IslamiCity.org Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Politics > Current Events
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - The US puppet Karzai cuts his strings  What is Islam What is Islam  Donate Donate
  FAQ FAQ  Quran Search Quran Search  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

The US puppet Karzai cuts his strings

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
Umm Hufsah View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie
Avatar
Female
Joined: 27 February 2010
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 93
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Umm Hufsah Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: The US puppet Karzai cuts his strings
    Posted: 28 April 2010 at 1:46am
The Obama administration made no secret it wanted to replace Karzai. You could almost hear Washington crying, "Bad puppet! Bad puppet!" Karzai fired back, accusing the US of vote-rigging. He has repeatedly demanded the US military stop killing so many Afghan civilians.

But the Obama administration, misadvised by Washington neocons and other hardliners, is determined to "win" a military victory in Afghanistan (whatever that means) to save face as a great power and impose a settlement that leaves it in control of strategic Afghanistan.

Alas, the US keeps making the same mistake of seeking obedient clients rather than democratic allies who are genuinely popular and legitimate.

http://stopwar.org.uk/content/view/1833/1/
Back to Top
ops155 View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 08 November 2008
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 155
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ops155 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 April 2010 at 10:11am
Do you even pay attention to what you post. In the same section they question  the very existance of the taliban yet at the end of it they say working with the taliban is the only way to peace.
 

"Next, Karzai dropped a bombshell, asserting the US was occupying Afghanistan to dominate the energy-rich Caspian Basin region, not because of the non-existent al-Qaida or Taliban. Karzai said Taliban was "resisting western occupation." The US will soon have 100,000 soldiers in Afghanistan, plus 40,000 dragooned NATO troops.

Karzai even half-jested he might join Taliban.

Washington had apoplexy. A vicious propaganda campaign was unleashed against Karzai. The New York Times, a mouthpiece for the Obama administration and ardent backer of the Afghan war, all but called for the overthrow of Karzai and his replacement by a compliant general.

An American self-promoter, Peter Galbraith, who had been fired from his job with the UN in Kabul, was trotted out to tell media that Karzai might be both a drug addict and crazy.

Behind this ugly, if also comical, spat lay a growing divergence between Afghans and Washington. After 31 years of conflict, nearly three million dead, millions more refugees and frightful poverty, Afghans yearn for peace.

For the past two years, Karzai and his warlord allies have been holding peace talks with the Taliban in Saudi Arabia. Karzai knows the only way to end the Afghan conflict is to enfranchise the nation�s Pashtun majority and its fighting arm, the Taliban. Political compromise with the Taliban is the only � and inevitable � solution.

 

SO which one is it? Do they exists or not and if they do then why claim they are non-existent? This is the type of thing that shows you the person who wrote this can't be trusted.
Back to Top
Umm Hufsah View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie
Avatar
Female
Joined: 27 February 2010
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 93
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Umm Hufsah Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30 April 2010 at 5:45am
Originally posted by ops155 ops155 wrote:

Do you even pay attention to what you post. In the same section they question  the very existance of the taliban yet at the end of it they say working with the taliban is the only way to peace.
 

"Next, Karzai dropped a bombshell, asserting the US was occupying Afghanistan to dominate the energy-rich Caspian Basin region, not because of the non-existent al-Qaida or Taliban. Karzai said Taliban was "resisting western occupation." The US will soon have 100,000 soldiers in Afghanistan, plus 40,000 dragooned NATO troops.

Karzai even half-jested he might join Taliban.

Washington had apoplexy. A vicious propaganda campaign was unleashed against Karzai. The New York Times, a mouthpiece for the Obama administration and ardent backer of the Afghan war, all but called for the overthrow of Karzai and his replacement by a compliant general.

An American self-promoter, Peter Galbraith, who had been fired from his job with the UN in Kabul, was trotted out to tell media that Karzai might be both a drug addict and crazy.

Behind this ugly, if also comical, spat lay a growing divergence between Afghans and Washington. After 31 years of conflict, nearly three million dead, millions more refugees and frightful poverty, Afghans yearn for peace.

For the past two years, Karzai and his warlord allies have been holding peace talks with the Taliban in Saudi Arabia. Karzai knows the only way to end the Afghan conflict is to enfranchise the nation�s Pashtun majority and its fighting arm, the Taliban. Political compromise with the Taliban is the only � and inevitable � solution.

 

SO which one is it? Do they exists or not and if they do then why claim they are non-existent? This is the type of thing that shows you the person who wrote this can't be trusted.


I think you seldom read what you argue about. You need to quit the habit of dismissing information and the sources willy nilly when you fail to understand something.

However, I will shed some light on the difficult subject for you.

Karzai who is a corrupt US hand picked corrupt puppet, still licks US boots but he has started to hate the consequences of falling so low and so he has started to rebel against the degrading treatment from US. He wants to do some thing about the invading forces tutelage or else the cost will be never ending civilian blood streams (collateral murders - cheap to the eyes of coalition compared to their inhuman goals - strategic strong holds and paving the way for war profiteers to exploit this country to its full potential).

Irony is as corrupt leader as him can have conscious stinging his heart, seeing innocent afghan people being murdered ruthlessly by coalition and foreign countries attacking Afghanistan like pack of hyenas, tearing it to bits.

I am sorry the article was too much for you to digest. Take little bit at a time eventually it will sink in.



Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd.