Judaism and Islam |
Post Reply | Page 123> |
Author | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Andalus
Moderator Group Joined: 12 October 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1187 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 13 October 2005 at 5:34pm |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I am not sure why that would be interesting, unless of course one would have an idea that the Quran is a book about the message of Jesus in a "specific" sense, and that the specifics you cannot find in his message was relevant and necessary for someone to be Muslim or to fully understand Islamic doctrine, such that a "mistake" would be in order.
How did you come to your assumption?
He could have made claims similar and parrallel to the other Prophets during the entire history of Judeah and/or the Northern Kingdom, who would also have been as enlightened as those of the very late second temple period. The real question is, how does this imply that the Quran must give certain details about the entire message of Jesus, aftrer all, it does not give us the ingredients to make "mana" either, or if Moses preferred tahinni or humus on his falafel.
Argument from silence can be valid and it can also be a fallacy. Given that "ignorance", or some other "fallacious" defect is not the only possible reason, and that an assumption of a dubious reason has not even been clearly presented by you, except for your claim that it some how must be, seems to place the entire topic in a "null" light. In other words, I see no reason to indulge in the question. Edited by Andalus |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A feeling of discouragement when you slip up is a sure sign that you put your faith in deeds. -Ibn 'Ata'llah
http://www.sunnipath.com http://www.sunniforum.com/forum/ http://www.pt-go.com/ |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AhmadJoyia
Senior Member Joined: 20 March 2005 Status: Offline Points: 1647 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
O my dear brother Howard, though your questions are addressed to bro Israfil, however, I may also like to respond to them. In this, I would like to begin with a little bit of basics of Islam that appears unfamiliar to you as to most of my Christian brothers. In Islam, we never say that Allah needs us, but the fact is that we need Him, we need his mercy and we need his never-ending forgiveness of our own sins. Secondly, the message of all Prophets (from Adam to Moses to Jesus to Mohammad with all others in between) was the same i.e. to guide the mankind to Allah and Allah alone. With this premise, let us see how I can answer your questions.
Israfil, hello Quote: [43.63] And when Isa came with clear I don�t think Quran is silent about this, as I have already mentioned that the basic objective of all messenger was essentially the same. Here it is in Quran � Say ye: "We believe in Allah, and the revelation given to us, and to Abraham, Isma'il, Isaac, Jacob, and the Tribes, and that given to Moses and Jesus, and that given to (all) prophets from their Lord: We make no difference between one and another of them: And we bow to Allah (in Islam)." (Chapter #2, Verse #136) � In the same token, Quran says "(4) It is He Who sent down to thee (step by step), in truth, the Book, confirming what went before it; and He sent down the Law (of Moses) and the Gospel (of Jesus). (Chapter #3, Verse #3)� In essence, the clear arguments were about their psudo-monotheism and the real monotheism. Read on where I have provided the reference verse from Quran.
Quote: [61.6] And when Isa son of Marium said: O O my dear brother, from where this issue of �tampering of Taurat� came in from these verses that you picked to ask? On the contrary, the verses show that Jesus came and said ��surely I am the apostle of Allah to you, verifying that which is before me of the Taurat����. Hence, your questions are totally misplaced to understand the verses.
Yap, this is the right question within the context of the verses that have been quoted. Yes, Ahmad is also another name of Prophet Mohammad given to him by his mother.
To answer your question kindly read �57:27. Then, We sent after them Our Messengers, and We sent ��s� (Jesus) - son of Maryam (Mary), and gave him the Injeel (Gospel). And We ordained in the hearts of those who followed him compassion and mercy. But the monasticism which they invented for themselves, We did not prescribe for them, but (they sought it) only to please All�h therewith, but they did not observe it with the right observance. So We gave those among them who believed their (due) reward; but many of them are F�siq�n (rebellious, disobedient to All�h).�. Hence, they were accused of psuedu monasticism that they had invented out of the scriptures given to them plus their rebellious disobeidience. One would recall that even in the time of Moses, in his absence, this nation had started worshipping the golden calf for which they were severely rebuked by Moses on his arrival back.
Oh, I thought you are about to figure it out yourself. Nevertheless, I think all the miracles performed by Jesus were to convince the people of his Prophet hood. But, as the habit of this nation was, they failed to recognize him and shrugged off all such miracles on the false assertions of �magic� etc.
Quote: [61.14] O you who believe! be helpers (in the Yes, this is what I call the gist of the whole message, which is not only of Jesus but also of all the Prophets who came before him or after him. It can�t be described more precisely and elegantly as it is presented here.
Quote: [5.116] And when Allah will say: O Isa son of Probably you forgot to note that Quran�s foremost addressees are the people living in the surroundings of the messenger so that the message could be understood readily. It is fact that the Christian community living in that area venerated �Mary� as �Mother of God�, though not necessarily as a part of doctrine of �Trinity�. Kindly refer to �eastern orthodox church� and their beliefs about �Mary�.
Quote: 43:63. When Jesus came with Clear Signs, Clear signs are the Miracles that he performed as a proof of his Prophet hood, same as the Prophets before him performed. Quote: 4.157] And their saying: Surely we have killed So why did Allah let so many people be deluded? Well my brother, not Allah but the arrogance of people through the work of Satan, had deluded them. If one may realize, we on this earth are under test. It is we who has the need for good deeds to pass this exam. Allah only provides guidance, but to take heed of, it is the sole prerogative of humans. Simply because, each individual human being shall be responsible for his own deeds and actions at the Day of Judgment when the result of this test shall be announced. No one carries the burden of any other human being, no concept of �original sin� etc.
I think I have already clarified your misconception. It is not Allah who need us but we who need Him. To your question specifically, Allah says in Quran �Those apostles We endowed with gifts, some above others: To one of them Allah spoke; others He raised to degrees (of honour); to Jesus the son of Mary We gave clear (Signs), and strengthened him with the holy spirit. If Allah had so willed, succeeding generations would not have fought among each other, after clear (Signs) had come to them, but they (chose) to wrangle, some believing and others rejecting. If Allah had so willed, they would not have fought each other; but Allah Fulfilleth His plan. (Chapter #2, Verse #253)�
If I had been Allah I would have let the Your false assumption of �rigorous monotheists� have been answered above where Allah opens up their pseudo- monotheism. On the more, how do you account for the fact that treatment which Jesus received from Jews was not unique as these Jews had the history of Killing their Prophets before Jesus. The example of John the Baptist may be recalled and similarly many more Prophets before him who came to guide the lost sheep of Israel and got killed by none others but by this nation. Your underlying assumption about Jews accused Jesus of blasphemy of �Son of God� is false and self-contradictory simply because how else the notion of �One God� could ever be retained within the Christianity. You yourself have acknowledged elsewhere on this forum that the notion of �Trinity� was invented some 300 years after Jesus.
Edited by AhmadJoyia |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
firewall
Senior Member Joined: 06 November 2004 Location: Malaysia Status: Offline Points: 215 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
bismillahi rahmani raheem
Quran, 5:116-118 And (remember) when Allah will say (on the Day of Resurrection): "O 'Iesa (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary)! Did you say unto men: 'Worship me and my mother as two gods besides Allah?" He will say: "Glory be to You! It was not for me to say what I had no right (to say). Had I said such a thing, You would surely have known it. You know what is in my inner�self though I do not know what is in Yours, truly, You, only You, are the All�Knower of all that is hidden and unseen. Never did I say to them aught except what You (Allah) did command me to say: 'Worship Allah, my Lord and your Lord.' And I was a witness over them while I dwelt amongst them, but when You took me up, You were the Watcher over them, and You are a Witness to all things. (This is a great admonition and warning to the Christians of the whole world). If You punish them, they are Your slaves, and if You forgive them, verily You, only You are the All �Mighty, the All �Wise." Edited by firewall |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
howard
Newbie Joined: 25 September 2005 Location: France Status: Offline Points: 39 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Israfil, hello
As you have stated that I ignored your proofs, we can go through them one by one
So what ARE these clear arguments? Why does the Quran remain so silent about this?
So had the Taurat been 'adulterated' or not when Isa spoke to the Jews? Did he tell them that the Taurat had been tampered with? If the Taurat hadn't been tampered with when Isa was a Prophet to the Jews then when did the Jews tamper with it? Who is Ahmad? Muhammed? Again WHAT are the clear arguments that Isa used? The Quran says NOTHING about the CONTENT of these 'clear messages'. And why did the Jews accuse Isa of using magic? We know that Musa was accused of using magic when he transformed a snake into a stick. But that episode is in the Torah...
Is that for Muslims what Isa's message can be reduced to? "Who are my helpers in the cause of Allah?" Is that all?
This verse simply proves that Mohammed had heard a garbled and erroneous version of the doctrine of the Trinity. The Trinity is composed of God, the Holy Ghost and Jesus. Mary is NOT part of the Trinity as the Koran would lead one to believe.
SO WHAT ARE THE CLEAR SIGNS ?
So why did Allah let so many people be deluded? Did Allah know that his sending a Kitab to Isa would end up as a total failure? Did he know that His efforts would not only result in a religion that practiced 'shirk' but that woudl be practised by more people than Islam? If I had been Allah I would have let the Jews alone - at least for a Muslim they were more rigourous monotheists than those who thought they were following Jesus. Shouldn't Allah have just simply 'skipped' Isa and gone straight to Mohammed? If Allah did not know that his efforts would result in a shirk-practicing religion then he isn't omniscient. If he did know that, then why did he send Isa to the Jews in the first place? Edited by howard |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Israfil
Senior Member Joined: 08 September 2003 Status: Offline Points: 3984 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
As'Salaaum Alaikum brother Rami, No offense brother but this is regarding the theology of Judaism and Islam what does the trinity have to do with the discussion of Judaism and Islam? |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
rami
Moderator Group Male Joined: 01 March 2000 Status: Offline Points: 2549 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bi ismillahir rahmanir raheem
I havnt read through this in its entirety but from what i understood of Howards earlier posts i should point this out. The Concept of a trinity is forign to the Bible you will not find it mentioned specificly anywhere, but as the chritian scholars explain it comes from the culmination of the understanding of a number of passages. It did not come about untill much later than the time of jesus and the first christians never heard of such a thing, so questioning/comparing the theology of Islam to jewish and thus christianity is pointless, the common teaching is tawhid oneness of god were it varies is the later christian teaching of the trinity. Edited by rami |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rasul Allah (sallah llahu alaihi wa sallam) said: "Whoever knows himself, knows his Lord" and whoever knows his Lord has been given His gnosis and nearness.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Israfil
Senior Member Joined: 08 September 2003 Status: Offline Points: 3984 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
first and foremost Howard how you approach the subject of
Islam and its various components is indeed in question. first off you ask for proof. I gave you proof then you asked for other things other than what you've asked. I gave you those yet you still disregard my post. the transition from a rational discussion to a perennial discussion of pointless arguments is what I do not look for. When one disagrees with the religion one makes it known that he/she disagrees but doesn't make points to try to refute the religion. How can I or anyone here take you seriously if you try to refte Islamic theology? Obviously your arguement sare subject thus the possibility of an irrational behavior and irrational discussion. If your disagreement was out of sincerity then its understandable then there are no quarrels because you just disagree with Islam. But you coming here trying to disprove the Qur'an is not sincere nor is it Christ-liek (if you are a Christian) nor is it the nature of a Judaic follow (if you are a Jewish follower). If you are atheist then I'd say the nature of you words are appropriate. That is whay I refuse to discuss the issue any further with you. You talk about rational discussion, but I have yet to find one out of you so I would suggest to you stop calling what you are discussing now rational. BTW the lacking part of your so-called rational discussion is evident in your words "Muslims always ty to refute Hinduism, Buddism Christianity etc." Obviosly you are God so you know all 1.2 Billion Muslims in the world. I haven't on here tried to refute non of thoe religions nor should you make a broad sweeping assertion. Again I have yet to find any rationality in your person therefore this conversation is over...... |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
howard
Newbie Joined: 25 September 2005 Location: France Status: Offline Points: 39 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Israfil, hello Well obviously if one disagrees with the tenets of a religion or a belief system, then one will try to refute it. Don't Muslims try to refute Hinduism, Buddhism, atheism, Christianity etc? A problem often occurs when people with different if not opposing beliefs resort to personal abuse in order to 'argue' their position. I do not use such methods. Now, Muslims here by quoting certain Koranic verses have tried to show that Mohammed was illiterate . I examined the verses in question in a calm and rational manner and came to the conclusion that the ayat in question do not prove that Mohammed was illiterate - btw certain Muslims such as the Kharadjites also hold to the opinion that Mohammed was not illiterate. If you want to maintain that Islam is beyond rational analysis and that your religion is just a matter of faith, then fine. And in that case, yes, any rational discussion becomes impossible |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Post Reply | Page 123> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |