A Brief History of Islam

I have posted this work all over the net, no I have not compiled the work, it is a good idea though. Here are the links to some of the work that I have collected:

http://www.shani.offlife-hosting.com/board/index.php?showfor um=32

http://www.kr-hcy.com/board/hcf/index.php?showforum=44

here is my one of the best collection of shia beliefs about Quran

http://www.kr-hcy.com/board/hcf/index.php?showtopic=1039

Edited by Fatah-Momin

Most of the sources on the links are shia Sources that have been quoted for example:

Al-Shafi/Al-Kafi
Page#140 Book of Imaan and Kufar Vol:IV
Imam Abu Abdullah[AS] said: "Taqeeyah [to lie] is 90% of the deen[religion] and one who does not use Taqeeyah has no deen[religion], lie is in every thing other than Nabeez [wine of barley] and Masah over leather socks"

On this particular link it quote exclusively from shia sources only about the corruption[naouzobillah] of Quran,

http://www.kr-hcy.com/board/hcf/index.php?showtopic=1039

 

Edited by Fatah-Momin

No this is not shia refutation this is only an humble effort to expose the muslims to other version of Islamic history which has obscured by the vested interest, if you or any one else take it in a different direction, then it depends on each individual and not one me.

As far as who is getting the original information, most of it I get directly and like I said some I get translated, if you have objection to the content, please present your argument to the contrary and if I have knowledge to answer inshallah I will repond, I have been through many threads on this board and site, never have I seen such cross examination of the content as you are doing to this thread, is there a reason for it? This is a debate forum every one has right to present their views in a civil manner and I have maintained such behavior.

It is your scrutiny of this thread that is puzzeling and unprecedent, why do you not do the reasearch on your own and then get back to me. I think this is a tactic on your behalf to deviate the thread off the course.

I have not broken any site rules neither have I been rude to any one and this site claim to representing tolerant and liberal Islam, then why all of sudden such exteremisn?

 

Hazrat Ameer Maveeyah(ra) advice his son Yazeed


However, none of the books relating the tragic event contains a single expression clearly stating that those two Khal�fas were smeared with the blessed blood of Hadrat Husayn. Not even the vaguest implication that Hadrat Mu��wiya might have had to do with the martyrdom of Hadrat Husayn has been witnessed throughout the literature assigned to the event, let alone a clear statement that it was done by his order. What is unanimously stated (by all books and scholars) is that the martyrdom of Hadrat Husayn did not take place during the caliphate of Hadrat Mu��wiya. Molla B�qir Mejl�s�,[shia scholar] whose name is mentioned above, relates Hadrat Mu��wiya�s last advice to his son Yaz�d as he was dying, as follows:

�You know what relation Im�m Husayn �radiy-All�hu �anh� is to the Messenger of Allah. He is a part from the beloved Prophet�s blessed body. He is an offspring from the flesh and blood of that most honourable person. I understand that the inhabitants of Iraq invite him to go there and be with them. But they will not help him; they will leave him alone. If he should fall into your hands, behave in appreciation of his value! Remember the closeness and affection of the Messenger of Allah �sall-All�hu �alaihi wa sallam� to him! Do not get back at him for his behaviour! Mind you don�t break the substantial ties I have established between him and us! Be extra careful lest you should hurt or offend him!� This advice of Hadrat Mu��wiya�s to (his son) Yaz�d is written in the three hundred and twenty-first (321) page of the book Jil�-ul�uy�n, which was written by Muhammad B�qir bin Murtad� Fayz� Khoras�n�, a Shiite leader, who is better known with his nickname Molla Muhsin. He died in 1091 [1679 A.D.].