Evidence in favour of NIQAB

The hadeeth mentioned in the question was narrated by Abu Dawood (4104) from al-Waleed from Sa�eed ibn Basheer from Qataadah from Khaalid ibn Durayk from �Aa�ishah (may Allaah be pleased with her), that Asma� bint Abi Bakr entered upon the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) wearing a thin dress. The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) turned away from her and said, �O Asma�, when a woman reaches the age of puberty, nothing should be seen of her except this and this� � and he pointed to his face and hands. 

Abu Dawood said: This is mursal; Khaalid ibn Durayk did not meet �Aa�ishah (may Allaah be pleased with her). 

This hadeeth is da�eef (weak) and is not fit to be used as evidence. The reasons why it is da�eef are as follows: 

1 � Its isnaad is interrupted, as was stated by Imam Abu Dawood (may Allaah have mercy on him) when he said, �This is mursal; Khaalid ibn Durayk did not meet �Aa�ishah.� 

2 � Its isnaad includes Sa�eed ibn Basheer al-Azdi (or it was said al-Basri) Abu �Abd al-Rahmaan. Some scholars of hadeeth regarded him as thiqah (trustworthy), but Ahmad, Ibn Ma�een, Ibn al-Madeeni, al-Nasaa�i, al-Haakim and Abu Dawood regarded him as da�eef. (weak). 

Muhammad ibn �Abd-Allaah ibn Numayr said of him: His hadeeth is to be rejected and he does not amount to anything, and he is not strong in hadeeth. He narrated munkar reports from Qataadah. 

Ibn Hibbaan said of him: He has a bad memory and makes grievous mistakes. 

Al-Haafiz ibn Hajar said of him: (he is) da�eef. 

3 � Its isnaad includes Qataadah who is mudallis (i.e., gives false impressions concerning the narration of the hadeeth) and did not clearly state that he heard the hadeeth from another. It also includes al-Waleed ibn Muslim of whom al-Haafiz said: (he is) trustworthy but he was also mudallis and did not clearly state that he heard the hadeeth from another. 

These are the faults in the hadeeth because of which the hadeeth was judged to be da�eef (weak). See Fataawa al-Lajnah al-Daa�imah, Majallat al-Buhooth, 21/68. 

Even if we assume that the hadeeth is saheeh or is strengthened by corroborating reports, the scholars have also noted that this incident occurred before hijab was enjoined. Ibn Qudaamah said: �With regard to the hadeeth of Asma�, it is to be understood as having occurred before the verse of hijab was revealed.� 

Shaykh Muhammad ibn �Uthaymeen (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: �Even if we assume it is saheeh, it is to be interpreted as referring to the time before hijab was revealed.� See �Awdat al-Hijaab, 3/336. 

If we study the text of the hadeeth , we will find that it is extremely unlikely, because Asma� (may Allaah be pleased with her) was very pious and modest, so she would not have worn these thin clothes and appeared in them in front of the Messenger (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him). 

The correct view on this matter is that it is obligatory for women to cover their entire bodies in front of non-mahram men. See question no. 21134. .....Islam Q&A