Letter to Iran

Does agreeing with Netanyahu's position make someone out to be a patsy of Netanyahu? 
This article seems to be suggesting that the senator only took this action because he 'got paid' to do it.
Are they suggesting that Netanyahu himself wrote the letter?

And, lets not overlook the fact that 47 senators signed on to it.
Isn't it just possible that a junior senator was willing to go out on a limb because he believed in his cause, and would receive a valuable contribution for doing so?
If this is a newbie, a young idealistic senator, and particularly from the state of Arkansas, which in my opinion is a state which still seeks to adhere to high ideals and principles... then it would not surprise me at all.
and yes, most people do not take big risks unless they see value in the payoff... whether that payoff be monetary, or moral... so I don't think it is right to slant the issue as this article has done.... that is... 'if anything is in favor of anything Jewish, then it must have been done by the Jews'...

What if that opinion had been held when blacks were fighting for their rights?  What if every time a white person spoke in favor of 'black rights' it was said and believed that 'Ohhhh.... there must be a black person behind it somewhere, pulling the strings'?
Can people act merely on their own strong moral convictions?

jmo,
Caringheart


Edited by Caringheart - 12 March 2015 at 5:05pm