IslamiCity.org Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Religion - Islam > Interfaith Dialogue
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - My reply to the thread on LDS  What is Islam What is Islam  Donate Donate
  FAQ FAQ  Quran Search Quran Search  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

My reply to the thread on LDS

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
Andalus View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group

Joined: 12 October 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1187
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Andalus Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: My reply to the thread on LDS
    Posted: 01 May 2006 at 2:35pm

I had just finished this rpely when Mishmish, as is her usual MO, decided to close off the topic based upon her own junevnile interpretation of the rules. This forum is over moderated and the mods are completely irresponsible.

Mishmish, talking about Christianity has nothing to do with Islam. Your rational gives away your abuse of your moderating powers. If we follow through with your thinking, then lcose the whole damn forum. If you cannot handle public debate, then step down and have someone else moderate this part of the forum. You obviously have "sensitivities

and issues", and your personal feelings get in the way with yoru job. Do your job, and stop making this site an embarresment. I am going to make a formal compaint concerning over moderating of this forum and the silly "rule interpretations" of the mods. If I get no response, I will pull my funds from this site as my payment due for the next year comes up.

PS This is an INTERFAITH discussion. Because this is an INTEFAITH forum.

Originally posted by Angela Angela wrote:

Kolob is not where god was born.....Ugh, I love how stupid non Mormons take Kolob completely out of context.  Kolob is not where God is born.  Kolob is the planet closest to the Throne of God.  (IE Pious and Faithful)

The hym clearly alludes to the early position of the Church of LDS.

If you could hie to Kolob in the twinkling of an eye,
      And then continue onward with the speed of light to fly**,
      D'ye think that you could ever, through all eternity,
      Find out the generation where Gods began to be?

This is based upon the foundings of your book of Abraham.

http://scriptures.lds.org/abr/fac_2

Look at Figure one.

Fig. 1. Kolob, signifying the first creation, nearest to the celestial, or the residence of God.

So if we hie Kolob, we can find Gd?

 

Originally posted by angela angela wrote:

THE BOOK OF ABRAHAM
TRANSLATED FROM THE PAPYRUS, BY JOSEPH SMITH

CHAPTER 3
 
The book of Abraham is based upon an Egyptian Papyrus that Joesph Smith is said to have "translated". He even filled in the missing images, and gave mankind the book of Abraham. The problem is that Egyptologists have told us a very different story.
 
Angela, what you will find, if you search out your new evironment, is that the Church of LDS has built a heirarchy in terms of historical teachings and documents. Some of what was taught at its origins have been altered. The hym I provided is a look into an idea that has been "white washed", along with the Mormon Holy land tours where people can can go see the Mayan ruins and believe they are witnessing a representaiton of the book of Morman.
 
I have a friend who is a desendent of Joseph Feilding Smith (left the Church of LDS after 3 somthing years), who compiled the teachings of Joseph Smith. I have the book here in front of me. Lets look at what Joseph Smith though about Gd as an exalted man. "God himself was once as we are now, and is an exalted man, and sits enthroned in yonder heaven! That is the great secret. If the veil were rent today, and the great Gd who holds this world in its orbit, and who upholds all worlds................", continuing, "We have imagined that God was God from all eternity. I will refute that idea and take away the veil so that you may see." Page 347, Teachings of Jospeh Smith. And on page 349, he says, "In the beginning, the head of the Gods called a council of the Gods; and they came together and concocted a plan to create the world and people it."
 
This may not be what Mormons believe, as 21st century Mormons will exclaim, but the was the beliefs of early Mormons, and the founder of your faith, and a proclaimed Prophet of Gd, whom we know as HaShem, Allah, Adonai, and his views are not only antithetical to Judaism and Islam, but also main stream Christianity.    


Edited by Andalus
A feeling of discouragement when you slip up is a sure sign that you put your faith in deeds. -Ibn 'Ata'llah
http://www.sunnipath.com
http://www.sunniforum.com/forum/
http://www.pt-go.com/
Back to Top
Mishmish View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior  Member

Joined: 01 November 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1694
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mishmish Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 May 2006 at 2:51pm

Andulus: This is an Islamic Forum. If you don't like the rules, leave.

You cursed in the above post and ONCE AGAIN: we will not tolerate any religion bashing. You brought forth this topic uninvited for what purpose? If you feel the need to mock or denigrate differences in Christianity, go elsewhere to do it.

The Forum Title: Islamic Interfaith Dialogue  might be helpful in describing what is discussed here...



Edited by Mishmish
It is only with the heart that one can see clearly, what is essential is invisible to the eye. (The Little Prince)
Back to Top
Mishmish View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior  Member

Joined: 01 November 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1694
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mishmish Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 May 2006 at 2:57pm

Andulus: Please read the Guidleines below and let me know which part you do not comprehend. I will try to explain them to you in a clearer fashion if necessary.

3. Use of any profanity or obscenities of any kind within a post, even disguised with *asterisks or dashes etc will either lead to editing or deleting of the entire message.

10. We will not tolerate personal attacks on participants from ANY Community (personal attacks are defined as comments that reflect upon the person instead of their opinion). Furthermore, any insults intended to ANY religion or ANY prophet of God, or ANY holy scripture shall be removed.

It is only with the heart that one can see clearly, what is essential is invisible to the eye. (The Little Prince)
Back to Top
Andalus View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group

Joined: 12 October 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1187
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Andalus Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 May 2006 at 3:08pm
Originally posted by Mishmish Mishmish wrote:

Andulus: This is an Islamic Forum. If you don't like the rules, leave.

Thats a well thought out reply Mishmish. The option of "leaving" is an obvious one, and your quick "popping it out" speaks volumes about your irresponsible moderating ability. This is an Islamic forum, and and "INTERFAITH" forum. The rules are great, the problem MIshmish is no one can predict which way you will interpret them. This goes back to a question" Why have rules written when the moderation uses some kind of "zen methodology" form which to "loosley interpret them". Not only do I have a choice to leave the forum, I also have the choice to hold my membership funding of Islamcity.org this year.

Originally posted by Mishmish Mishmish wrote:

   

You cursed in the above post and ONCE AGAIN: we will not tolerate any religion bashing. You brought forth this topic uninvited for what purpose? If you feel the need to mock or denigrate differences in Christianity, go elsewhere to do it.

Mishmish, once more you are appealing to a childish mode of applying rules. I did not curse a religion. I did not "curse". Damn is in the dictionary and the bible, and an Arabic form of it, la'ana is in the Quran. I never used the word to point to a faith. Instead of trying to deflect from my legitimate concerns and that of other members here, you choose to try and nit pick about ambiguous matters.

I brought forth the topic because this is an "Interfaith" discussion group. The topic was relevant to Christan and Islamic dialogue concerning the aqida that is represented in the form of "orthodox Christianity" and that of Jospeh Smith, and the changes of the "aqida" in the Church of LDS" over the last 100 years. If you would stop moderating with your "feelings", and start looking at the thread with some kind of objectivity, you would not have to try and nitpick about words like "la'ana" and you would have real points to thinking about.

I did not mock anything, and your slight of hand accusation speaks volumes about your "impartiality" and objectivity. Back up your accusation that I intentionally "mocked" someone? You cannot. You will instead do what you always do, ban me, or lock me out, or lock the thread, or randomly invoke a rule and then stretch it to fit your personal feelings, or complain about the use of la'ana. I came here for a serious discussion. So far, the most difficult part about this forum is trying to figure out how not to break the wide interepretations of the set rules.

ma'salaama

PS The forum descirbes this section as: Islamic Interfaith Dialogue: Christianity, Judaism, etc

You left out these important tid bits. Mormonism is a sect of Christianity.

 



Edited by Andalus
A feeling of discouragement when you slip up is a sure sign that you put your faith in deeds. -Ibn 'Ata'llah
http://www.sunnipath.com
http://www.sunniforum.com/forum/
http://www.pt-go.com/
Back to Top
Andalus View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group

Joined: 12 October 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1187
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Andalus Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 May 2006 at 3:16pm
Originally posted by Mishmish Mishmish wrote:

Andulus: Please read the Guidleines below and let me know which part you do not comprehend. I will try to explain them to you in a clearer fashion if necessary.

What I am unable to comprehend is your use of the rules. That is the problem. We all know you have them memorized, the problem is that your personal interpretation of them to fit your feelings make them "fallacious" and it defeats the prupose of having rules.

Originally posted by Mishmish Mishmish wrote:

3. Use of any profanity or obscenities of any kind within a post, even disguised with *asterisks or dashes etc will either lead to editing or deleting of the entire message.

How old are you Mishmish? What "profanity" did I use? What part of what I posted were you unable to comprehend? I will try and explain in a clearer fashion if needed.

 

Originally posted by Mishmish Mishmish wrote:

 

10. We will not tolerate personal attacks on participants from ANY Community (personal attacks are defined as comments that reflect upon the person instead of their opinion). Furthermore, any insults intended to ANY religion or ANY prophet of God, or ANY holy scripture shall be removed.

Once more, I can only fahtom the method of your "zen like interpretation". Show me where I made a personal attack? Show me where I insulted any prophet? Mishmish, you are simply trying to cover your blunder with what you always do: Invoke a rule, assert it has been broken. I broke non of the rules of above. And this is the abuse you place upon this forum. You abuse your moderating status, and the rules, which you hide behind so you do not have to actually explain yourself. Invoke a rule, and then assert it is broken. No objectivity.

ma'salaama  

A feeling of discouragement when you slip up is a sure sign that you put your faith in deeds. -Ibn 'Ata'llah
http://www.sunnipath.com
http://www.sunniforum.com/forum/
http://www.pt-go.com/
Back to Top
Mishmish View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior  Member

Joined: 01 November 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1694
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mishmish Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 May 2006 at 4:20pm

Ah my Brother,

You are the one who threatened to leave and take your funding with you. A worthy threat. Contact the owners of the Site. I am not worried. Name calling and tantrum throwing will not cause me to allow you to denigrate another religion.

I believe the rule says: "Furthermore, any insults intended to ANY religion"   The last time I checked, Mormonism was still a religion.

What was the public debate of your original post? In fact, I believe a number of posters asked you basically the same thing, to which you became very defensive.

You may find that my offense at profanity is juvenile, but as a Muslim and a woman I find any cursing or abusive language offensive.

The Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) said, �A person might utter a single word by virtue of which Allah will raise his station; or he may utter a single word thanks to which he may be flung right into the middle of Hellfire.� He also said, �A believer is not one who is in the habit of cursing, swearing or indulging in foul or lewd talk.�

I am finished with this matter. Contact who you will and let them come and read ALL of the posts regarding this issue. I am waiting with bated breath.....

It is only with the heart that one can see clearly, what is essential is invisible to the eye. (The Little Prince)
Back to Top
Andalus View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group

Joined: 12 October 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1187
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Andalus Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 May 2006 at 6:00pm
Originally posted by Mishmish Mishmish wrote:

Ah my Brother,

You are the one who threatened to leave and take your funding with you. A worthy threat. Contact the owners of the Site. I am not worried. Name calling and tantrum throwing will not cause me to allow you to denigrate another religion.

I never denigrated another faith. You are "asserting" your opinion, not showing a fact. Your deragoatory use of the word "tantrum" is breaking the rules. Niether did I show one, nor did I imply one.

I give money to the site. When people come to the site, they enter into the forum to discuss some of the issues, of which some are controversial. When they see mods stacking crards in favor of the site, stifling any and hot issue, or silencing topics because the mod does not like it, then the site becomes transparent, and looses credibility. I did not "name call" either. I raised legitimate points, and if you diagree then fine, let the forum judge for themsleves, but you are "deflecting: from my points and my complaints by trying to smear it with irrelevant diatribe.

Originally posted by Mishmish Mishmish wrote:

 

I believe the rule says: "Furthermore, any insults intended to ANY religion"   The last time I checked, Mormonism was still a religion.

You are asserting again. The last I looked, an assertion is baseless. I never argued that Mormonism was not a religion, and I never insulted it. Now you are building a strawman. One must stretch the rules a great deal to classify my contribution as "insulting another faith", and if you stretch that much, then you might as well shut the forum down.   

Originally posted by Mishmish Mishmish wrote:

What was the public debate of your original post? In fact, I believe a number of posters asked you basically the same thing, to which you became very defensive.

1) The establishment of the Mormon idea about the nature of Gd and the Gdhead which has changed in the last 90 years from the standpoint of "tenents", given that the founders are the true "definers", the material to first establish a solid bases is with early material, including hyms.

2) The comparison of this notion with that of Orthodoxy, and Islam.

3) The discussion of these differences.

Actually, and factually, there was no serious discussion about it, and the replies were defensive, and due to finals, I have not been able to re-initiate the thread.

First reply:

Is there a question in there somewhere?  Mormons are not considered Orthodox Christians, in case you didn't know.

My response:

You did not see a question because I did not form one in the content. Also, I did not imply anything about Christianity in general nor did I put anything in the content that would allow one to deduce any implication or sweeping generlaization.

There is not a single defensive phrase in my reply. As you can see, I made no sweeping generalizations. My contribution was a notion about the nature of Gd and a cosmological implication.

 

The next reply:

Bismillah,

Funny.  I never sang that one in Sunday School.  Of course, there were many others like:  Onward Christian Soldiers...

What's your point?  I guess we could do a search on Mormonism if we need any more information on the topic.

P.S.  I do consider Mormons Christians.  Please get off your bandwagon thinking that if you repeat a thing over and over again that it makes it true.

That would be considered defensive posturing. Irrelevant statements, etc, etc, all defensive in nature. Nothing about the nature of the contribution I put up.

My reply was concise.

 

Angels called me stupis in another reply. Defensive? Insulting?

I find nothing in any of my replies that label as "defensive".

 

Originally posted by Mishmish Mishmish wrote:

 

You may find that my offense at profanity is juvenile, but as a Muslim and a woman I find any cursing or abusive language offensive.

No, I find your nature of deflecting from the point given to you and trying to make an issue out of a non-issue as juvenile. You did not actually show the offensive word, you simply asserted that a rule had been broken, and an assertion is baseless. I had to guess at the word you find so revolting, and that particular word that you would classify as revolting would also be juvenile. So it is pleasing Sister that you have modesty and shame and refrain from profanity, but it is nauseating that you insist on asserting that a rule has been broken and when one looks at the charge closely one finds that nothing really exists but your desire to force your personal view, which is an abuse.

Originally posted by Mishmish Mishmish wrote:

The Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) said, �A person might utter a single word by virtue of which Allah will raise his station; or he may utter a single word thanks to which he may be flung right into the middle of Hellfire.� He also said, �A believer is not one who is in the habit of cursing, swearing or indulging in foul or lewd talk.�

The Allah (swt) also taught us about misusing the religion, and misusing knowledge for personal gain. You have yet to show that I have stated anything that places me in the above category. What you are doing is deflecting. Asserting, and deflecting. The fact is, I have not broken any rule. The fact is, you over reacted, and now you are trying to use the words of the Prophet (saw) to help yourself about an issue that simply does not exist.  

Originally posted by Mishmish Mishmish wrote:

I am finished with this matter. Contact who you will and let them come and read ALL of the posts regarding this issue. I am waiting with bated breath.....

I am going to make a formal complaint, simply because my hard earned money goes to support it. And I am disappointed at how juvnile your reaction is to my desire to complain. I believe a real problem exists, and too many times I see the Christians shut out and shut up when they begin to role up their sleeves and form a decent discussion. Then a Muslim brings up a serious topic for discussion about Christians, and because you have certain feelings for a member you decide to manipulate your moderation status and play fast and loose with the rules. I am a mod at another site, and I know it is sometimes hard to stay objective, but the day I am unable to do it, I will give it up, because it makes the forum look transparent.  I do not hate you sister, nor do I dislike you, and I only replied because now you are trying to use the words of the Prophet (saw) in a way that reflects your asserted charge of me, which simply does not exist. This conversation is no longer beneficial, and you will hold on to your personal beliefs regardless of what anyone has to say. I do not want you "fired", which is not the point of any complaint I put forth. I hope the best for you and wish you the best. 

Peace be with you Sister.

 

A feeling of discouragement when you slip up is a sure sign that you put your faith in deeds. -Ibn 'Ata'llah
http://www.sunnipath.com
http://www.sunniforum.com/forum/
http://www.pt-go.com/
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd.