IslamiCity.org Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Politics > Current Events
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - In defence of religious freedom  What is Islam What is Islam  Donate Donate
  FAQ FAQ  Quran Search Quran Search  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

In defence of religious freedom

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
Ron Webb View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior  Member
Avatar
Male atheist
Joined: 30 January 2008
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 2467
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Ron Webb Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: In defence of religious freedom
    Posted: 20 December 2015 at 11:24am
Originally posted by Tim the plumber Tim the plumber wrote:

Who was Justice Murphy and what was he talking about?

I don't know where abuayisha came across the quote, but you can read it in context from the link I provided: https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/315/568
Addeenul �Aql � Religion is intellect.
Back to Top
Tim the plumber View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior  Member
Avatar
Male
Joined: 30 September 2014
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 944
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Tim the plumber Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 December 2015 at 10:11am
Originally posted by abuayisha abuayisha wrote:

I agree with Justice Frank Murphy who opinioned;

�It has been well observed,� wrote Justice Frank Murphy, �that such utterances are no essential part of any exposition of ideas and are of such slight social value as a step to truth that any benefit that may be derived from them is clearly outweighed by the social interest in order and morality.�


Who was Justice Murphy and what was he talking about?
Back to Top
Ron Webb View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior  Member
Avatar
Male atheist
Joined: 30 January 2008
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 2467
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Ron Webb Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 December 2015 at 8:06am
Let's be clear what Justice Murphy was referring to by "such utterances":

"There are certain well defined and narrowly limited classes of speech, the prevention and punishment of which have never been thought to raise any Constitutional problem. These include the lewd and obscene, the profane, the libelous, and the insulting or "fighting" words -- those which, by their very utterance, inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace. It has been well observed that such utterances are no essential part of any exposition of ideas, and are of such slight social value as a step to truth that any benefit that may be derived from them is clearly outweighed by the social interest in order and morality.

"Resort to epithets or personal abuse is not in any proper sense communication of information or opinion safeguarded by the Constitution, and its punishment as a criminal act would raise no question under that instrument."

Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire (No. 255) (1942)

The specific "epithets or personal abuse" to which Murphy referred were the phrases "damned Fascist" and "damned racketeer", which by the standards of 1942 were quite a bit more vulgar and abusive than they might appear today.
Addeenul �Aql � Religion is intellect.
Back to Top
abuayisha View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior  Member
Avatar
Muslim
Joined: 05 October 1999
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Offline
Points: 5105
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote abuayisha Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 December 2015 at 7:07am
I agree with Justice Frank Murphy who opinioned;

�It has been well observed,� wrote Justice Frank Murphy, �that such utterances are no essential part of any exposition of ideas and are of such slight social value as a step to truth that any benefit that may be derived from them is clearly outweighed by the social interest in order and morality.�
Back to Top
Tim the plumber View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior  Member
Avatar
Male
Joined: 30 September 2014
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 944
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Tim the plumber Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 December 2015 at 9:43am
Originally posted by abuayisha abuayisha wrote:

very interesting case, and hopefully it will send a strong message against overheated rhetoric.


If he gets a fine then many hundreds of Islamic preachers should get jailed.

Do you wish to see free speach limited like that?

I don't. I want there to be a bias on the side of allowing free speach and only when violence is expressly called for would there be a problem.

Back to Top
abuayisha View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior  Member
Avatar
Muslim
Joined: 05 October 1999
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Offline
Points: 5105
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote abuayisha Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 December 2015 at 7:18am
very interesting case, and hopefully it will send a strong message against overheated rhetoric.
Back to Top
Tim the plumber View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior  Member
Avatar
Male
Joined: 30 September 2014
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 944
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Tim the plumber Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 December 2015 at 9:55am
The British National Secular Society, an organisation dedicated to the removal of religious privilage and influence on the state, is campaining to uphold the rights of a preacher from Northern Ireland who has been charged with offensive preaching after he uploaded a video of a sermon;

http://www.secularism.org.uk/news/2015/12/verdict-delayed-in-ridiculous-prosecution-of-preacher-in-satanic-islam-case

OK, he said stuff that was offensive. And?

It is strange that it is the secular types who are at the forefront of defending his freedom to shout his wrong views.

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd.