IslamiCity.org Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > General > General Discussion
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - How to NOT categorize women  What is Islam What is Islam  Donate Donate
  FAQ FAQ  Quran Search Quran Search  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedHow to NOT categorize women

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 22>
Author
Message
Israfil View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior  Member
Avatar
Joined: 08 September 2003
Status: Offline
Points: 3984
Direct Link To This Post Topic: How to NOT categorize women
    Posted: 28 May 2007 at 9:40am

Salaam,

I made this post specifically for Crass but anyone can join. I'm not trying to maliciously single Crass out in anyway but I noticed the style of writing he has is very different than most of the members of the forum. I'm intrigued in how a woman, well, a western woman, can be a "fornicatrous" person just because of her nationality, which is, either being American or European. Allow me shed some light on the subject.

First let me say that in some instances there is nothing wrong with categorizing things I mean, we do it naturally. I believe the thalamus controls the function of categorizing objects and organizing them into comprehensible forms and patterns. Now of course we need this to help us survive in the world and understand our environement. From a sociological perspective we need to categorize people in order to know the different classes of people [such as different ethnic groups etc] so that our interaction with them is appropriate. However we come to a point where we overanalyze people by categorizing them in inappropriate classes of people such as calling "all western women" promiscuous.

We must understand that extramartial affairs, promiscuity, exhibitionism and all the like are in almost every part of civilized societies. By civilized I mean nations which have established governments [or some form of government] this includes third world nations. One cannot even categorize all women into one category as there is no one person to fit exactly one or more of the same category. People are people and everyone is different with their different modes and behavior. Regardless whether one has the negative experience in a country's people or a good experience, still, everyone is different.

I've met many women in the States who are hard working, very religious, and righteous [at least in my eyes] people. I've met some righteous women here who are kind hearted and God oriented. The difference between them and us is some of them share a different religion than us. But we cannot justify our biases by categorizing them just because they are from a different country. There is no poll or statistics on the earth that supports the categorization of a group of people simply because of the behavior of a few. One cannot poll a billion people and come to the conclusion that all one billion of those people have the same behavior. It's ridiculous. We are different just like the different line patterns on our palms.

 

 

 

Back to Top
Hayfa View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior  Member
Avatar
Female
Joined: 07 June 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2368
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 May 2007 at 3:27pm

Well it is easy to "lump" people together. And well we realyl should deal with people on an individual level. 

It is like when I talk to people here- Moslem women they categorize all Pakistani women are "x." And I tell them it is not so.

There are Some women in the world who have free sex and such. That is true all over. But most women are not. Many women are actually repelled by that. They actually give up "dating" cause they do not like that lifestyle. Unfortunately a certain percentage of women have poor judgement and vlaue skills. And they pay a heavy price even on the level that gee that cannot be at peace and happy.

 

When you do things from your soul, you feel a river moving in you, a joy. Rumi
Back to Top
Israfil View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior  Member
Avatar
Joined: 08 September 2003
Status: Offline
Points: 3984
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 May 2007 at 3:52pm

The key thing you said sister Hafya was "it is easy to lump people together." People with prejudices [and everyone of us has them] categorize things because of our own experiences. The example you gave me [with the Muslim women categorizing Pakistani women] was a similar situation I myself run into. For instance I recently had a conversation with a Latino gentleman. Our conversation went well. When we discussed our favorite genre of music he asked me "do you like rap?" I asked him what makes you think I like rap? With reluctance he said, "Well, don't black people like rap?"

As you can see obviously from his experience [BTW which stems from media projections] had the assumption that all blacks listen to rap. By the way my favorite genre of music is Jazz, then opera, then classical, then rap [R&B]. Even people try to categorize a group through subtle language such as saying "a lot" and by emphasizing a lot they really mean say everyone. For example, a person may say "A lot of Pakistani women do X, because that is what they do." I don't mean to get technical here but let me support what I just said. From the previous premise "A lot of Pakistani women do X" can be said to be an assumption because it is a general statement. Then, it is thus supported by the second part with "because that is what they do." So unfortunately it is not just the experiences that may lead to incorrect categorization but following this, is our language.

Women much like any human on this planet are individuals no matter what country they reside from. It is just unfortunate that humans such as some men, would use what they see either on television or from experience as the core thing to generalize all women.

 



Edited by Israfil
Back to Top
crasss View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior  Member

Joined: 01 April 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 516
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 May 2007 at 2:49pm
Originally posted by Israfil Israfil wrote:


Salaam,

I've met many women in the States who are hard working, very religious, and righteous [at least in my eyes] people. I've met some righteous women here who are kind hearted and God oriented.

Salaam,

I wish them all the best. In absence of a community, it is hard, however, to transmit such values to the children.
Originally posted by Israfil Israfil wrote:

The difference between them and us is some of them share a different religion than us.

As I said, I consider "functioning" Christianity vastly superior to atheism, even though "functioning" Christianity has very much of an inclination to create a class-based society, which will eventually shake off Christianity again, in an attempt to shake off the class problem. So, atheism will re-emerge again, and all its related problems. And then we're back to square one.
Originally posted by Israfil Israfil wrote:

But we cannot justify our biases by categorizing them just because they are from a different country.

I think they are just trapped. Even criminals are actually just trapped in a society that happily produces them.

It is hard to go against the mainstream. If you are born in a broken family somewhere in an American inner city, and grow up with other kids, who are attracted to the wrong values, you will probably end up doing the same as them, whatever that may be.

So, my rant against family breakdown, crime, prostitution, is not really a condemnation of individuals. Most of these individuals have very limited choices.

Men are more easily forgiven by the community for trespassing. Women, however, are more readily categorized for life. Therefore, women may have a stronger vested interest in defending the very system that trapped them, and reject going back to tradition. That is a political problem. As such, the problem prevents a fix of the problem. And then the problem gets even more entrenched.

They even take the issue to the extreme, by exporting the problem to other countries, and create the same problems there too. The United States have too much power, than is good for themselves, or than is good for the rest of the world.

If they were still majoritarian Christian, the export of depravity would be seriously less than it is today. Christianity does not function, however, without being state religion. So, the problem was built in from the very start. And Christians would have shaken off Church and state-enforcement anyway. The Reformation was inevitable, just like the French Revolution. It is no coincidence that Christianity produced this spate of atheism.

It is also no coincidence that the bureaucratic state endorses atheism. The more people are disconnected through extended and nuclear family breakdown, the more power the bureaucratic state has over individuals. The end of an empire is characterized by rampant depravity, extreme taxation, and deluges of new laws that interfere with every aspect of life. The empire is just using the women against the men, in order to have more power over both.

The empire will, however, become its own victim in extending its power over individuals, because it takes more than just an individual to raise the next generation.

Back to Top
crasss View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior  Member

Joined: 01 April 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 516
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 May 2007 at 9:04pm
Originally posted by Israfil Israfil wrote:

It is just unfortunate that humans such as some men, would use what they see either on television or from experience as the core thing to generalize all women.

It is not because the West does not enforce a social norm, that there is no social norm. On the contrary, there is still a social norm, which is free-floating, and enforces itself.

It is this social norm that generalizes itself. If the social norm dictates that casual sex is the normal thing to do, and that dating is outdated, that is exactly what the vast majority will do.

A hundred years ago, you would go to her father and ask for her hand. That was the social norm then. If you do this today, you are considered a lunatic. Today you meet through casual sex, which obviously doesn't blossom into a relationship, and therefore, the next time you get drunk, you just have casual sex with someone else.

Don't ask teenagers to go against the social norms enforced by their peer group. It doesn't work. The only solution is to keep them away from such peer group.

So, I disagree with your statement. Social norms DO generalize themselves across the majority of the population.

These women are not like that, because they want to, but because their environment forces them to. It is peer pressure that does it. So, keep your kids away from there.

Back to Top
pauline35 View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 15 November 2005
Location: Malaysia
Status: Offline
Points: 459
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 May 2007 at 11:13pm
I agree with you Crasss, better spell your Crasss with 3 sses or else I would be seen rude.
Back to Top
Angela View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior  Member
Avatar

Joined: 11 July 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 2555
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30 May 2007 at 3:12pm

Crasss,

I believe you are wrong, there are many women who want to return to traditional values.  Women are fighting against abortion, women are fighting for more wholesome entertainment.  Women are fighting spousal abuse and pornography. 

Western women are one of the fastest growing groups converting to Islam.  Women are trying to focus on their families in a world that just invents new ways to pull them away. 

In my own state, popular clothing goes below the knees, covers the shoulders and does not show cleavage.  Girls are encouraged to get educations, marry in the temple (something you can't do if you're having premarital sex) and raise families.  Boys are encouarged to serve the Lord for 2 years on a religious mission and marry soon after returning.  Focus is on chasity, modesty and clean living.  We do not drink and do not smoke. 

Our church has grown from 3 million in 1980 to almost 13 million today. 

If western women were so impure, why would they be turning to faiths like Islam and Mormonism????

Do you think that women like the images of scantily clad women who are emaciated gracing TV?  No.  Women in this country have to fight harder to teach their kids to rise above the media perceptions of what is right and wrong.  But that doesn't mean they aren't fighting.

I really blame alot of our troubles on the rich and on men.  If men were more faithful, there wouldn't be so much spousal abuse, child abuse and broken homes. 

Its easy to blame the woman.  But who is paying for the pornography and strip clubs?  Who is creating the atmosphere?  If the daughter was abused by her father and then kicked out at 18 with no money.  Who is it that is to blame if she turns to prostitution to survive?  She should have been protected and cared for by the men in her family.  Or should she turn to another man and marry quickly to escape, who is to blame when she shows up at the hospital with broken bones?

I get upset when men blame the women for all the ills.  Most prostitutes started life out with the world against them.  Abusive families, parents with addictions.  A girl from a good home doesn't turn to these things.

I've worked for domestic violence shelter and for a home for children who were victims of abuse.  These problems are cross cultural and without boundaries.

With state-run television, the problems aren't talked about openly in other areas.  Its not that the US is necessarily worse, its just more open about our problems.  If they didn't occur in Middle Eastern or Asian nations.  You wouldn't hear about stonings, hangings and beatings for immorality. 

The tight lipped approach doesn't eradicate these issues, it just drives them underground.

There is no difference in the pitiful plight of a western woman with an education being mistreated by society and a woman forbidden to get an education who can't make better of her life in a society that doesn't practice what it preaches.

 

Back to Top
crasss View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior  Member

Joined: 01 April 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 516
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30 May 2007 at 6:47pm
Originally posted by Angela Angela wrote:

I believe you are wrong, there are many women who want to return to traditional values.

I am sure quite a few would want to. However, I doubt they can. They would have to row against a strong current, and few people manage this.
Originally posted by Angela Angela wrote:

Western women are one of the fastest growing groups converting to Islam.

To the extent that the outcome in the West and its lifestyle is more devastating to women than to men, I understand that they are seeking a solution more urgently.
Originally posted by Angela Angela wrote:

If western women were so impure, why would they be turning to faiths like Islam and Mormonism????

As I said, I think Mormonism is superior to no religion at all. However, that is where the comparison to Islam ends for me.

Overall, the Mormon divorce rate appears to be no different from the average American divorce rate.

Since it is family breakdown that is the underlying driver underneath the current depravity fest, I doubt Mormonism is the solution. The followers are undoubtedly too westernized and too influenced by the mainstream to make a difference.

You need to keep separate in every possible way, in order to make a dent. And that is hard, when the extended families are weak or non-existent and there is an enormous government around enforcing its views in private family matters, and interfering in every possible aspect of family life.
Originally posted by Angela Angela wrote:

She should have been protected and cared for by the men in her family.

These men cannot protect her against herself. If they do, the massive bureaucracy will interfere and impose its depraved views.
Originally posted by Angela Angela wrote:

I get upset when men blame the women for all the ills.

The authority of the father gets usurped by a government that defines freedom as the right to sleep around, and have others pay for the consequences.
Originally posted by Angela Angela wrote:

A girl from a good home doesn't turn to these things.

If a sufficient proportion of the girls in the peer group do it, she will too.
Originally posted by Angela Angela wrote:

Its not that the US is necessarily worse, its just more open about our problems...The tight lipped approach doesn't eradicate these issues, it just drives them underground.

The secret lies in managing the social norm. If you don't, it manages itself.
Originally posted by Angela Angela wrote:

There is no difference in the pitiful plight of a western woman with an education being mistreated by society and a woman forbidden to get an education who can't make better of her life in a society that doesn't practice what it preaches.

You can't on the one side expect male family members to enforce the social norm, and at the same time, clamour abuse all the time. You can't have it both ways.

If men enforce the social norm in the West, they are facing the government. What is the result? Nobody does anything any more. What's more, men generally don't want to marry any longer in the West. Even cohabitating is being abandoned.

Now, I don't advocate doing anything about it. Why? Because I don't believe the problem can be corrected. Most people will not change. They grew up like that.

Only Islam manages to an important extent to keep out the depraved western influence and resist integrating with the mainstream. But then again, these communities reject marriage with westernized outsiders. They are right to do that. I would do exactly the same. I wouldn't want my children to marry westernized outsiders.

In the meanwhile, I still believe one should marry, but to heed (Islamic) common sense: do not marry any wife who is not religious, is no virgin, or whose parents are divorced. That rule excludes the vast majority of western women, and reflects what I think about them: stay away from trouble.

For most women in the West, it is simply "game over". They can try a feeble attempt, if some man is crazy or st**id enough to try, and probably fail at that anyway, or follow the mainstream and necessarily limit oneself to casual sex with strangers, and increasingly catch all kind of diseases, end up with an illegitimate child, and produce the next wave of crime, rampant fornication, and prostitution.

The solution will only begin, when western governments finally collapse over their own policies, so that they cannot interfere any longer with family matters. By then, it will be too late for most.



Edited by crasss
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 22>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd.