For Truth Seekers Only

Abu Mujahid wrote: Andulus It look like Hollywood horror movies..... Dahlani and his sufi cohorts put master piece of lies. It really deserve in comic/movie arena not in real Islamic debate circles. Having said that, why don't you challenge one single chapter of book?!! Or its suffice to you all these fake books that undermine towhidul Islam?. Your Kabbanism/Dahlanism dogma really want help. Only Allah can help your brain to grasp the truth.  Anway, I repeat what I said before, let Abu Mujahid stretch his legs as readers judge/enjoy reading Kitabul towhid or should I say your fake horror movies.   Abu Mujahid

Wow! More belligerent name calling, labeling, and the usual bellicose hot air! This is suprising!  Really!

As far as challenging the book, that is not a difficult task because it is poorly written. Not only will show that it is weak, but I will put up comments by others who know more than I do. The truth is, Kitab At-tawhid has never been considered a classical work, and its popularity is due to the oil money that has allowed wahabis to unload volumes of the english translations to new Muslims who do not know better. It is a similar tactic used by Missionaries. Keep in mind that the book has never been accepted by Sunni scholars (I will get into its problems at another time), it is only considered a classic by the deviants who are "wahabis".

 I have checked up the list, content of book. I found many bad points in that. That was only by looking at the index of contents. Ibne Wahhab was not any saint or Sufi or appointed by Allah for guidance. According to a hadith, on the head of every century Allah wil appoint a Mujaddid for the Ummah. So was Ibne Wahhab a mujaddid. I believe not. He was much agianst spiritualism and in favor of rituals. He was against the Sufis.

 Of course there are Pseudo Sufis too. But the original theory of Sufis is good. Wahhabis deny any Sufi business. They forget that there were ashaab e suffah in the time of the prophet s.a.w.s. They forget that it was the intensive prayers and rememberance of Allah in a cave that brought the Mercy of Allah home to the Ummah. But Wahhabis do not go near any cave.

To me they are like the Jews of the time of Hazrat Isa a.s. who were practicing the books of their Hadith more than the Torah and they had very little spiritualism in them. They were just following a line blindly and had very little love or wisdom. So they tried to pull the man of God (Jesus) on the cross.

 The Ahle hadith people in India called wahhabis do have great differences with the general body of Muslims (Ummah). These Wahhabis are far and few. Of course they do not like to be called wahhabis and I also do not intend to abuse them but it is necessary to identify them. It is bad that they say there Imam is the prophet s.a.w.s. Why they do that?? Is it not that the prophet saws is the Imam of all of us Muslims.?? That just appears to be a clever move on thir part.

I ask a question from those Ahle Hadith people and I do not say them Wahhabi. There is a Hadith, states: "Any one who did not recognise the Imam of his age will die the death of an ignorant". Is that Hadith true and valid?? Please tell. Thanks.