Guarding |
Post Reply | Page <1 234 |
Author | |
Mishmish
Senior Member Joined: 01 November 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1694 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Serv: "Technically, to remain consistent with my standardized inquiry into goosebumps, it really only counts if �French Pastry� is a soprano who can sustain a high (octave) C" Well, it's singing my name.... |
|
It is only with the heart that one can see clearly, what is essential is invisible to the eye. (The Little Prince)
|
|
fredifreeloader
Guest Group Joined: 17 February 2006 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 456 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
yeah right bismarck, two swords between the lot of them, right? arent we just s t r e t c h i n g things a little here? let me just also say - there is no place for any literal war in christianity, as is clear in the holy scriptures. the christians arsenal, and the nature of his war, are clearly delineated in ephesians 6: 10-18. this is not to say that christians, as citizens of their country, may not fight in a just war, in defence of their country, but that, of course, is a seperate issue Edited by fredifreeloader |
|
for i am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth - romans 1: 16
|
|
fredifreeloader
Guest Group Joined: 17 February 2006 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 456 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
no i dont know the song you quoted, servetus, but it certainly fits my thoughts in relation to gethsemane and the crucifixion i would have called them "goose-pimples", actually! as for nicholas kristofs article, i dont know why its called "jesus and jihad". the scenario presented does not seem to include any christian army, for instance. i do not know of any christian army in the bible, in this age, or in the future. it describes the return of Christ to earth, and the destruction of his enemies. why this should come into the category of "religious intolerance" i dont know. it is direct divine intervention in the world, nothing to do with human relations. the writer strikes me as being of that ilk, that just cannot believe that anybody believes the bible any more. he ought to get out more. but i dont think ill be reading any of tim lahayes books, they sound too florid, among other things |
|
for i am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth - romans 1: 16
|
|
Servetus
Senior Member Male Joined: 04 April 2001 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 2109 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Well, Fredi, I meant to mention as a �reader beware� that the op/ed piece came from the New York Times, after all. That said, with that caveat aside, it is not so difficult for me, an amateur reader of history, to envisage a less than celestial (read military, or �Church Militant�) means by which, in future, every knee could be somehow made to bow and every tongue somehow made to confess and all that. Speaking of florid, I had best reign in my imagination at this point, lest I try my hand at writing the world�s worst American novel (a sort of Torquemada as Robert Mapplethorpe at Abu Ghraib, if you get my drift). But still, truth be told, I hear, understand and appreciate your perspective on this. I thought, in turn, that you could appreciate the song. Serv Edited by Servetus |
|
Post Reply | Page <1 234 |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |