Antichrist |
Post Reply | Page 123 7> |
Author | |
ejdavid
Senior Member Joined: 28 August 2006 Status: Offline Points: 173 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 02 November 2006 at 10:16am |
Hanan
Many Muslims call Christianity "The Pauline" religion, and for good reason. Paul's missionary work established the "Jesus Movement" throughout the Mediteranean world, and the various "Churches" he founded and nurished led directly to the world religion we now know as Christianity. Accordingly, Christianity is unique in the world since it was 'founded' by a man whose original mission was, by his own testiment, to destroy it root and branch before it could spread. In addition, Paul became intimately acquainted with relatives, apostles, and followers of Jesus. As a result, his conclusions regarding Jesus's life and death have a special and independent authority regarding those matters. Christian philosophy can not in the least be understood without extensive study of Paul's work in the early church. Just about everything else is accretion upon the original teachings of Jesus himself. Edited by ejdavid |
|
ejdavid
Senior Member Joined: 28 August 2006 Status: Offline Points: 173 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Hanan
The Christian New Testament is not The Unaltered Word of God. It is a collection of historical documents chosen from many such documents by the Councel of Nicea in the century of about 300 CE. At that time Christianity was not standardized, and countless documents from the earlier era were circulating. These included the "Gospel of Judas", the "Gospel of Mary Magdalen" and many others. The church elders examined the existing plethora of such documents, and quite simply voted on which ones to include in the "Christian Cannon". In reallity, IMHO, none of them originally claimed to be the Word of God, or even the Inspired Word of God. Instead, all of them were created by informed persons who had known Jesus, or known of him, and/or by philosophers and others with opinions on the matter. For instance, Revalations is the least authoritative of all the included documents, and it is some mystery as to how the elders decided to include it. Include it they did, and today many Christians believe it is a very authentic document, though any serious investigation shows it to be an allagory for Rome and Nero. IMHO, the most authentic documents are the letters of Paul because they were disseminated and copied during his lifetime and have come down over history in relatively good order. It is clear, however, that some copiests took liberities with their work, and many of these are easy to identify for several reasons. Among those reasons is that some of the paragraphs attributed to Paul neither correspond to his general and easily understood philosopy; or simply don't even use the words he used: Paul had a recognizable vocabulary that has been cataloqued. Suspicious forgeries are not all that hard to isolate. Anyway, this is just my understanding, and is in now way any sort of Christian authority of any given 'confession' or sect. Edited by ejdavid |
|
Hanan
Senior Member Joined: 27 July 2006 Location: Germany Status: Offline Points: 1035 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
. Edited by Hanan |
|
air_one
Newbie Joined: 23 September 2006 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 35 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
The event you're always referring to stepenc is the event we muslims call the single most important event regarding to the preservation of the Quran.
You call this event as proof that the Quran has been altered. Muslims call this event as proof the Quran has been preserved. You will not be able to change our views nor shall we be able to change your view regarding this event. Lets move on. |
|
StephenC
Guest Group Joined: 16 September 2006 Status: Offline Points: 264 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I agree that the Christian Bible has been changed and altered and that some of the events may not have happened, just like the Quran! The Quran too, was compiled by a committee which picked and chose what would and would not go in it. It was unauthorized by GOD and even Muhammad! Does that belittle Islam? Does that belittle Christianity? |
|
Hanan
Senior Member Joined: 27 July 2006 Location: Germany Status: Offline Points: 1035 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
. Edited by Hanan |
|
jacques4173
Newbie Joined: 21 October 2006 Status: Offline Points: 8 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
There are multiple versions of the Bible true, however all the words mean the same thing. Alteration has not been made to original meanings. For instance someone may have a youth Bible. Well it is only broken down so a youth can get a full understanding of the scriptures. There is an Amplified Bible, that just goes into more depth of the same meaning. Versions are just broken down, or more in depth meanings of the original text in the Bible. King James, New Living, Amplified,etc all are saying the exact same thing just using a different word for some to comprehend better, or easier. For example one Bible may use the word Satan, another will say the Devi etc. They both mean the same thing. Yes Prayer would be superior.
|
|
Hanan
Senior Member Joined: 27 July 2006 Location: Germany Status: Offline Points: 1035 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
. Edited by Hanan |
|
Post Reply | Page 123 7> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |