Does Allah Say? |
Post Reply | Page <1 7891011 16> |
Author | |
Sign*Reader
Senior Member Joined: 02 November 2005 Status: Offline Points: 3352 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Edited by Sign*Reader - 19 October 2008 at 11:53pm |
|
Kismet Domino: Faith/Courage/Liberty/Abundance/Selfishness/Immorality/Apathy/Bondage or extinction.
|
|
H3OO
Senior Member Joined: 11 July 2008 Location: Switzerland Status: Offline Points: 215 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Who is this He? use a clear language!/
Read the hadith and its very clear. Why every thing has to be taught to you, use some sense for yourself. Whose personal opinion [ Muadh ra] and you keep on showing your ignorance by repeating the same invalid points. I ask u again how can someone make such a major decision on the basis of certification or personal opinion alone without consulting the orders of Allah and prophet[sa] when even prophets didnt take any majors decisions of their own without the instructions of Allah. and second again, see the mistake he made by associating something with prophet and Allah that they clearly never said which proves that certification is not a guarantee that a man can never make any mistake. Is it too difficult for you to understand. Stop making conclusions by yourownself. It clear for anyone who is not bigoted Edited by H3OO - 20 October 2008 at 2:28am |
|
H3OO
Senior Member Joined: 11 July 2008 Location: Switzerland Status: Offline Points: 215 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
We are only supposed to follow the Orders of Allah [Quran] and prophet[sa] and clearly neither Allah said anything in this regard and neither did prophet[sa].
I hope u today learn a new thing. Edited by H3OO - 20 October 2008 at 12:09am |
|
seekshidayath
Senior Member Female Islam Joined: 26 March 2006 Location: India Status: Offline Points: 3357 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
As'Salamu Alaikum WRWB, Sis Chrysallis, its waste of my time to discuss with a person, who distorts Qur'an and hadiths . So i just ignore his posts. Moreover, brother {Sign Reader} has answered him. So i think, there no point of explanation, to that hadith. I asked a question to you, minuteman ? {Read this whole post, and do not come with your line "It was a long post seeks, so i did not read} When u state something, you shud backup with Qur'an and sunnah. When u state that apostate shud n't be killed, on what basis did you state that ? U said :
Even Maudoodi sahib said that "Important matters concerning life and death or Haram/halal cannot be left to the Hadith alone. Proof for such matters must come from the Quran." (Rasaail o Masaail Vol?)
Here, for me, Madudi sahab is n't greater than the sayings of Prophet Muhammad. His statement must be context based. However Prophet Muhammad did kill a number of people who deserted Islam and so the punishment is Sunnah (actions and sayings of Muhammad) and hence Shariah, Islamic Law. I said this earlier in a thread, and even now am repeating that the scholars say, it is not necessary that a hadith be supported by ayaat of Qur'an. Infact to understand to Qur'an, hadith is necessary. A hadith can be independent. Its not necessary that it be supported by an ayah. Suppose if a hadith contradicts with an ayah, then it is not taken. Show me one ayah, which contradicts the saying of the Prophet that : "It is not permissible to take the life of a Muslim except in one of the three cases: the married adulterer, a life for a life (if the person is Muslim), and the deserter of Islam." and this hadith too - "Whoever changes his religion, execute him.� Narrated by al-Bukhaari in his Saheeh. Show me atleast one Ayah , which contradicts this saying of Prophet ?
Let me also add, as why we take hadiths. Because Allah swt says in the holy Quran - """And whatever the Messenger gives you, take it, and whatever he forbids you, leave it. And fear Allah: truly Allah is severe in punishment. " [ 59:7] I named just two apostates, who were ordered by Prophet Muhammad {Sallal lahu alayhi wasallam} to killed. They were Abdullah ibn Khatal,and Miqyas ibn Subaha.
Abdullah ibn Khatal, who had previously, accepted Islam, and been accepted Islam and been sent by Prophet to collect alms tax. A slave and one of the Ansars went along with him. Coming to a halt in their journey, Abdullah ibn Khatal told the slave to prepare a chicken for a meal, but the slave went to sleep instead, and was unable to prepare food in time. Abdullah ibn Khatal became angry and killed the slave. Fearing that if he returned to Medina, the Prophet would exact retribution for the slave's death, he turned apostate and joined infidels. There he used to abuse Prophet thru his poems. On the day of conquest of Makkah, he wrapped himself up in the curtain of the kabah. Here, we need to learn that on the day of conquest of Makkah when Prophet entered the city, he gave his commander orders not to do battle with anyone unless they themselves were attacked. If they took refuge beneath the curtain of the Kabah, they were forgiven., But this person - Abduallah ibn Khatal was ordered to be killed even when he wrapped himself in the curtain of Kabah. He was ordered to be killed in the very place. Abu Burza and Saeed ibn Harith {RA} executed him between black stone and place of Ibrahim {Maqam e Ibrahim}. This shows the severity of the case. Next apostate was Miqyas ibn Subaha. He was also ordered to put to death when he turned apostate. He was slewed by Numaila ibn Abdullah. Now my question to you is, when there was no such ayah in Qur'an , why did Prophet Muhammad {sallal lahu alayhi wasallam} order them to be killed ? There were other hadiths too posted by Brother {sign reader}. Am repeating them as a reminder. Bukhari 9:89:271 - A man embraced Islam and then reverted back to Judaism Mu'adh said: "I will not sit down unless you kill him as it is the verdict of Allah and His Apostle" Why did Mua'dh RA, kill him ? Why did he say that he shall not even sit down, untill he kills him ? Did you not read, when he said that it is the VERICT of Allah and His Apostle ? Bukhari 4:52:260 Ali burnt some people (Zanadiqa, atheists 9:84:57) although the Prophet had said, "Don't punish anybody with Allah's punishment (Fire)" if a Muslim discards his religion, kill him" What do you say about this hadith ? Why did n't Prophet, stop Ali from killling him ? Instead he was said, do not punish anyone with fire as its Allah ' s punishment. You need to understand minuteman, that a person is n't FORCED into Islam. Islam forbids us to compel someone into Islam. A person enters by hs own will, by his own choice. He is expected to submit himself totally to Allah swt. He surrenders the rights of his decisions to Qur'an and Sunnah. Allah swt says in the Qur'an , " 33 : 36. It is not for a believer, man or woman, when Allah and His Messenger have decreed a matter that they should have any option in their decision. And whoever disobeys Allah and His Messenger, he has indeed strayed into a plain error. If Allah and His Messenger decreed a matter, no one has the right to go against that, and no one has any choice or room for personal opinion in this case. In Islam, a muslim if protected from kufr and shirks. When he accepts a right path willingly, is he allowed to be an apostate ? Can he declare that he does not believe in Allah swt. or Prophet or aakhirah or other tenents ? Islam does n't tolerate that. A muslim cannot reject fundamentals. Out of ignorance or out of any distractions or weak faith , one may have doubts of those fundamentals. He can question the, debate or discuss and get the understanding. But why does he desert Islam ? In order to protect the true religion from the defamation of the liars and to protect the faith of its adherents and remove obstacles from the path of those who are entering the faith. , they are to be killed.. Execution is the greatest deterrent that will prevent people from committing such a crime. Why does then death penalty exists in our laws {constitution} . Why is a person "hanged" . Death sentences and such laws are made to protect disorder in a society. To protect society against such crimes. Similarly, in an Islamic state wherein the laws are n't man-made, an apostate is to be killed so that he does n't spread this fitnah anymore. Just as upholding and protecting the constitution of a country is a sign of patriotism, and undermining it is a form of treason - in the same way open rejection of the fundamental beliefs of Islam by a Muslim is an act of treason. Apostasy i.e. the public declaration of rejecting the fundamentals of Islam, has also negative influence on the Muslim society, it is indeed a major fitnah. Edited by seekshidayath - 20 October 2008 at 12:32am |
|
Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) said: �All the descendants of Adam are sinners, and the best of sinners are those who repent."
|
|
Sign*Reader
Senior Member Joined: 02 November 2005 Status: Offline Points: 3352 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
You can try all the tricks in your bag to sell Mirza's exemption from being eligible for death penalty is a belated idiocy on your part! He got away with his scam cuz the land and the place was in British bondage! And it was their desire to kill the fighting spirit jelling in some part of the Muslims population and that was that! You can plead till the hell freezes over on this subject like a juvinile! To you it might look like a major decision but when Prophet had sent his governors to far off areas they were fully authorized to operate! There was no internet to use and ask question after question like you are doing to protect your kind! You have been avoiding the point of Zrar Mosque issue Why! Just count how many concur with your POV! Couple o threads have been locked out indicating the poverty of your arguments! Just blurt your agenda out so we can move on! We need some stimulating debate and not Juvenile blabbering! Finally I will take Muadh ra ijtihad any time as against the Mirza's and you want take a poll on this to end the matter! Edited by Sign*Reader - 20 October 2008 at 12:47am |
|
Kismet Domino: Faith/Courage/Liberty/Abundance/Selfishness/Immorality/Apathy/Bondage or extinction.
|
|
Whisper
Senior Member Male Joined: 25 July 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 4752 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
and you keep on showing your ignorance by repeating the same invalid points
Perhaps the most beautiful Fruedian Slip yet that this son of so n so has made. What the eff are you repeating since the day you arrived here? Other than the same invalid points? You distort the most visible fact on someone's profile just to suit your point and we know how you distort Koran just for feeding your Psychopathic needs.
We all know that by now.
One of the primary symptoms of deep Psychosis is that the patient is the last one to realise his sickness and is often shocked, almost, to death by the realisation what he is doing.
I have sincerely advised you to seek professional help before you harm someone. You are at that critical stage. Edited by Whisper - 20 October 2008 at 12:43am |
|
Whisper
Senior Member Male Joined: 25 July 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 4752 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Sis Chrysallis, its waste of my time to discuss with a person, who distorts Qur'an and hadiths . So i just ignore his posts. Moreover, brother {Sign Reader} has answered him. So i think, there no point of explanation, to that hadith. Hamsheer'em, let me please explain.
There is simple straight principle of Life. We can ever and always give ONLY what has been given to us. This man displays all the signs of having been beaten up and suppressed to an irredeemable degree.
Such people dip into a sub branch of deep Psychosis and turn out to be Psychopaths. For them, no one can ever be of their like in the world. When you study his utterances in his posts, you find him impying that even gaad dances just to appeal to his logic.
In one of his posts he stated that Allah works just through the Laws of Physics! Great thought.
He started a string to convince us of the Virging Birth!
Be honest, do we need any convincing of that? Do you need any excuses, explanations or some other crutches to believe in Allah Kareem ?
Because he does so for him, we all do.
He is on record (in this or in the other string) distorting my profile just for his own purpose, just to make a point. He is blatantly distorting the Koran, everywhere, all the time, just to make POINTS.
He has not been allowed to win all his life. Now the advanced stage of his psychosis forces him just to win. Just watch his lines:
* and you keep on showing your ignorance by repeating the same invalid points.
* Is it too difficult for you to understand. Stop making conclusions by yourownself * It is common sense but u have lost it completely
* but i dont follow the 3rd option and neither do any Muslim
Do you wish for the entire list?. I have analysed him and also discussed him with my son who is a Consultant Psychiatrist at the Glasgow Royal Infirmary.
This poor chap is a Psycho-Sociopath in very advanced stages of his ailment. In this stage, they can even kill just to prove themselves right or just better than the next person in the tram! Edited by Whisper - 20 October 2008 at 1:12am |
|
H3OO
Senior Member Joined: 11 July 2008 Location: Switzerland Status: Offline Points: 215 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
seeks said
Ali burnt some people (Zanadiqa, atheists 9:84:57) although the Prophet had said, "Don't punish anybody with Allah's punishment (Fire)" if a Muslim discards his religion, kill him" ______________________ i said here is another version Ikramah relates that he heard that some Zindeeqs were presented before Hazrat Ali whereupon he directed the burning alive of these people. Ibn Abbas stated that had it been him, he would not have ordered this because the Holy Prophetsa had said that the torment of the fire may only be decreed by God but the Prophetsa had also said, �Slay whosoever changes his religion � Bukhari Mishkat (Egypt), 9�10; Bukhari and Finch AI-Bari, Hadith, no. 6922 (Egypt), vol. 12, 267. The contents of the above Hadith are erroneous in several ways.
another point that can be raised is that THE hadith states the narrator was Ikramah, so it also raises a question about the truthfulness/authenticity of the narrator. what he(Ikramah) says are neither the words of God nor the prophet. what he says doesnt necessarily means that this is what actually happened or this is what actually was said. and quranic verses, logic, common sense surely do go against it. Edited by H3OO - 20 October 2008 at 11:17am |
|
Post Reply | Page <1 7891011 16> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |