Iraq Guilt |
Post Reply |
Author | |
Whisper
Senior Member Male Joined: 25 July 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 4752 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 04 October 2005 at 2:00pm |
'Iraq guilt' mars morale of UK army General Sir Michael Walker, chief of the defence of staff, also said, in an interview with the Sunday Times, that Britain and the United States will have to make do with a less-than-perfect outcome from the US-led war.
�There was an understanding by members of the armed services that this was not an all-hands-up, popular event across the country,� he said.
�Now I think that�s shifted a bit, if I am absolutely honest. Some of the opprobrium attached to the war is also attached to the fact that the armed services are taking part in it. We are, if you like, guilty by association with a decision to go to war that not the whole of this country enjoined.� Asked what conditions are needed to withdraw from Iraq and whether the conflict there is �winnable�, the general said: �Winnable is the wrong word. I think what it is, is that there is a �my glass is half full�.� The Sunday Times said the �half full� comment indicated that Britain�s ambitions for the insurgency-plagued country had been scaled down. �I have no doubt that, provided we can keep the training and the security sector reform going, and providing some of the reconstruction will continue at the present rate, we�ll reach a point where we can see an Iraq that is self-governing, providing its own security and has a democracy of the form that the Iraqis want,� said Walker. But he refused to be drawn on the question of how long British troops would be required to stay on the ground, reiterating the official line that it is up to the Iraqi government to decide. �I would hope that as we go through the political process, the referendum and the next set of elections in December, it will become clear how secure the political machinery in Iraq is becoming,� said Walker. �If the elections are successful, and if a fully elected government gets in with a genuine mandate, then I think that confidence will overspill into all areas of progress. �That will allow their own security forces to continue to develop from where they are at the moment, and at some stage in the future they will feel confident enough to take on their own management of the security in their country.� |
|
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |