and God knows best what He reveals, they say you have made it up. Yet most of them do not know� Read the above verse and think carefully. I ask, who was there to question Prophet that you have made it up yourself? 1- it couldn�t be the Sahabas for they believed him to be Prophet, they would accept whatever prophet would had said. 2- Of course it couldn�t also be non-Muslims, as they didn�t believe in Quran so it didn�t matter to them that what was earlier and what get abrogated. �they� would never say such a thing on one verse being replaced by another, they would never say this on verses being replaced that you have made it, for they didn�t say it on replacement that you have made it up yourself, but they said of the whole Quran that you have made it up!!! So who are these� they say�??? No permutation combination fits but one- if we take �they� to be Jews and Christians for Torah and Gospel were message of God; for Torah and Gospel were replaced by God. Thus we understand when God says; {2:106 )- �When we cancel a message or cause it to be forgotten( He means Torah, Gospel or Sahufe Ibrahim and Nuh) We replace it with one better or similar�. He means replace Torah and Gospel and cause to be forgotten Sohufe Ibrahim. He replaces it with one better or similar - that is Quran! The principle of Abrogation when taken to be one Quranic verse cancelling other while the other still being there as many believe gives rise to contradiction after contradiction in Quran, but Quran claims �there is no contradiction in Quran� Thus the Group of Scholars who hold that the Abrogation refer to God�s previous Ayats/ Messages/ Verses that is, Torah, Gospel etc being replaced are correct and those who take it to be referring to verses of Quran replacing each other are those who have corrupted their nature which was of God�s spirit, they have hamstrung the she camel of God, that is - �their nature� and are doomed for failure. For Example, the verse; (3:85)- �If anyone seeks a religion other than Islam it will not be accepted� This verse is seen as abrogating; (2:62)- �The believer Jews, Christians and Sabeans who believe in God the last day and do good deeds they shall be rewarded� How foolish are they who see (3:85) as a newer verse than (2:62) and thus an abrogating verse. The verse (3:85) is the oldest verse of God!!! It is not a verse that came after {2:62}, it dates back to even before Adam (PBUH) and thus of course even before Jews and Christians. Was not Abraham (PBUH) on Islam and doesn�t God say �he was not a Jew nor yet a Christian�. Thus the very logic is wrong and forced in the cases pointed out about one Quranic verse cancelling another in a harmonious, no contradictory book. Now men of understanding will say, �by the example you gave, do you mean that Jews and Christians will be rewarded?� I counter ask, �do you say Muslims will be rewarded?�, you will say �yes�, I will say that �there are so many hadiths that point out that Muslims will go astray, go in hell etc�, then you will say �no actually believing Muslims will go�, I say that�s what the verse say, �believing� Jews, Christians and Sabeans and not �unbelieving Jews, Christians and Sabeans. No Unbelievers whether a Jew or Muslim will be rewarded. So abrogation as referred to in the Quran refers to the old ayats of Allah ie. Torah, Zabur, Injil and Safuhe Ibrahim being replaced by Quran, not one Quranic verse replacing another. Otherwise answer who are �they say� of {16:101}??? may Allah guide us |
|
The whole world is like Hazrat Umar but no one is like his sister and brother in law.
|
|
FahadKhan
Starter Joined: 25 June 2006 Status: Offline Points: 3 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
(emphasis added) I second that. |
|
FahadKhan
Starter Joined: 25 June 2006 Status: Offline Points: 3 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Salaam alaikum all.
Circumstances always keep on changing. Not only in those 23 years. Its been more than 1400 years now, do we need a new Quran for new circumstances? No. Allah's words are valid in all circumstances and do not need abrogation. |
|
minuteman
Senior Member Joined: 25 March 2007 Status: Offline Points: 1642 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
The question about the abrogation of verses and christian friends are interested in looking for the abrogated verses in the Quran. The Muslims are too simplistic in providing a proof (or some kind of admission) that there are some abrogated verses in the Quran. That is not true.
The verse which is used to go for abrogation does not mention the abrogation of verses in Quran or bible etc. It is a genearl statement telling that Allah, the sender of the verses is competent to abrogate or replace verses ( signs, commands). That is all. It is not necessary to go looking for the abrogated verses in the Quran or bible. See the Verse:
We ( Allah) do not abrogate any verse nor make it to be forgotten, We bring a better than that or the like (equal) thereof.
That is a good general statement and is very true.
|
|
Friendship
Senior Member Joined: 24 August 2008 Status: Offline Points: 884 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Assalamu alaikum.
We must distinguish betwen abrogation and simplicity or ease for mankind to live comfortably within a certain limit and survive. I do not think that Allah abrogated what He said in Genesis 1-32, about His Pleasure and seing Good on His creations. If the People of the Book agreed to this, then there cannot be abrogation on the organic creation. Muhammad did not abrogate the Old Testament neither the precepts of the 10 Commandments. He lived by them and executed the punishments prescribed therein to those People of the Book who committed the offence. In reality there is no special Law or Commandment from Allah to Muhammad other than the MERCY of ALLAH. The Law Muhammad completed was the Mercy of Allah. The world can live in peace by strictly applying the LAW in the Old Testament. Let us read the Scriptures and their accepted commentaries and stop deceiving others. The Qur 'an is for all to read and not only a certain class of people.
Frindship.
|
|
Gulliver
Senior Member Joined: 12 September 2008 Status: Offline Points: 621 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I just pick up little pieces here and there. A little knowledge can be dangerous, I know. I cannot argue anything and would not wish to. I have known periods of near disbelief myself, and been what might be termed a 'disbeliever'. Perhaps I still am. A 'heretic' in the eyes of some I am sure.
I was wondering about the hierarchies in Heaven.
I found this translation of the Qu'ran and it's interesting. I have only just started, but this part came to me and made me wonder.
The bible says, "the first shall be last and the last first." I wonder about these words. That as the 'higher' man evolves - grows spiritually - he/she, though 'first,' come 'last,' in that their desire to 'serve' grows as they progress to that higher 'first' level.
"It is in giving that we receive".
"I did not come to be served, but to serve......... "
It's another of those paradoxes that seem so common to all of it.
Just thoughts folks.
From this translation of Qu'ran and introduction:
Connection between the two lives. The life after death, according to the Holy Qur�an, opens out a wide vista of progress before man, a new world of advancement before which the progress of this life sinks into insignificance: �And certainly the Hereafter is greater in degrees and greater in excellence� (17:21). The connection between the two lives, the life on this earth and the life after death, is established in the clearest words. Heaven and hell are not places of enjoyment and torture to be met with only after death; they are realities even here. The Hereafter is not a mystery beyond the grave; it begins in this very life. For the good, the heavenly life, and for the wicked, a life in hell, begins even here: �And for him who fears to stand before his Lord are two Gardens� (55:46). �O soul that art at rest, return to thy Lord, well-pleased (with Him), wellpleasing (Him), so enter among My servants, and enter My Garden� (89:27�0). �It is the Fire kindled by Allah, which rises above the hearts� (104:6, 7). �And whoever is blind in this (life), he will be blind in the Hereafter� (17:72). P.19. |
|
Gulliver
Senior Member Joined: 12 September 2008 Status: Offline Points: 621 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Hello Minuteman
I haven't got a clue who Ron Webb is. It was just when reading through the post - that little 'gem' in there that lightened the whole experience. It's way too intellectual for me. I'll leave it to those who know what they are talking about to discuss and argue these matters.
I wasn't laughing at any person here, or what they were claiming one way or another. It was just that comment about the astro physics and the marketing student. It was like trying to read and understand in a foreign language - then someone says something you understand completely, and your tired brain just knows it's time to take a break.
You'll get used to my silly Irishness in time :-)
God bless
Edited by Gulliver - 19 September 2008 at 8:19am |
|
minuteman
Senior Member Joined: 25 March 2007 Status: Offline Points: 1642 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
What Chrysalis was saying that Ron is an Atheist. He/she does not believe that there is a god. In such a case it would be futile to wander into deeper lanes of any religion. I feel Chrys was right.
When a person does not believe in God and does not find fitness with any faith then it useless to discuss whether the grand is going to hell or heavens.
|
|
Post Reply | Page 123 15> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |