kenski70 wrote: ... Lucifer knows his fate is sealed.how can he change it?he needs to eliminate his enemies but who are they?easy the Christians and Jews are named specifically as his foes.so how can you eliminate them?first...

Plan B.  Eliminate the enemies (i.e., Christians and Jews) by forcing them to live together beneath a single roof and to discuss their doctrinal differences .

Servetus

Why will God let his only son die?, why will he put him in pain?. God put Jesus in hell? . If I was God and people killed my only "child", I will make hell break loose on them.

Maybe he (Lucifer)came to Paul when we was writing his bible?

Jesus's last words were "Eli,Eli, Lama Sabachthani?" my god my god why have thou forsaken me? Christ was the promised messiah.his sole purpose for being born was to die.to die and give men the ability to atone for our sins.his suffering was not deserved ours is he paid the price for the wages of sin on behalf of all men.that was his reason to be here. while they were nailing him to the cross Christ said"forgive them father for they know not what they do."

Matt 27:54 now when the centurion,and they that were with him,watching Jesus,saw the earthquake,and those things that were done,they feared greatly,saying truly this was the son of god.

Matt 27:62-66 Now the next day that followed the day of preparation,the chief priests and Pharisees came together unto Pilate.63 saying sir we remember that that deceiver said while he was yet alive that after 3 days i will rise again.64 command therefor that the sepulcher be made sure until the third day,lest his disciples come by night,and steal him away and say unto the people,he has risen from the dead.65 Pilate said unto them ye have your watch:go your way and make it as sure as you can.66 so they went and made the sepulcher sure,sealing the stone and setting a guard.

Matt 28:1-6 in the end of the Sabbath as it began to dawn  to wards the first day of the week,came Mary Magdalene and the other Mary to see the sepulcher.2 and behold there was a great earthquake:for the angel of the lord descended from heaven and came and rolled back the stone from the door and sat upon it.3 his countenance was like lightning,his raiment white as snow.4and for fear of him the keepers did shake and became as dead men.5 and the angel answered the women.fear ye not for i know you seek Jesus which was crucified.6 he is not here:for he is risen,as he said.come see the place where the lord lay.

so much for faking his death.he rose from the dead in front of guards!and i doubt that was Satan Paul ran into when he wrote the new testament.why??Paul's job at the time Christ appeared to him was to hunt down and kill Christians.just as Satan would want.why would Satan use Paul's voice against himself when Paul originally was on Satan's side.

The conspiratorial plot thickens.  One wonders (and to play "you-know-whose" advocate), why is it that the crucified Christ of Christianity, the propitiatory sacrifice, so closely resembles all those crucified and resurrected savior gods of Pagan antiquity?   (St. Justin Martyr�s explanation, that it is due, in effect, to clever demons that can read the Bible in advance and thus replicate, or counterfeit the idea, is somewhat but not altogether satisfactory to my Unitarian mind.)  Also, why is it that human sacrifice, with some possible exceptions, e.g., Jeptha's daughter,  is so expressly prohibited in the Old Testament and yet becomes central to the New Testament and to its mystery of redemption? Is this the "stumbling stone and rock of offense" that was laid in Zion, spoken of by Prophet Isaiah (8:13-15)?

Servetus 

Maybe he does need treatment.

But I was on the edge of my seat with excitement, waiting for the next chapters in this grand conspiracy (assuming there were some).

Servetus

Rudy, though I agree that the Bible was corrupted.  And people rely too heavily on the Epistles of Paul....I would suggest that you look deeper into the Gospel of Barnabas.

There is alot of evidence that suggests that the Gospel of Barnabas was actually written in the 14th century.  There are a number of inaccuracies that Barnabas would not have made the mistakes. 

The Gospel of Barnabas also contradicts the Quran by claiming Mohammed to be the Messiah and denying Christ as the Messiah. 

I would think it would be dangerous to put faith into any book with questionable origins, especially if there are pieces that contradict what is believed to be the pure word of God (The Holy Quran).

I fear the Gospel of Barnabas is just more of the created writings that appeared in the years after Jesus's (death/disappearance, depending on belief) 

But, to be fair, I have a couple of sites, one for and one against the Gospel of Barnabas.

http://www.answering-islam.org/Green/barnabas.htm - http://www.answering-islam.org/Green/barnabas.htm

http://www.answering-christianity.com/barnabas.htm - http://www.answering-christianity.com/barnabas.htm

I think its best if we stick to what we know to be true in our hearts.  You have the Quran...I have my own book.  But in the end, I put little faith in anything brought out and haggled over by the Apostate Churches of the Middle Ages. 

unless you are claiming muslims aim to kill all non muslims which is even makes your arguments look more bigated.
If they ever had any taste or need for that then ay others would not have been left in India, the Central Asia or Spain - and almost a lot of the rest of the world.

People often hide their own  kill counts ad ratios under this allegation!