Some differences between the Quran and Hadith

•       If the Qur'an talks about the aqeedah and the unseen (Ghaib), it is obligatory to believe it, while the hadith is not all, etc.

Therefore, it is not true if we accept all hadith as a source of law given that there are still many false hadiths circulating in Muslim societies. But it is not true that we reject all hadiths because the hadith is the second source of Islamic law after the Qur'an.

That's right what you say that all of that is returned to each Muslim, but it will be different with in my country where most are still permissive, meaning that if someone who is considered influential in religion comes then he makes his statement that this hadith is narrated by Imam Bukhari from Abu Hurairah Radiallahu 'anhu, but truly it was actually made by himself, and incidentally many Muslims did not examine the truth of the content he stated, that's the problem. finally many emerging misguided understandings or not in accordance with Islamic law, and some of the ummah have followed it, even though the Prophet sallallaahu 'alaihi wasallam did not issue such hadith, because I believe that our Prophet certainly always followed the commands of Allah Subhanahu Wata'ala.

Jazakallahu khairan.