After waiting for some more responses, I think, its better to move forward with whatever has been posted uptill now. In that, I agree with what sis herjihad says that "Allah, SWT, made us all different colors "so that we may know one another"." Though this may mean different beliefs about the same doctrinal basics, but through different angles.
Coming to the expected response from bro rami, here are some of my comments and questions on his remarks.
Diferences in Fiqh do not constitue sectarian splits. |
But what if some one don't acknowldge others as authentic Fiqh, e.g. Jafaria fiqh in Shia Madhab.
They are groups who reject parts of the Quran or sunnah or who reject certain sahabah or the prophets wives or have Aqeedah beliefs which are not acceptable. | Not acceptable to what level? And from which yard stick? Is this yard stick common to all including those who are being judged with?
An example is saying who ever commits a sin has left Islam. That verse is not an excuse for the sects in Islam, it refers to different nations not groups which have unaccptable beliefs. It is easy to generalise but when you take a look at the beliefs of these groups no reconciliation can take place if it means declaring what they hold as true to be accptable by Islam.
| Reconcilliation doesn't necessarily means accepting others as true but to have patience among them despite having difference of opinion. Moreso, if Allah is so generous even towards non-believers of Prophethood of Mohammad, e.g. the people of the book, how difficult is it for us to recognise those who do, at least, believe in the this Prophethood? I don't understand this logic at all.
This is a Good work on the subject by Shaykh al Islam Abdul Qadir al Gilani http://web.archive.org/web/20030625191950/www.sunnah.org/aqida/ghunya/Default.htm - THE SECTS THAT HAVE GONE ASTRAY |
Bro, I have come across several of such treatizes in my life and they are all based upon differentiating the ummah. None of them tells us as how to do integration on ummah. It is for this very reason that I have raised such a question, though I am myself not qualified to say anything on it. I don't find it logical to start differentiating people by labling them and then identifying them such and such without even bother to look at their arguments, how logically authentic they may be; simply based upon my preconcieved notion from labling on them.
In the end I would appreciate sis firewall about her candid opinon when she says "anyway, we all can check it out wether we're right or not. Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) promised that if we follow Quran & Sunnah, we will be safe. i do believe that. & a dose of humbleness is wonderful." but the point is though it is highly important for us to recognise the right path for each one of us, but equally important to realise is that difference of opinon with others is not necessarily an opposite of "right path". Hope to hear soon more on this.
|