The terrorist

Is it very Islamic to accuse someone of some quite serious matter and then slip away from the thread when challenged?

Professor Community, substantiate your charge that I called Karl Marx a messenger of Allah. You have accused me of that and the onus is on you to prove.

Till you substantiate your charge levelled against me, you are a bogus professor, a liar without any dignity and a forger of ayaats.

It's sad that even our own devotees refused to accept Marx el Rasool Allah in their kalimeh.

My friend, that proves my point that we would not accept anyone from either side of the divide to replace our faith. We believe in the message brought to us by Rasool Allah. That's why we find it extremely difficult (in fact, impossible) to accept the divinity of Market Place or the dollar.

I have no problems with you other than your use of the ayaats to justify invasions and occupations. At times, you seem to re-invent the Koraan. I am a simple straightforward Pathaan, we take this re-invention of the Koraan thing terribly seriously. In fact, even more seriously than we take occupations by the Ferenghi.

Plus, my friend, you hold no first hand experience of being occupied. So, when you advise people to move on or invite the occupiers home for Thursady night dinners and join the American army, you leaveme little choice but to place you in the occupiers' basket.

Have you ever seen me quoting the Koraan to support my point or my credibilty? Ever?

Now let me give you a big shock. He wakes me up at the crack of Fajr each morning, in best of health, spirit and what ever else you could count. I was allowed the saddat of Hajj in 1997. I am responsible for 28 Schools (with Darul Shafqaats - Affection Centres. We don't agree with that cold word; orphanages) in three countries. A 500 acre Islamia University is now being completed in Pakistan. I have all the time in my life to read the Koraan and I do as much as I could.

But my faith is my personal matter. I do not go about plastering it or my "knowledge" of my faith around for any reason at all - least of all to gain credibility or in order to "kill" a few points with it.

Your knowledge of the Koraan is your own affair. Please, be very kind and keep it for yourself and let us, the poor invaded and the occupied, deal with what we are facing in our own way.

If you really don't like the situation in Iraq or this global terror, please, knock at Dick Cheney's door for he was the one who thought that Iraq was doable.

My best regards

Obviously you hold freedom as something unislamic, because you connect it to the indesency and sexuality of women?

Anyway not that it matters to you, but the prophet never fought for land or defending land, he fought for the defence of the faith and the faithful because of being attacked for their faith. The US is not fighting any people for their faith, but they are fighting those who justify their attacks based on their secterian beliefs. Nowhere in the koran will you be able to find one verse speaking about defending land. The Faith is the only thing worth defending if attacked because of it.

Whisper wrote: Nowhere in the koran will you be able to find one verse speaking about defending land. The Faith is the only thing worth defending if attacked because of it. I agree with you, but what does it say if the land has people on it? And, what are you supposed to do if some other bastards attack you? Just sit down like good fryable ducks and invite the marines for candle lit dinners?

Well you defend yourself if you are attacked, but these wars are waged against specific groups hiding amongst civilian population and this should ofcourse make you question if these groups are wrongly attacked or if there is a justifiable way against them. I believe that the answer to these questions is what is the cause of where one will stand in the conflict, either as an enemy to the US or a peacemaker. and opposer of the hardcore terrorists and their supporters.