God�s commands |
Post Reply | Page <1 56789 20> |
Author | ||||||||||||||||
Ron Webb
Senior Member Male atheist Joined: 30 January 2008 Location: Ottawa, Canada Status: Offline Points: 2467 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||||
If, as you say, they "went back to their old ways," then you must agree that they had already accepted the new way, i.e. had accepted the true God. Perhaps they "didn't fully understand", but then that could probably be said about anyone. It could certainly be said by anyone who was looking for an excuse for having committed Shirk. Sura 4:48 allows no such excuses, however. It makes no exceptions for repentance, nor for incomplete understanding. Once having received "clear signs" of the true God, to "set up partners" with Him is to commit an unforgivable sin.
|
||||||||||||||||
minuteman
Senior Member Joined: 25 March 2007 Status: Offline Points: 1642 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||||
Ron your question has put me in some difficulty. You are right about what you have said in your last post and there is no easy answer for that. My answer was only that which I had posted previously. But you have raised a good question about that now. So I have to look for some reply. Please see below:
Edited by minuteman - 21 April 2008 at 11:14pm |
||||||||||||||||
Shasta'sAunt
Senior Member Female Joined: 29 March 2008 Status: Offline Points: 1930 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||||
Ron, the people did as Moses told them to do. That does not mean that they understood why, they were following his lead, literally. As soon as he was no longer there to tell them what to do, they fell back into their old habits.
God knows if we truly understand that we are committing shirk or not. In Islam, intention is everything.
|
||||||||||||||||
�No one can make you feel inferior without your consent.�
Eleanor Roosevelt |
||||||||||||||||
myahya
Senior Member Joined: 06 February 2008 Status: Offline Points: 222 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||||
Minuteman has quoted a very key verse of
Quran which says that some people get stuck to some portions of Quran. This
will mislead them more and more. That is why Quran says many people become
misled with Quran (means misunderstanding of verses and/or fast judgments based
on a portion of it) and many people get the guidance from it. That is one of
the reasons I think Hadith and Sunnah is also vitally important. In a Hadith from an infallible it is said
that a few things are always hided in a few other things. Then the infallible
counts them. One of them is the following: �For everyone that sin which is the most unpleasant sin beside Allah (swt) is hided in their sins. Be extremely careful to seriously avoid underestimating ANY of your sins (and committing it again). A small sin beside you may be not so beside Allah (swt)� Therefore, our duty is to take a lot of care as much as possible in a sincere way (this means Taghvaa in Arabic). But about the Shirk, I think first of all we�d better to remember that �to be worshiped� is only and only the Allah�s Right. In Arabic this falls into the category of �Hagho�llah�. We can not judge if Allah (swt) forgives a Moshrik or not then He is just or not. This is DIRECT Right of Allah (swt). However, when Allah (swt) forgives a Moshrik, this doesn�t mean the Moshrik is not a loser on the Last day, does it? As much as I know from Islam teachings, I can say that if a person be sinful and unjust to other people then Allah (swt) will NOT forgive that person on the Last day unless those people (who have been sinfully and unjustly behaved by the corresponding person) get satisfied and/or forgive that corresponding person. In Arabic this falls into the category of �Hagho�nnaas�. Minuteman: �All the companions of the prophet
s.a.w.s. were polytheists (Mushrik)�� I am sorry but I have to disagree here. We
can not say ALL of them were necessarily Mushrik even if there is one exception.
I am sorry but this is not a good excuse for them. Moses (as) surely didn't want them to be like a good trained animal. I think he had told them "WHY" for sure ... Edited by myahya - 23 April 2008 at 1:23am |
||||||||||||||||
honeto
Senior Member Male Islam Joined: 20 March 2008 Location: Texas Status: Offline Points: 2487 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||||
believer, let me use here something you use often, "LoL"
I am sorry but I think you are a bit short sighted in your advice. It should be open minded not open heart. If I follow my open heart, trust me I will fall, I will not make it to a desired hereafter as there is too much wrong, sin and lust everywhere, for "the open heart approach".
It is for that and because God knew it, God has asked us to use our mind rather. In Islam through Quran, God challanges the mind and intellectual of a person. And trust me and may be your own experience in real life may have revealed to you that open and alert mind works, not open heart.
Having said that, and using open and alert mind, I have showed you a few of the Bible's contradictions on this board, even Christian scholars agree and admit to such contradictions. And remember the old rule, a mistake not corrected will lead to many mistakes.
Hasan Edited by honeto - 22 April 2008 at 3:40pm |
||||||||||||||||
The friends of God will certainly have nothing to fear, nor will they be grieved. Al Quran 10:62
|
||||||||||||||||
Ron Webb
Senior Member Male atheist Joined: 30 January 2008 Location: Ottawa, Canada Status: Offline Points: 2467 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||||
What do I say? First, I say that it is a pleasure to discuss with an honourable man (woman?) who will admit to being "in some difficulty" and having "no easy answer". It is so rare to encounter such intellectual honesty, especially on the Internet. Thank you for that. But back to the subject: I think if there is a way to resolve the contradiction it would have to be in the definition of "shirk". If shirk is unforgivable, and Allah forgave the Israelites, then it follows that the Israelites did not commit shirk. I have always been puzzled by the phrase "setting up partners with Allah". If Allah had meant idolatry, or worshipping other god(s), why didn't He just say that? I think the answer is that the Golden Calf is not a "partner" with Allah -- it is a replacement for Him. The same can be said about worshipping other gods, even polytheism. Those who worship other gods do not know Allah. They are ignorant but not evil. To me, "setting up partners" would be to believe in Allah and the Quran, but to claim that Allah is not sufficient -- that He needs a "partner" to complete His message and establish His authority. Such a message implies that Allah is a weak, inadequate God. Moreover, it corrupts the message of Islam from within, whereas Golden Calves and other competing religions can only attack it from the outside. I can see why Allah would find such corruption treasonous and unforgivable. Frankly, I think the sin of shirk was a specific warning to Muslims not to treat Mohammad as a partner to Allah. Allah's message, the Quran, is sufficient and complete. It does not need to be, and must not be, augmented with the Hadith or the Sunnah. As great as Muhammad may have been, he was only the messenger of Islam, not a co-author. But I am not a Muslim, so what do I know, eh? |
||||||||||||||||
myahya
Senior Member Joined: 06 February 2008 Status: Offline Points: 222 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||||
Ron: �It does not need to be, and must not be, augmented with the Hadith or the Sunnah.� I agree with this sentence. No real Muslim or Momen arguments Quran using Hadith or Sunnah. If you have seen or felt such a manner, it is a perverse manner or a misunderstanding. This is why the essential criterion to understand whether a written Hadith is right or not, is to check them with Quran.Edited by myahya - 23 April 2008 at 1:08am |
||||||||||||||||
Shasta'sAunt
Senior Member Female Joined: 29 March 2008 Status: Offline Points: 1930 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||||
"Frankly, I think the sin of shirk was a specific warning to Muslims not to treat Mohammad as a partner to Allah. Allah's message, the Quran, is sufficient and complete. It does not need to be, and must not be, augmented with the Hadith or the Sunnah. As great as Muhammad may have been, he was only the messenger of Islam, not a co-author." Muslims knew that the Prophet was just a man.
After the Prophet Mohammed died, the people were in disbelief and dark despair. Abu Bakr made this speech to the people: 'And now, he who worships Muhammad(PBUH) Muhammad is dead now. But he who worships Allah, He is Ever Living and He never dies. Allah says: 3:144 Muhammad is no more than an apostle: many Were the apostle that passed away before him. If he died or were slain, will ye then Turn back on your heels? If any did turn back on his heels, not the least harm will he do to Allah. but Allah (on the other hand) will swiftly reward those who (serve Him) with gratitude."
There is a huge difference between The Quran and the Hadith and the Sunnah of The Prophet. One is The Word of God, the others are the customs and practices of The Messenger of God. We are to take The Word of God as our law and the Hadith and Sunnah as our example.
Edited by Shasta'sAunt - 23 April 2008 at 1:50am |
||||||||||||||||
�No one can make you feel inferior without your consent.�
Eleanor Roosevelt |
||||||||||||||||
Post Reply | Page <1 56789 20> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |