Myahya
Quote:-The other references (which say that Ali, Fatima, Hasan, and Hussain (as) are the meaning of the purification verse) do not consider wives included and they are from Sahih Muslim, Tirmidhi and so on.
>>>I have posted a bukhari hadith before now there is one from muslim.
It is narrated in Sahih Muslim by Zayd ibn Arqam (رضّى الله عنه) that the Prophet�s wives are part of the Ahlel Bayt. In Sahih Muslim (Book 31, Chapter 4, Hadith-5920)
I hope you know the status of sahih bukhari and sahih muslim for a sunni.Both are saying the same thing.As far as the cloak hadith of sahih muslim and termidhi, you are taking some meaning which not there at all,(that the wives are not included) and not realizing yours mistake.
Quote:-First, literally it is not referring to this verse of Quran. Second, the purification verse is talking about absolute and complete purification which is called infallibility and from Quran we know that the wives do not have such purification.
>>>If he (pbuh) is not referring the verse so what, it is good enough to know that Prophet called them ahle bayt.
Quote: Second, the purification verse is talking about absolute and complete purification which is called infallibility.
>>>Any prove of it please share with us.
I said:-how do you explain that ahle bayt has two meanings one is with the wife and other without wife? Please provide the support of Arabic grammar in yours reply.
You said:-Support of Arabic grammar can be obviously found in the purification verse. It can never mean anything other than infallibility
>>>I have read all of your reply but found no answer of a simple question.Ponder please.
Quote:-The authenticity of a hadith can be understood only from detail historical study through the chain of the narrators of that hadith and the fact that whether the hadith is in line with Quran or not to get sure that the hadith is word of an infallible. In this regard all ahadith are potentially questionable. Do not make an exception for yourself. Bukhari was a Muslim scholar who was a fallible person and collected some ahadith in a book about 200 years after the prophet (sawa), nothing more.
So What about Quran, it is also transmitted to us by fallible people like ahadith and not through infallible.The initial compiling of Quran carried out by Hazrat Abu bakr time(RA) on the advised by Hazrat Umer(RA).
Quote:-Yes, but you claim that infallibility must be only the hallmark of a prophet. How do you support this claim?
Lots of verses of Quran and ahdith are there which shows that Prophet(pbuh) was infallible.
And he (the Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) does not speak out of his own desire. It is not but a revelation revealed (to him). (53:3-4)
Say: This is my way. I call to All�h with sure knowledge, I and whoever follows me. (12:108)
I said:-Could you bring a single verse where it is showing the infallibility of four of ahle bayt as you claimed,apart from 33:33 where Allah talking to the wives(Umahatul Momaneen).
You said:-I brought one (the last part of 33:33). Our argumentation is written in this thread and everyone can read it and ponder if they would like to.
>>>So you don�t have single verse.As far as the last part of 33:33,remember that the next verse 33:34 start with �and� it shows the continuity from the previous verse�s last part as you referred, further more it is also address to the wives(Allah bless them all) as well,ponder please.
Quote:-That is the same for many other things in Quran. For example, if the prophet had not told us and shown us how to pray we couldn�t understand it from Quran. That is why I believe that only-Quran Muslims are greatly deviated.
>>>I am fully agreed with you on that.But I don�t see much difference between only Quran muslims and shite muslim honestly.Shite Muslims also did not follow most of the ahadith even which are not against the Quran as well.You have yours reasons and they have their reasons.See what you have said for bukhari.
Bukhari was a Muslim scholar who was a fallible person and collected some ahadith in a book about 200 years after the prophet (sawa), nothing more.
>>>I have seen them giving almost the same remarks about bukhari.