When Ram was worshipped as God?

If temple to be built for Ram, it should be built after Ram was worshipped as God. Now Hindus are worshiping Ram as God, but they didn�t do it before. Ram was not considered as God, Especially during the period of 300-1100 AD, which was claimed by RSS, the time when Ram temple was built.

In the name of � Amara Kosa�.

In that, those who are worshipped as God in India were specified. Ram name was not in the list. So Hindus during that period were not considering Ram as GOD�s Avatar and its considered as big testimonial.

A Sadhu called Lakhsmidhar, collected the information of all sacred places up to 11th century (until last time of Gupta Dynasty). Ayodhya Ram temple did not exist in that.

If Ram temple was build during Gupta period, why it was not included in the list of sacred place?

Same like that, S.S. Iyer , a notable research scholar, published book called � Indian Temples, Historic notes�. He didn�t specify anything about Ram temple. He noted five temples which were built by Vikramathidya. Ayodhya Ram temple is not there.

At 1989 November 12, IAS officer Ramachandra Kadri wrote one article in �Radiance�. He referred so many evidences with Encyclopedia like Britannica and comment that only after 1100 AD, Ram was worshipped as God.

That means, until the last period of Gupta kings, Ram was not worshipped as God. Can any Hindu who has real conscience, believe that Ram temple was build during the Gupta period?

If we want to tell more clearly, Valmiki wrote Ramayana in Sanskrit. Sanskrit was not popularly spoken by all people and only Brahmins knew about that. Because of this Ram was not considered as God.

Valmiki Ramayana was translated and released in Hindi by Tulsi Das. After that, Ramayana was very famous among people. After Tulsi Das translated Ramayana in Hindi, people start considering Ram as God�s Avatar.

What�s the time of Tulsi Das ? Tulsi Das Lived during the period of Baber (in Ayodhya ), which was claimed for demolition of Ram temple. Baber ruled during 1500 AD and Tulsi was living under that rule.

Ramayana was translated in Hindi during the rule of Baber and that time Ram was not considered as God. So it becomes true that Hindu people didn�t have any knowledge about him.

How Ram was worshiped as GOD when Ramayana was not spread across people? How temple was built for him? Dear Hindu Brothers and sisters, think about this.

India�s first president was Dr. Radha Krishnan. His son Gopal who was good Hindu devotee and very good research scholar too. In his research article, he proclaimed that �There was no temple for Ram before 1750 AD, in any part of India. He confidently declared that �All Ram temple belongs to 18th century�.

If Ram temple did not exist before 200 years, how did Baber demolish Ram temple at Disputed location of Ayodhya. I request every citizen, to think about this.

The truth is, the foundation of Babri Majid was laid by Ibrahim Lodi, on 1524. He was unable to continue the service for long time and he was killed in war by Baber. Then, Baber built a Majid, with the foundation laid by Ibrahim Lodi. So it is untrue to tell that Baber demolished the temple.
 

Will Baber Demolish temple ?

So far, the evidences provided here is enough for everyone, who can really able to distinguish between good and bad. For debate purpose, even though if any temple was there in the disputed location, Baber would not demolish that. Because, in same Ayodhya, for five temples like Hunumangiri ,Jenmasthan, Baber provided incentives by writing in brass . This been safeguarded still now by temple management and was reiterated with evidences by Ramrasha Thiribathi.

How a person will demolish a temple, who provided incentives to many temples?

Also the population of Muslims during Baber reign would be meager when compared with present population. Sovereignty of the kingdom will be maintained only by the support of majority Hindus. Baber would be thrown-out from his throne, by agitators of Hindu Majority, if their temple was demolished. No king will be involved in such activities, if he really wants to retain his power.

Hindus during that time were not involved in any riots or agitation, but only welcomed all Mughal heirs like Babar, his son Humayun, his son Akbar. This shows the courtesy and kindness were showered by Mughal emperors towards Hindu majority.

During the last time of Baber, he wrote one WILL to his son Humayun written in Persian language and it is been preserved still today at Central government�s National museum at Delhi. In that he gave advise as �Dear son, you are going to rule a country where Hindus are in majority. They are respecting COW as God. So don�t eat Cow�s meat (Beef) at any instance.

How a Good Citizen can believe that Baber demolished a temple, who advised his son to renounce the eating habit of Cow�s meat (beef)?

Guru Nanak who founded Sikh religion was considered as big enemy during Baber�s reign. He rigorously opposed Baber, especially for the issues related with women. If Baber demolished the temple, he would have indicated that with his strong resentment. But history commenting that he went to Ayodhya and enjoyed the beauty of Babri Majid�s Structure.

Person like him who lived in those years only knew that whether Baber constructed Majid by demolishing temple. In such case, he would never enjoy its building structure.

Some falsely imagine and claim that people didn�t oppose the rule because of Babar�s tyrant nature.

Baber was neither hated by Hindu people nor was he was a tyrant king. This is the truth. For debate purpose, if we consider Baber was a tyrant king, it would not be true.

After Baber, his kingdom was ruled by his son Humayun. After 25 years of Baber�s death, his grandson Akbar ruled the kingdom. He gave up Islam and was following New Religion Din-ilahi, for which he was the founder. Akbar was like a Hindu king and even he got appreciation from many saffron organizations.

If Baber demolished the temple, it should have been noticed by many people who lived during the period of Akbar too. They didn't need to worry about Akbar and they would have asked him to rebuild the temple which was demolished by his grandfather. Surely, Akbar would have satisfied such people, if his grandfather had demolished such structure. People could have requested, only if temple was demolished!!! But there happened no such incidents.

We�ll leave that. Even after the Mughals era was ended by Britishers, this issue was not raised by anyone until 1948. There was no case registered too.


In 200 years rule of British:

No case was registered during British rule against the demolition of mosque and nobody requested British government to get back their temple.

Problem suddenly rose to its full vigor only after December 23, 1949, when a mob placed Ram idol inside the mosque.

In Ayodhya there are more than 30 Temples which manifest about Ram�s birth place. Hindu scholars identified many places as Ram�s birth place and they didn�t include Babri Majid among them.

This was the reality, until saffron group diverted the attention of Hindus by such false claims.
 
Saffron Group discovered that by evoking extreme hatred among Hindus and Muslims, they can capture the opportunity to rule India from Congress. Finally they captured the rule by cheating innocent Hindu citizens who believe that� All the glitters are Gold �.

Dear Hindu Brothers and Sisters!!!

We�ll strive to preserve the UNITY.

We�ll neglect communal forces, which have vested interest in creating extreme friction to the development of our country.

We�ll work hard for the economic development of our country and for its prosperous future.