Provoking Islamic Iran |
Post Reply | Page 123 4> |
Author | |
herjihad
Senior Member Joined: 26 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 2473 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 01 January 2006 at 4:37pm |
Bismillah, Subhanna Allah! Bush the most fair? I think Jimmy Carter had him beat. But what does the most fair mean to people who live with open sewage in the streets, barricaded in by a super wall, with enemy planes flying overhead and bombs landing God knows where each day? Fair isn't the right word at all. Life isn't fair, and it certainly isn't fair to the people in Gaza and elsewhere in Phalasteen. AND it's not fair to Daniel and his family either for that matter. No-one signed up to live in such bedlam! |
|
Al-Hamdulillah (From a Married Muslimah) La Howla Wa La Quwata Illa BiLLah - There is no Effort or Power except with Allah's Will.
|
|
DavidC
Senior Member Male Christian Joined: 20 September 2001 Location: Florida USA Status: Offline Points: 2474 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Pro-Israel groups today sent out press releases. They are furious at Bush
because they say he is making agreements with Iran against Israel due to Iranian influence in Iraq. I think even Whisper must admit Bush has been the most fair president yet when it comes to Palestine/Israel affairs. Maybe Iran will be the peacemaker in the middle east! Edited by DavidC |
|
Christian; Wesleyan M.Div.
|
|
kenski70
Guest Group Joined: 13 November 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 352 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Saddam could have been knocked off many years ago, if the US had not fought on the side of Iraq when Iran fought Iraq back to the Iran-Iraq border and then tried to invade Iraq to get Saddam, who they knew was evil. Iraq invaded Iran. Iran fought back. Iran knew Saddam was evil. They tried to get him, but the US protected him. ---- If Afghanistan had been invaded by anyone else apart from Russia, the US would have completely ignored the whole incident. But because it was the USSR that invaded, the US had to jump in and play the cowboy with the white hat. And now they are reaping what they sowed and the Afghanistan people are still suffering. The US doesn't care about them, they are just trying to protect themselves from some almost invisible, US-trained and funded enemy. Kim... Outstanding Kim you are very well informed indeed.The Iran-Iraq war happened shortly after the Iranian hostage ordeal.Americans had nothing but hate for Iran. And would even back someone as foul as Saddam just to spite Iran...........Afganistan was a cold war battle field without a doubt.There have been many. But I am failing to see why the US after the war is over and we have gone are responsible for how Afghanistan turned out.Is it because we didn't stay and rebuild? We only supplied the stingers the Afghans had to have to win the war. does that make us responsible for the aftermath? The Afghans got what they wanted from the US. weapons! And why is it people are crying about the US being in Muslim lands now but cry that we left after the Afghan war? |
|
Sorry about that turn signal,I must have fallen asleep.
|
|
kim!
Senior Member Joined: 17 September 2001 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 2390 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Saddam could have been knocked off many years ago, if the US had not fought on the side of Iraq when Iran fought Iraq back to the Iran-Iraq border and then tried to invade Iraq to get Saddam, who they knew was evil. Iraq invaded Iran. Iran fought back. Iran knew Saddam was evil. They tried to get him, but the US protected him. ---- If Afghanistan had been invaded by anyone else apart from Russia, the US would have completely ignored the whole incident. But because it was the USSR that invaded, the US had to jump in and play the cowboy with the white hat. And now they are reaping what they sowed and the Afghanistani people are still suffering. The US doesn't care about them, they are just trying to protect themselves from some almost invisible, US-trained and funded enemy. Kim...
|
|
kenski70
Guest Group Joined: 13 November 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 352 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Saddam's murderous reign was not the U.S.' fault, nor was it the reason we Agreed! Its amazing to me though is how lots of people out there who do blame the US for their misfortune. I once saw an interview with an afghan man who said the post soviet war economy in Afghanistan was America's fault. and we abandoned them after they fought the Soviets for us. I'm like "Hello its your country not ours. all we did is provide support for you so you could repel the Russians." |
|
Sorry about that turn signal,I must have fallen asleep.
|
|
DavidC
Senior Member Male Christian Joined: 20 September 2001 Location: Florida USA Status: Offline Points: 2474 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Saddam's murderous reign was not the U.S.' fault, nor was it the reason we
invaded Iraq. It is a post hoc justification. All in all, the U.S' invasion will prove to be a positive event because it will bring Islamic government to Iraq. Unfortunately Sunni Islam will be suppressed and Christians expatriated. Bush's incompetent diplomacy assured the elimination of Christianity in Iraq, and the 32k dead. |
|
Christian; Wesleyan M.Div.
|
|
kenski70
Guest Group Joined: 13 November 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 352 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Kenski - The mass graves and gassing of the Kurds happened while Saddam Very true! And why was that? Because Saddam was against Iran plain and simple. We looked the other way because he was against our adversary. His mass killings took on a larger scale and we distanced ourselves from him. After Saddam invaded Kuwait, America had no choice but to turn its back on him. Was looking the other way wrong? yes absolutely wrong. But how long did the concentration camps go on for? The Killing fields in Cambodia? lots of genocide, America cant stop it all acting alone. Saying America is responsible in part for those mass graves, is like saying we're responsible for the gulags in soviet Russia because we were allies with Russia in WWII. |
|
Sorry about that turn signal,I must have fallen asleep.
|
|
ak_m_f
Senior Member Joined: 15 October 2005 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 3272 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I remember Canadian journalist Mark Steyn saying: "Saddam Hussein may be a son-of-a-bitch but he's our son-of-a-bitch."
|
|
Post Reply | Page 123 4> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |