The Moon (Part 2)

If the moon had entered the earth's atmosphere in the UAE, it would be below the horizon for most of the planet.  I think somebody would have noticed that.  Shucks, I think I would have noticed it myself.

On the other hand, maybe not.  We'd be too busy dealing with the catastrophic tidal effects, which would drown most of the coastal areas (not to mention ripping the moon itself apart).  And I can't even imagine the effects on the weather.

What does NASA have to do with it?  We understood the basic physics of the solar system hundreds of years ago.

Abu Loren wrote: Tim the plumber wrote: The Moon you see is the same one we see here.It has not come into the Earth's atmosphere.Your rantings are geting more and more silly. Plonker no. The cloud cover in the UK is almost always low whilst here in the UAE amazingly we get clear skies most of the time. As you've been brought up studying NASA's lies you wouldn't be able to think outside the box. The heavenly bodies are not what you think they are.

I understand how to measure the gravity of the Moon from Earth. I understand how to find the distance away from us that the Moon is using a laser range finder or radar. I understand how to measure the distance away from us that the Moon is using 2 telescops at different locations at the same time. I understand how to measure the distance using one point of observation over several sightings.

If the Moon had come into the Earth's atmosphere we would all be dead already. Not something you could miss.

AbuL

If the moon was millions of miles away then this reflection of it's light would be impossible.

Sounds like the top lecture from a future Nobel prize winner

-----------------------------------------------------

The earth and it's gravity are independent of the moon and do not depend on it.

Part II (Still to be published in Nature).


Airmano




Edited by airmano - 09 July 2015 at 6:53am

Ron Webb wrote: Why would it be impossible?� And where are you getting this stuff?� It's not Islam, and it's certainly not science.� Are you just making it up out of your own head?

Look compare the reflection of light of a street light and the reflection of the moon's light on water. It's almost identical which means that the moon is very near.

Ron Webb wrote: The moon is responsible for earth's tides, not for its gravity.

The earth is independent of any heavenly bodies. The tides are controlled by Allah Subhana Wa Ta'ala's natural laws. He tells us in the Qur'an that He has set a balance. This is the natural law of the universe.

Ron Webb wrote: Again, what does NASA have to do with anything?� Wikipedia says that "Seleucus of Seleucia theorized around 150 B.C. that tides were caused by the Moon,", and (ironically) that "Medieval understanding of the tides was primarily based on works of Muslim astronomers."

People follow what lies NASA tells and they follow the lies of the so called scientists of the past who has proven nothing but theorised much.

There you go, you get your scientific facts from wikipedia. Say no more.

Let also say this.

The Earth is flat hence the reason we can see the moon at the same time all over the world. Those areas covered by sunlight can also the see the moon as the moon is not only visible at night. Human beings do not possess the technology to penetrate the Earth's 'atmosphere'. There is no 'atmosphere' as such but it continues to the next heaven. What we see is out own universe, there are no glaxies, black holes, supernova's etc etc as these are the imaginations of a group of people who has the only agenda which is to rip off the government for billions of dollars of funding, most of which goes into their own pockets.