IslamiCity.org Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Religion - Islam > Interfaith Dialogue
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - The Bible has errors?  What is Islam What is Islam  Donate Donate
  FAQ FAQ  Quran Search Quran Search  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

The Bible has errors?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 7>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
niqab_ummi View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Avatar
Joined: 08 December 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 159
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote niqab_ummi Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: The Bible has errors?
    Posted: 21 December 2006 at 5:51am
Peace Be With You As Well Sarita
Umm Abdelkhalek
Back to Top
Sarita View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar
Joined: 31 October 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 21
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Sarita Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 December 2006 at 5:50am
Originally posted by niqab_ummi niqab_ummi wrote:

Assalamu'Alaikum, and Salaams to all of our non-muslim guests,

It is well documented there are hundreds of places you can go to start with a good encyclopedia or dictionary at the very least here is a small part from a very lengthy exerpt.

Pope Damasus I assembled the first list of books of the Bible at the Council of Rome in 382 A.D. He commissioned Saint Jerome to produce a reliable and consistent text by translating the original Greek and Hebrew texts into Latin. This translation became known as the Latin Vulgate Bible and was declared by the Church to be the only authentic and official Bible.

The priests of the past were not priests by todays definition or standard.

There's little to no doubt that at that time some scattered documentations, and widely contested but in general accepted points of views and interpretations of the teachings and practices of Issa(AS) Jesus did exsist but not a complete text.

 Go deeper into that time period and you will find that after Issa(AS) was taken to Jannah-Heaven the horrific killings by the romans continued the mass slaughtering of the followers appostles continued at a certain point a mergence or mutual aggreement came about to combine the Roman traditions and Christian beliefs after the Roman empire felt threatened....

For example look at the winter season now...

For hundreds of years Christmas was banned in the UK it wasn't until the late 1400's the church and governing bodies allowed it....It was viewed as not a true holiday of the birth if Issa(AS) but as a pagan holiday one that was celebrated in rioutus fun one with Roman Influences in relation to the winter solstice and Sun God worshiped by them.

No matter what your faith is you must delve deep into it's time period and history using not only the resource your church, temple, or masjid has provided but also outside well documented sources. When you study not only the text but also the history surrounding it. It brings much more understanding.

I do know Issa(As) did not finish his work because the Quran states that....and that's why he will return. Allah(swt) knows best.

No matter what your faith it has been well documented by Islamic Officials, Church Officials, and Jewish Officials that the Quran is the only book of God that has be so well preserved and maintained from the very first of it's revelations....There have been many documentaries, international conferances and articles on this subject.

Even if there were none I would say just by reading the Quran and the amount of detail and knowledge it provides about all of the book of Allah(swt) God is proof enough.....I learned many things in more detail about the Christian faith as a Muslim than I did as a Christian and that just backs up the evidence that the Quran is the Pure unaltered word of Allah(swt) God.

Wa'Allahu'Alim...God is the most Knowing.

MasSalaama,

Thank you so much for that!  Sounds fascinating and I promise to check it all out and research more. The journey for truth continues to get more interesting and exciting for me as time goes on. God bless you sister.

The only thing I question about what you said previously was that a priest wrote the Bible, only later did you clarify this:

Quote

Pope Damasus I assembled the first list of books of the Bible at the Council of Rome in 382 A.D. He commissioned Saint Jerome to produce a reliable and consistent text by translating the original Greek and Hebrew texts into Latin. This translation became known as the Latin Vulgate Bible and was declared by the Church to be the only authentic and official Bible.

All he did was translate the text, as the Quran has also been translated. It does not mean that the translator was the writer, just the translator, it is quite different.



Edited by Sarita
Back to Top
niqab_ummi View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Avatar
Joined: 08 December 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 159
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote niqab_ummi Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 December 2006 at 5:22am

Assalamu'Alaikum, and Salaams to all of our non-muslim guests,

It is well documented there are hundreds of places you can go to start with a good encyclopedia or dictionary at the very least here is a small part from a very lengthy exerpt.

Pope Damasus I assembled the first list of books of the Bible at the Council of Rome in 382 A.D. He commissioned Saint Jerome to produce a reliable and consistent text by translating the original Greek and Hebrew texts into Latin. This translation became known as the Latin Vulgate Bible and was declared by the Church to be the only authentic and official Bible.

The priests of the past were not priests by todays definition or standard.

There's little to no doubt that at that time some scattered documentations, and widely contested but in general accepted points of views and interpretations of the teachings and practices of Issa(AS) Jesus did exsist but not a complete text.

 Go deeper into that time period and you will find that after Issa(AS) was taken to Jannah-Heaven the horrific killings by the romans continued the mass slaughtering of the followers appostles continued at a certain point a mergence or mutual aggreement came about to combine the Roman traditions and Christian beliefs after the Roman empire felt threatened....

For example look at the winter season now...

For hundreds of years Christmas was banned in the UK it wasn't until the late 1400's the church and governing bodies allowed it....It was viewed as not a true holiday of the birth if Issa(AS) but as a pagan holiday one that was celebrated in rioutus fun one with Roman Influences in relation to the winter solstice and Sun God worshiped by them.

No matter what your faith is you must delve deep into it's time period and history using not only the resource your church, temple, or masjid has provided but also outside well documented sources. When you study not only the text but also the history surrounding it. It brings much more understanding.

I do know Issa(As) did not finish his work because the Quran states that....and that's why he will return. Allah(swt) knows best.

No matter what your faith it has been well documented by Islamic Officials, Church Officials, and Jewish Officials that the Quran is the only book of God that has be so well preserved and maintained from the very first of it's revelations....There have been many documentaries, international conferances and articles on this subject.

Even if there were none I would say just by reading the Quran and the amount of detail and knowledge it provides about all of the book of Allah(swt) God is proof enough.....I learned many things in more detail about the Christian faith as a Muslim than I did as a Christian and that just backs up the evidence that the Quran is the Pure unaltered word of Allah(swt) God.

Wa'Allahu'Alim...God is the most Knowing.

MasSalaama,

Umm Abdelkhalek
Back to Top
Sarita View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar
Joined: 31 October 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 21
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Sarita Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 December 2006 at 3:12am
Originally posted by niqab_ummi niqab_ummi wrote:

Well I can point out one huge flaw and being a former Christian know this to be true and documented by many officials in the church the Bible was composed more than 300 years after Isa(AS) Jesus returned to Jannah-Heaven....by a priest that had no ties to any of the original appostles other than scattered verbal and some written accounts and interviews that had been passed down over the generations.....

The other being that it is not the word of Allah(swt) how could it be the exact word of Allah(swt) God if it was composed by a priest in a monestary 300 year after the fact....

I have been a Christian my whole life and never heard of something like that before. Clearly it is NOT well documented. The Bible is written by God through his disciplies over a long period of time. Not one priest. And think about that for a minute. Priests only come from the Christian religion, if the Christian religion had no Bible, how could he have been a priest?

I am very interested in the Quran and Prophet Mohammed, but these kinds of make believe stories REALLY begin to tarnish it. I hope we can get back to focusing on the truth and proven facts.

Back to Top
Angel View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior  Member
Avatar

Joined: 03 July 2001
Status: Offline
Points: 6641
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Angel Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 December 2006 at 6:57pm
Originally posted by niqab_ummi niqab_ummi wrote:

Isa(AS) Jesus was unable to complete his Prophet Hood at that time due to the governing body of rulers that were very unjust and will complete his work when he returns to earth to defeat Dajaal otherwise none in the non-muslim community as the Anti-Christ. At that time he will speak to everyone and unite everyone to the belief in One God........MasSalaama

the reason why Jesus was unable to complete his Porphet due to the governing rulers, is not that. AND who says that Jesus didn't complete his work at that time?? Jesus had a mission he completed it, He has another in the future, to come back. 

~ Our feet are earthbound, but our hearts and our minds have wings ~
Back to Top
niqab_ummi View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Avatar
Joined: 08 December 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 159
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote niqab_ummi Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 December 2006 at 5:42pm

Salaams and Assalamu'Alaikum to my muslim br's and sr's

Well I can point out one huge flaw and being a former Christian know this to be true and documented by many officials in the church the Bible was composed more than 300 years after Isa(AS) Jesus returned to Jannah-Heaven....by a priest that had no ties to any of the original appostles other than scattered verbal and some written accounts and interviews that had been passed down over the generations.....

The other being that it is not the word of Allah(swt) how could it be the exact word of Allah(swt) God if it was composed by a priest in a monestary 300 year after the fact....

What is left of the Injiil Gospel of Isa(AS) Jesus can also not be documented as 100% either since very little documentation had been done at that time.....

Isa(AS) Jesus was unable to complete his Prophet Hood at that time due to the governing body of rulers that were very unjust and will complete his work when he returns to earth to defeat Dajaal otherwise none in the non-muslim community as the Anti-Christ. At that time he will speak to everyone and unite everyone to the belief in One God........

MasSalaama

Umm Abdelkhalek
Back to Top
Andalus View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group

Joined: 12 October 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1187
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Andalus Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 December 2006 at 9:32pm
Originally posted by Bismarck Bismarck wrote:

Originally posted by rubies rubies wrote:

 


Well one well known example is  the story of the woman caught in
adultery.  Where Jesus (peace be upon him) reportedly says 'let him who is
without sin cast the first stone'.  (paraphrasing)


Bible scholars know that this story is absent from the earliest
manuscripts and is a later insertion.  You can read more about this here:
http://www.bible-
researcher.com/adult.html


Now, who added it?  When?  What else did they add or subtract? How
can anyone rely on such a book - the NT?



Rubies,
My understanding is that, although the 'pericope' about the woman
caught in adultery may not have originally been in that Gospel, if it was
not, it was almost assuredly inserted because it was a treasured story
in its own right in oral tradition
and it was inserted into the canon in
order to preserve it.

That is complete and absolute conjecture. All anyone can say with any certainty is that it was not a part of the tradition.

 

Quote

 

Thus, its presence it not the same as saying
scripture was corrupted... just two treasured scriptures (the Gospel, and
that 'pericope') were combined in order to preserve both.
Best regards,
Bismarck

Actually, in the context of transmission and textual criticsm, that would be considered an example of corruption.

regards

 

A feeling of discouragement when you slip up is a sure sign that you put your faith in deeds. -Ibn 'Ata'llah
http://www.sunnipath.com
http://www.sunniforum.com/forum/
http://www.pt-go.com/
Back to Top
Bismarck View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 01 March 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 286
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Bismarck Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 December 2006 at 10:25pm
Originally posted by rubies rubies wrote:


Well one�well known example is��the story of the woman caught in
adultery.� Where Jesus (peace be upon him) reportedly says 'let him who is
without sin cast the first stone'.� (paraphrasing)


Bible scholars know that this story is absent from the earliest
manuscripts and is a later insertion.� You can read more about this here:
http://www.bible-
researcher.com/adult.html


Now, who added it?� When?� What else did they add or subtract? How
can anyone rely on such a book - the NT?



Rubies,
My understanding is that, although the 'pericope' about the woman
caught in adultery may not have originally been in that Gospel, if it was
not, it was almost assuredly inserted because it was a treasured story
in its own right in oral tradition
and it was inserted into the canon in
order to preserve it. Thus, its presence it not the same as saying
scripture was corrupted... just two treasured scriptures (the Gospel, and
that 'pericope') were combined in order to preserve both.
Best regards,
Bismarck
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 7>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd.