Print Page | Close Window

Female circumcision halal?

Printed From: IslamiCity.org
Category: Religion - Islam
Forum Name: Basics of Islam
Forum Description: Basics of Islam
URL: https://www.islamicity.org/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=8791
Printed Date: 22 November 2024 at 1:59pm
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.03 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Female circumcision halal?
Posted By: Showkat
Subject: Female circumcision halal?
Date Posted: 09 March 2007 at 2:45pm

Salaams All

The topic of female circumcision has always been controversial and commonly accepted as being a cultural practice and considered haram as it mutilates the woman.

A discussion is taking place based on Islamic evidences on this very important topic which u can view and participate in. Please note that some people are very strongly of the opinion that it is halal. See the link below inshAllah

http://www.7cgen.com/index.php?showtopic=8745&hl - http://www.7cgen.com/index.php?showtopic=8745&hl =



-------------
www.Muslimways.com, check out the poetry section



Replies:
Posted By: rami
Date Posted: 11 March 2007 at 12:02am
Bi ismillahir rahmanir raheem

Please note that some people are very strongly of the opinion that it is halal.

Thats becouse it is halal, rasul allah [sallah llahu alaihi wa sallam] specifically spoke about it. islamic female circumcision is not mutilation only western fanatical idiots who confuse actual mutilation with islamic circumcision say such garbage, i suggest you look up what it means islamicaly before stating such things. If you have not learnt about this topic from Islamic sources dont comment on the Islamic aspects of the discussion.

Finaly i suggest you also do a search on this forum becouse it has been extensively discussed.


-------------
Rasul Allah (sallah llahu alaihi wa sallam) said: "Whoever knows himself, knows his Lord" and whoever knows his Lord has been given His gnosis and nearness.


Posted By: Suleyman
Date Posted: 11 March 2007 at 9:46am
http://www.soundvision.com/info/gender/femalecircumcision.asp - http://www.soundvision.com/info/gender/femalecircumcision.as p


Posted By: rami
Date Posted: 11 March 2007 at 7:59pm
Bi ismillahir rahmanir raheem

It is a valid ruling in Islam to perform female circumcision as rasul allah [sallah llahu alaihi wa sallam] described.

"Cut off only the foreskin (outer fold of skin over the clitoris; the prepuce) but do not cut off deeply (i.e. the clitoris itself), for this is brighter for the face (of the girl) and more favorable with the husband."

Mutilation occurs when the clitoris is cut or removed, this is the distinction between Islamic circumcision and FGM which westerners fail to see.

Jamal Badawi is welcome to prove this hadith is fabricated but until that occurs the above hadith remains the words of Rasul allah thus no person can ever claim for this to be Haram as aproval is clear even in the translation.
 


-------------
Rasul Allah (sallah llahu alaihi wa sallam) said: "Whoever knows himself, knows his Lord" and whoever knows his Lord has been given His gnosis and nearness.


Posted By: Sign*Reader
Date Posted: 12 March 2007 at 10:19pm
Originally posted by rami rami wrote:

Bi ismillahir rahmanir raheem

It is a valid ruling in Islam to perform female circumcision as rasul allah [sallah llahu alaihi wa sallam] described.

"Cut off only the foreskin (outer fold of skin over the clitoris; the prepuce) but do not cut off deeply (i.e. the clitoris itself), for this is brighter for the face (of the girl) and more favorable with the husband."

Mutilation occurs when the clitoris is cut or removed, this is the distinction between Islamic circumcision and FGM which westerners fail to see.

Jamal Badawi is welcome to prove this hadith is fabricated but until that occurs the above hadith remains the words of Rasul allah thus no person can ever claim for this to be Haram as aproval is clear even in the translation.
 

Rami
ASA
Let's get to the point;There is no may be in this information age.
What is the injunction here; should it be done (yes/No)
Is it part of the faith and if yes the supporting evidence?
Do you have any daughters of your own? are you natural born Australian? and where do you stand on this issue?
Thanks & salaam




-------------
Kismet Domino: Faith/Courage/Liberty/Abundance/Selfishness/Immorality/Apathy/Bondage or extinction.


Posted By: rami
Date Posted: 13 March 2007 at 2:52pm
Bi ismillahir rahmanir raheem

My posts is clear and the hadith is clear.

the sunnah of rasul allah [sallah llahu alaihi wa sallam] is a source of law in islam.

without intending insult how long have you been a muslim as i find my self pointing out an obvious matter in our dean.

There is a ruling in the shafii madhab that says it is wajib, there is another ruling in the shafii madhhab that states it is not wajib but merely recommended, Hanafi's also hold it is not wajib.

no one can ever claim it is Haram becouse rasul allah gave instruction on this act specifically. It is a matter of personal choice for those who dont adhere to the wajib ruling of the shafii madhhab.





-------------
Rasul Allah (sallah llahu alaihi wa sallam) said: "Whoever knows himself, knows his Lord" and whoever knows his Lord has been given His gnosis and nearness.


Posted By: Andalus
Date Posted: 13 March 2007 at 4:19pm

Originally posted by rami rami wrote:

Bi ismillahir rahmanir raheem

It is a valid ruling in Islam to perform female circumcision as rasul allah [sallah llahu alaihi wa sallam] described.

"Cut off only the foreskin (outer fold of skin over the clitoris; the prepuce) but do not cut off deeply (i.e. the clitoris itself), for this is brighter for the face (of the girl) and more favorable with the husband."

Mutilation occurs when the clitoris is cut or removed, this is the distinction between Islamic circumcision and FGM which westerners fail to see.

Jamal Badawi is welcome to prove this hadith is fabricated but until that occurs the above hadith remains the words of Rasul allah thus no person can ever claim for this to be Haram as aproval is clear even in the translation.
 

Assalam Aleikum.

I guess Br Jamal Badawi is now delving into the science of hadith. Good luck to him! It is sad to see the hadiths distorted by Muslims and non-Muslims.

Nice clarification of the issue and I think the Maliki madhab considers it "recommended".

 



-------------
A feeling of discouragement when you slip up is a sure sign that you put your faith in deeds. -Ibn 'Ata'llah
http://www.sunnipath.com
http://www.sunniforum.com/forum/
http://www.pt-go.com/


Posted By: Sign*Reader
Date Posted: 13 March 2007 at 11:20pm
Originally posted by rami rami wrote:

Bi ismillahir rahmanir raheem

the sunnah of rasul allah [sallah llahu alaihi wa sallam] is a source of law in islam.

I didn't hear rasul allah(saw) practice this in his household. if did -show me pl.

Originally posted by rami rami wrote:


without intending insult how long have you been a muslim as i find my self pointing out an obvious matter in our dean.

I  say my dad was Muslim & grand pa was and could care less before that cuz all the the Muslim people were colonized then so their being Muslim or or what ever is immaterial.
The people in bondage  had nothing to brag about their deen even the punishment of slaves is half.- if you know what I mean.
I had never heard of this female circumcisions till recently (in my golden years) when I heard late last year some Ethiopian dude(Khalid Adem) was convicted and sent to jail for 15 years in Georgia for doing this surgery on his 2 year old  daughter. The Africans or mid easterners morons brought the practice to the US in order to give a black eye to the Islamic community. This after cartoons ruckus didn't help the already maligned Islamic faith.
And I didn't see your face taking the mike infront of the TV camera for an obvious matter in our deen.
but now I know the status of this obvious matter goes as follows:

Legal Measures to Eliminate FGM
Several governments in Africa and elsewhere have taken steps to eliminate the practice of FGM in their countries. These steps include laws criminalizing FGM, education and outreach programs and the use of civil remedies and administrative regulations to prevent the practice.

Read on

African Nations
Fourteen countries�Benin, Burkina Faso, Central African Republic, Chad, C�te d�Ivoire, Djibouti, Ethiopia, Ghana, Guinea, Kenya, Niger, Senegal, Tanzania, and Togo�have enacted laws criminalizing FGM. The penalties range from a minimum of six months to a maximum of life in prison. Several countries also impose monetary fines. In Egypt, the Ministry of Health issued a decree declaring FGM unlawful and punishable under the Penal Code.

There have been reports of prosecutions or arrests in cases involving FGM in several African countries, including Burkina Faso, Egypt, Ghana, Senegal, and Sierra Leone.

Industrialized Nations
Ten industrialized countries that receive immigrants from countries where FGM is practiced�Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, New Zealand, Norway, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom, and United States�have passed laws criminalizing the practice. In Australia, six out of eight states have passed laws against FGM. In the United States, the federal government and 16 states have criminalized the practice.

One country�France�has relied on existing criminal legislation to prosecute both practitioners of FGM and parents procuring the service for their daughters.

Now you tell about yourself, are you from the same neighborhood as was Khalid Adem? or some special special place which we don't know where
Originally posted by rami rami wrote:


There is a ruling in the shafii madhab that says it is wajib, there is another ruling in the shafii madhhab that states it is not wajib but merely recommended, Hanafi's also hold it is not wajib.

Being a Hanafi I guess I got lucky, I am going to check who have more fun the Shafiites or the Hanifite !
Originally posted by rami rami wrote:


no one can ever claim it is Haram becouse rasul allah gave instruction on this act specifically. It is a matter of personal choice for those who dont adhere to the wajib ruling of the shafii madhhab.

Rami it is law of the land which decides unless someone loves the place in the big house.
I went back to look at some of your previous posts as what is the logic behind all this?
 You do have a tendency of  pull rank --but you are not the mod any more so there -Thank God.
I hope you are resident in a safe Aussi state and be safe for preaching this !


-------------
Kismet Domino: Faith/Courage/Liberty/Abundance/Selfishness/Immorality/Apathy/Bondage or extinction.


Posted By: rami
Date Posted: 14 March 2007 at 3:02am
Bi ismillahir rahmanir raheem

I seem to be meeting a lot of people lately who submit there will to people before they do to allah as they place right and wrong in the hands of this dunya beffore the Quran and sunnah.

I didn't hear rasul allah(saw) practice this in his household. if did -show me pl.

which means absolutely nothing, is it a principle of law that he must do so for something to be permissible.

Masha allah, isnt it enough for you that he gave instruction on how to do it!

I  say my dad was Muslim & grand pa was and could care less before that cuz all the the Muslim people were colonized then so their being Muslim or or what ever is immaterial.

if you are not educated in the basics of Islam why are you commenting on them?

Your welcome to your personnel opinion but you are not welcome to make up things about islam and islamic law!!

I had never heard of this female circumcisions till recently (in my golden years) when I heard late last year some Ethiopian dude(Khalid Adem) was convicted and sent to jail for 15 years in Georgia for doing this surgery on his 2 year old  daughter. The Africans or mid easterners morons brought the practice to the US in order to give a black eye to the Islamic community. This after cartoons ruckus didn't help the already maligned Islamic faith.

Islamic law is clear it doesnt change simply becouse you are embarrassed.

And I didn't see your face taking the mike infront of the TV camera for an obvious matter in our deen.

wow now TV is the criterion of right and wrong, if its right on TV it must be right 

but now I know the status of this obvious matter goes as follows:

Islamic law is in the hands of the madhhabs not any government. You and they are welcome to do as you please.

Rami it is law of the land which decides unless someone loves the place in the big house.

i would rather assume you are uneducated than a kafir, becouse in the above you have placed "the law of the land" above the Quran and sunnah.

Even if you can not practice something which Islam permits in a non Islamic country you should believe in your heart that it is still right and this is the lowest form of Iman.

You do have a tendency of  pull rank --but you are not the mod any more so there -Thank God.

only a person who follows people in authority blindly and submits there will to them out of fear perceives matters the way you do. If you have never done this in the past you would not recognise it in such a way at all [in plain english, it takes one to know one].

Haq is in the hands of rasul allah [salla llahu alaihi wa sallam] and Allah not any man or earthly authority.

I guess only time will show that my style of posting wont change in general and that i wasn't pulling rank as you perceive it but stating what is clearly within Islamic limits to people who largely have no clue about Islam and invent there own laws as they like.

I hope you are resident in a safe Aussi state and be safe for preaching this !

Islamic law is clear, i am stating what the ulama have said not my own personnel opinion. the least you can do is make that distinction but you seem to be more interested in attacking me.


-------------
Rasul Allah (sallah llahu alaihi wa sallam) said: "Whoever knows himself, knows his Lord" and whoever knows his Lord has been given His gnosis and nearness.


Posted By: UmmTaaha
Date Posted: 19 March 2007 at 5:40am

Originally posted by Sign Reader Sign Reader wrote:

I didn't hear rasul allah(saw) practice this in his household. if did -show me pl.

Hadith or sunnah is not only what rasul Allah practised ... there are various categories of sunnah, one of which is "sunnah by Iqrar"

ie something which he (saw) did not oppose or forbid.

Perhaps you do not understand the words wajib and sunnah muakkadah, .... this may lead to finding only halal or haram in rulings. Where in realitly rulings are based on as many as 8 categories in hanafi madhab, and 4-5 in other madhabs.

Something which has been recommended, no muslim can grade it in the category of makruh or haram. That is the very basic of the laws of sharia.

 

 



-------------
Adab with Allah is the proper fruit of obedience - Habib Ali Jifri


Posted By: hat2010
Date Posted: 19 March 2007 at 3:56pm
Bismillah,

If I lived in the time of the Prophet (pbuh) and he really did say that, I would
ask him to reconsider, as females lose sensitivity in the clitoris as well as the
general unpleasant weirdness of the operation.

p.s someone is mapping the human genome right now, someone else is
puzzling over whether to circumcize a female. Any guesses why my more
modern Africa peers are flocking to the west?


Posted By: umsami
Date Posted: 10 April 2007 at 9:46am
Assalamu Alaikum:

We are not supposed to do something that is harmful, right? And the effects of female circumcision are extensive--including death to the girl undertaking it as well as to any future children she may have. (See the WHO study done in 2006). 

Let's also not forget that to call somebody a "circumciser of women" was an insult in the Prophet's (saws) time.  If it was a virtuous thing--then it wouldn't be an insult, right?

Islam is also a religion that encourages mutual sexual pleasure--and by removing any portion of a woman's clitoris, one removes her pleasure... thus harming the success and happiness of the marriage.

It is in no way similar to male circumcision.  To make them the same, one would remove a portion or the entire penis--rather than just the foreskin.

Also...it predates Islam and was practiced in Pharaonic times and in the Jahiliya.  The practice is limited (thank God) in the Muslim world to mainly Egypt and other African countries.  It is practiced among Muslims and Christians--and is not an exclusively Muslim practice.

Finally, many Muslim scholars met at Al-Azhar last November and declared that this practice is not Islamic and a crime against humanity. http://www.yoursdaily.com/world_news/middle_east/islam_outla ws_female_genital_mutilation
"The religous scholars at the conference were the following: Grand Mufti and Patron of Al-Azhar: Prof. Dr. Ali Goma'a; the Grand Sheikh of Al-Azhar: Prof. Dr. Mohamed Sayed Tantawi; the Minister of Religion of Egypt: Prof. Dr. Mahmoud Hamdi Zakzouk; Sheikh Yusuf Qaradawi from Qatar; Sheikh Hissein Hassan Abkar from Chad; Imam Mahammadou Diallo from Mali; Imam Bal El Bechir from Mauritania; Sheikh Mohamed Darassa from Ethiopia, and Imam Tarafa Baghrajati from Austria. Reports were given by medical experts from Egypt, Ethiopia, and Germany."

Peace. 





Posted By: aka2x2
Date Posted: 10 April 2007 at 10:31am

I agree with Jamal 100%.

 

We seem to forget two important issues. First, there is not total agreement on authenticity of all Hadiths among all Muslims. It is wrong to call another Muslim a Kafir simply because he doubts the authenticity of a particular Hadith. This kind of talk has dehumanized us and made it easier to go to war with each other. Second, even if the Hadith were authentic, the Prophet never claimed he was infallible. In fact there are verses in the Quran attesting to his human fallibility. So, I too would have asked him to reconsider.

 

I was born in a Muslim country. However, I did not even know what female circumcision was until I was accused of practicing it in the West. Frankly, if this practice is isolated to such a small group of Muslims, it is very likely to be cultural and not religious, even though its practitioners believe otherwise.



-------------
Respectfully
aka2x2


Posted By: Abeer23
Date Posted: 10 April 2007 at 8:35pm

Originally posted by umsami umsami wrote:

Assalamu Alaikum:


Also...it predates Islam and was practiced in Pharaonic times and in the Jahiliya.  The practice is limited (thank God) in the Muslim world to mainly Egypt and other African countries.  It is practiced among Muslims and Christians--and is not an exclusively Muslim practice.

Peace. 


As salamu alikum.  Actually sister, though I DO NOT advocate it, female circumcision is not limited to the regions you've mentioned.  It is practiced in many Eastern countires.  My Malay sisters tell me that in Malaysia, if a woman is not circumcised she cannot be burried in a Muslim cemetary.  I know a Thai convert that married a Indian/Malaysian Brother and had to have this done in order to get a legal marriage certificate (why she agreed I'll never know). 

Salaam



Posted By: Aminah07
Date Posted: 12 April 2007 at 5:13am

WAS,

so is it required or not?

i was shocked  by abeer23's posting about not getting permission for marriage or burial. it has never been mentioned at any halaqa that i've gone to or attended when srs' issues are discussed. i'm just assuming that this is not a common practice today at least with births in the west.

Aminah



Posted By: amah
Date Posted: 12 April 2007 at 3:10pm

Bismillahirrahmanirraheem

assalaamualaikum

guideline no 4. When discussing issues dealing with Islam, please support your comments with the Quran or Sunnah. Mocking any Quranic reference, Hadith, scholar, or member will not be tolerated. If you are stating something about a religion, please list your source. If it is an opinion, please state this fact.

Whoever claims that a hadith is daeef, should present his reference. It is apalling that muslims with little knowledge of islam (which they make obvious) go as far as to say that a hadeeth is daeef just because they do not agree with it.

If someone does not wish to follow a particular sunnah, then it is upto them. coming here and making baseless statements is not only misleading others but you may be sinning by such remarks about a hadith which may be the prophet's words. what would you tell Allah on the day of judgement for this action?

genital mutilation and circumcision are two entirely different things. get this into your heads for Allah's sake.

la haula wa la quwwata illa billa.

wassalaam.



-------------
Allah is Sufficient as a Walee (Protector) and Allah is Sufficient as a Naseer (Helper).
(Surah An-Nisa, Chapter #4, Verse #45)


Posted By: amah
Date Posted: 12 April 2007 at 3:17pm
Originally posted by aka2x2 aka2x2 wrote:

 

the Prophet never claimed he was infallible. In fact there are verses in the Quran attesting to his human fallibility. So, I too would have asked him to reconsider.

 

prophets of Allah are guided by Allah. they do not commit sins but on rare occasions if they have erred, Allah has corrected them right then and there. You think allah will allow injustice to people in the form of an incorrect hadith? You think the prophet sallallahu alaihi wa sallam ,naozubillah , made a mistake with this hadith? are you aware of what you and br jamal are saying?

 

 

 

I was born in a Muslim country. However, I did not even know what female circumcision was until I was accused of practicing it in the West. Frankly, if this practice is isolated to such a small group of Muslims, it is very likely to be cultural and not religious, even though its practitioners believe otherwise.

 

There are many things in sunnah which many muslims have not heard of because of ignorance. In fact many muslims are not even aware of things from the quran.

 



-------------
Allah is Sufficient as a Walee (Protector) and Allah is Sufficient as a Naseer (Helper).
(Surah An-Nisa, Chapter #4, Verse #45)


Posted By: amah
Date Posted: 12 April 2007 at 3:19pm
Just to make it clear, I agree with jamal badawi's point of view.

-------------
Allah is Sufficient as a Walee (Protector) and Allah is Sufficient as a Naseer (Helper).
(Surah An-Nisa, Chapter #4, Verse #45)


Posted By: crasss
Date Posted: 12 April 2007 at 8:29pm
Originally posted by Showkat Showkat wrote:

The topic of female circumcision has always been controversial and commonly accepted as being a cultural practice and considered haram as it mutilates the woman.

If the people arguing against female circumcision did only that, the discussion would be a lot easier. These people carry with them, however, an entire, rather dangerous agenda, which is less innocent than just arguing against female circumcision.

I think the proponents of the practice may be afraid that they cannot give in to this point in the agenda, because that would open the door for the entire agenda.

It is rather a unfortunate, but nevertheless political fact of life, that first this dangerous agenda has to disappear, before more innocent arguments could be accepted.



Posted By: rami
Date Posted: 13 April 2007 at 2:03am
Bi ismillahir rahmanir raheem

Jamal wrote;

If I lived in the time of the Prophet (pbuh) and he really did say that, I would ask him to reconsider, as females lose sensitivity in the clitoris as well as the general unpleasant weirdness of the operation.

After which sayidinah Abu Bakr, Umar or Ali would ask rasul allah's permission to cut of your head as you have just challenged him directly.

any person with a sense of respect for our prophet [sallah llahu alaihi wa sallam] would ask him to clarify himself before correcting himself.

Regarding your second uneducated statement i will repeat what Sister amah said "
genital mutilation and circumcision are two entirely different things. get this into your heads for Allah's sake."

umsami wrote;

We are not supposed to do something that is harmful, right? And the effects of female circumcision are extensive--including death to the girl undertaking it as well as to any future children she may have. (See the WHO study done in 2006).

I have yet to see a study which makes the clear and obvious distinction between mutilation and
circumcision. [read this part carefully] Usually they define what they mean by mutilation and in this they clearly say the removal of [or in part] of the clitoris, now read the words of our prophet CAREFULLY and tell me where he mentions touching it in any way what so ever.

Let's also not forget that to call somebody a "circumciser of women" was an insult in the Prophet's (saws) time.  If it was a virtuous thing--then it wouldn't be an insult, right?

Firstly using one hadith to clearly contradict another hadith and simply ignore the later is not permissible in our deen and is tantamount to accusing rasul allah of contradicting himself especially if both ahadith have no serious weakness in them
.

Secondly Any hadith in which rasul allah gives clear instruction on how to perform something [as is the case here] can not be negated by even a verse in the Quran let alone a Urf [custom] of the time which you are Quoting. The Quran would condition the hadith and limit its application in some respect, an apparent contradiction between the two must be explained and not simply ignored.


Islam is also a religion that encourages mutual sexual pleasure--and by removing any portion of a woman's clitoris, one removes her pleasure... thus harming the success and happiness of the marriage.

no part of the clitoris is touched hence no sexual pleasure is reduced. You must differentiate between the local practice and clear instruction of our prophet. The practice of a people do not make there actions islamicly sound simply becouse they are popular among a people.


Also...it predates Islam and was practiced in Pharaonic times and in the Jahiliya.  The practice is limited (thank God) in the Muslim world to mainly Egypt and other African countries.  It is practiced among Muslims and Christians--and is not an exclusively Muslim practice.

So are many other practices such as fasting, giving zakkat, purifying your self etc etc Islam came to confirm the truthful aspects of prior religions and in this respect rasul allah gave clear instruction, how on earth can you or any other person posting here simply ignore an authenticated hadith.

To me this is mind boggling, how people can do this and still pretend to be talking about Islam, its like you saying this and this are a part of islam while rasul allah said something completely different.

I am sorry if my words seem harsh i dont intend insult but this is not a small matter either.


Finally, many Muslim scholars met at Al-Azhar last November and declared that this practice is not Islamic and a crime against humanity. http://www.yoursdaily.com/world_news/middle_east/islam_outla ws_female_genital_mutilation
"The religous scholars at the conference were the following: Grand Mufti and Patron of Al-Azhar: Prof. Dr. Ali Goma'a; the Grand Sheikh of Al-Azhar: Prof. Dr. Mohamed Sayed Tantawi; the Minister of Religion of Egypt: Prof. Dr. Mahmoud Hamdi Zakzouk; Sheikh Yusuf Qaradawi from Qatar; Sheikh Hissein Hassan Abkar from Chad; Imam Mahammadou Diallo from Mali; Imam Bal El Bechir from Mauritania; Sheikh Mohamed Darassa from Ethiopia, and Imam Tarafa Baghrajati from Austria. Reports were given by medical experts from Egypt, Ethiopia, and Germany."

again that is all well and good but look at there definition of the term no doubt it would clearly mention the removal of the clitoris. There is clear confusion between the arabic and english i have seen these type of documents beffore.

Further you should also understand it would be Kufar in Islam to declare what rasull allah said to be haram they would need to prove this hadith is fabricated which has not been done.

More importantly Azhar is a shafii university, there is a valid ruling in this madhhab which states the matter is wajib while there is another ruling stating it is not [shafii's are permitted to choose either], neither of which actually say it is haram, the point Being none of these shaykhs above are mujtahid Imams [ie qualafied enough] to be making Ijtihad [new rulings] on this matter.

aka2x2 wrote

I agree with Jamal 100%.


Read what jamal baddawi wrote more carefully he doesnt actualy say this practice is haram [you may get that impression from the article i understand] he only says there is no basis for it to be widespread which arguably means nothing really as people are free to choose which authentic rulings they wish to follow.

 

We seem to forget two important issues. First, there is not total agreement on authenticity of all Hadiths among all Muslims.


this is a general statement and not relevant to this point as we are talking about the authenticity of one particular hadith on which you have to comment.


It is wrong to call another Muslim a Kafir simply because he doubts the authenticity of a particular Hadith.


This is correct as his doubting the authenticity for valid reasons is acceptable but who then called any person a kafir for doing this.


Alternately who proved this particular hadith is not authentic?


Second, even if the Hadith were authentic, the Prophet never claimed he was infallible.


You are correct, Allah himself said he was infallible in the Quran.


In fact there are verses in the Quran attesting to his human fallibility. So, I too would have asked him to reconsider.

 

Authubillah, there is a clear distinction between making a mistake in choosing one path over another and making a mistake in Islamic rullings you would be committing Kufr to claim the second. Allah himself says in the Quran nothing he speaks is from his own desire and he is Guided to speak.


Abasa wa tawallah  is referring to two paths rasul allah had to choose from not an Islamic ruling in which Allah has Guaranteed his Infallibility on.


Allah testifies in the Quran that he delivered the message correctly, please be carefull with your words.


Abeer wrote;

My Malay sisters tell me that in Malaysia, if a woman is not circumcised she cannot be burried in a Muslim cemetary.

This would be correct becouse malaysia is majority shafii madhhab and in that madhhab it is a wajib act to do. Not being
circumcised is a clear and open [upon death] act of not following your religion, but i am speaking generaly here and not becouse i have true knowledge of the situation there, there are abuses in many areas and the point about marriage i have no clue why that may be.

This does seem to be an excess any way you look at it and not from the deen as there are two clear rullings in the madhhab to choose from, also how on earth can they know you are shafii if you dont tell them not all malaysians are shafii there are hanafi's for example and in that madhhab it is not wajib [obligatory].

Showkat wrote:

The topic of female circumcision has always been controversial and commonly accepted as being a cultural practice and considered haram as it mutilates the woman.

See everything i have written above clearly you are wrong.


-------------
Rasul Allah (sallah llahu alaihi wa sallam) said: "Whoever knows himself, knows his Lord" and whoever knows his Lord has been given His gnosis and nearness.


Posted By: Abeer23
Date Posted: 13 April 2007 at 6:13am
Originally posted by Aminah07 Aminah07 wrote:

WAS,

so is it required or not?

As salamu alaikum,

No sister, it is not required.   



Posted By: Israfil
Date Posted: 13 April 2007 at 9:06am

Since Rami refuses to deny that female "circumcision" is wrong let's see the list, oh and since this is a scientific fact this is not religiously biased. Before I commence I'm acknowledging that we are discussing not just the act initself but what defines this act. It is obvious that Rami has a problem with the terminology given to female circumcision as many have referred it as female mutilation (or female genital cutting) I would say the latter definition is more appropriate whereas the former may seem pejorative regardless because it is practiced widely by cultures it is not necessarily mandated by medical experts.

Also, female circumcision despite it being interpreted in Hadith as religious mandate has been practiced before/during/after the Prophet Muhmmad. So it would be nothing new to say that this is an acceptable practice. But this practice is not something that is biologically helpful to women note the following:

When we discuss female circumcision we are discussing clitoridectomy which is: the removal or splitting of the clitoral hood The clitoral hood is the female prepuce, which is homologous to the foreskin of the male (See online ref: http://cancerweb.ncl.ac.uk/cgi-bin/omd?clitoridectomy - http://cancerweb.ncl.ac.uk/cgi-bin/omd?clitoridectomy )

Believe it or not there are two types of female circumcision: Excision and Fibulation.

Excision refers to the surgical removal of tissue (such as the prepuce and the clitoris) plus the partial or total removal of the labia minora, the inner lips of the female vulva (See online ref:http://cancerweb.ncl.ac.uk/cgi-bin/omd?query=Excision) also ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Excision - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Excision )

Of course the above type is associated with the Sunna tradition but the second type refers to the sewing together of the leftover labia minora epidermis, which contains sweat glands, a buildup of sweat and urine in the closed off space beneath this closed space can lead to urinary infection, septicemia, hemorrhaging and cyst formation which is of course cancerous (See ref:http://www.cirp.org/pages/female/dirie1/).

The other type is called infibulation which is extensive tissue removal of the external genitalia, including all of the labia minora and the inside of the labia majora, leaving a raw open wound. The labia majora are then held together using thorns or stitching and the girl's legs are tied together for two - six weeks, to prevent her from moving and allow the healing of the two sides of the vulva (See  ref: Pieters, Guy, M.D.; Albert B. Lowenfels, M.D., F.A.C.S. (April 1977). "Infibulation in the Horn of Africa" New York State Journal of Medicine 77 (6): 729-731). 

In addition Nothing remains of the normal anatomy of the genitalia, except for a wall of flesh from the pubis down to the anus except a small opening in the inferior portion of the vulva to allow urine and menstrual blood to pass through. Sounds awful? There is more. Female genital cutting is today mainly practiced in African countries. It is common in Senegal in West Africa to Somalia on the East coast, as well as from Egypt in the north to Tanzania. An estimated of more than 95% of all women have undergone this procedure. It is also practiced by some groups in the Arabian peninsula, especially among a minority (20%) in Yemen (See ref: Hedayat, Kamyar M.; Pirzadeh, Roya (October 2001). "Issues in Islamic Biomedical Ethics: A Primer for the Pediatrician". Pediatrics 108 (4): 965-971. Retrieved on 2006-10-02

There only reaons I could list that FGC can be justifiable is:

A) customary tradition in which female genital cutting is seen as a rite of passage from childhood to adulthood.

B) A cultural practice that sometimes has a religious identification (a female's honor is a reflection on her entire family, and believing it is God's will).

C) Social conformity

Of course the opinions of Muslims that support Female Genital Cutting are few and is not widely accepted by Muslims. Like I mentioned before Female Genital Cutting predates Islam but was also practiced during the time of the Prophet. The support by those Muslims who believe in Female Genital Cutting are those who believe in the mildest form of cutting which, of course many site the Hadith by the Prophet:

a woman used to perform circumcision in Medina. Muhammad said to her, 'Do not cut severely as that is better for a woman and more desirable for a husband." Umm 'Atiyyah; Abu Dawud, al-Bayhaq. Partial Translation of Sunan Abu-Dawud, Book 41: General Behavior (Kitab Al-Adab).University of Southern California. Retrieved on 2007 March 27.

Many schools of thought which order the "slight trimming" of the hood of the clitoris do so in means of enhancing sexual pleasure. But most Muslims do no support Female Genital Cutting.

"Among practicing cultures, FGC is most commonly performed between the ages of four and eight, but can take place at any age from infancy to adolescence. Prohibition has led to FGC going underground, at times with people who have had no medical training performing the cutting without anesthetic, sterilization, or the use of proper medical instruments. The procedure, when performed without any anesthetic, can lead to death through shock from immense pain or excessive bleeding. The failure to use sterile medical instruments may lead to infections and the spread of disease, such as HIV, especially when the same instruments are used to perform procedures on multiple women." (See online ref: http://www.cirp.org/pages/female/dirie1/)

Other serious long term health effects are also common. These include urinary and reproductive tract infections, caused by obstructed flow of urine and menstrual blood, various forms of scarring and infertility. Of course there are other parts I'd like to add but I'd like for us to sit on this issue for now.

 

 



Posted By: rami
Date Posted: 13 April 2007 at 5:25pm
Bi ismillahir rahmanir raheem

Israfil does your mind differentiate between the words of our prophet and what these Kufar intentionally lump together with mutilation. This seems to be the only way for you or any other person of making what is Islamicly sound seem to be wrong.

I am talking pure islamic law i dont care what people practice [most of the countries where the clitoris is removed are non islamic countries, but they/you fail to make that distinction], our prophet instructed on how to do this so unless you want to also deny that learn how to differentiate between issues.

Not you or these so called "majority" muslims are in a position to speak for Islam.

You would be better served openly and clearly saying "i dont agree with Islamic law", i wont argue with you at that point but merely say that is your prerogative.

From, The Reliance of the Traveler which is A summation of Imam Nawawi's [do you know who he is?] rulings in the Shafii Madhhab.

""20.4.3  Circumcision is Obligatory
Circumcision is obligatory for both men and women. For men it consists of removing the prepuce from the penis, and for women, removing the prepuce (bazr) of the clitoris but not the clitoris itself, as some mistakenly assert.

Hanbalis hold that circumcision of women is not obligatory but Prophetic practice [ie sunnah/my insertion], while Hanafis consider it a courtesy to the husband.""

A ruling on the matter exists in all madhhabs [three are mentioned above] this is an undeniable fact, the international community and so called modernist muslims have no place even commenting on the legality of the issue from an islamic perspective.

If they would like to invent there own religion they are welcome to but Muslims prostrate to Allah.


-------------
Rasul Allah (sallah llahu alaihi wa sallam) said: "Whoever knows himself, knows his Lord" and whoever knows his Lord has been given His gnosis and nearness.


Posted By: Israfil
Date Posted: 13 April 2007 at 11:32pm

Rami,

It appears that ignorance is bliss and your post is riddled with it. Most Muslims and by most i'm not referring to the authorities of the madhabs do not practice female genital cutting. Again, this practice is mainly for the enhancement of sexual pleasure according to some of the schools of thought. And yes my mind differentiates between what the "Sunnah circumcision" states and what is stated by the medical community.

when I said FGC or Female Genital Cutting I was referring to three types which the third would be consider mutilation which is the removal of the external tissue of the clitoris as well as some of the internal tissue. I never said the Islamic practice was the third type if you read I mentioned that in Islamic practice, those that do practice it mainly do the "slight trimming" of the clitoris. Even if you cite the Hadith there is no explicit wording from the Prophet which states "Females must be circumcised." Only authoritarians do and most of the scholars in Islam are in disagreement over this issue. The issue regarding female circumcision is not even an Islamic practice when in fact it predates the Prophet so its not even an original practice. The act of female circumcision is purely cultural not religious. It is thought that female circumcision to have started in 163 B.C.E in Egypt which greeks had written about young girls in egypt who were circumcisied.

Here is the question if a young Muslim girl gets her clitoris slightly trimmed by a qualified Muslim how do we know that this Muslim is qualified? Obviously she cannot get it done in the States as well as other countries so where and who determines these qualifications? Even if the procedure is done according to the Sunnah does this muslim have knowledge regarding surgical procedures? There are many questions. Even if the surgery is low risk there is still risk!

I know you love to criticize me because I challenge authority because i find authority to be as fallible as those who follow authority. You however are blinded by your own zeal cannot possibly recognize the illogical nature of female genital cutting. When the prophet commented on the woman who was performing the circumcision he did so with the intention make sure the young girl was not being harmed and he made a comment based on what was acceptable at that time. Since the prophet was indeed human he was involved in his own culture at that time so I wouldn't expect any individual to be so isolated from their culture simply because they receive revelations from God.

Again I said nothing about Muslims cutting off the clitoris however they do trim the clitoris and that is a fact.

 

 



Posted By: rami
Date Posted: 14 April 2007 at 9:09pm

Bi ismillahir rahmanir raheem

It appears that ignorance is bliss and your post is riddled with it. Most Muslims and by most i'm not referring to the authorities of the madhabs do not practice female genital cutting.

I beg to differ Malaysia, Indonesia and Egypt make up a vast number of the muslim population all of which are countries in which the shafii madhhab is dominant, there are other countries as well.

The Shaffi madhhab and the hanafi madhhab make up the overwhelming majority of muslims around the world, Indonisia if I remember correctly is the largest single muslim population on earth.

The muslim world is overwhelmingly different from that in the west where you and I reside, have you been outside America to a muslim land?

And yes my mind differentiates between what the "Sunnah circumcision" states and what is stated by the medical community.

If you acknowledge something is sunnah how can you go on to state it is not a part of islam.

those that do practice it mainly do the "slight trimming" of the clitoris

Is the prepuce [clitoral hood] of the clitoris now the clitoris itself?

Even if you cite the Hadith there is no explicit wording from the Prophet which states "Females must be circumcised."

What do you know about Islamic law, do you think muslims are simply literalists who don�t deeply analyse there Quran and sunnah. But even the word Deeply can only ever be understood by to the extent of your experience your world hasn�t been opened up to Islamic scholarship and its sciences, more than likely you can only conjure up what form of science and analysis you have come across in your western world. Does rasul allah [sallah llahu alaihi wa sallam] need to specifically state something for it to be a command ?

Am i making the claim they must be?

Only authoritarians do and most of the scholars in Islam are in disagreement over this issue.

Do you know how to deduce law from the Quran and sunnah, speaking from limited experience with the science of Usul al Fiqh the arguments and evidences and methods our scholars have produced over 1400 years of studying The Quran and sunnah are of a higher standard when  compared to any arguments I have seen from any individual anywhere including yours. It is easy to talk about something you know nothing about its called generalization, your statement ignorance is bliss would truly be appropriate at this point in time as ignorance allows a person to conclude on matters before comprehensively studying them.

If the scholars are in disagreement who said it is haram they only disagree on various levels of acceptability.

Maybe you think if a matter is not hallal it must be haram and there is nothing in between why else would you even bother saying he did not specifically say it must be done if your mind wasnt limited to these two extremes.

The issue regarding female circumcision is not even an Islamic practice when in fact it predates the Prophet so its not even an original practice.

Is this some sort of Usul principle that URF [custom] of a people can not be legislated upon, the argument of Islamic circumcision is in order to stop this practice entirely even among the people in which it is a custom not over whether or not this should spread around the muslim world so let us make that crystal clear. You and others are making Haram what rasul allah gave permission for and instructed on.

I dont think you know what identifies a practice as being Islamic you seem to be just certain of your self, many people confuse confidence for being correct.

The act of female circumcision is purely cultural not religious.

The moment rasul allah spoke about it, it became a religious matter, you wont find any scholar on earth who wont say this.

It is thought that female circumcision to have started in 163 B.C.E in Egypt which greeks had written about young girls in egypt who were circumcisied.

This is a non Issue since rasul allah�s words are grounds for legislation in Islam.

Here is the question if a young Muslim girl gets her clitoris slightly trimmed by a qualified Muslim how do we know that this Muslim is qualified? Obviously she cannot get it done in the States as well as other countries so where and who determines these qualifications? Even if the procedure is done according to the Sunnah does this muslim have knowledge regarding surgical procedures? There are many questions. Even if the surgery is low risk there is still risk!

Im not even slightly interested in how things are implemented, the actions of a people do not dictate Islamic law, I am only interested in what is and isn�t a part of Islam logistics are the responsibility of the people themselves.

I know you love to criticize me

You replied to my post withSince Rami refuses to deny that female "circumcision" is wrong� and then claim I love to critisise you subhanallah you replied to my post initially.

because I challenge authority because i find authority to be as fallible as those who follow authority.

This is baggage from your non Islamic days, logically speaking you have not studied the Islamic sciences to be making such a high claim so your words are baseless. Spiritualy speaking most if not all mujtahid Imams are considered awliyah in Islam, maybe theyre not infallible but there closer to ihsan [moral and spiritual perfection] in there character and judgment than anyone else on earth, having personaly looked into the sciences on an extremely basic level I have a more informed opinion than you do, you can easily counter this statement by making the effort yourself maybe you will better see what I refer to, at least I would give you the respect of a person with an informed opinion.

Islamicly speaking right character breads right judgment, would you like me to back that up for you? 

You however are blinded by your own zeal cannot possibly recognize the illogical nature of female genital cutting.

Samana wa ataynah, we hear and we obey, I have submitted my will to Allah and his prophet, your arguments don�t even compare. You have not proven otherwise nor have you logically assessed anything if I recall you are also against male circumcision and simply think it is genital cutting.

When the prophet commented on the woman who was performing the circumcision he did so with the intention make sure the young girl was not being harmed and he made a comment based on what was acceptable at that time.

Explain to me how you can know the intentions of any person let alone a prophet who lived 1400 years ago. It was his duty to teach the religion, his character was not so weak as to simply be swayed by cultural norms he set what was normal in Islamic society he was the guide he affirmed the actions of these people and further clarified the matter for them.

Since the prophet was indeed human he was involved in his own culture at that time so I wouldn't expect any individual to be so isolated from their culture simply because they receive revelations from God.

Are you saying his words are not a source of legislation, are you now negating his words with this far fetched explanation. Rasul allah [sallah llahu alaihi wa sallam] was a human prophet he was anything but normal he was privy to what others can not even dream of, if a simple scribe from the court of saydinah sulaiman can bring him the throne of bilqis in less than the blink of an eye [as it is mentioned in the Quran] and he was not even a prophet how normal are prophets compared to us, there spiritual excellence allows them to enter the heavens and see what no other human has the capacity to see.

By allah saydianh Umar after his death himself said he lived among us and behaved like us but he was not one of us.

Again I said nothing about Muslims cutting off the clitoris however they do trim the clitoris and that is a fact.

Is the prepuce [clitoral hood] of the clitoris now the clitoris itself?



-------------
Rasul Allah (sallah llahu alaihi wa sallam) said: "Whoever knows himself, knows his Lord" and whoever knows his Lord has been given His gnosis and nearness.


Posted By: rami
Date Posted: 14 April 2007 at 9:24pm
Bi ismillahir rahmanir raheem

Aminah07 wrote

so is it required or not?

No it is not sister only the shafii madhhab says it is wajib [obligatory], this whole discussion is over whether or not we can/should stop muslims who consider it wajib from performing this act.

For that to occur they have to prove it is completely Haram [an impossible task at this point in history] not simply that it isnt wajib which other madhhabs have already stated.

Rulings of the Shari`ah

Taken from http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/law/shariahintroduction.html - http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/law/shariahintroduction.html

The rulings of shari`ah for all our daily actions are five : prescribed, recommended, permissible, disliked and unlawful . The distinctions between the five categories are in whether their performance (P) and nonperformance (NP) is rewarded, not rewarded, punished or not punished (see the table). The prescribed (fard) is also referred to as obligatory (wajib), mandatory (muhattam) and required (lazim). It is divided into two categories :

  • personally obligatory (fard al-'ayn), which is required from every individual Muslim (e.g. salah and zakah);
  • and communally obligatory (fard al- kifaya), which if performed by some Muslims is not required from others (e.g., funeral prayers).

The recomended (mandub) is also referred to as sunnah, preferable (mustahabb), meritorious (fadila), and desirable (marghub fih). Examples are night vigil (tahajjud) prayers, and rememberance of Allah (zikr).

The performance and nonperformance of the permissible/ allowed (mubah) is neither rewarded nor punished.

Nonperformance of both the disliked (makruh) and the unlawful/prohibited (haram ) is rewarded. Performance of the unlawful is punished, but that of the disliked is not punished.

""The Hanafi school has its own classification, too, as it distinguishes between the Fard and Wajib, and the Haram and Makruh Tanzihi, by making the Makruh two levels.""


Rulings of Sacred Law
1. Prescribed 2. Recommended 3. Permissible/Allowed 4. Disliked/Offensive/Detested 5. Unlawful/Prohibited
Other terms:
- Obligatory
- Mandatory
- Required

Personally obligatory, communally obligatory

Performance: rewarded
Non-Performance: punished
Other terms:
- Sunnah
- Preferable
- Meritorius
- Desirable

P: rewarded
NP: not punished
P: not rewarded
NP: not punished
P: not punished
NP: rewarded
P: punished
NP: rewarded





-------------
Rasul Allah (sallah llahu alaihi wa sallam) said: "Whoever knows himself, knows his Lord" and whoever knows his Lord has been given His gnosis and nearness.


Posted By: Israfil
Date Posted: 14 April 2007 at 11:24pm

Rami your responses are in blue

I beg to differ Malaysia, Indonesia and Egypt make up a vast number of the muslim population all of which are countries in which the shafii madhhab is dominant, there are other countries as well.

This says nothing about practicing female circumcision except telling me about a population in which a Madhab is dominant. True, people may still practice in those countries and in fact, I'll agree with you that perhaps people practice in those countries. But I wouldn't even go as far as to say that those populations regardless their size in the religious consensus form a unified opinion on the matter. If this is true why isn't it acceptable in all other muslim countries?

If you acknowledge something is sunnah how can you go on to state it is not a part of islam.

I never said that it wasn't in the first place. I was trying to make a distinction between what is traditional practice verses the stereotypical thought allocated to it by those ignorant of Islamic practices. So when I was referring to the types of Female Genital Cutting I mentioned the three types, the third being the most severe (which is considered mutilation) I said that the Sunnah tradition is the first type I believe I made this distinction clear.

Is the prepuce [clitoral hood] of the clitoris now the clitoris itself?

No, I was referring to the excision of any part of the female genitalia, but if you are looking for particular clarification then no, according to Islamic tradition the clitoris itself is not entirely cut obviously but the hood as you've mentioned. Perhaps I was not clear here.

What do you know about Islamic law, do you think muslims are simply literalists who don�t deeply analyse there Quran and sunnah. But even the word Deeply can only ever be understood by to the extent of your experience your world hasn�t been opened up to Islamic scholarship and its sciences, more than likely you can only conjure up what form of science and analysis you have come across in your western world. Does rasul allah [sallah llahu alaihi wa sallam] need to specifically state something for it to be a command ?

 I never said anything about Muslims not understanding or incapable of analyzing the qur'an, although I believe a large portion of the community do not critically think and analyze doctrine very well I do not believe the entire majority behaves this way. You're also right that the extent of my knwoledge of shari'ah Law is not very much, however I am knowledgeable on the basic claims of the Madhabs regarding issues in relation to philosophical matters (i.e. ethics, conduct). I also understand the Islamic process of legislation on certain matters such as the subject we are currently discussing. From my understanding, the rulings of the Islamic Legislation (Shari`ah) are to be deduced from the authentic sources of legalization, namely the Qur'an, right Sunnah (i.e., right Prophetic Traditions), Consensus of Muslim Scholars in case it fulfills its conditions stated in the science of the Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence as well as the sound Qiyas (i.e., Analogical Deduction).

How can one make a correct interpretation of a sound statement if it does not directly address an issue. If the prophet comments on a specific thing he did not say that thing is law. For example in the case with the Hadith the prophet didn't specify that female circumcision was obligatory nor is it even mentioned in the Qur'an. so how can a ruling be made on this if it is not even mentioned in the Supreme source which is god's Holy Words: The Qur'an Kareem.

As far as Sunnah is concerned, there are some Prophetic Hadiths that may indicate the legality of practicing female circumcision despite the fact that none of these Hadiths have an authentic chain of transmitters so that it is not possible to deduce a legal ruling from them on such a very serious human matter.

Do you know how to deduce law from the Quran and sunnah, speaking from limited experience with the science of Usul al Fiqh the arguments and evidences and methods our scholars have produced over 1400 years of studying The Quran and sunnah are of a higher standard when  compared to any arguments I have seen from any individual anywhere including yours. It is easy to talk about something you know nothing about its called generalization, your statement ignorance is bliss would truly be appropriate at this point in time as ignorance allows a person to conclude on matters before comprehensively studying them.

These scholars are indeed intelligent and highly trained and although I'm inclined to agree with you that these knowledgeable men are highly trained their skill is not supreme. They can only explain the sciences in accordance to Islamic tradition using subjective premises which amount only to the subjective truths they are so willingly trying to prove. The only intellectual in the Muslim world even close to fusing religion and objective science together was  Ibn Rushd (Averroes) who, was considered a heretic for his commentary on Aristotilean works during the Almohad dynasty.

If the scholars are in disagreement who said it is haram they only disagree on various levels of acceptability.

Maybe you think if a matter is not hallal it must be haram and there is nothing in between why else would you even bother saying he did not specifically say it must be done if your mind wasnt limited to these two extremes.

I'm not saying that one must accept one polar opposite over the other i was simply saying that this subject is not concrete in law. The various levels you mentioned are not gray areas, rather, it is the interpretation of Hadiths and their transmitters and whether they are reliable enough to make such a legislation.

Is this some sort of Usul principle that URF [custom] of a people can not be legislated upon, the argument of Islamic circumcision is in order to stop this practice entirely even among the people in which it is a custom not over whether or not this should spread around the muslim world so let us make that crystal clear. You and others are making Haram what rasul allah gave permission for and instructed on.

I dont think you know what identifies a practice as being Islamic you seem to be just certain of your self, many people confuse confidence for being correct.

This is a non Issue since rasul allah�s words are grounds for legislation in Islam.

Im not even slightly interested in how things are implemented, the actions of a people do not dictate Islamic law, I am only interested in what is and isn�t a part of Islam logistics are the responsibility of the people themselves.

Ok.

This is baggage from your non Islamic days, logically speaking you have not studied the Islamic sciences to be making such a high claim so your words are baseless. Spiritualy speaking most if not all mujtahid Imams are considered awliyah in Islam, maybe theyre not infallible but there closer to ihsan [moral and spiritual perfection] in there character and judgment than anyone else on earth, having personaly looked into the sciences on an extremely basic level I have a more informed opinion than you do, you can easily counter this statement by making the effort yourself maybe you will better see what I refer to, at least I would give you the respect of a person with an informed opinion.

Also logically speaking you are committing a fallacy and based upon what you're saying I can only reduce this large paragraph to a simple "That is your opinion." Since you claim to be more informed than me I'd like to see that.

Explain to me how you can know the intentions of any person let alone a prophet who lived 1400 years ago. It was his duty to teach the religion, his character was not so weak as to simply be swayed by cultural norms he set what was normal in Islamic society he was the guide he affirmed the actions of these people and further clarified the matter for them.

I'll admit it was an interpretation through my examining the various Hadith sources attributed to the legitimacy of female circumcision as well as Qur'an. My process is not extremely different than that of scholars who interpret doctrine/text.

Are you saying his words are not a source of legislation, are you now negating his words with this far fetched explanation. Rasul allah [sallah llahu alaihi wa sallam] was a human prophet he was anything but normal he was privy to what others can not even dream of, if a simple scribe from the court of saydinah sulaiman can bring him the throne of bilqis in less than the blink of an eye [as it is mentioned in the Quran] and he was not even a prophet how normal are prophets compared to us, there spiritual excellence allows them to enter the heavens and see what no other human has the capacity to see.

I never said the Prophet's words are not a legitimate source of law I would divide myself from the greater community if I did so and would thus become a Kafir if I did that. The prophet was the leader of the community but he did not separate himself from the people nor made himself more than others only those who revere him do so. I, unlike yourself do not revere the prophet in the way Christians revere Jesus (I do not say your reverence is worship but your reverence is more than it should be of a great person). I respect and love the intellect of Muhammad but I also understand his physical body was human (or at least according to history it was) and his behavior was human. I can create a dialetical argument on how his prophetic image separates his "humaness" from others but that would take away from the subject at hand.

Is the prepuce [clitoral hood] of the clitoris now the clitoris itself?

I believe I answered this already.

 



Posted By: mariyah
Date Posted: 15 April 2007 at 5:31am

Asalaamu alaikum:

I as an American Nurse abhor the thought of some person mutilatiing the body of a young woman. I do not think that Allah (swt) the Merciful, would sanction such a thing. Some of  the cultures avocate the cutting of the hymen in the female to open up the vaginal area in order to promote healthier flow and prevent infection. That was probably the original intent. Quote a hadith, and many times someone else can quote one to counteract it. I have noticed that some of the stricter madrasa teachings in your side of the world even state that the Prophet advocated that woman had no business at the mosque or even being out of the house. (are you of the persuasion that put the women in burqas in Afghanistan?)

Cutting a womans clitoris is the equivalent of cutting off the top half of a man's penis. Does this sound like something you would want done to you?

Since there is such a debate on this subject, I wish to share the following article from the Muslim American Society website, I received a copy of this in an email:


 

Muslims in Kenya launch Campaign on Issue of Female Genital Mutilation

Date Posted: Friday, April 06, 2007


In the Name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful

WASHINGTON, DC - Apr. 6, 2007 (MASNET) The practice of Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) is widespread in a number of cultures throughout the world, including some that have a majority Muslim population. The MAS Freedom Foundation believes that the imposition of this practice of the forced genital mutilation of girls and women is a clear violation of human rights and equal protection under the law for people of both genders.

Further, FGM has no basis in either the Holy Qur'an or the Hadith of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH).

Accordingly, we call for an end to this cruel and painful practice, and we offer this article as an example of a progressive dialogue within a Muslim community in Africa that is confronting the issue.

ARTICLE:

Muslims in Kenya launch Campaign on Issue of Female Genital Mutilation

Muslim leaders of Kenya have decided to speak of the dangers of the widespread practice that permanently scars women and girls. The leaders say it is a tradition, not an Islamic obligation.

Sunday, April 01, 2007

IRIN 

The decision by Muslim religious leaders in northeastern Kenya to talk about the dangers of female genital mutilation (FGM) during Friday prayers has turned into a significant campaign against the practice.

"We have managed to educate people and convince many parents, including those with strong traditional beliefs, that circumcising girls is not a requirement in Islam," said Sheikh Harun Rashid of Isiolo Rahma Mosque.

"Our first assignment was to inform the parents that the holy book [Quran] teaches that the painful act is not an obligation; it is a tradition and not a religious obligation," he told IRIN in Isiolo.

The campaign, which started in a small way 10 years ago, is now spearheaded by the Muslim Council of Imams and Preachers of Kenya. It still relies heavily on teachings delivered during Friday prayers, to reach the large Muslim populations in northeastern Kenya. More than 30 Mosques exist in Isiolo and Garissa towns alone, and the campaign has been extended to the coastal province as well.

"Our approach is different and cheap, unlike those [workshops] done in hotels," Rashid added. "Our simple campaigns by imams and Islamic schoolteachers are mainly conducted on Friday when large numbers of Muslims attend weekly prayers so we convince many."

It was cruel and caused the end of my marriage. I vowed the same will not be done to my two daughters 

According to council officials, the campaign has now spread across northeastern and parts of eastern provinces.

"Islam is very clear; no part of our bodies should be removed or changed. Only boys are supposed to be cut," explained Sheikh Mohamed Abdi from nearby Garissa, the largely Muslim capital of northeastern region.

"I was very young, but still remember the day I was circumcised," she told IRIN in Isiolo. "It was cruel and caused the end of my marriage. I vowed the same will not be done to my two daughters."

Her friend and business partner, Zainab Noor, disagreed, however. "The practice was introduced to protect our girls," she said. "Whoever is opposing it is evil. The community should fight any attempts to introduce immorality."

Widespread practice

FGM involves the cutting and/or removal of the clitoris and other vaginal tissue, often under unsanitary conditions. It is practised in at least 28 countries globally and the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) estimates that up to 140 million girls and women around the world have undergone some form of FGM.

It is practised extensively in Africa, including in Kenya. But pressure from human-rights activists has so far compelled 16 African governments to legislate against FGM, in line with the 2005 Maputo Protocol, an African regional document that explicitly prohibits and condemns FGM.

Kenya has signed the protocol and banned the practice under the Children's Act 2001, which protects girls from early marriage or forced FGM, and charges anyone found practising FGM. But observers say the law has proved extremely difficult to enforce.

Anti-FGM activists estimate that 32 percent of all women between the ages of 15 and 49 in more than half of Kenya's districts have undergone FGM. The numbers are high among the Kisii ethnic group, the Maasai, Kalenjin, Taita/Taveta and the Meru/Embu.

Apart from legislation, Kenyan authorities and NGOs are trying to raise public awareness through education campaigns and encouraging alternative rights of passage - a practice where communities maintain the rituals that lead adolescent girls to womanhood but exclude FGM.

SOURCE: For the complete article, see: http://www.speroforum.com/site/article.asp?idcategory=33&idSub=121&idArticle=8773 - http://www.speroforum.com/site/article.asp?idcategory=33& ; ;idSub=121&idArticle=8773



-------------
"Every good deed is charity whether you come to your brother's assistance or just greet him with a smile.


Posted By: crasss
Date Posted: 15 April 2007 at 6:39am
Originally posted by Maryah Maryah wrote:

Kenya has signed the protocol and banned the practice under the Children's Act 2001, which protects girls from early marriage or forced FGM, and charges anyone found practising FGM.


Early marriage is practiced in many societies. For heaven's sake, what on earth could make the western practice of early pre-marital sex superior to early marriage?

By associating "early marriage" to "forced FGM", the entire agenda ends up being just a piece of western propaganda.

The central underlying idea of the Children's Act is the idea that governments will interfere between parents and children. That idea must be rejected, and is rejected across the free world.

This whole FGM issue is just another decoy for the lesbians to stick their noses in other people's business.

The ultimate authority in children's education is the family, and not a bunch of single-mother lesbians waisting taxpayer's money in an office at 15000 kilometers from the scene.
Originally posted by Maryah Maryah wrote:

But observers say the law has proved extremely difficult to enforce.

Dealing with the West comes with too many strings attached. What's more, the West has no use any longer for the free world. Any manufactured goods can be sourced from China and India at a cheaper price. What else is the West now offering beyond meddling in other people's affairs?



Posted By: Israfil
Date Posted: 15 April 2007 at 1:44pm

Crass you said:

This whole FGM issue is just another decoy for the lesbians to stick their noses in other people's business.

The ultimate authority in children's education is the family, and not a bunch of single-mother lesbians waisting taxpayer's money in an office at 15000 kilometers from the scene

Crass, patty was right. It appears that you are far more st**id than I thought. What gives you the idea that the article Sister Maryah listed had anything to due with the sexual orientation of other human beings? A woman/little girl/child has every right to be free from pain and any other displeasurable act. The difference of opinion regarding this issue stems from how certain Hadiths are interpreted. The varying levels of disagreement that Rami implied is a smoke screen to the greater underlined issue, that is the interpretation whether the practice is acceptable or not.

The excision of vaginal tissue (even part of it) does not serve a benefit to the person as I have shown it is nothing more than a cultural practice solidified by myth. Obviously by proving such an act is objectively wrong is not accepted, therefore one must prove how it is wajib according to Islamic Law and I have no problems doing that however, I'm inclined to take the higher position which is to try to argue with objective reason. It seriously makes no sense to "slightly trim" the hood of the clitorous simply because it increases sexual performance/passage from childhood to adulthood/to control the woman's virginity.

My argument refutes the interpretation made by scholars who they themselves are men and are of priviledged status who make these claims. Obviously they are comfortable because they are authoritarians and also because they don't have to have their penis shaved...Excuse my language but only priviledged men can justify such abarbaric practice.



Posted By: crasss
Date Posted: 15 April 2007 at 5:02pm
Originally posted by Israfil Israfil wrote:

What gives you the idea that the article Sister Maryah listed had anything to due with the sexual orientation of other human beings? A woman/little girl/child has every right to be free from pain and any other displeasurable act.

And why link the issue of forced FGM to early marriage? That almost guarantees that the entire agenda will be rejected.

The following needs to be implemented:
(1) no killing of daughters
(2) no FGM
(3) no marriage before the age of 18
(4) parents cannot prevent the daughter from having boyfriend sex after 14
(5) alimony for ex-wive and her new boyfriend

They are arguing based on (1) and (2) that they should implement (3), (4) and (5).

That is called agenda manipulation, and this Children's Act is a typical example of that.

Everybody can see through it. Regardless of the merits of any arguments against FGM, the agenda must be rejected.
Originally posted by Israfil Israfil wrote:

the sexual orientation of other human beings

Homosexuality is outlawed, because it violates the laws of the One God. There is only sexual orientation allowed.

This idea that all sexual orientations are equal, is also a constituent part of the western agenda. And this must be rejected too.



Posted By: mariyah
Date Posted: 15 April 2007 at 8:06pm

Crasss,

 And I see by your statements that misgynocism is alive and well.

I would be afraid if you were my father or husband. Are you infering that I am lesbian because I am a western Muslim woman? May Allah (swt) be my judge, YOU are not.

Someday the clerics of Islam will look to the West. And will have more respect for the women amongst them. The largest growth in Islam is in the west and it is primarily women. We will someday outnumber you.

The article was written by knowledgeable people and the lessons against FMG are given by knowledgeable Muslim clerics.

Seems to me the only perversion there would be with FGM is with the creeps that cut the little girls and maim them. What kind of creep invades the awrah of a young female to play with their genitalia?  That really stumps me. That to me is Mabruk.

Thank you brother Israfil for your wisdom and support. I am not a scholar but I certainly have a heart!

Maryah



-------------
"Every good deed is charity whether you come to your brother's assistance or just greet him with a smile.


Posted By: crasss
Date Posted: 15 April 2007 at 8:47pm
Originally posted by Maryah Maryah wrote:

And I see by your statements that misgynocism is alive and well.

Ha ha.
Originally posted by Maryah Maryah wrote:

I would be afraid if you were my father or husband.

But I am not. So, the point is moot.
Originally posted by Maryah Maryah wrote:

Are you infering that I am lesbian because I am a western Muslim woman?

I said that there is no such thing as multiple valid sexual orientations. It doesn't exist.
Originally posted by Maryah Maryah wrote:

Someday the clerics of Islam will look to the West. And will have more respect for the women amongst them.

I don't know about that. They carry a baggage that may not be acceptable to them, such as the inclination to meddle with other people's affairs, and trying to "reform" various aspects of Islam. I am against that kind of reformation, because we know where it starts, but we don't know where it ends.
Originally posted by Maryah Maryah wrote:

The largest growth in Islam is in the west and it is primarily women. We will someday outnumber you.

There is one main difference between your and my approach: I do not try to change anything in Islamic tradition and culture. I may have my reservations concerning FGM, but I am not going to insist on it right now. They've done that since the night of times, and where is the urgency to change all of that right now? First and foremost, the agenda has to disappear. After that, we'll see.
Originally posted by Maryah Maryah wrote:

Seems to me the only perversion there would be with FGM is with the creeps that cut the little girls and maim them.

If the opponents of FGM did not have an entire agenda, covering lots of other unrelated issues, the argument might stick. But given the circumstances, I reject the idea of doing anything about it now.

By the way, are they talking of cutting you up? No? So, why don't you back off and leave these people alone?


Posted By: crasss
Date Posted: 15 April 2007 at 9:46pm
Originally posted by Maryah Maryah wrote:

Kenya has signed the protocol and banned the practice under the Children's Act 2001


We don't need any new laws, such as the Children's Act 2001.

The One God has made all the laws already.

There are no new laws, and all man-made laws are invalid.



Posted By: Sign*Reader
Date Posted: 15 April 2007 at 10:04pm
Originally posted by crasss crasss wrote:

Originally posted by Maryah Maryah wrote:

Kenya has signed the protocol and banned the practice under the Children's Act 2001


We don't need any new laws, such as the Children's Act 2001.

The One God has made all the laws already.

There are no new laws, and all man-made laws are invalid.


Do you drive and what city you cruise around in?
I thought if I visit that city I will be a bit careful about some one running the red light or not yielding


-------------
Kismet Domino: Faith/Courage/Liberty/Abundance/Selfishness/Immorality/Apathy/Bondage or extinction.


Posted By: rami
Date Posted: 16 April 2007 at 12:52am
Bi ismillahir rahmanir raheem

But I wouldn't even go as far as to say that those populations regardless their size in the religious consensus form a unified opinion on the matter.

What does a unified opinion establish, who placed the argument upon this notion, when did i claim it was unified in the muslim world, how is this even relevant to establishing what is or isnt part of Islamic law.

If this is true why isn't it acceptable in all other muslim countries?

this is like asking me what is a madhhab and how do people go about following one, at this stage in the discussion  and after many of your assertions you should know the answer to this by now.

I never said that it wasn't in the first place.

Ok so you acknowledge it is sunnah, are you then splitting hairs or dont you know the significance of a sunnah act.

No, I was referring to the excision of any part of the female genitalia, but if you are looking for particular clarification then no, according to Islamic tradition the clitoris itself is not entirely cut obviously but the hood as you've mentioned. Perhaps I was not clear here.

That was a rhetorical question.

I also understand the Islamic process of legislation on certain matters such as the subject we are currently discussing.

Care to point me towards classical texts in english on the matter, the only thing i have seen is third and fourth hand articles summarising some points. By and large you are ignorant of Islamic law and procedures you simply think what you have read all there is and nothing more exists on this earth.

you treat and approach this topic like you would any other topic this is where your lack of experience with the sharia is really apparent to those more familiar with it than you.

Dont confuse confidence in ones self to be correctness this is nothing but arrogance and arrogance blinds an individual from at least looking for other possibilities or knowledge.

How can one make a correct interpretation of a sound statement if it does not directly address an issue.

your lack of understanding the arabic language is apparent here, had you known an ounce of arabic you would answer this question your self, but you dont seem to have a problem judging Islamic matters solely based on english translations.

If the prophet comments on a specific thing he did not say that thing is law.

learn arabic and you wont ask such annoying questions, intelligence mixed with ignorance and arrogance this is your entire argument.

For example in the case with the Hadith the prophet didn't specify that female circumcision was obligatory nor is it even mentioned in the Qur'an. so how can a ruling be made on this if it is not even mentioned in the Supreme source which is god's Holy Words: The Qur'an Kareem.


His commenting it self is approval his silence also is considered approval and acceptance, only his open and clear condemnation is taken as prohibition. In Islam the natural state of matters is permissibility until it can be established that it is prohibited. His commenting elevates the matter above mere silence to the extent of it being recomended and to some scholars wajib [obligatory]. You need to know Arabic and the basics of Usul principles and Fiqh to understand how this was deduced, what i underlined is one such principle.

You may be interested in knowing that most sects that have come up in Islam have done so by means of  reversing this above fundamental principle ie they state all matters are haram until permissibility is established.

As far as Sunnah is concerned, there are some Prophetic Hadiths that may indicate the legality of practicing female circumcision despite the fact that none of these Hadiths have an authentic chain of transmitters so that it is not possible to deduce a legal ruling from them on such a very serious human matter.

It was authentic enough for three madhhabs to rule upon it and one to state it is wajib, you do not know more than them about its chian of transmission nor any modern day sectarian scholar who speaks above himself.

They can only explain the sciences in accordance to Islamic tradition using subjective premises which amount only to the subjective truths they are so willingly trying to prove.

Clearly you did not understand what i said about your perception being limited to your experiences this is a basic reality that applies to all people. As long as you have not even read a basic text on Usul al Fiqh you can not even imagine what has been said let alone comment on and easily push aside the issue as you have.

Is this realy what you have reduced entire sciences to, by your simple imaginings and wishfully thinking.

Also logically speaking you are committing a fallacy and based upon what you're saying I can only reduce this large paragraph to a simple "That is your opinion." Since you claim to be more informed than me I'd like to see that.

You havnt proven anything i have said is fallacious just simply stated that it is, why dont you bother to investigate these sciences for your self, the nature of your argument is an indication of your lack of knowledge.

Qur'an. My process is not extremely different than that of scholars who interpret doctrine/text.

So you dont bother to study the methodoligies of muslim scholars have never even investigated the matter and you somehow conclude that your approach is similar to theres.

Are you jocking?

The prophet was the leader of the community but he did not separate himself from the people nor made himself more than others only those who revere him do so.

his piety was not due to his ditance away from Allah but due to his nearness, Isa raised the dead walked on water performed many miracels was raised to heaven spirit and body was he any less pious.

I, unlike yourself do not revere the prophet in the way Christians revere Jesus (I do not say your reverence is worship but your reverence is more than it should be of a great person).

Your reverence is that of a westerner not a muslim or a person who understands.

�Say: �If your fathers or your sons or your brothers or your wives or your tribe, or any wealth you have acquired, or any business you fear may slump, or any dwelling-places which please you, are dearer to you than Allah and His Messenger and fighting hard in jihad in His Way, then wait until Allah brings about His command.�� (9:25)

�None of you will believe until I am more beloved to him than his children, his father and all people.� (al-Bukhari, Muslim & an-Nasa�i)

�Umar ibn al-Khattab told the Prophet, �I love you more than anything except my soul which is between my two sides.� The Prophet replied, �None of you will believe until I am dearer to him than his own soul.� �Umar said, �By the One who sent down the Book on you, I love you more than my soul which is between my two sides.� The Prophet said, ��Umar, now you have it!� (al-Bukhari)

A muslim should love the prophet more than his own self, this is a direct instruction from the prophet [sallah llahu alaihi wa sallam].


-------------
Rasul Allah (sallah llahu alaihi wa sallam) said: "Whoever knows himself, knows his Lord" and whoever knows his Lord has been given His gnosis and nearness.


Posted By: rami
Date Posted: 16 April 2007 at 12:58am
Bi ismillahir rahmanir raheem

wa alaikum assalam

I as an American Nurse abhor the thought of some person mutilatiing the body of a young woman. I do not think that Allah (swt) the Merciful, would sanction such a thing.

The only thing i can say to you after such discussions have taken place is to speak for your self and not for islam.






-------------
Rasul Allah (sallah llahu alaihi wa sallam) said: "Whoever knows himself, knows his Lord" and whoever knows his Lord has been given His gnosis and nearness.


Posted By: crasss
Date Posted: 16 April 2007 at 3:36am
Originally posted by Sign*Reader Sign*Reader wrote:


Do you drive and what city you cruise around in?
I thought if I visit that city I will be a bit careful about some one running the red light or not yielding

Look. Traffic regulations must be derived from the rules of the One God too:

"It is forbidden to hurt or kill someone"

Now, whatever is needed to enforce this rule, is a derived rule that I can accept, because it simply implements the rules of the One God.

It is absolutely permissible to derive a ruling or even a practical rule from the rules of the One God. This must be performed according to well-known and well-understood methods, in order to prevent unlawful derivations from being enforced.

In my impression, Islamic Shariah works like that. If that's true, there is no room for "invention" of new rules in Shariah. And if that is the case, it is simply an absolutely superior legal system.

Any legal system that does not invent new laws out of the blue, is superior to the western "Roman" legal system cum "parliament", which is obviously just a despicable instrument of oppression.



Posted By: crasss
Date Posted: 16 April 2007 at 3:46am
Originally posted by rami rami wrote:

You may be interested in knowing that most sects that have come up in Islam have done so by means of  reversing this above fundamental principle ie they state all matters are haram until permissibility is established.

Hi Rami,
That approach would be disastrous. Do you know which sects in Islam do this?



Posted By: rami
Date Posted: 16 April 2007 at 4:58am
Bi ismillahir rahmanir raheem

assalamu alaikum crasss

Now, whatever is needed to enforce this rule, is a derived rule that I can accept, because it simply implements the rules of the One God.

this is correct, the scholars have derived laws and rulings from the Quran this is how the Quran is still relavant 1400 years after it was revealed.

In my impression, Islamic Shariah works like that. If that's true, there is no room for "invention" of new rules in Shariah.

All derived laws must be in accordance with the spirit [if you like] of Islam and not at odds with it. It is not permissible to derive a law that contradicts other aspects of the religion, the science of Usul al fiqh was to ensure all this was done with integrity and constancy so a scholar living in north africa will come up with the same conclusion as a scholar living in india [depending on context of course].

That approach would be disastrous. Do you know which sects in Islam do this?

Kahrijites where one, Wahabie's another but they are moving away from this extremest view and adopting many things from the Hanbali Madhhab but are still far from this though.


-------------
Rasul Allah (sallah llahu alaihi wa sallam) said: "Whoever knows himself, knows his Lord" and whoever knows his Lord has been given His gnosis and nearness.


Posted By: Alwardah
Date Posted: 16 April 2007 at 6:12am

As Salamu Alaikum

When we have clear evidence from the Sunnah that there is a choice in this matter, there should be no argument. It is left up to the individual which way to choose as both are correct. Why do we need reports to argue a point when we have clear evidence? These reports change with the moods of the people who make them in the first place. May Allah Subhanahu wa Ta'ala protect us from such foolishness. Ameen!

Maryah:

Someday the clerics of Islam will look to the West. And will have more respect for the women amongst them. The largest growth in Islam is in the west and it is primarily women. We will someday outnumber you.

I sincerely pray I don�t live to see this day as that will be the end of the Muslims. Who said they (the clerics) don�t respect women. Being a woman I think we must learn to respect ourselves first. Most scholars or students of Islam who quote from the Glorious Qur'an and Sunnah are accused of not respecting woman. Audho Billahe minash Shaitanir-Rajim! Why! because they are not saying things to satisfy our whims and desires but making it very clear what is in the authentic sources, so we don't like it and accuse them of not respecting us.  

�They ask you concerning fighting in the Sacred Months. Say, "Fighting therein is a great (transgression) but a greater (transgression) with Allah is to prevent mankind from following the way of Allah, to disbelieve in Him, to prevent access to Al-Masjid Al-Haram (at Makkah), and to drive out its inhabitants, and Al-Fitnah is worse than killing.'' And they will never cease fighting you until they turn you back from your religion (Islamic Monotheism) if they can. And whosoever of you turns back from his religion and dies as a disbeliever, then his deeds will be lost in this life and in the Hereafter, and they will be the dwellers of the Fire. They will abide therein forever. (Surah Al-Baqarah 2: 217)

Today the Disbelievers are using every mean to fight us, so that we disunite and turn our backs to Islam. WAKE UP dear brothers and sisters. Unity is strength - the Battle of Badr- remember. Unity

May Allah Subhanahu wa Ta'ala protect us from the evils within ourselves and the evils around us. Ameen!

Wa Alaikum Salam



-------------
�Verily your Lord is quick in punishment; yet He is indeed Oft-Forgiving Most Merciful (Surah Al-An�am 6:165)
"Indeed, we belong to Allah and to Him is our return" (Surah Baqarah 2: 155)


Posted By: rami
Date Posted: 16 April 2007 at 7:23am
Bi ismillahir rahmanir raheem

wa alaikum assalam

well said sister.


-------------
Rasul Allah (sallah llahu alaihi wa sallam) said: "Whoever knows himself, knows his Lord" and whoever knows his Lord has been given His gnosis and nearness.


Posted By: abuzaid
Date Posted: 16 April 2007 at 9:07am

Originally posted by rami rami wrote:


That approach would be disastrous. Do you know which sects in Islam do this?

Kahrijites where one, Wahabie's another but they are moving away from this extremest view and adopting many things from the Hanbali Madhhab but are still far from this though.
As per my knowledge Wahabie's do not believe so. Yes, only in the matters of worships they hold that" Everything is prohibited unless proven from Quran and sunnah"

Assalamualaikum WRWB.



Posted By: rami
Date Posted: 16 April 2007 at 9:24am
Bi ismillahir rahmanir raheem

assalamu alaikum

I honestly cant remember the way the scholar i spoke to explained it but it was more apparent in there earlier days than it is now.

It isnt as explicit now days but it is apparent in there fatwas and ideology like an underlaying mentality left over from the older days, wahhabi ideology has not been consistent over the years as they never attempted to form a madhhab. Numerous times i have argued with wahabi br's over various topics only to see them state that something was not permissible becoue it wasnt specifically mentioned in the Quran or sunnah.

I cant remember specifics of the top of my head at the moment but if i do i will be certain to let you know.

Yes for things like worship the opposite is absolutely true without exception, all madhhabs hold to this principle but this isnt what i am referring to. More than likely they used this principle [haram until proven permissible] applied to acts of worship alone and expanded it to the wider areas of fiqh allahu allam.


-------------
Rasul Allah (sallah llahu alaihi wa sallam) said: "Whoever knows himself, knows his Lord" and whoever knows his Lord has been given His gnosis and nearness.


Posted By: Israfil
Date Posted: 16 April 2007 at 10:38am

If I were to flatter you with a long drawn out post in response to what you've written we would be going in circles. What this whole discussion amounts to a simple matter of opinion. You're right I do not agree with the Madhabs and maybe it's because I do not follow one. I do not believe in following jurisprudences especially when all four [no matter how similar they are] have difference of opinion on matters. I am one of the opinion that there should be a unified belief [aside from the unified belief inOneness of God etc]. These same Madhabs you speak of Rami also spawn individuals who believe that women are second class citizens and who believe in the excision of a woman's clitoris.

Obviously Rami unless it is mandated in Islam you do not believe in the objectivity in science therefore, it remains to be Kufr practice if it is done outside of Islam am I correct?

You say that my Arabic [or lack thereof] is insufficient in understanding various translations of Quranic doctrine as well as Hadith. Whatever, that may be true that my Arabic is not up to par. but that kind of comment could easily be mistaken as an excuse for an individual [such as yourself] inability to logically prove something is reasonable. Rami, you have not proven that medically speaking the excision of tissue from the hood of the clitorous is beneficial to the woman. I've given you a link to a legitimate medical website for you to see for yourself as well as links made by Muslim physicians who, are using their arguments against Female Genital Cutting from the interpreted Hadith.

The subjective position you hold is obvious and since you have failed to objectively prove anything. I have shown the outlining view of FGC but if you want I can prove how this practice is not a benefit to women, are then going to respond that the woman's feeling in this matter irrelevant? You said that my reverence is like that of a "westerner" obviously you cannot overstep my nationality and rather, call me a Muslim you identify me first by my nationality and emphasize that rather than me being a Muslim. It doesn't surprise me anyway I think it was you that made the dumb comment about there being a difference between Eastern and western Muslims right? Yes I'm confident in my knowledge because I'm working hard to establish myself. I'm sorry you do not believe in confidence but that is your choice.

Anyway your opinion is yours on this matter.

 



Posted By: fatima
Date Posted: 17 April 2007 at 3:21am

Bismillah irrahman irrahim

Assalamu alaykum

Originally posted by Israfil Israfil wrote:

Anyway your opinion is yours on this matter.

 

Yes brother that is the whole point, in this particular issue it is the opinion of one of great scholars of islam who has derived a law from Sunnah. Now other scholars have given their rulings too so it is a personal choice to follow whichever ruling you feel comfortable with.

Thing people keep mentioning 'science' and 'proving your point through logic'. What is science and logic? something that a human can prove, right? There was a time when 'Great scientists' believed sun is stationary, Holy Quran said, 'it is moving in its orbit'. So what happened? divine knowledge has always had a supremecy and it always will stay this way.

In today's world there are plenty of scientific researches going on. One would tell you oil is good, the other would say pure butter is. One would tell you the advantages of double bond strands and other would tell you how it increases the chances of having cancer with all the free radicals lurking around. I can myself post plenty of articles on how we muslim torture an animal while slaughtering and scientifically how beneficial alcohol or pork is.

So no matter how many reports you bring or how good you can prove your point, if it contradicts a proven sunnah, you are in the wrong till the day we meet our Lord.

Religion gives us choices and that is mercy of our Most Merciful Lord. Taking a choice is totally upto individuals but not ridiculing the one that you don't prefer for yourself.

I am now closing this thread because it is not serving any purpose.

wassalam



-------------
Say: (O Muhammad) If you love Allah, then follow me, Allah will love you and forgive you your faults, and Allah is Forgiving, MercifuL


Posted By: rami
Date Posted: 17 April 2007 at 3:57am
Bi ismillahir rahmanir raheem

Khair insha allah,

I do not believe in following jurisprudences especially when all four [no matter how similar they are] have difference of opinion on matters. I am one of the opinion that there should be a unified belief [aside from the unified belief inOneness of God etc].

Diference of opinion is a rahma from allah which he afforded us, this is one reason why rasul allah [sallah llahu alaihi wa sallam] used to stay silent on matters and chose not to answer them. He would also tell his followers that the jews used to ask there prophet to many questions [as the sahabah where also doing at the time] and it brought them ruin as they could not handle the responsibility of knowing so much and acting upon it all.

You dont really know why there are differences between the madhhabs to have an opinion about why there should be only one.

These same Madhabs you speak of Rami also spawn individuals who believe that women are second class citizens and who believe in the excision of a woman's clitoris.

This to me and any other person who is familiar with Shariah law indicates you dont even know why four madhhabs exist or what they actualy do. Principles of law do not produce individuals who look down on women i would like to  see you establish this as fact. Differences in legal principles is why we have four madhhabs diferences in opinion and interpretation is why we have more than one ruling on a particular matter within a madhhab.

You see Islam is diverse and hardly authoritarian as you so blindly claim.

Just becouse a shaykh happens to belong to a madhhab does not mean he only holds opinions of the madhhab no scholar is infallible and for you to place together all the scholars of a madhhab spanning the period of 1400 years on the words of a handful of individuals is low.


Obviously Rami unless it is mandated in Islam you do not believe in the objectivity in science therefore, it remains to be Kufr practice if it is done outside of Islam am I correct?

Actualy i thought i already clarified this point, "
the natural state of matters is permissibility until it can be established that it is prohibited."

You are the person trying to say female circumcision is not a part of islam.

You say that my Arabic [or lack thereof] is insufficient in understanding various translations of Quranic doctrine as well as Hadith. Whatever, that may be true that my Arabic is not up to par. but that kind of comment could easily be mistaken as an excuse for an individual [such as yourself] inability to logically prove something is reasonable.

No i have stated the legal principles indicating the way in which our prophets words should be taken maybe i wasn't clear enough, "
His commenting it self is approval his silence is also considered approval and acceptance, only his open and clear condemnation is taken as prohibition." this is becouse had someone said something reprehensible in front of him he would not of hesitated to correct them, rasul allah would not stay silent on an error he was obliged to guide people and help them.

Rami, you have not proven that medically speaking the excision of tissue from the hood of the clitorous is beneficial to the woman.

I dont need to prove benefit just harm, only when something is harmfull can it be against islamic law. No one has established the Islamic view is harmfull.

"the natural state of matters is permissibility", until harm can be confirmed, a good example of this is smoking at first the scholars had said it was makruh but when the scientific community established that it caused so much dammage to the body they then declared it to be Haram.

Of course ignorant muslims who know nothing about islam simply thought they had just changed the law.

I've given you a link to a legitimate medical website for you to see for yourself as well as links made by Muslim physicians who, are using their arguments against Female Genital Cutting from the interpreted Hadith.

When performed properly as per islamic dictates there is no harm but when it is not mutalation occurs and in this matter i agree with them, they have simply lumped all formes of female circumsision into one basket and labeled it all the same out of there own ignorance. A muslim medical physician is not a muslim scholar he is not qualafied to speak about islamic law and my argument would be just as valid as his, but when comparing it to that of a madhhab whose views i am stating the physician may as well be talking about aliens on mars.


The subjective position you hold is obvious and since you have failed to objectively prove anything.

I dont need to prove anything you do, all i need to do is establish the matter is part of islamic law and that is enough.

I have shown the outlining view of FGC but if you want I can prove how this practice is not a benefit to women,

Not being a benefit and being harmfull are two different things, simply becouse you may or may not prove something is of material use or benefit does not decrease from the religious responsibility. Do you know all there is to know about creation or harm and benefit no but we still are obliged to do things in the sunnah, it is part of obeying Allah.

are then going to respond that the woman's feeling in this matter irrelevant?

A muslim women has no trouble following the sunnah if that is what she believes to be true and her responsibility, muslims put there religion above there selfs this is our quality which is instilled in us as practicing muslims and the result of our worshiping Allah.

You said that my reverence is like that of a "westerner" obviously you cannot overstep my nationality and rather,

Most scholars i listen to are of a western background not arabic well except for one. I dont even identify my self as Lebanese and am against any form of nationalism.

call me a Muslim you identify me first by my nationality and emphasize that rather than me being a Muslim. It doesn't surprise me anyway I think it was you that made the dumb comment about there being a difference between Eastern and western Muslims right?

According to this simple logic as soon as a person says the shahadah his level of ihsan increases phenomenally he becomes a wali of allah perfect in almost every way and destined for the highest levels of jannah.

I was referring to you not having yet shed your past and embarrassed true ibaddah of allah, it is a journey and a path which one increases himself in. Shahhadah is only the beginning of becoming a muslim not the final stage.

Our prophet said we are only as good as the last verse we recite before death, do you understand what he meant by this?

Yes I'm confident in my knowledge because I'm working hard to establish myself. I'm sorry you do not believe in confidence but that is your choice.

There is no room for I in la illaha illah llah.

Anyway your opinion is yours on this matter.

no its the opinion of Islams Great mujtahid Imams.

---------------------------------------------------------

sorry sister was typing while you closed this so it posted anyway i guess.


-------------
Rasul Allah (sallah llahu alaihi wa sallam) said: "Whoever knows himself, knows his Lord" and whoever knows his Lord has been given His gnosis and nearness.



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd. - https://www.webwiz.net