![]() |
quran and science |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 2021222324 26> |
Author | |||||
Matt Browne ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Male Joined: 19 April 2010 Location: Germany Status: Offline Points: 937 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||||
Smart Muslims in the middle ages translated the works of Greek scientists. Less smart Muslims thought and still think that scientific revelations can be found in holy books.
|
|||||
A religion that's intolerant of other religions can't be the world's best religion --Abdel Samad
Great minds discuss ideas. Average minds discuss events. Small minds discuss people--Eleanor Roosevelt |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
airmano ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 31 March 2014 Status: Offline Points: 884 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||||
Good luck TG,
The trick is always the same: By deviating on claims which are not(!) laid down in the "Clear Book", (as here the word "minimum" which magically pops out of the void) there is always an escape lane, since there is simply no[t much] precise and scientifically testable, information in the Quran to start with. There are good reasons that modern scientific books contain often hundreds of pages to explain a given knowledge. Thinking that complex knowledge can be compressed into two or three vague lines makes the respective believers feel good, but in the end it only shows their ignorance. It is like a blank screen with a few unstructured lines on it: You can interpret the most marvellous pictures into it ( Picasso, the Orbitals of the Hydrogen atom/electron, the backside of the moon: feel free to choose...) and nobody can prove your interpretation wrong. However: It still remains a blank screen with only a few chaotic lines on it. Everybody can see that, except for those who were brain-washed in order to read a specific interpretation into it. Time to lean back for a while now, having a little chuckle from time to time. Airmano Edited by airmano - 25 January 2015 at 4:09am |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
TG12345 ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Male Joined: 16 December 2012 Status: Offline Points: 1146 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||||
Why did I use the word "usually"? Because the average term of pregnancy is 9 months, or 9.25 lunar months. http://www.webmd.com/baby/news/20060323/typical-pregnancy-now-39-weeks-not-40 My choice of the word "usually" to describe 9 months being the period of pregnancy has nothing to do with the verse, 9 months not mentioned in the verse.
Thank you for sharing. The source states that a baby can be viable at the earliest during the 6th month. That doesn't mean that 6 months is the minimum length of gestation, and two of the Companions of Muhammad who became Caliphs did not understand it that way either. I will cite two tafsirs of this verse, tafsir Ibn Qathir and Maulana Maududi's commentary. And (the period of) his gestation and weaning is thirty months,) `Ali, may Allah be pleased with him, used this Ayah along with the following two Ayat to prove that the minimum period of pregnancy (gestation) is six months: ﴿وَفِصَالُهُ فِى عَامَيْنِ﴾ (And his weaning is in two years.) (31:14) and ﴿وَالْوَلِدَتُ يُرْضِعْنَ أَوْلَـدَهُنَّ حَوْلَيْنِ كَامِلَيْنِ لِمَنْ أَرَادَ أَن يُتِمَّ الرَّضَاعَةَ﴾ (The mothers suckle their children two complete years -- for those who desire to complete the term of suckling. ) (2:233) This is a strong and valid conclusion, and it was approved by `Uthman and a number of the Companions. Muhammad bin Ishaq bin Yasar narrated from Ba`jah bin `Abdullah Al-Juhani that a man from his tribe (Juhaynah) married a woman from Juhaynah. She delivered a baby after six months. So her husband went to `Uthman, may Allah be pleased with him, and told him about that. Thus, `Uthman summoned her. When she was getting dressed, her sister started crying. She asked her: "Why do you cry By Allah, no one has ever approached me (for sexual relations) of Allah's creation except him (my husband). So let Allah decree (for me) as He wills.'' When she was brought before `Uthman, he commanded that she be stoned to death (for adultery). `Ali heard of this, came to `Uthman, and said: "What are you doing'' He (`Uthman) said: "She delivered after six months! Can this ever happen'' `Ali, may Allah be pleased with him, said: "Don't you read the Qur'an'' He said: "Yes, of course!'' He (`Ali) then said: `Haven't you heard Allah's saying, ﴿وَحَمْلُهُ وَفِصَـلُهُ ثَلاَثُونَ شَهْراً﴾ (and his gestation and weaning is thirty months), and; ﴿حَوْلَيْنِ كَامِلَيْنِ﴾ ( two complete years) (2:233) (Subtracting the two numbers) we are only left with six months.'' `Uthman, may Allah be pleased with him, said: "By Allah, I did not see that! Bring the woman back.'' But they found that she had already been killed. Ba`jah continued: "By Allah, no two crows and no two eggs are more similar than that child turned out to be to his father! When his father saw that he said, `By Allah! This is my son without any doubt.' Later on, Allah afflicted him with a skin abscess in his face (because of his false accusation to his wife). It kept eating him up until he died.'' Ibn Abi Hatim related from his father that Farwah bin Abi Al-Maghra' told them that `Ali bin Mushir narrated to them from Dawud bin Abi Hind, who narrated from `Ikrimah that Ibn `Abbas, may Allah be pleased with him, said, "When a woman delivers after nine months, the baby will only need twenty-one months of suckling. When she delivers after seven months, the baby will need twenty-three months of suckling. When she delivers after six months, the baby will need two full years of suckling, because Allah says, ﴿وَحَمْلُهُ وَفِصَـلُهُ ثَلاَثُونَ شَهْراً حَتَّى إِذَا بَلَغَ أَشُدَّهُ﴾ (and his gestation and weaning is thirty months, till when he attains full strength).'' meaning, he becomes strong, youthful, and attains full ability. http://www.qtafsir.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2042&Itemid=102This verse tells that although the children should serve both the mother and the father, the mother's right is greater in importance, on the ground that she undergoes greater hardships for the sake of the children. The same is borne out by a Hadith, which has been related with a little variation in wording in Bukhari, Muslim, Abu Da'ud, Tirmidhi, Ibn Majah, Musnad Ahmad, and in Adab al-Mufrad of Imam Bukhari, to the effect that a person asked the Holy Prophet: "Who has got a greater right to my service? The Holy Prophet replied: Your mother. He asked: Who after her? He replied: Your mother. He asked: Who after her? He replied: Your mother. He asked: Who after her? He replied: Your father; " This Hadith precisely explains this verse, for in it also allusion has been made to the triple right of the mother: (1) His mother bore him with hardship; (2) she gave him birth with hardship; and (3) his bearing and his weaning took thirty months. Another legal point also is derived from this verse and verse 14 of Surah Luqman and verse 233 of Al-Baqarah, which was pointed out by Hadrat `Ali and Hadrat Ibn 'Abbas in a law case and made Hadrat `Uthman change his decision. The story goes that during the caliphate of Hadrat `Uthman (may Allah be pleased with him) a person married a woman from the Juhainah tribe, and just six months after the marriage she gave birth to a healthy and sound child. The man took the case before Hadrat `Uthman, who declared the woman to be an adultress and ordered that she be stoned to death. On hearing this Hadrat `Ali immediately came to Hadrat `Uthman and asked: What sort of a decision have you given ? He replied: She has given birth to a sound child six months after marriage. Is it not a clear .proof of her being an adultress? Hadrat `Ali did not agree, and recited the three above mentioned verses in their sequence. In Surah Al-Baqarah Allah says: 'The mothers shall suckle their children for two whole in years, if the fathers desire the suckling to be completed." In Surah Luqman it is said: "And his weaning took two years," and in Surah AI-Ahqaf: "And his bearing and his weaning took thirty months." Now, if two years of suckling are taken away from 30 months, six months of bearing remain. This shows that the minimum period of pregnancy in which a sound child can be born is six months. Therefore, the woman who has given birth to a child six months after the marriage cannot be declared an adulteress . On hearing this reasoning of Hadrat 'Ali, Hadrat 'Uthman admitted that he had not considered that thing at all. Then he recalled the woman and changed his decision. According to another tradition, Ibn 'Abbas also supported the reasoning of Hadrat 'Ali and then Hadrat 'Uthman changed his decision. (Ibn Jarir, Ahkam al-Qur an by al-Jassas Ibn Kathir). The following legal injunctions are derived from the three verses when they are read together: The woman who gives birth to a sound and complete child in less than six months after marriage (i.e. in a proper delivery and not abortion) will be declared an adulteress and her child's lineage from her husband will not be established. (2) The woman who delivers a sound and complete child six months or more after marriage, cannot be accused of adultery only on the basis of the child birth, nor can her husband have the right to slander her, nor can he refuse to acknowledge fatherhood of the child; the child will certainly be recognized as his, and the woman will not be punished. (3) The maximum period for fosterage is two years. If a woman has suckled a child after this age, she will not be regarded as his foster mother, nor will the injunctions pertaining to fosterage (An-Nisa: 23) be applicable to her. In this regard, Imam Abu Hanifah has out of caution proposed the period of two and a half years instead of two years so that there remains no chance of error in a delicate matter like the prohibition of the foster relations. (For explanation, see E N. 23 of Surah Luqman). Here, it
would be useful to know that according to the latest medical
research a child needs at least 28 weeks to remain in the mother's
womb to be developed and delivered as a living baby. This period
amounts to a little more than 6 months. The Islamic law has allowed
a concession of about half a month, because a woman's being declared
an adulteress and a child's being deprived of lineage is a grave
matter, and its gravity demands that maximum period be allowed to
save both the mother and the child from its legal consequences.
Furthermore, no physician and no judge, not even the pregnant woman
herself and the man impregnating her, can know as to when exactly
did the conception take place. This thing also demands that a few
more days be allowed in determining the minimum Legal period of
pregnancy. http://englishtafsir.com/Quran/46/index.html#sdfootnote19sym
Hopefully, I have made clear why I used the word "usually". It had nothing to do with the Quranic text. I can see why you used the word "minimum", and I have showed you how this verse was interpreted by the Caliphs, who actually knew Muhammad. 6 months being the minimum means that a viable child can be born at the earliest 6 months after marriage. Here is another point to consider- if gestation + weaning and nursing (2:233 states that nursing is 2 years so 46:15 by weaning means weaning+nursing) is 30 months and gestation is 2 years, that would mean that the only children who are advised to be nursed and weaned for two years are babies who are born 6 months after marriage. The average child then needs only 21 months of breastfeeding. However, we know from the World Health Organization that babies, in particular babies from developing countries, benefit from two years or more of breastfeeding. Breastfeeding is the normal way of providing young infants with the nutrients they need for healthy growth and development. Virtually all mothers can breastfeed, provided they have accurate information, and the support of their family, the health care system and society at large. Colostrum, the yellowish, sticky breast milk produced at the end of pregnancy, is recommended by WHO as the perfect food for the newborn, and feeding should be initiated within the first hour after birth. Exclusive breastfeeding is recommended up to 6 months of age, with continued breastfeeding along with appropriate complementary foods up to two years of age or beyond. http://www.who.int/topics/breastfeeding/en/ Key facts
Health effectsPriscilla Colletto stated in Beyond Toddlerhood: The Breastfeeding Relationship Continues, "The adverse health effects of weaning a child before or during toddlerhood are well documented for Third World countries such as Guinea-Bissau, where children who were no longer breastfed at ages 12�35 months had a 3.5 times higher mortality rate than did their peers who continued to breastfeed."[171] Dr. Laurence Grummer-Strawn, widely known in the breastfeeding research and advocacy communities,[172] observed that breastfeeding is protective against diarrheal diseases and other infections and that breastfed children aged 12 to 36 months in Indonesia have much greater mid-arm circumference than children who have been weaned at an early age. He also noted that the incidence of malnourishment in breastfed Indonesian children is 3�5% less common than generally encountered in early-weened children. In one study, artificially fed infants had 2 to 3 times as many episodes of significant illnesses (defined as "otitis media, lower respiratory disease, significant vomiting or diarrhea, and any illness requiring hospital admission").[151] In traditional human societies, the lack of nutrients missing in breast milk such as iron, zinc, and vitamin b12 was supplemented through premastication and feeding of meat to the child.[173][174] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BreastfeedingIf God is the Quran's author, why would He give advice to parents to nurse for a shorter time than is necessary to provide their children with the best health? A parent in a developing country who follows the Quran's advice that the term of weaning is to last 2 years and that weaning + gestation is 30 months, is unintentionally bringing harm to their kid. Edited by TG12345 - 30 January 2015 at 9:35pm |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
Quranexplorer ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Male Joined: 09 May 2014 Status: Offline Points: 152 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||||
Now that the objective part of the discussion has been cleared that there is no basis to establish anything wrong with the mentioned Quranic verses as 6 months gestation is a fact, for me the crux of the matter is concluded.
What is remaining is the subjective part where the arguments are mostly based on personal opinions and usually a definitive conclusion is difficult. I would prefer not to waste much time on such discussions as only Allah knows the best, however, Insha Allah I can present my reasons as and when time permits. Again thanks TG for sharing those tafsirs and commentary. First of all, on a related note, I would like to put to perspective two specific characteristics of the Quran that sets it apart from any of the human works: 1. Instead of stating the obvious, Quran gives a vital information which was not available at its time of revelation, that helps man make a better judgement--even though the quoted tafsirs are self explanatory for those who look for the right cues, it is amazing to note how the Quranic verses here far exceed the normal human wisdom by mentioning a 6 months gestation. While a 9 months gestation is what usually observed and what a normal human would tend to mention, especially some 1,400 years ago, the Quran here gives a 6 months gestation which then provided for a legal framework to judge the legitimacy of a child and is now an acknowledged fact in modern times. 2. a very careful selection of words to state the facts--this is another amazing characteristic of the Quran that the underlying facts in the Quranic verses are always stated using the best selection of words that it stands the test of time in all circumstances. Now coming to my link, I just gave it for a reference to let you know that 6 months gestation is a fact as per modern day knowledge. Now if you have a look at the below two quotes, you can see for yourself that modern knowledge itself gives contradicting information on the minimum gestation--in one place it says "during" 6 months and in another place "after" six months. So which one do you take here for reference? However, I won't blame science or medicine for their failure to give an accurate figure as these are things beyond absolute human judgement as you mentioned below. So I won't waste my time on such discussions as "during", "after" etc. unless you can establish a unanimous figure which is impossible in this case. I think the Islamic Law providing about half a month concession here provides the best reasonable way given the element of uncertainty with the exact date of conception.
Coming to the weaning period:
The Quranic verses are very clear. The weaning period is expressly mentioned as 2 years. So there is no question of Quran advising a lower duration. Now comes the human judgement which is subjective--whether you want to follow something that is expressly mentioned and you know with your reason that is the best thing to do in a situation, or to look for an interpretation which gives you an inferior result. And again the 2 years weaning period mentioned in Quran 1,400 years ago is in perfect agreement with the modern day studies on this subject--more signs for those who wish to think in the right direction! |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
Quranexplorer ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Male Joined: 09 May 2014 Status: Offline Points: 152 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||||
Now that you have agreed that you can't possibly prove a Quranic statement wrong conclusively (not even one!), I think you could try another challenge: Why don't you produce a book similar? Even though you have an unfair advantage of the modern day knowledge of over 1,400 years over the Quran, and we would expect you to produce something better, I think we can manage if you can produce something similar at least. And don't worry how this will be judged, it will be judged the same way as the Quran--by its power to transform human minds. Till then, it's only empty bottles making noise--and sure they make quite some noise ![]() |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
Quranexplorer ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Male Joined: 09 May 2014 Status: Offline Points: 152 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||||
Really? We don't see many of the Quranic scientific references in the Greek works and moreover the Quran is strikingly devoid of all the misconceptions that Greeks had! And further that leaves one to wonder why those who think themselves smarter still only have generic statements to defend their claims. Nobody can conclusively prove a statement wrong in Quran and whenever we get to specifics on the scientific references, these self proclaimed smart guys are left wanting for arguments! |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
airmano ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 31 March 2014 Status: Offline Points: 884 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||||
QE
Chuckle point for QE!! ![]() -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I take the challenge! To prove that one can do better it is sufficient to provide one verse. Here we go: Old pond A frogs jumps in The sound of water! (Matsuo Basho) No doubt, much better than any verse from the Quran!
Ah and by the way: I guess that going by the numbers Karl Marx's "Das Kapital" has probably transformed more human minds than the Quran - not to talk about the Bible. Airmano Edited by airmano - 31 January 2015 at 8:56am |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
Tim the plumber ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Male Joined: 30 September 2014 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 944 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||||
First off, can you produce a Koranic statement which says something about the world which would be impressive in a science sense? Then we could have a go at showing it to be wrong. If we can't it gets respect. Second, I recommend the book "Guns Germs and Steel". It's a history book. I think that the effect of it has been to counter the tendency for the world to become a single state. That it has produced a very good argument for the advantages of division and diversity. It is not fault free. Since it's writing the prehistory of the Americas has been better understood. The first humans there were indeed the earlier ones. There seems to have been a meteor strike which set all the Americas on fire destroying all the habitats and killing off the large animals. Thirdly, if you are after a book which has definitely and drastically changed the world then either "The competitive advantage of nations" by Adam Smith or "Principia Mathematica" by Isaac Newton. Both world shaking. |
|||||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 2021222324 26> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |