Christians are degrading Islam |
Post Reply | Page <1 111213 |
Author | |||||
Angela
Senior Member Joined: 11 July 2005 Status: Offline Points: 2555 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Amen David. These men tend to stir up controversy even among other Christians. Long before I left mainstream Christianity, I did not find these men very appealing. Christ taught us to be kind and loving towards all. Their tirades against homosexuals and other faiths leave me with a sour taste in my mouth. I honestly believe they are in it for the money and not the religious conviction. Pat Roberston has also be showing signs of mental illness lately. I wonder seriously how long he'll be with 700 Club. |
|||||
Patty
Senior Member Joined: 14 September 2001 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 2382 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Er, hmmmm, I don't judge anyone, it's God's place to do that. But I wonder if any of you have ever heard what these two gentlemen have to say regarding Catholics and the Catholic Church? **hint** It ain't pretty. God's Peace. |
|||||
Patty
I don't know what the future holds....but I know who holds the future. |
|||||
AnnieTwo
Senior Member Joined: 26 May 2006 Status: Offline Points: 281 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
David and BMZ, Luke 3 is the verse I was thinking of. If God created Adam then God is Adam's "father." God "fathered" him. His special relationship with God would be that Adam was created in God's image. "Adam" means "human." God showed that He wanted to have a father/son relationship with humans and started with Adam. Annie |
|||||
14If you are reproached for the name of Christ, blessed are you, for the Spirit of glory and of God rests upon you. On their part He is blasphemed, but on your part He is glorified. 1 Peter 4
|
|||||
DavidC
Senior Member Male Christian Joined: 20 September 2001 Location: Florida USA Status: Offline Points: 2474 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Robertson & Falwell are classic demigogues. The technique is:
1) Detail a long list of problems, threats and resentments. 2) Convince people that all of these stem from a single root cause. 3) Direct hostility at this target. Robertson, Falwell, Bush, anti-American Arabs...all share this evil technique as a means to claw their way to power. |
|||||
Christian; Wesleyan M.Div.
|
|||||
Servetus
Senior Member Male Joined: 04 April 2001 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 2109 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
(DavidC) �Robertson, Falwell, ... all share this evil technique as a means to claw their way to power.� And real political power they have. Here, in this article, is a case in point of the effect that they can have on American foreign policy. After reading this and other articles of its type, one can well understand why some of their critics have called them (the Evangelical bloc in general) a veritable Fifth Column of American Likudniks: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/10/03/60minutes/main5242 68.shtml Serv Edited by Servetus |
|||||
George
Senior Member Joined: 14 April 2006 Status: Offline Points: 406 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
TO GEORGE George, That is okay. I did understand you. By the way, what do you think of my suggestion to Annie, in my post at 6:10 am of 4th June 2006, regarding some proposed new words to replace the term "Begoteen"? You mean this one?
Annie, From you: "amah, I don't think that works. There are other interpretations of "begat" besides to procreate. The misunderstanding clearly comes from the Qur'an or interpretations of the Qur'an. Christians don't have a problem with the term. If a more accurate interpretation of the Greek word "monogenes" is unique or only then why are most Muslim scholars translating monogenes as "begotten" and why is Allah so upset about it since an all-knowing God knows the meaning of all words in any language? If Allah knew the correct translation of the word "begotten" shouldn't the following aya: "They say (the Christians): "Allah hath begotten a son!" Glory be to Him! He is self-sufficient! His are all things in heaven and on earth! No warrant have ye for this!" (Surah 10:68) Instead be: "They say (the Christians): "Allah has a unique and only son in the figurative sense. Glory be to Him! He is self-sufficient! His are all things in heaven and on earth! No warrant have ye for this!" (Surah 10:68) That would have solved the whole "begotten" problem, wouldn't it? Well, not quite. We are still left with the words: He is self-sufficient! What does the fact that Allah is "self-sufficient" have to do with having a son in the figurative sense? It sounds like Allah is saying that he doesn't need another God; that he is enough, which true. Is this another sticky wicket?
There is another meaning of the word Beget and that is "give rise to" or "cause". Would you consider these better than using "begotten"? What is your source for "give rise to" or "cause?" Provide a link, please. I think we should leave the translation to those who are experts in the Greek. As I pointed out to you in another thread a few (most do not) Muslims scholars translate begotten as "taken." But taken has the same connotation as "begotten."
Now, I am not suggesting that God procreated Jesus himself. That is the meaning of the word chosen by Christians. Muslims resent that word "Begotten" in English and write to object. No, BMZ. Monogenes does not mean that God procreated Jesus. You must use a word in context with the rest of the sentence. In The Zondervan Pictorial Encyclopedia in Five Volumes, 1975, Vol A-C, p. 510, we find: BEGOTTEN (BEGETTING) Various forms of the roots In the Greek translation of the Old Testament the word "monogenes" is also used for Isaac. It means "only" or "unique." In the case of Isaac since Abraham already had a son, Ishmael, it cannot mean that Isaac was Abraham's only child. It means that Isaac was "only and unique" because it was Isaac that God designated to be the bearer of His covenant. Muslims have no reason to "resent" anything. What Muslims should do is understand that monogenes means unique and only son and it has nothing to do with a biological son.
So, if I say that God gave rise to Jesus in his virgin mother's womb or God caused Jesus to be born, would you be willing to throw away and discard the word "Begotten"? Would you be willing to admit that Jesus' "father" is YHVH in terms of relationship and that Jesus taught us to call YHVH "father" assuring that those who believe in Jesus have a father/son/daughter relationship, a personal relationship? Peace
BTW: Do you still go to the cricket matches? |
|||||
Servetus
Senior Member Male Joined: 04 April 2001 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 2109 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
I don�t offer this as a point of contention, or controversy, but thought, with the repeated emphasis upon Jesus as the �only� begotten (monogenes) that it might be worth noting that, according to Revelation 1:5, Jesus is referred to as prototokos, which the KJV translators render as �first� begotten. Apparently, whether the original wording be (Greek) monogenes or prototokos, it results in �begotten� for the English translators. Again, though, this is just an aside, or side note, and a possible point of interest for us students of these matters. Serv http://www.blueletterbible.org/tmp_dir/c/1149535289-635.html # |
|||||
Post Reply | Page <1 111213 |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |