American Christian new member: my views |
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Author | |
airmano
Senior Member Joined: 31 March 2014 Status: Offline Points: 884 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 24 February 2015 at 8:09am |
I'd pretty much agree on what you (Emettman) wrote on democracy, i.e. the sentence
Democracy makes sure that those that are in power know that their successors may/will ask them to account for what they did (not) do and that there will be a (unforeseeable) successor in the first place. Here is a rather detailed study on the subject Happiness & Democracy (Do a "find" on "democracy" in this article) I see it pretty much as Winston Churchill did: Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all those other forms that have been tried from time to time. Airmano Edited by airmano - 24 February 2015 at 8:26am |
|
Emettman
Senior Member Male Joined: 02 December 2014 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 144 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Pretty much right: an unfettered democracy is mob rule with extra paperwork. The quality of a democracy (or a constitutional republic with (some) democratic voting process) depends on the degree to which the electorate id educated and informed. It also operates with the legal fiction that for this purpose all opinions are equally valid. Which they are not, really. "Democracy" is not a miracle word of liberty or perfection. Having said that, compared to most if not all the other options going around, it's hardly worse. For one thing it offers a route to changing authority and government without violence and bloodshed. The compatibility between Islam and democratic processes is low to minimal, as it is anathema that the public should have a deciding vote for something which might be unIslamic. |
|
ProudSlave
Starter. Male Joined: 01 February 2015 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 7 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Caring Heart -
You mentioned "Democracy"; "Freedom"; and "America" (U.S. I assume, not South or Central). You do realize that the United States is NOT A Democracy, right? It is a Constitutional Republic. A Democracy does NOT result in freedom, it results in mob rule. As soon as any particular group holds a majority, their will can be legally imposed on the minority. This is why the Constitution of our Republic contains what are referred as "negative rights" (a list of things that can NOT be done to the citizenry by the government, even if the majority thinks it is ok) Just wanted to clear that up :-) |
|
eesa the kiwi
Starter. Male Joined: 20 February 2015 Location: New Zealand Status: Offline Points: 4 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
if you compare the drastically low rates of theft in saudi arabia compared to the united states where a car is stolen something like every 17 seconds i feel that critics coming from western countries (I'm from a western country myself) should realise that in islam the system works compared to yours which clearly is failing miserably. As for your question as to whether a starving theif stealing to feed his family would have his hand amputated the answer is no, there is allowances in the sharia for such circumstances ie in times of famine the punishment for theft is suspended. I would also consider womens rights in the west to be somewhat of a myth in my country you just have to go to town on a friday night to realise this. The way women are treated, verbally and sometimes physically abused by drunken *****s is appalling. Some of the things i've heard makes my skin crawl i would never treat a lady like that. Islam came and protected the rights of women outlining clearly strict guidelines dealing with their welfare. I'm not saying bad stuff doesn't go down in some so called muslim countries in the world but you will find in a lot of cases this is people trying to pass culture off as islam ie women being prevented from education (One of the biggest scholars in islam was a woman) Or honor killings (In most cases the perpertrators would be executed for murder), I hope this clarifies somewhat,
eesa |
|
NABA
Senior Member Male Joined: 13 December 2012 Location: India Status: Offline Points: 867 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
First of all as a muslim I believe that its only Allah who will decide who is going to heaven or not, but Allah clearly said that Allah if wants can forgive any sin but not the sin of shirk, Allah in ch 103 v 1-4 of Quran says with token of time man is in state of loss except those who have faith, good deeds,resorting people to truth, resorting people to patience and perseverance.this verse reminds us whether we are on right path or not.regarding shariah about restrictions on women, first of all its a misconception that islam oppress women, in fact islam gives unimaginable respect to women because there is a chapter ch 4 named as Surah An Nisa which means women, so I aak you is there any a holy book in which a chapter is present named after women.this shows how woman a precious creation of Allah, islam promotes education for everyone irrespective of sex.in fact the first ever verse revealed to whole mankind was ch 96 v 1-5-recite in the name of Allah who created you, recite in the name of Allah who taught you that you didn't know, recite in the name of Allah who is the doer of big things.Allah in ch 4 v 19 of Quran says it is unlawful for you to inherit women under compulsion, live in kindness with them.regarding thief thing well Allah had commanded us on all well to do muslims to give zakah I.e charity to poor muslims,because of irregularity in this deed acts like robbing has occured.
|
|
Caringheart
Senior Member Joined: 02 March 2012 Status: Offline Points: 2991 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Greetings dennyg, I agree with most of what you said, except, I do not think that YHWH and allah are the same. (I don't know if I should elaborate.) I also agree that democracy can not be forced, however, for me, I see that to choose islam is to choose oppression I can never see making that choice - I can never see surrender to islam to choose democracy is to choose freedom the west stands for freedom - liberty - self determination - not to be ruled by tyrants I believe that when people are oppressed and we want to free them from that oppression, that is serving the Creator and His creation... it is seeking to serve good. I also believe this only comes through education and exposure to other cultures and understanding what it means to have freedom. People must desire freedom for themselves... however, the number of people that have immigrated to western nations I believe testifies that these people do have the desire for self-determination, for freedom, for education, for advancement... if they only knew how to break from the yoke of the ideology with which they were raised. (i.e., come to Christ ) When people want to put others under oppression, claiming that it is the will of God to do so... I do not, can not, see that that serves the Creator. The Creator gave us free will, and the only way to come to Him is freely of our own will... so we must be given the freedom to do so... to choose of our own accord. You asked for thoughts, there are mine. asalaam and blessings to you, Caringheart ------------------------------------------ added note: I came across a old thread, 'can america and islam co-exist', it caused me to ask a more relevant question; Can islam and democracy co-exist? Can islam be democratic? I remember reading an article a year or so ago that talked about islam being democratic... even being the first democratic society. Is it possible? Can islam be democratic? Edited by Caringheart - 21 February 2015 at 3:01pm |
|
Let us seek Truth together
Blessed be God forever "I believe in Jesus as I believe in the sun... not because I see it, but because by it, I see everything else.: - C.S.Lewis |
|
dennyg
Starter. Male Joined: 10 February 2015 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 7 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
To answer another question you posed, I feel that a misdemeanor/felony charge, arrest, fine, and probable probation and permanent mark on one's criminal record is a better solution than hacking a limb off.
That is not really the part of Sharia that bothers me, however. I'm referring more to restrictions for women and other human rights. But as long as you do not impose it on anyone who doesn't want it then I have no issues with it at all. Your hypothetical about what the thief cost the man he robbed made me think: What if this thief is only stealing in order to get money that he needs to feed his starving family? Is that still against Sharia and to cost the man a hand? What then of his already suffering family? This would doom them Edited by dennyg - 10 February 2015 at 9:46pm |
|
dennyg
Starter. Male Joined: 10 February 2015 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 7 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Thanks for your post
|
|
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |