Aftermath of USA'S Insincerity. - Event Date: 12 September 2012

Message Topic Search Topic Options Post Reply Create New Topic Printable Version Translate Topic

   Assalamu alaikum.

It is unfortunate that the American Ambassador to Libya has lost his life through the actions of those claiming to be followers of Muhammad Rasulullah. As, a representative of Muhammad, he has never allowed or prescribed helping associating listening to a tyrant or any system of governance not in accordance to what Allah prescribed in the Torah principally Exodus 23:1-9.
The Ambassador must have been killed by his people- the United states of America. The weapons used were manufactured in USA. The USA prefers to aid Muslim countries with weapons and not with Qur'anic education on the Sunna of Muhammad Rasulullah. If the USA had followed the Sunna of Muhammad in not manufacturing weapons and that helping unjust rulers is a sin, how could their ambassador be killed? 
As for the film maker, he was wrong to have used the word Islam. He could have said: The followers of Muhammad in this century.  Realistic criticism is allowed and is always welcomed in the teaching of Muhammad. Let the West objectively criticize the followers of Muhammad according to their actions and not the name Muhammad. But how can this be justified while their Governments prefers the followers of Muhammad to be treated unjustly by their leaders? What is the recompense of oppression and hypocrisy?

Friendship.

Author	Message Topic Search Topic Options Post Reply Create New Topic Printable Version Translate Topic
Friendship Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Senior Member Joined: 24 August 2008 Status: Offline Points: 884	Post Options Post Reply Quote Friendship Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Calendar Event: Aftermath of USA'S Insincerity. Posted: 12 September 2012 at 2:33am
	Assalamu alaikum. It is unfortunate that the American Ambassador to Libya has lost his life through the actions of those claiming to be followers of Muhammad Rasulullah. As, a representative of Muhammad, he has never allowed or prescribed helping associating listening to a tyrant or any system of governance not in accordance to what Allah prescribed in the Torah principally Exodus 23:1-9. The Ambassador must have been killed by his people- the United states of America. The weapons used were manufactured in USA. The USA prefers to aid Muslim countries with weapons and not with Qur'anic education on the Sunna of Muhammad Rasulullah. If the USA had followed the Sunna of Muhammad in not manufacturing weapons and that helping unjust rulers is a sin, how could their ambassador be killed? As for the film maker, he was wrong to have used the word Islam. He could have said: The followers of Muhammad in this century. Realistic criticism is allowed and is always welcomed in the teaching of Muhammad. Let the West objectively criticize the followers of Muhammad according to their actions and not the name Muhammad. But how can this be justified while their Governments prefers the followers of Muhammad to be treated unjustly by their leaders? What is the recompense of oppression and hypocrisy? Friendship.