Anti-science madness |
Post Reply | Page 123 13> |
Author | ||
asep48garut60
Senior Member Male Joined: 27 July 2016 Location: Indonesia Status: Offline Points: 248 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 31 October 2016 at 2:51pm |
|
Dear Tim the plumber,
I claim that in the days of Noah had a big flood, and I believe it because God knows more about it than humans opinions which their statements are often different, even I have personal experience unusual or contrary to science, it shows that most of human's knowledge is only limited to things that make sense of them. Regards, Asep |
||
Tim the plumber
Senior Member Male Joined: 30 September 2014 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 944 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I don't understand you. What are you claiming? That there was a world flood, that there was a flood big enough to carry a ship onto the largest mountain in Turkey or that there was a big flood which was not all that unusual? Was there a need to take in a breeding stock of every animal in the world to repopulate after it? |
||
asep48garut60
Senior Member Male Joined: 27 July 2016 Location: Indonesia Status: Offline Points: 248 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Well ... dear Tim,
If so, for a while I am not focused on where the flooding occurred and like what the actual incident, but I believe that Allah gives the information in the Quran about in the days of Noah had occurred a big flood. Thank you. Regards, Asep |
||
Tim the plumber
Senior Member Male Joined: 30 September 2014 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 944 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
There has never been a time when humanity was gatered around the middle east. The story in the Bible is that the flood was enough that Noah's arc ended up on Mount Ararat in Turkey. No it didn't. There has never been such a flood. If the legend is about a local flood or the flooding of the Black sea then fine. But that means it's not much of a claim and there was no mirricle. |
||
airmano
Senior Member Joined: 31 March 2014 Status: Offline Points: 884 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
@Ahmad
As told, Ahmad we are not done yet with this discussion. Well, first: No surprise that the Quran doesn't talk of "over the whole world". Nobody, including the prophet had a precise idea of what "whole world" really meant at the time. There are even claims that Mohamed thought the earth was flat and the the sun sets in murky water (18:86). One can however gather facts from the Quran and the exegesis that make clear what was likely to be meant. When looking at the Wiki entry on Noah you find the sentence under "Noah in Islam": Abdallah ibn 'Umar al-Baidawi, writing in the 13th century, explains that in the first of its three levels wild and domesticated animals were lodged, in the second the human beings, and in the third the birds. On every plank was the name of a prophet. - i.a.W. implicitly a world wide flood. Furthermore if you look at the translation of 23:27 in Corpus Quran you'll find that almost all translators imply a worldwide flood (and no one favours a local one). In addition: in 71:26, Yusuf Ali: And Noah, said: "O my Lord! Leave not of the Unbelievers, a single one on earth! . So either God didn't bother much about Noah's wish, or much more likely: The Quran talks of a worldwide flood ! Now: 5 of the 7 translations of 11:44 state Mount Judi, the other two unspecifically of "On the Judi". If you want more have a look here for example. So a clear majority for "on a mountain", implying hundreds of meters high. Again this means a worldwide flood and not a local one. Last not least, looking at the word by word translation of 23:27 in Corpus Quran (omitting parenthesis) you'll read: then put into it of every mates two and your family... So, as already established, no sign of "take only domestic animals" or "just take what you need for your own survival" statements. To summarize: Historical Quran exegesis as well as more recent translators agree on the "worldwide flood assumption". The interpretation as "local flood" came probably from the infamous Mr. Bucaille and can -forced by the now established knowledge that a worldwide flood is impossible- rather safely be seen as a desperate attempt to "float with the tide" - to do the pun. If you still insist on a local flood model, I would like to see some support from the Quran (supposed to be crystal clear) to corroborate your view. Can you ? Airmano Edited by airmano - 19 October 2016 at 6:20am |
||
The word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses (Albert Einstein 1954, in his "Gods Letter")
|
||
AhmadJoyia
Senior Member Joined: 20 March 2005 Status: Offline Points: 1647 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Please just don't believe me and look at the verses yourself. The misperception is not unique to Christians but among the Muslims as well, but their source is also baised due to biblical accounts. Best regards |
||
asep48garut60
Senior Member Male Joined: 27 July 2016 Location: Indonesia Status: Offline Points: 248 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Dear Tim the plumber,
Due to the flood has occurred centuries ago, the earth's surface has undergone changes naturally, and at that time the humans most were still gathered in the middle east and not as much as now, therefore, some people think that it's a world flood. If I look carefully to the words of God in the 29:14, the interpretation of the word "Aththuufaanu" is "the great flood" not the world flood. So, my personal opinion is: The great flood may include water covered the entire surface of the earth because we can't find a living witness in today, but surely that all the people of Prophet Noah drowned by the great flood (except the loyal followers) although the water did not cover the entire surface of the earth. Regards, Asep |
||
Tim the plumber
Senior Member Male Joined: 30 September 2014 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 944 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
So, and here I only know the Biblical version, did Noah's boat land on the biggest mountain in Turkey or was it just a small local flood which has often happened especially in the river valleys of the Tigres and Euphrates? If its' the second then I have no trouble believing that this flood happened but then its' not much of a claim. |
||
Post Reply | Page 123 13> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |