|
Amazing.....?Why? |
Post Reply 
|
Page <12345> |
| Author | |
macoooo 
Senior Member 
Joined: 27 August 2014 Status: Offline Points: 564 |
 Post Options
 Thanks(0)
 Quote Reply
 Posted: 23 January 2016 at 2:06am |
|
The Solar
The notion of a settled place for the sun is vividly described in chapter Yaa Seen of the Qur�an: �The sun runs its coarse to a settled place That is the decree of the Almighty, the All Knowing.� Qur�an, 36:38 �Settled place� is the translation of the word mustaqarr which indicates an exact appointed place and time. Modern astronomy confirms that the solar system is indeed moving in space at a rate of 12 miles per second towards a point situated in the constellation of Hercules ( alpha lyrae ) whose exact location has been precisely calculated. Astronomers have even give it a name, the solar apex. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Q8m5in9sl8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dXqqtpoMZrA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=po65ViMfwTE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pqw91ihJcQw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y4SiHSCemT8 |
|
 |
|
|
macoooo
Senior Member
Joined: 27 August 2014 Status: Offline Points: 564 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 26 January 2016 at 1:48am |
|
Among the achievements of modern science is the �conquest� of space
which has resulted in mans journey to the moon. The prediction of this
event surely springs to mind when we read the chapter ar-Rahmaan in the
Qur�an:
�O assembly of Jinns and men, if you can penetrate the regions of the heavens and the earth, then penetrate them! You will not penetrate them except with authority.� Qur�an,55:33 Authority to travel in space can only come from the Creator of the laws which govern movement and space. The whole of this Qur�anic chapter invites humankind to recognize God�s beneficence. At this point, we must ask ourselves the following question: How could an uneducated man in the middle of the desert accurately tackle so many and such varied subjects at a time when mythology and superstition reigned supreme? How could he so skillfully avoid every belief that was proven to be totally inaccurate many centuries later? شاب أمريكي يشرح دماغ ملحد الفيديو الذي أسلم بسبه الكثير شاهد قبل الحذف https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vUfVgTdEEyU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H4dVCewtvm0 THE SEAL OF ALL THE PROPHETS MUHAMMAD PBUH - Muhammad Abdul Jabbar | ALQADRMEDIA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=blxHYZfX78k |
|
|
|
|
macoooo
Senior Member
Joined: 27 August 2014 Status: Offline Points: 564 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 30 January 2016 at 12:53am |
|
the water cycle in nature. This is a
topic which is well known today. Consequently, the verses in the Qur�an
that refer to the water cycle seem to express ideas that are now totally
self-evident. But if we consider the ideas prevalent at that time, they
appear to be based more on myth and philosophical speculation than on
observed fact, even though useful practical knowledge on soil irrigation
was current at that period. Let us examine, for example, the following verse in chapter az-Zumar: �Have you not seen that Allah sent rain down from the sky and caused it to penetrate the ground and come forth as springs, then He caused crops of different colors to grow�� Qur�an,39:21 Such notions seem quite natural to us today, but we should not forget that, not so long ago, they were not prevalent. It was not until the sixteenth century, with Bernard Palissy, that we gained the first coherent description of the water cycle. Prior to this, people believed that the waters of the oceans, under the effect of winds, were thrust towards the interior of the continents. They then returned to the oceans via the great abyss, which, since Plato�s time was called the Tartarus .In the seventeenth century, great thinkers such as Descartes still believed in this myth. Even in the nineteenth century there were still those who believed in Aristotle�s theory that water was condensed in cool mountain caverns and formed underground lakes that fed springs. Today, we know that it is the infiltration of rain water into the ground that is responsible for this. If one compares the facts of modern hydrology with the data found in numerous verses of the Qur�an on this subject, one cannot fail to notice the remarkable degree of agreement between the two. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=StPobH5ODTw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KJXk6eG6Y-A https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TiLBGHwX_4c https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fluiDCYCVhw |
|
|
|
|
macoooo
Senior Member
Joined: 27 August 2014 Status: Offline Points: 564 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 February 2016 at 2:33am |
|
botany at the time of Muhammad (S) was not advanced enough in any
country for scientists to know that plants have both male and female
parts.
but in the Qur�an �(God is the One who) sent down rain from the sky and with it brought forth a variety of plants in pairs.� Qur�an, 20:53 Today we know that fruit comes from plants that have sexual characteristics even when they come from unfertilized flowers, like bananas. In the chapter ar-Ra�d we read the following: �� and of all fruits (God) placed (on the earth) two pairs.� Qur�an, 13:3 In the field of physiology, there is one verse which appears extremely significant to me. One thousand years before the discovery of the blood circulatory system, and roughly thirteen centuries before it was determined that the internal organs were nourished by the process of digestive , a verse in the Qur�an described the source of the constituents of milk, in conformity with scientific facts. To understand this verse, it must first be known that chemical reactions occur between food and enzymes in the mouth, the stomach and the intestines releasing nutrients in molecular form which are then absorbed into the circulatory system through countless microscopic projections of the intestinal wall called villi. Blood in the circulatory system then transports the nutrients to all the organs of the body, among which are the milk-producing mammary glands. This biological process must be basically understood, if we are to understand a verse in the Qur�an which has for many centuries given rise to commentaries that were totally incomprehensible. Today it is not difficult to see why! This verse is taken from the chapter an-Nahl: �Verily, in cattle there is a lesson for yon. I give you drink from their insides, coming from a conjunction between the digested contents ( of the intestines ) and the blood, milk pure and pleasant for those who drink it.� Qur�an, 16:66 The constituents of milk are secreted by the mammary glands which are nourished by the product of food digestion brought to them by the bloodstream. The initial event which sets the whole process in motion is the conjunction of the contents of the intestine and blood at the level of the intestinal wall itself. This very precise concept is the result of the discoveries made in the chemistry and physiology of the digestive system over one thousand years after the time of Prophet Muhammad (S). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d_Uy6lzQb7U https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5NzXVXSvqhw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtA4HXfcIXA |
|
|
|
|
macoooo
Senior Member
Joined: 27 August 2014 Status: Offline Points: 564 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 09 February 2016 at 12:53am |
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QJia7NND2ec
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EG-V-addeF0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sby5k7WAhy4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dHj5hlOvjAg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b5GmdSGCm_M |
|
|
|
|
macoooo
Senior Member
Joined: 27 August 2014 Status: Offline Points: 564 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 February 2016 at 1:33am |
|
the complexity of the semen and the fact that an infinitely small
quantity is required to ensure fertilization. In chapter al-Insaan the
Qur�an states:
�Verily, I created humankind from a small quantity of mingled fluids.� Qur�an, 76:2 The Arabic word nutfah has been translated as �small quantity�. It comes from the verb meaning �to dribble, to trickle� and is used to describe what remains in the bottom of a bucket which has been emptied. The verse correctly implies that fertilization is performed by only a very small volume of liquid. On the other hand, mingled fluids ( amshaaj ) has been understood by early commentators to refer to the mixture of male and female discharges. Modern authors have corrected this view and note that the sperm is made up of various components. When the Qur�an talks of a fertilizing fluid composed of different components, it also informs us that human progeny will be formed from something extracted from this liquid. This is the meaning of the following verse in chapter as-Sajdah: �Then He made [ man's ] offspring from the essence of a despised fluid.� Qur�an, 32:8 The Arabic word translated by the term �essence� is sulaalah which means �something extracted, the best part of a thing�. In whatever way it is translated, it refers to part of a whole. Under normal conditions, only one single cell, spermatozoon, out of over 50 million ejaculated by a man during sexual intercourse will actually penetrate the ovule. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LfTzVbdu2eU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pnc4woJSfk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RMQPkDKnOCM https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2eghBcXYddk |
|
|
|
|
macoooo
Senior Member
Joined: 27 August 2014 Status: Offline Points: 564 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 16 February 2016 at 2:19am |
|
Once the egg has been fertilized in the fallopian tube, it descends to
lodge itself inside the uterus. This process is called the �implantation
of the egg�. Implantation is a result of the development of
villosities, which, like roots in the soil, draw nourishment from the
wall of the uterus and make the egg literally cling to the womb. The
process of implantation is appropriately described in several verses by
the word �alaq, which is also the title of the chapter in which one of
the verses appears:
�God fashioned humans from a clinging entity.� Qur�an, 96:2 The evolution of the embryo inside the maternal uterus is only briefly described, but the description is accurate, because the simple words referring to it correspond exactly to fundamental stages in its growth. This is what we read in a verse from the chapter al-Mu�minoon: �I fashioned the clinging entity into a chewed lump of flesh and I fashioned the chewed flesh into bones and I clothed the bones with intact flesh.� Qur�an, 23:14 The term �chewed flesh� (mudghah) corresponds exactly to the appearance of the embryo at a certain stage in its development. It is known that the bones develop inside this mass and that they are then covered with muscle. This is the meaning of the term �intact flesh� (lahm). The embryo passes through a stage where some parts are in proportion and others out of proportion with what is later to become the individual. This is the obvious meaning of a verse in the chapter al-Hajj, which reads as follows: �I fashioned (humans) a clinging entity, then into a lump of flesh in proportion and out of proportion.� Qur�an, 22:5. Next, we have a reference to the appearance of the senses and internal organs in the chapter as-Sajdah: �� and (God) gave you ears, eyes and hearts.� Qur�an, 32:9 Nothing here contradicts today�s data and, furthermore, none of the mistaken ideas of the time have crept into the Qur�an. Throughout the Middle Ages there were a variety of beliefs about human development based on myths and speculations which continued for several centuries after the period. The most fundamental stage in the history of embryology came in 1651 with Harvey�s statement that �all life initially comes from an egg�. At that time, when science had benefited greatly from the invention of the microscope, people were still arguing about the respective roles of the egg and spermatozoon. Buffon, the great naturalist, was one of those in favor of the egg theory.Bonnet, on the other hand, supported the theory of �the ovaries of Eve�, which stated that Eve, the mother of the human race, was-supposed to have had inside her the seeds of all human beings packed together one inside the other. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HsD2Dnbd4ps |
|
|
|
|
macoooo
Senior Member
Joined: 27 August 2014 Status: Offline Points: 564 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 February 2016 at 4:10am |
|
comparison between modern knowledge and passages in the Qur�an that are also referred to in the Bible.
Creation We have already come across some of the contradictions between scripture and science regarding the creation of the universe. When dealing with that topic, I stressed the perfect agreement between modern knowledge and verses in the Qur�an, and pointed out that the Biblical narration contained statements that were scientifically unacceptable. This is hardly surprising if we are aware that the narration of the creation contained in the Bible was the work of priests living in the sixth century BC, hence the term �sacerdotal� ( priestly ) narration is officially used to refer to it. The narration seems to have been conceived as the theme of a sermon designed to exhort people to observe the Sabbath. The narration was constructed with a definite end in view, and as Father de Vaux (a former head of the Biblical School of Jerusalem) has noted, this end was essentially legalist in character. The Bible also contains a much shorter and older narration of Creation, the so-called �Yahvist� version, which approaches the subject from a completely different angle. They are both taken from Genesis, the first book of the Pentateuch or Torah. Moses is supposed to have been its author, but the text we have today has undergone many changes. The sacerdotal narration of Genesis is famous for its whimsical genealogies, that go back to Adam, and which nobody takes very seriously. Nevertheless, such Gospel authors as Matthew and Luke have reproduced them, more or less word-for-word, in their genealogies of Jesus. Matthew goes back as far as Abraham, and Luke to Adam. These writings are scientifically unacceptable, because they set a date for the age of the world and the time humans appeared on Earth, which most definitely contradicts what modern science has firmly established. The Qur�an, on the other hand, is completely free of dates of this kind. Earlier on, we noted how perfectly the Qur�an agrees with modern ideas on the formation of the Universe. On the other hand, the Biblical narration of primordial waters is hardly, nor is the creation of light on the first day before the creation of the stars which produce this light; the existence of an evening and a morning before the creation of the earth; the creation of the earth on the third day before that of the sun on the fourth; the appearance of beasts of the earth on the sixth day after the appearance of the birds of the air on the fifth day, although the former came first. All these statements are the result of beliefs prevalent at the time this text was written and do not have any other meaning. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eezncqgZJrY http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-SO86cs3ZXU |
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
Page <12345> |
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Topic Options