IslamiCity.org Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Religion - Islam > Interfaith Dialogue
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - AnnieTwo: I do not wish to spoil  What is Islam What is Islam  Donate Donate
  FAQ FAQ  Quran Search Quran Search  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

AnnieTwo: I do not wish to spoil

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 9>
Author
Message
BMZ View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: 03 April 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 1852
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote BMZ Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: AnnieTwo: I do not wish to spoil
    Posted: 13 June 2006 at 8:42am

the Jesus, Paul and Women thread but wish to ask you here, the following:

You wrote to Cassandra:"Read everything, think, meditate, decide how it affects you, and then you are in a position to criticise.  That's a motto of mine - I do try to make it work." followed by "Don't stop thinking."

I have never stopped thinking and I read everything, even the fine print, I meditate and think about the words, etc and then I get ready to criticise. That was a good advice to her, I like it.

Could you please explain the following contradiction  in the NT when Jesus is arrested? Only John gives this narrative, the other three don't:

18:6When Jesus said, "I am he", they drew back and fell to the ground.

What happened, what did they see that made them fall down? Was there any transfiguration of his face? Keep in mind that the other three writers did not know about this at all.

Next comes18:8"I told you that I am he," Jesus answered. "If you are looking for me, then let these men go." 9This happened so that the words he had spoken would be fulfilled:"I have not lost one of those you gave me."

Before this he had already lost Judas. Immediately after this he had already lost Simon Peter who disowned him three times verified by the cock crowing. He had also lost the doubting Thomas. How was 9 fulfilled?

 


 

 

Back to Top
Cassandra View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar
Joined: 30 May 2006
Location: Spain
Status: Offline
Points: 293
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Cassandra Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 June 2006 at 9:06am

bmzsp:

Actually it was I who wrote:

:"Read everything, think, meditate, decide how it affects you, and then you are in a position to criticise.  That's a motto of mine - I do try to make it work."

followed by Annietwo's rejoinder:"Don't stop thinking."

Just a little point of order.  I've made a life of thinking. I'm even qualified in it!

Both, I think are worth contemplating.  Cassandra

Back to Top
DavidC View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior  Member
Avatar
Male Christian
Joined: 20 September 2001
Location: Florida USA
Status: Offline
Points: 2474
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote DavidC Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 June 2006 at 11:02am
Commentary on John 18:6-7 adds no facts but does add many opinions.  Either the soldiers were struck down by the majesty of God, by the power of their own conscience, or by Jesus' calm and commanding manner in the face of arrest.

John 18:8-9 refers to Jesus submitting voluntarily under the condition that none of his followers were to be arrested.  As this came directly after the forced prostration of the soldiers, it clearly shows Jesus willingly gave himself up and was not forcibly arrested.  The "loss" refers to the physical safety not any lack of faith on the part of the Apostles.
Christian; Wesleyan M.Div.
Back to Top
AnnieTwo View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 26 May 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 281
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote AnnieTwo Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 June 2006 at 12:00pm

Originally posted by BMZ BMZ wrote:

Could you please explain the following contradiction  in the NT when Jesus is arrested? Only John gives this narrative, the other three don't:

There is no contradiction.

Originally posted by BMZ BMZ wrote:

18:6When Jesus said, "I am he", they drew back and fell to the ground.

What happened, what did they see that made them fall down? Was there any transfiguration of his face? Keep in mind that the other three writers did not know about this at all.

John has already testified to the effect of Jesus' words on temple officials sent to arrest him (see John 7:45-46).  It is not at all unlikely that some of the same personnel are again involved.  If they have been awed by Jesus before, if they have been dumbfounded by his teaching, his authority, his directness in the full light of day in the precincts of the temple where they most feel at home, it is not hard to believe that they are staggered by his open self-disclosure in the middle of the night.  Their physical ineptitude was another instance of people responding better than they knew.

Jesus' effect on people was astounding.  I think just looking into his eyes could make one weak in the knees.

Originally posted by BMZ BMZ wrote:

Next comes18:8"I told you that I am he," Jesus answered. "If you are looking for me, then let these men go." 9This happened so that the words he had spoken would be fulfilled:"I have not lost one of those you gave me."

Before this he had already lost Judas. Immediately after this he had already lost Simon Peter who disowned him three times verified by the cock crowing. He had also lost the doubting Thomas. How was 9 fulfilled?

What did Jesus mean by saying "I have not lost one of those you gave me."  When did Jesus say that?  Read John 17:12,

12 While I was with them in the world, I kept them in Your name. Those whom You gave Me I have kept; and none of them is lost except the son of perdition [pointing to Judas], that the Scripture might be fulfilled.

Also, see John 6:39

39 This is the will of the Father who sent Me, that of all He has given Me I should lose nothing, but should raise it up at the last day.

And John 10:28

28 And I give them eternal life, and they shall never perish; neither shall anyone snatch them out of My hand.

It is already understood that Judas was lost by his actions.  Peter and Thomas were not lost.  Thomas called Jesus, "My Lord and My God" after he saw Jesus after his resurrection.  Peter went on to preach the gospel of Messiah Jesus.

Annie

14If you are reproached for the name of Christ, blessed are you, for the Spirit of glory and of God rests upon you. On their part He is blasphemed, but on your part He is glorified. 1 Peter 4

Back to Top
Mishmish View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior  Member

Joined: 01 November 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1694
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mishmish Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 June 2006 at 2:13pm

Annie wrote:

"Jesus' effect on people was astounding.  I think just looking into his eyes could make one weak in the knees."

But this is not true.

John did not recognise Jesus and had to be told who he was: John 1:33 I would not have known him, except that the one who sent me to baptize with water told me, 'The man on whom you see the Spirit come down and remain is he who will baptize with the Holy Spirit.'

Isaiah states that there was nothing unusual or even beautiful about Jesus: Isaiah 53:2 He grew up before him like a tender shoot, and like a root out of dry ground. He had no beauty or majesty to attract us to him, nothing in his appearance that we should desire him.

And we all know that jesus was so indistinguishable from his followers that Judas had to point him out to those who came to arrest him: Matthew 26:47 While he was still speaking, Judas, one of the Twelve, arrived. With him was a large crowd armed with swords and clubs, sent from the chief priests and the elders of the people.    26:48 Now the betrayer had arranged a signal with them: "The one I kiss is the man; arrest him."    26:49 Going at once to Jesus, Judas said, "Greetings, Rabbi!" and kissed him



Edited by Mishmish
It is only with the heart that one can see clearly, what is essential is invisible to the eye. (The Little Prince)
Back to Top
AnnieTwo View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 26 May 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 281
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote AnnieTwo Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 June 2006 at 3:23pm

Originally posted by <span =bold1>Mishmish Mishmish wrote:

Annie wrote:

"Jesus' effect on people was astounding.  I think just looking into his eyes could make one weak in the knees."

But this is not true.

John did not recognise Jesus and had to be told who he was: John 1:33 I would not have known him, except that the one who sent me to baptize with water told me, 'The man on whom you see the Spirit come down and remain is he who will baptize with the Holy Spirit.'

Apples and oranges.  John said that he was not worthy to tie Jesus' sandals.  People followed Jesus in droves and hung on his every word.  People brought the sick to him.  He spoke like no other prophet either before him or after him.

Originally posted by Mishmish Mishmish wrote:

Isaiah states that there was nothing unusual or even beautiful about Jesus: Isaiah 53:2 He grew up before him like a tender shoot, and like a root out of dry ground. He had no beauty or majesty to attract us to him, nothing in his appearance that we should desire him.

I am not speaking of Jesus' outward appearance but his inward appearance.

Originally posted by </span><span =bold1><span style=font-size: 10pt; font-family: Verdana;> Mishmish Mishmish wrote:

And we all know that jesus was so indistinguishable from his followers that Judas had to point him out to those who came to arrest him: Matthew 26:47 While he was still speaking, Judas, one of the Twelve, arrived. With him was a large crowd armed with swords and clubs, sent from the chief priests and the elders of the people.    26:48 Now the betrayer had arranged a signal with them: "The one I kiss is the man; arrest him."    26:49 Going at once to Jesus, Judas said, "Greetings, Rabbi!" and kissed him

Nope.  I am speaking of Jesus inward appearance not his outward appearance.

 

Annie
14If you are reproached for the name of Christ, blessed are you, for the Spirit of glory and of God rests upon you. On their part He is blasphemed, but on your part He is glorified. 1 Peter 4

Back to Top
Mishmish View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior  Member

Joined: 01 November 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1694
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mishmish Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 June 2006 at 4:05pm

Annie:

If you are speaking of his inward appearance, then what did they see that made them fall to the ground?

"18:6When Jesus said, "I am he", they drew back and fell to the ground.

What happened, what did they see that made them fall down? Was there any transfiguration of his face? Keep in mind that the other three writers did not know about this at all."

You wrote:

"John has already testified to the effect of Jesus' words on temple officials sent to arrest him (see John 7:45-46).  It is not at all unlikely that some of the same personnel are again involved.  If they have been awed by Jesus before, if they have been dumbfounded by his teaching, his authority, his directness in the full light of day in the precincts of the temple where they most feel at home, it is not hard to believe that they are staggered by his open self-disclosure in the middle of the night."

If they had already been awed by him, having come in contact with Jesus before, why would they have needed Judas to point him out to them?

It is only with the heart that one can see clearly, what is essential is invisible to the eye. (The Little Prince)
Back to Top
DavidC View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior  Member
Avatar
Male Christian
Joined: 20 September 2001
Location: Florida USA
Status: Offline
Points: 2474
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote DavidC Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 June 2006 at 4:22pm
Not to be redundant, but John does not say exactly why the soldiers fell.

I reviewed at least a half dozen accepted biblical commentaries for my previous response.  There is no agreement; only the speculations I posted. 

The transfiguration idea is completely without evidence.
Christian; Wesleyan M.Div.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 9>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd.