![]() |
Rationality in the Trinity |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 678910 20> |
Author | ||
George ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 14 April 2006 Status: Offline Points: 406 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
It is true that Christians believe in ONE GOD. You can get views about the logic of the trinity on the Internet. And some have presented the logical view and some analogies to get the point across in response to your request. I believe that intelligent Jews understand the logic of the trinity (I have spoken to many) but they reject it. Rejecting it is different than saying it isn't logical. We humans are sometimes at a loss to understand the things that God can do and has done. The virgin birth of Jesus is not logical, but God managed to do it because nothing is too hard for him to do. We can say that the virgin birth is not logical, but true at the same time. It is a useless exercise to find fault with trinity analogies. None of them are perfect, because we cannot explain God by using analogies. He is beyond that. Analogies are meant as illustrations of specific points, not complete one-to-one mirrors of an entire reality. A Christian does not have to be able to explain the trinity. I look only to Jesus. What did Jesus say? Jesus spoke of the Father, of the Son and of the Holy Spirit. In the Gospel of John Jesus said that the Holy Spirit of God was in the world and he goes on to say that this same Holy Spirit indwells Christian believers. Can I explain how God's spirit indwells believers? No. Did Jesus explain how it happens? No, but Jesus believed it. All a Christian needs to know is that there is one God and that this God is one Being and that this one God was incarnate in Jesus Christ and that this one God is working today inside or indwelling Christians all over the world. |
||
![]() |
||
Angel ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 03 July 2001 Status: Offline Points: 6641 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Ok, but you might like to explain what you mean by incarnate. Where does it say in scriptures that God was incarnate in Jesus ? (or that God is in us today)? To say that God was incarnate in Jesus is to say that Jesus became God, and its in correct, I have already meantioned that Jesus never said he was God according to scriptures, he never stated he was. I agreed to your point until I got to that point of incarnation. |
||
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
George ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 14 April 2006 Status: Offline Points: 406 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
You can find articles on the Internet that will help you with the incarnation. Read the first Chapter of John. The Word became flesh for starters. Jesus did not become God. God incarnated Jesus. I have already meantioned that Jesus never said he was God according to scriptures, he never stated he was. I disagree with you. He did not use those exact words, but Jesus made claims that only God can claim. You can find them on the Internet too. What faith are you Angel? |
||
![]() |
||
Israfil ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 08 September 2003 Status: Offline Points: 3984 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I have to disagree with Angel in saying that the Trinity is an ambiguous concept even within the Catholic Church. The philosophy from this concept has been practiced by Eastern and Western Churches for around 1500 years. Even Constantine ordered all members within his empire to believe in this philosophy, to not conform was considered heresy and the penalty was death. For those of you not clear on the Trinity, the Trinity is The Father, whom is God, who is eternal and absolute. The Son whom is considered "Logos" or the Word incarnate as Jesus of Nazareth and Holy Spirit or in Hebrew known as Ruah Haqodesh. The Trinity is composed of three divine persons, who are co-eternal yet are distinct in nature in personae. These distinct persons are known as hypostases which is the belief that Jesus had a duel nature of being God and human. The Islamic opinion here on this matter is that the foundation of the principle which the trinity stands are not at issue, but that there exist within this concept plurality. God is made in this matter divisible by 3 which defies the concept of God's Oneness. Although Christian say God is one there are some discrepencies when the matter is divided into three. God in the trinity is One and eternal but has two other aspects which are considered "co-eternal" with the father. The fact that there exist others that are "co-eternal" with God is a problem. Hence, the response that the trinity implies a form of historical paganism which we find in Rome in the city of Baalbeck having temples that showed reverence to the planets: Jupiter Venus and Mercury. As I mentioned earlier that no Christian has yet to prove the trinity logically. I have seen attempts earlier using the H2o example, and however that seemed like a plausible argument it is again a logical flalacy. Although the gaseous and vaporous states of water are "similar" because of the main element: Water the three states are different. Water which can be vapor (gas), liquid and solid are three aspects of water however those aspects, in their individual state are different. Here we find a plurality based on the state of water in various circumstances. If I were to say that h2o is One and there is no plurality in this, my argumenet goes that water cannnot change from state to state it is thus consistent on its existence. Also when we say "God is absolute" yet believe in the trinity we contradict absolute. We are therefore saying God does not change in being absolute. Hence we contradict that. I have seen Chritians here use the argumenet of God's omnipotence. We Muslims do not deny the omnipotence of God, however this argument does not run a justification of plurality either. The Jews had it right in the Sh'ma in saying that there is only One LORD. When God says that he is one he is therefore declaring his absolute sovereignty and his state of existence. Edited by Israfil |
||
![]() |
||
Sign*Reader ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 02 November 2005 Status: Offline Points: 3352 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
OK here is some background on the Trintarianism. I would say it is moronic debating H2O nonsense. A dead human soul can rationalize anything when it comes to justification of his actions stemming from the evil of his soul. The trinity concept has been the main stay of the socities of of old and new and it is not going away any time soon till Jesus reappears and clears thsi gods combo cz it fits so well in the materialistic and debauched socities. You can see the socities with trinitarian cultic background do have more affinity than with others.
There are souls available to be swayed by greed, and vile is the price for which they sell and debase their souls. Read on>>>>>>>>>>> The Trinity-Theological Thoughts Pre-Roman Latium worshipped her as the Capitoline Triad
under the collective name of Uni, �The One,� a cognate of yoni. Her three personae were Juventas the Virgin,
Juno the Mother, and Menarva or Minerva the wise Crone. Under the empire, Juventas was ousted to make
room for a masculine member of the trinity, Jupiter. (See, Georges Dumezil, Archaic Roman Religion
at 116). Some modern scholars refer to
the two-female, one-male Capitoline Triad of the later period as �three gods� �
as if they might describe a group of two women and one man as �three men.� (See, J.B. Carter, The Religious Life of
Ancient
The Goddess Triformis ruled heaven as Virgin, earth as
Mother, and the underworld as Crone, or Hel, or Queen of the Shades. This was remembered even in Chaucer�s time,
for his Palamon invoked her �Three Forms,� Luna in heaven, Diana on earth,
Proserpine in hell. (See, Chaucer, The Bardic romances abounded in manifestations of the Triple Goddess. Wayland the Smith married her, after she first appeared to him as three magic doves. (See, Thomas Keightley, The World Guide to Gnomes, Fairies, Elves and Other Little People at 215) King Arthur went to Avalon with her. The triadic Guinevere was another version of her. Sir Marhaus (Mars) encountered her as the Three Damosels at their magic fountain: the eldest �threesome winters of age, wearing a garland of gold; the second thirty winters of age, wearing a circlet of gold; the youngest fifteen winters of age, wearing a wreath of flowers.� (See, Sir Thomas Malory, Le Morte d�Arthur at 1, 115). Fifteen was the number of the pagan Virgin Kore, the pentacle in the apple. Mythic virgin mothers, like that of Zoroaster, typically gave birth at the age of fifteen. Double that was the Mother�s age, double again the age of the Crone. The notion of a trinity appeared during the 14th century
B.C., a popular Babylonian trinity was composed of Shamash, Sin, and Ishtar �
Sun, Moon, and Star. In Gnostic versions of the trinity followed the
Father-Mother-Son patterns of the contemporary east, with the Holy Ghost
recognized as a female Sophia, the Dove, worshipped as the Great Goddess in During the Christian era, all-male trinities became popular among Germanic tribes. Woden, Thor, and Saxnot were worshipped together by the Saxons of the 8th and 9th centuries. Norsemen called them Odin, Tyr, and Frey. According to a certain fragmentary myth, the Triple Goddess seems to have burned as a witch. She had to be burned to ashes three times. Afterward, youth, beauty, and love in the person of Freya departed from Asgard; and there was war in heaven. (See, Brian Branston, Gods of the North at 112, 213-14). |
||
Kismet Domino: Faith/Courage/Liberty/Abundance/Selfishness/Immorality/Apathy/Bondage or extinction.
|
||
![]() |
||
Israfil ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 08 September 2003 Status: Offline Points: 3984 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Interestng post. As I have known already what this shows is that the "trinity" is not a new concept to religion but has existed in many other societies.
|
||
![]() |
||
fredifreeloader ![]() Guest Group ![]() ![]() Joined: 17 February 2006 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 456 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
no it is certainly not new. it has existed from eternity, in fact. infidels like to claim that the holy faith of Christ has borrowed from paganism, failing to understand that God came first, before any paganism. pagan notions are corruptions of the truth, not the inspiration for the truth
|
||
for i am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth - romans 1: 16
|
||
![]() |
||
Israfil ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 08 September 2003 Status: Offline Points: 3984 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Well, nobody here is talking about the Christian foundation as being borrowed from paganism, however the foundation which Christianity came from which is Judaism, was not founded on a trinitarian ideology. I have already refuted how incompatible the trinity is with foundational monotheism.
|
||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 678910 20> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |