Seal of prophet-KhatamanNabiyyeenand othe

SR i have provided u all details from quran, and u have not been able to refute any of them and still u are in a denial.

U keep on mentioning Iqbal but u are not mentioning the fact that u have not been able to prove a single thing against the arguments presented here from quran.

is quran more important or words of   Iqbal

who equates Allah swt  with a physicist
where did i did that. Prove that. Posts are here to see.

leave Quraan alone
i guess it is u who used leave it alone, as u cant interpret is correctly and as a result have badly effected the image of islam

Just stop abusing the Holy Quraan
Plz show where am i doing that. To correctly interpret quran is abusing.is it?

U definitely have lost the argument here and now u have retorted to these ways of bashing me instead of trying to prove against my arguments from quran.

Be a man

Im sure u all are learning lots of good things over here, the real interpretation of quran that no one knew here before


Edited by H3OO - 05 October 2008 at 11:28pm

if you take up hadiths while reading Qur'aan

are u asking my view or an ahmedis?

i sure do

as for ahmedis are concerned, they do also.

but here are the rules they say and im sure we all agree
1st of all one thing needs to be made clear;
1.  The Word of God stands supreme.
2. This is followed by the actual practices of the Holy Prophet of Islam [sa]. This is known as sunnah.
 3. This is followed by hadith, the words reported to be those of the Holy Prophet[sa]


If the authenticity of the words of the Holy Prophet[sa] is established unquestionably, the words concerned are words put into the mouth of the Holy Prophetssa by God Almighty. Where there is no apparent contradiction between the word of the Holy Prophet[sa] and the Quran, the tradition may be accepted as authentic.

Whenever any so-called tradition attributed to the Holy Prophet of Islam[sa] contradicts any clear injunction of the Holy Quran, such a tradition is rejected as false and is not accepted as the word of the Holy Prophet[sa].

Another reliable method of investigating the credibility of a tradition is to study its internal evidence critically. If the contents of the tradition clash with the image of the Holy Prophet of Islam which has emerged from a study of his conduct and bearing throughout his life, then such a tradition would be rejected as a false attribution to the Holy Prophet[sa] or as being against the principles of logic and common sense.

u mean the sources of hadith. which source i use?

yes i take the help from the sources that are considered authentic but even in them i dont blindly accept. There are no. of things to consider bcz who have compiled these hadiths, they are humans as well and so they can also make mistakes


Edited by H3OO - 06 October 2008 at 8:28am