One or ’Two’ Qur’an?

Let me begin with my first post on Islamic interfaith � by aknowledging the fact that posting this article and defending the slander against such imminent Muslim scholars as Imam Hassan al-Banna, Sayyid Qutb, Sheikh Qaradawi, and Imam Khomeini � I received �Kufr Fatwa�, and all my previous 200 posts were deleted by a particular Salafi website.

Many Sunni sectarians have been blaming Shi�ites for many centuries for possessing a �parallel Qur�an� � Al-Kafi. In fact, whosoever claims that the Qur�an has been corrupted is an unbeliever according to the consensus of Muslim scholars and must be dissociated from the Ummah. But we should not hurry in accusing people because mere presence of these traditions does not mean it is a belief of theirs, also we should know their methodology concerning the interpretation of what they narrate.

This link explains the views of a Sunni scholar.

http://www.geocities.com/noorullahwebsite/shiites.html

Aliya wrote: shias do not follow a different Qur'an than sunnis (if you need verification please visit http://www.al-islam.org/quran/ which is a shia site and has Qur'an online including in Arabic) Also shias do not claim other than Qur'an to be 100% sahih. Thus, while there are undoubtedly some weak hadith in the collection of Al-Kafi, shias do not claim them to be sahih, and only follow those that are in line with Qur'an

That was my point dear.

Wa Salaam

Rehmat wrote: Let me begin with my first post on Islamic interfaith � by acknowledging the fact that posting this article and defending the slander against such imminent Muslim scholars as Imam Hassan al-Banna, Sayyid Qutb, Sheikh Qaradawi, and Imam Khomeini � I received �Kufr Fatwa�, and all my previous 200 posts were deleted by a particular Salafi website.   Many Sunni sectarians have been blaming Shi�ites for many centuries for possessing a �parallel Qur�an� � Al-Kafi. In fact, whosoever claims that the Qur�an has been corrupted is an unbeliever according to the consensus of Muslim scholars and must be dissociated from the Ummah. But we should not hurry in accusing people because mere presence of these traditions does not mean it is a belief of theirs, also we should know their methodology concerning the interpretation of what they narrate. This link explains the views of a Sunni scholar. http://www.geocities.com/noorullahwebsite/shiites.html

 Es_Selam'un Aleykum ve Rahmetullahi ve Berakatuh,

 Brother,i apologize;but today my mind is full of work..May i ask you a question?.Is there anyone accused  you while defending these scholars?;also why you were defending them?,because they have strong signs from the holy Qur'an;just talk from the objective references of the holy Qur'an,this is enough for you.My last question to you is this;why Abu Hanifa,Imam Shafii,Imam Ibn-i Hanbal,Imam Malik or Ibn Qatir,Maulana Maududi are not in the list?:),were they talking different from the holy Qur'an...these persons who did absorb Islam are lost their minds,Subhan'Alah;thet are all in dilemma while accusing the persons;they are accusing their hearts;they are suffering from heart pain that attacking to the opposite side..i wish Alla h will guide us to the right path;not mine,not yours;His Path.....

 Brother,if i have truly understood your statement;please be cool...because there are some groups in the islam world who mixed islam and their benefits on the same table and they are loving to depending on it instead of breaking the idols;as the Jews do well...if i have truly understood your words,please let me know...you are not the first man in the same situation;the first man in this situation was the last prophet Hz.Muhammed(s.a.v.s.) when He began talking about Tawhid where the believers had mixed the concepts....Wa Salaam....

 a note:i am talking about wisdom and tawhid ;not about shia sect...

Es_Selam'un Aleykum ve Rahmetullahi ve Berakatuh,

 Brother,i'll turn back to you after i have turned back from the job;we have got so much things to talk;warm welcome from me to you....Wa Salaam...