temporary marriage/mut`a |
Post Reply | Page <12345 10> |
Author | |||
Abu_Hadi
Starter Joined: 17 December 2008 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1 |
Posted: 17 December 2008 at 3:48am | ||
Holy Quran allows mutaa' in Surat 4 Ayat 24.
It was allowed by Rasoulallah(p.b.u.h)
It was made haram by Umar Al Khattab, who had no right to make something haram which was allowed by Quran and Rasoulallah(p.b.u.h)
Mutaa' is not prostitution. It is marriage.
The iddah applies to mutaa'. If a prostitute did halal mutaa', she would have to wait 3 months between each new client. Now that would be a pretty poor prostitute, lol.
|
|||
Sign*Reader
Senior Member Joined: 02 November 2005 Status: Offline Points: 3352 |
Posted: 19 December 2008 at 1:17am | ||
4:24 Also (prohibited are) women already married, except those whom your right hands possess: Thus hath Allah ordained (Prohibitions) against you: Except for these, all others are lawful, provided ye seek (them in marriage) with gifts from your property,- desiring chastity, not lust, seeing that ye derive benefit from them, give them their dowers (at least) as prescribed; but if, after a dower is prescribed, agree Mutually (to vary it), there is no blame on you, and Allah is All-knowing, All-wise. What part is Mutaa? What is stopping you marrying upto four? It is all matter of staying within limits or go past it. If you are a king then you make your own rules! If you have to ask then you know you are asking for trouble! Now if you pay enough the poverty is non issue! Like in case of King Abdul Aziz & son Saud every woman would get an all found palace! And there was no one telling him or her that it was wrong,,,They went around the rule! Saud went insane and lost throne! Edited by Sign*Reader - 19 December 2008 at 4:12pm |
|||
Kismet Domino: Faith/Courage/Liberty/Abundance/Selfishness/Immorality/Apathy/Bondage or extinction.
|
|||
abosait
Senior Member Joined: 05 November 2008 Location: India Status: Offline Points: 381 |
Posted: 19 December 2008 at 7:44am | ||
Who is this King Saud You are talking about? The woman got the palace for what? Should I assume it was muta'a because that is the subject of discussion?
Again the same question. Do you mean to say that they were practicing Muta'a? Kindly elaborate on the above and the following statement:
|
|||
Sign*Reader
Senior Member Joined: 02 November 2005 Status: Offline Points: 3352 |
Posted: 19 December 2008 at 4:25pm | ||
OMG Who doesn't know these guys? Any how
Al Saud was the founder of Kingdom of the Saudi Arabia and Saud was his son who became the next king! The number of children that Ibn Saud fathered are unknown, and estimates range from about 80 to over 100. One source indicates that he had 37 sons by 16 wives. His number of wives is put at 22 though never more than three or four simultaneously. The way it worked the tribes offered the daughters to these kings hoping that they will become favorites otherwise a luxurious living facilities was a well understood as part of mehr for the ex wives and princely brood! The concept of mutaa wasn't there probably but then it sure was some thing that needs a name let's call it Saudia or whatever! King Saud had 53 sons and 56 daughters, number of wives AOA! Edited by Sign*Reader - 19 December 2008 at 4:53pm |
|||
Kismet Domino: Faith/Courage/Liberty/Abundance/Selfishness/Immorality/Apathy/Bondage or extinction.
|
|||
abosait
Senior Member Joined: 05 November 2008 Location: India Status: Offline Points: 381 |
Posted: 20 December 2008 at 5:32am | ||
Why would I ask you if I knew? And how do you know them? Are you an offspring of that dynasty that empowers you to speak so firmly about their private life?
Unknown to whom? Wouldnt the children demand their rights?
Please produce proof of those contradicting statistics which you wish to spread on the net? Or have you copied that from some book of fiction? Edited by abosait - 20 December 2008 at 5:36am |
|||
Sign*Reader
Senior Member Joined: 02 November 2005 Status: Offline Points: 3352 |
Posted: 20 December 2008 at 6:38pm | ||
Succession to Saudi Arabia's throne has been a process that has, to a large extent, excluded all but the senior members of the Al Saud. Male progeny, with tenure in senior government positions, whose mothers were King Abdul Aziz Ibn Saud's wives and from prominent peninsula based families and tribes, and who have shown both the willingness and ability to build the necessary consensus from other wings in the family are, in theory, the most eligible candidates.
All of these carry the surname "bin Abdul Aziz Al Saud" for men and "bint Abdul Aziz Al Saud" for women. Ibn Saud is the father of all the Kings of Saudi Arabia that have succeeded him. King Saud succeeded his father as regent of Saudi Arabia in 1953, three months after being appointed Prime Minister by his father. In 1964 King Saud was deposed by the Saudi Council of Ministers and succeeded by King Faisal, another of Ibn Saud's sons. Faisal was followed by three further sons, King Khalid, King Fahd and King Abdullah. According to the Saudi Basic Law of 1992, the King of Saudi Arabia must be a son or grandson of Ibn Saud. Edited by Sign*Reader - 20 December 2008 at 6:41pm |
|||
Kismet Domino: Faith/Courage/Liberty/Abundance/Selfishness/Immorality/Apathy/Bondage or extinction.
|
|||
BMZ
Moderator Group Joined: 03 April 2006 Status: Offline Points: 1852 |
Posted: 20 December 2008 at 8:46pm | ||
Hello, all
I have written so much on this topic at various sites that I am tired of it. Shia brothers defend it. Shia sisters abhor it and would never allow anyone to have a Mut'aa with them for a time. Once, I had a long discussion with some of my Shia friends and it reached a point, when I said,"Will you then allow me to have Mut'aa with your sisters?" The answer was a straight NO! I must say that Mut'aa IS Haraam. Period. Salaams BMZ |
|||
Shasta's Aunt: "Well, there's the difference you see. The Bible was written by man about God, The Quran was revealed to man by God."
|
|||
islami_munda
Starter Joined: 09 November 2008 Location: Pakistan Status: Offline Points: 1 |
Posted: 21 December 2008 at 11:25pm | ||
it is true that muta is haram in islam n snip snip Mod-edit: Please do not call Shias, kafir. Salaams BMZ
Edited by BMZ - 23 December 2008 at 7:59pm |
|||
Post Reply | Page <12345 10> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |