What is Islam? |
Post Reply | Page 123 7> |
Author | ||||||||||||||
ansari
Newbie Joined: 15 December 2008 Location: Singapore Status: Offline Points: 15 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 27 December 2010 at 4:51pm |
|||||||||||||
schmikbob, Your translation of my question was wrong. In fact the translation should read: We are not in a position to comment on anything about the book and �its author� yet, because we are not fully aware of what we are commenting about. Before we can open our mouths, we should know at least the basics about what we are talking about, and therefore it is better that we get more information. Since you have threatened that you were �through with this dialogue until ...�, I better forget about gathering more information about the book �and its author�. What you wanted to know was �what is so miraculous about the word �smoke� mentioned in 14:11 of the Quran�. Let me admit that I have nothing else to add to whatever some of the world-renowned scientists said about it. In fact it was these scientists were the ones who concluded that the word �smoke� in the Quran is a miracle. Some of them further indicated that the Quran must be from our Lord, THE ALMIGHTY. Let me quote some of them, though these may be familiar to you and were quoted over and over again:
For an ordinary person like me, after going through their explanations, what else should I wait for to conclude that the contents of the Quran on the matter under discussion are miraculous, especially when no other person with a comparative standing with these scientists disagreed with them? Arguments from me (and may be from you, too), however colourful they may be, will fall on deaf ears. We can keep on arguing until the cows come home, but nobody will pay any attention. Here I would express my understanding of the Quran. 1. It is not a textbook. If it were, it would have run into hundreds of volumes. It is meant to be a SIGN from The God, THE ALMIGHTY. 2. It is meant to be for people, until the end of time. The following verses say so: 38:87 - This [divine writ], behold, is no less than a reminder to all the worlds 68:52 - [Be patient:] for this is nought else but a reminder [from God] to all mankind. 3. There won�t be any more periodical messages or messengers from God. The last messenger, who came with the final messages that are meant for mankind until the end of time, came centuries ago. But there are a number of so-called messages and/or messengers claimed to be inspired or sent by god. How are we to differentiate the true messages from The God from the others? To help us recognise them, HE has made the Quran a miracle, by building in universal truths that were realised centuries later, and that would be realised by future generations. We can be assured that no other so-called messages would contain these safety features. These safety features are the ones that enabled the scientists to recognise the Quran as the one that is from The God, THE ALMIGHTY. There are numerous such safety measures; for example there are mentions about ants, bees, birds, camels, clouds, light, darkness, lightning, moon, sun, mountains, night, day, spider, stars, planets, seas, growing of seeds, etc. etc. Things that are mentioned in the Quran about these things may not be sufficient for ordinary people to learn anything about them; for those whom God has blessed with investigative minds will be able to recognise the given cues, advance themselves and enlighten the world. Eventually, that will in turn help the people at large to realise that the Quran is from God. Let me elaborate a little on this: In the Quran, it is stated: 29:41 The parable of those who take [beings or forces] other than God for their protectors is that of the spider which makes for itself a house: for, behold, the frailest of all houses is the spiders house. Could they but understand this! For an ordinary person, this verse may not contain any significant information. But the scientist who came across this verse began to wonder why there is mention of the spider�s web in a religious book? He investigated further and found out that the thread from a spider�s web is the frailest. When an ordinary person comes to know about it, he would realise that such information was not known more than 1500 years ago, and therefore, the Quran must be from God. We will appreciate this fact when we know that an illiterate person could not have written this Quran 1500 years ago and therefore we will conclude that every one of about 99000 words in the Quran is a miracle, and that the Quran itself is a miracle. Regards, Ansari Edited by ansari - 27 December 2010 at 11:37pm |
||||||||||||||
schmikbob
Senior Member Male Joined: 27 June 2010 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 526 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
Wonderful, "why are we hasty about it?". Translation, "I have no intention of answering your question and instead am going to diverge into all sorts of dogmatic non relevant issues." Ansari, I have asked this same question and many other similar questions about this same subject on this same subject site and gotten the same non answers. I now realize that this is the modus operandi here. Since I have asked and answered many of your questions and you have chosen to answer none of mine and simply asked more questions of me (not to mention misquoting me and not acknowledging it) I am through with this dialogue until you can at least reciprocate with courtesy.
|
||||||||||||||
ansari
Newbie Joined: 15 December 2008 Location: Singapore Status: Offline Points: 15 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
schmikbob,
You said you were not sure if �...any of my questions have to do with your comment ...�
Let me reiterate: We are trying to find out if the word �smoke� as used in the Quran has any modern scientific meaning ...�. But why are we hasty about it? The word �smoke� is one of the 99,464 words that make up the Quran. Half of the people presently living on earth believe that every single word in the Quran has special meaning; and that the Quran itself is a miracle. We want to find out if there is any substance in what they think, and therefore we should have knowledge, especially the background knowledge of the book and its author, (that is, the Quran and Muhammad, according to what you believe). We can�t simply take the literal meaning of the word �smoke� and discuss it. Does the Quran reflect the scientific knowledge of the age in which it was written ... I can�t believe it. For example I don�t know if anybody was talking about the expanding universe 1400 years ago. I don�t know if people in those days were talking about galaxies. No doubt people were wondering about the nature. Naturally they were bewildered about the sun, the planets and stars. Especially in the field of astronomy, even during the primitive age, people had their own conclusions. Because of that we can�t say Muhammad �learned� about them and confirmed those ideas. If that were the case, the scribes who had written down whatever Muhammad said stood a better chance to do so. Muhammad was a person who spent his whole life in the To one of my questions I introduced for discussion, your answer was that it was possible during the 7th century for a number of scribes to follow an illiterate, epileptic person in order to take down whatever he recited, much of which was beyond the understanding of people of the time. Literacy usually goes along with education, and therefore the educated scribes were ready to listen and record whatever an �uneducated� person who was also epileptic. And it was done continuously for 23 years. As you said, it was possible; and that was what happened. But then, why did it happen? Was PROPHET MUHAMMAD, as Muslims call him, uneducated? Was he epileptic? When you said it was possible, I am sure you have your own very good reasons to believe so. What�s about sharing your reasons? You said you have nothing more to add to the compendia that the historians have compiled. Which of those great historians or which of those compendia stated that Muhammad was an epileptic? Was it your own discovery or invention? Either way, you may like to discuss your conviction. I am not sure if the great historians would forgive us (you and me) for such labelling if we can�t prove our stand. Otherwise we owe the world an apology. Regards, Ansari |
||||||||||||||
schmikbob
Senior Member Male Joined: 27 June 2010 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 526 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
Ansari, I am not sure what any of your questions have to do with my comment about mental gymnastics and the word "smoke". Either you see my point or you do not.
1. Of course it is possible. I have known many people for 23 years as have many people. Relevance?
2. I actually don't think it's unbelievable at all. Also, I am not one of the crowd that thinks of "iltifat" as a beautiful form of poetic license.
3. I never said that I "had difficulty in finding a word to describe the Muhammad in question". What I said was "This question is one that has been tackled by a great many historians and I don't think I can add anything to their compendium". I hope that you are not implying that these are the same. Also, no, I don't feel like reconsidering. I still think it possible that Muhammed suffered from epilepsy.
Now, don't you think that you have danced around my question long enough? Do you believe that the word "smoke" as used in the Quran has
some modern scientific meaning that has only recently come to light, or, do you believe that it reflects the scientific knowledge of the age in which it was written?
|
||||||||||||||
ansari
Newbie Joined: 15 December 2008 Location: Singapore Status: Offline Points: 15 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
Schmikbob, When you said that I have already made up my mind, that is actually the fact and I do not wish to deny it. But as I said in my earlier post �I (still) begin to wonder if what you said about someone�s �mental gymnastics�, trying to attribute special significance to the word �smoke� could be right. I still hold on to it. Now, let me go through some of the things you have mentioned in your latest post. Let me borrow one of your phrases: �OK, lets move very slowly� as we are �trying to determine if the proponents of science in the Quran are simply trying on a new polemic for size�. You accept the fact that Quran was recited by Muhammad, and that somebody else had written it down. About the person who recited the Quran, you said that he may have been epileptic. After discarding all those adjectives I have suggested, you have chosen to believe him to be an epileptic. I am sure you have chosen this word very carefully; so I have to be careful in considering it You were expressing your thought as an epileptic Muhammad recited the Quran and a scribe or a number of scribes had written it down. I can follow your thought up to that point. Then I stop to think: 1. An epileptic Muhammad recited the Quran and there were scribes who were ready to be with him for 23 years (That is the time span during which he recited (received) the Quran). Do you believe its possibility? 2. During these 23 years he recited 6,226 verses every one of which is free of grammar mistakes. At least that is the �mental gymnastics� by some, but those critics of the Quran who scrutinised the Quran claimed that they found 13 grammar mistakes which was vehemently refuted by Arabic linguistic scholars. Let�s forget about the linguistic scholars. Let�s suppose the critics were right. Then, we have to admit that an �epileptic Muhammad� who was illiterate had recited 6,226 verses (of his own) during 23 years with 13 grammatical errors! Unbelievable! Don�t you think so? 3. When you had difficulty in finding a word to describe the Muhammad in question, I decided to find a suitable one on my own. By checking through the internet, I found the following just in one page. There were thousands of such pages. On this one page alone, hundreds of people who were considered to be assets to human race and who themselves were not Muslims had said a lot about this Muhammad. Let�s see what some of them said about him:
1. the most influential person in all history 2. ... an honest and upright man who had gained the respect and loyalty of others who were likewise honest and upright men . 3. Philosopher, orator, apostle, legislator, warrior, conqueror of ideas, restorer of rational dogmas, of a cult without images; the founder of twenty terrestrial empires and of one spiritual empire ... 4. .. He must be called the Savior of Humanity...if a man like him were to assume the dictatorship of the modern world, he would succeed in solving its problems in a way that would bring it much needed peace and happiness. 5. There is Muhammad the Prophet. There is Muhammad the Warrior; Muhammad the Businessman; Muhammad the Statesman; Muhammad the Orator; Muhammad the Reformer; Muhammad the Refuge of Orphans; Muhammad the Protector of Slaves; Muhammad the Emancipator of Women; Muhammad the Judge; Muhammad the Saint. . .. 6. It was the rigid simplicity, the utter self-effacement ..., the scrupulous regard for his pledges, his intense devotion to his friends and followers, his intrepidity, his fearlessness, his absolute trust in God and in his own mission. . .. 7. one man single handedly, could weld warring tribes and wandering Bedouins into a most powerful and civilized nation in less than two decades. 8 ... when the peasant and king kneel side by side and proclaim: 'God Alone is Great'... I have been struck over and over again by this indivisible unity of Islam that makes man instinctively a brother." 9. "The league of nations founded by the prophet of Islam put the principle of international unity and human brotherhood on such universal foundations as to show candle to other nations. ... the fact is that no nation of the world can show a parallel to what Islam has done towards the realization of the idea of the 10. the honor of the Prophet have never transgressed the measure of human virtues; and his living precepts have restrained the gratitude of his disciples within the bounds of reason and religion." ... These are just the tip of an ice berg. Where is your position among these great souls? All that you could say about Prophet Muhammad was that he was an �epileptic�. Feel like reconsidering? Regards, Ansari |
||||||||||||||
schmikbob
Senior Member Male Joined: 27 June 2010 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 526 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
Ansari, since clarifying doubts is not what you are interested in (the tone of your post indicates you have already made up your mind), your questions are not as clever as you obviously believe them to be. I will,however, indulge your game.
1. If by author you mean the originator of the spoken words that were transfered to the written word, I would say Muhammed is the author. If you mean who actually wrote the words down I would say that is a matter of some dispute but probably not Muhammed.
2. This question is one that has been tackled by a great many historians and I don't think I can add anything to their compendium. No I don't think he was a "liar, a magician, a lunatic, a tyrant, a terrorist etc". These are simplistic labels that far too restricting. I do believe he was a product of his times. I also think he may have been epileptic but that is irrelavent.
3. I believe that whatever education Muhammed had about "nature, astronomy, zoology, physics etc" probably came from the exposure he had to a vast number of people during the years in which the words that make up the Quran were "revealed".
4. I know of no other "seventh century illiterate Mohameds". Since I believe that any so called prophets only believe they receive revelation from God and don't actually do so, comparing Muhammed to other prophets is really just an exercise in semantics.
Finally, I will say that answering these questions has been fun but not vital to determining if the proponents of science in the Quran are simply trying on a new polemic for size (or, doing mental gymnastics). Only a little common sense and logical thought is required. Sadly they seem to be in short supply.
|
||||||||||||||
ansari
Newbie Joined: 15 December 2008 Location: Singapore Status: Offline Points: 15 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
Schmikbob, After reading through your posts, I begin to wonder if what you said about someone�s �mental gymnastics�, trying to attribute special significance to the word �smoke� could be right. But before I subscribe to your thought, I want to get further insight into your thinking. I believe that the word �smoke� we are talking about is found in the Quran 41:11. So, before I can assume if the �mental gymnastics� theory is correct, I hope you can clarify some of my doubts, namely: 1. Since the word is taken from the Quran, who do you think the author of this Quran is? I am sure you won�t agree it is Allah. Then the obvious answer is Mohamed. Or, do you think it could be someone else? 2. If you feel it is the latter, what kind of person was he? What do you know about him? Was he a liar, a magician, a lunatic, a tyrant, a terrorist etc. etc.? What kind of background did he live in? What is about his ancestors? 3. When Quran talked about prophets, some critics of the Quran said that Mohamed �learned� about these prophets from the earlier scriptures. In this case, do you believe that he had some sort of �education� about nature, astronomy, zoology, physics etc. etc. from previous scriptures or from anyone else? 4. How many other seventh century illiterate Mohameds, who talked about �smokes� �revolving stars�, �the moon following the sun�, �the star of piercing brightness� �the sky full of great constellations�, �the expanding universe� etc. etc. , did you learn about? How many such Mohameds lived before the 7th century A.D. (not including the prophets as we are not considering the Mohamed in question a prophet. If Mohamed is not a prophet, comparing him with prophets is not fair. Please note Question 3 above is a separate issue).Were there any other such Mohameds for the next 10 centuries after his death? Answers to these questions are vital to see if somebody was doing �mental gymnastics�. Honest answers to these questions will also enlighten us to know him - if he was one of many that existed, if he was talking something sensible, if so, from where did he get that information etc. Then we will also be able to consider whether there is anything miraculous about the Quran. Regards, Ansari
Edited by ansari - 14 December 2010 at 4:37pm |
||||||||||||||
schmikbob
Senior Member Male Joined: 27 June 2010 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 526 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
Friendship, other than "When did modernity begin?" your response to my statement actually had nothing to do with my statement. So in answer to the pertinent portion of your statement, when modernity began is highly subjective but for the sake of argument lets say it began with the year 1800. Does that help?
|
||||||||||||||
Post Reply | Page 123 7> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |