IslamiCity.org Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Religion - Islam > Interfaith Dialogue
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Postcard to Angela  What is Islam What is Islam  Donate Donate
  FAQ FAQ  Quran Search Quran Search  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Postcard to Angela

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234>
Author
Message
ak_m_f View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior  Member
Avatar

Joined: 15 October 2005
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 3272
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ak_m_f Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 April 2006 at 10:50am
Originally posted by fredifreeloader fredifreeloader wrote:

akmf - he is torrencedelay.� have you never heard of the great torrencedelay?


O, Yes I have. sorry about not recognizing you (TD), hope you forgive me�.. Your majesty
Back to Top
Torrencedelay View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Avatar
Joined: 18 April 2006
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 39
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Torrencedelay Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 April 2006 at 10:56am
ak_m_f     Oh, so your in Canada, are you. Whereabouts?
Debate is an art form
Back to Top
Angela View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior  Member
Avatar

Joined: 11 July 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 2555
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Angela Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 April 2006 at 3:03pm

Servetus,

I did appreciate the comment and took it for exactly as you meant it.  I saw the irony there and enjoyed every minute.  Thank you.

Oh, and the Veiling the Virgins link you posted is not on my interfaith womens website. 

Ang

Back to Top
Servetus View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior  Member

Male
Joined: 04 April 2001
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2109
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Servetus Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 April 2006 at 6:59pm

�More the pity that pointing out truth is considered an insult.�

You mean, like telling one�s wife, correction, ex-wife, that her new dress actually does make her look fat?

�Those who are unable to defend their viewpoint shouldn't engage in debate.�

Perhaps I shouldn�t have.  Sometimes, I miss her!

�It is not for the oversensitive and thin skinned.�

But is it, by any chance, as in her case, for the only slightly (but nevertheless beguilingly) overweight?

�If you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen.�

I could stand the heat but, after our debate, she kicked me out of the kitchen.  Pity, that, because, being the inveterate Political Progressive and superb cook that she was, she had just invited a group of her (and our), well, �fabulous� literary friends over for some of her to-die-for madelaines and for a select reading of Marcel Proust.

On second thought, I don�t actually miss her all that much and might rather, at least tonight, eat some Toll House cookies, or biscuits, and sit around and watch ESPN.

�Debate is an art form.�

Variant:  �If one debates another�s form, one had best do it artfully.�

Serv



Edited by Servetus
Back to Top
ak_m_f View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior  Member
Avatar

Joined: 15 October 2005
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 3272
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ak_m_f Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 April 2006 at 7:15pm
Originally posted by Torrencedelay Torrencedelay wrote:

More the pity that pointing out truth is considered an insult.� Those who are unable to defend their viewpoint shouldn't engage in debate.� It is not for the oversensitive and thin skinned.


If you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen.



sounds like you got kicked out of the forum... I mean kitchen
Back to Top
George View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 14 April 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 406
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote George Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 April 2006 at 6:48am
Originally posted by Servetus Servetus wrote:

Observation:  Some Christians at times seem quick to deride every absurd doctrine that they cannot claim as their own or as having originated with them.  I close with a select reading from the troubled Tertullian: 

 ï¿½ï¿½credibile est, quia ineptum est��

[�� because it is absurd, it is to be believed ��]

Serv

When Tertullian said this he was speaking of the Crucifixion and Resurrection of the Lord.

"And the Son of God died; it is by all means to be believed, because it is absurd. And he was buried and rose again; the fact is certain because it is impossible." (De Carne Christi)

The Context:

De Carne Christi means From Christ's Flesh (Latin) is a text against the Gnostic docetism of Marcion, Apelles, Valentinus and Alexander. Tert. argues that the body of Christ was a real human body, was born just like any other human being, but Jesus wasn't conceived in the regular way, e.g., sexual relations.

 

The rest of the quote:

Crucifixus est dei filius; non pudet, quia pudendum est. Et mortuus est dei filius; credibile prorsus est, quia ineptum est. Et sepultus resurrexit; certum est, quia impossibile.

The Son of God was crucified: I am not ashamed--because it is shameful. The Son of God died: it is immediately credible--because it is silly. He was buried, and rose again: it is certain--because it is impossible.

 

The usual implication is that Tertullian believed in Christianity because it was absurd.  Tertullian thought nothing of the kind.

 

Have any of you had discussions with atheists or agnostics?  I have.  They say that Christians and Muslims and members of other faiths believe in the absurd; that we believe in fairy tales and the like.

 

They say that the virgin birth of Jesus is absurd, and on an on and on, but we know that nothing is impossible for God.

 

Do you understand?

 

I didn't find any humor here.

Back to Top
Servetus View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior  Member

Male
Joined: 04 April 2001
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2109
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Servetus Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 April 2006 at 7:59am

If I had wanted to use the �usual� rationalistic criticism against Tertullian, George, I might have brought the customary misquote: credo quia absurdum est ("I believe because it is absurd").

�The usual implication is that Tertullian believed in Christianity because it was absurd.  Tertullian thought nothing of the kind.�

Thanks.  For purposes of this discussion, I have already narrowed the focus from Christianity in general to the specific claim of the resurrection and, by implication, crucifixion of Christ (see above).  This claim Tertullian certainly does acknowledge as absurd and, because absurd, believable. 

�When Tertullian said this he was speaking of the Crucifixion and Resurrection of the Lord.�

Thanks.  Repeat.

"And the Son of God died; it is by all means to be believed, because it is absurd. And he was buried and rose again; the fact is certain because it is impossible." ([Tertullian] De Carne Christi)

Speaking of those usual implications, I can certainly see how and why some hard-core Rationalists latch onto this one.  Following Tertullian�s lead, I suppose I should believe in, say, walking, talking and seducing snakes also because, being impossible, they are therefore a fact.  Or, what�s more, develop a credo which states:  �a doctrine is believable only to the extent that it is absurd; ergo, that doctrine which is most absurd is most worthy of belief.�  Why, if one were truly given to mockery, there is no end to what one could do with a syllogism of this type!

�Have any of you had discussions with atheists or agnostics?�

When as an infant, I cut my first set of teeth in academia and then later cut my second set on Wall Street, so to speak.

�I have.�

So have I.

�They say that Christians and Muslims and members of other faiths believe in the absurd; that we believe in fairy tales and the like.�

Yes, in fact, they often do.  But then again, you guys also sometimes say that about each other as well. 

�They say that the virgin birth of Jesus is absurd, and on an on and on, but we know that nothing is impossible for God.�

Agreed.

�Do you understand?�

Yes, I do.  To a point.

�I didn't find any humor here.�

To my view, there is nothing particularly unusual about that.  Thus far, you simply fit the preponderant and characteristic pattern that I referred to above.  Thanks, in any case, for the post-card, and welcome to the discussions.

Servetus



Edited by Servetus
Back to Top
George View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 14 April 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 406
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote George Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 April 2006 at 9:30am

Servetus,

Following Tertullian�s lead, I suppose I should believe in, say, walking, talking and seducing snakes also because, being impossible, they are therefore a fact.  Or, what�s more, develop a credo which states:  �a doctrine is believable only to the extent that it is absurd; ergo, that doctrine which is most absurd is most worthy of belief.� 

Nonsense.

Should I as an atheist believe in angels?  Angels who appear in bushes that are on fire; angels appearing to the prophet of Islam in a cave?  Many religious beliefs are absurd to unbelievers.

We must be able to discuss subjects in a cordial manner, would't you agree?

Peace.

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd.