New Group Request for Liberal Muslims |
Post Reply | Page 123 4> |
Author | |
Nausheen
Moderator Group Female Joined: 10 January 2001 Status: Offline Points: 4251 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 10 May 2005 at 5:13pm |
Auzubillahi minash shaitan ir rajeem, Bismillah ir rahman ir rahim, It is being requested from all members on this thread to please stay within the topic. it is for your own convenience, that the webboard has been categoricaly divided in sections, thus kindly take advantage of it. Thank you. |
|
<font color=purple>Wanu nazzilu minal Qurani ma huwa
Shafaa un wa rahmatun lil mo'mineena wa la yaziduzzalimeena illa khasara.[/COLOR] |
|
Nausheen
Moderator Group Female Joined: 10 January 2001 Status: Offline Points: 4251 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Auzubillahi minash shaitan ir rajeem, Bismillah ir rahman ir rahim,
What is the topic of this thread, my dear? are ur concerns within the topic and in an appropriate forum, or are they off? Just think about it with a cool mind before thinking there is a problem with the moderators here. In other words, please start a NEW thread for your discussion in a forum that is meant for it .... u are writing in "comments and complaints" This pertains to coments and complaints you may have about the working of this webboard, and not about Islam as a system or muslims as a community. Peace. |
|
<font color=purple>Wanu nazzilu minal Qurani ma huwa
Shafaa un wa rahmatun lil mo'mineena wa la yaziduzzalimeena illa khasara.[/COLOR] |
|
kim!
Senior Member Joined: 17 September 2001 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 2390 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Huh? Surely Christianity was changed in the 3rd centuryAD during the time of what's-his-face (Constantine?)
And since priests were allowed to marry up until 1,000 years ago, then one assumes the church has changed that way, too. I really don't think you can say that the Catholic church has not changed in 2,000 years. Or is the inquisition still going? Kim... |
|
Patty
Senior Member Joined: 14 September 2001 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 2382 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
"the christians and jews changed there religion" I am a Roman Catholic/Christian. We have not changed our religion since it was first established by Christ over 2000 years ago. I have no idea what the Jews have changed. But I do know the Protestant Christians have changed their beliefs many times, as is evidenced in the large number of Protestant denominations. Also, I believe that we are all, Catholic, Muslim, and Jew, brothers/sisters, as we are all sons of Abraham. Additionally, I believe human beings have been given a "free will" to determine what they will and will not believe. So atheists and agnostics have much good to contribute to the world too. We cannot force them to believe in a God which they honestly feel does not exist. If they have good morals and values, they should be welcomed to contribute their opinions to conversations as well. No one has to agree with anyone, but EVERYONE should be given the opportunity to express their opinion. (Just my opinion). Maybe I'm wrong here, but I fail to see how open discussion harms anyone, as long as it is done with maturity and respect for all those involved in the conversations. We are adults, and we know we have beliefs which differ from one another, but also we share beliefs on many subjects. There are many values upon which we all agree. Don't you believe it is possible that if we focused more on our agreements and the beliefs we DO have in common, rather than arguing constantly about our differences, we could solve a lot of problems present in the world? We are ALL God's children. HE loves us ALL. Why can't WE love and respect each other, as HE told us to do? Or am I mistaken? Peace to All, Patty |
|
herjihad
Senior Member Joined: 26 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 2473 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Bismillah, Mustafa, I would not join a group that advocates in reality to practice death for adultery and cutting hands off for stealing. So, I don't want to go to Saudi to live for sure. Tasneem, I don't know what to comment about your comments to me. Everyone's input is important, so keep inputing! Edited by herjihad |
|
Al-Hamdulillah (From a Married Muslimah) La Howla Wa La Quwata Illa BiLLah - There is no Effort or Power except with Allah's Will.
|
|
Tasneem
Senior Member Joined: 28 April 2005 Status: Offline Points: 124 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Wa-alaikum-Salaam Thankyou for your response , but I do not understand what the problem is with you people. The information I have provided is from Quran and you do not want to discuss on that, instead you give wrong interpretations of what I have stated. What do you mean that " You may like to follow another rule which the scholars have laid down..."? What rule am I following and which scholar do you have preference for? I would like to correct myself if I am wrong and I look forward to the verses of the Quran that you say I am contradicting. I don't blindly listen to scholars without first reading up. Unfortunately, a lot of our brothers and sisters take the short cut of listening to the scholars (who sometimes create terrible controversies by making unwarranted comments, as in a recent case in the country where you live), because of this they give up learning on their own. I think in the interest of Muslims who are interested in learning, you should leave this thread open, instead of deleting posts, so everyone can discuss and learn. Is this not Ijtihad? Alternatively, you write only your viewpoint and don't allow any discussions at all. The useless posts on Islam and Hinduism are going on endlessly, why is it you are allowing that which is of no benefit to any Muslim, and here there is learning for Muslims, and only because it goes against your views, you wish to delete it. Let us be humble about our knowledge which is limited and let us open our hearts and minds to learning. Once Hazrat Umar was giving a sermon and made a comment that the women were asking a lot of dowry to get married. A lady amongst the listeners spoke and said to Hazrat Umar that it is none of his business to comment on this. And Hazrat Umar said that I was wrong and the lady is right. So we would like to see this scholarly approach like Hazrat Umar from our contemporary scholars. Can you sight any examples of this kind? Everyone seems to be an authority by themselves and don't wish to give room for any discussions. Quoting Dr Mahathir Mohammed in his recent speech at Islamicity "Islam does allow for differences in the interpretations. But does it allow interpretations which are so different as to cause accusations of not being Islamic and the believers not being Muslim, so different that each is willing to fight and kill because of what each claim to be heresy on the part of the others." Seems like we are on this path. |
|
rami
Moderator Group Male Joined: 01 March 2000 Status: Offline Points: 2549 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Bi ismillahir rahmanir raheem assalamu alaikum Tasneem any further posts which are of topic will be deleted, if you wish to continue this conversation you are curently having please start a new topic. I will properly reply to your posts when i have the time but the short answer is yes the sahaba did preform ijtihad, so did the tabiin and those after them. Islamic defanition for Ijtihad is Independant reasoning in line with the Quran and Sunnah. It was used to deal with cases which were not specificaly spoken of by the Quran and Sunnah. The Quran ans Sunnah set the Guidlines/parameters/framework for how a muslim should live, behave...etc it didnt deal with every single issue specificaly. You may like to follow another rule which the scholars have laid down...Dont interprate the Quran in a way which contradicts other verses in the Quran. |
|
Rasul Allah (sallah llahu alaihi wa sallam) said: "Whoever knows himself, knows his Lord" and whoever knows his Lord has been given His gnosis and nearness.
|
|
Tasneem
Senior Member Joined: 28 April 2005 Status: Offline Points: 124 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
At the outset let me say that if we patiently gave thought to other people�s expressions with a cool mind we would not waste time in arguing who is right or wrong. My quote that you have quoted I think amply explains the essence of your explanation. I have said : For practising Islam in everyday life you don't need any Mujtahid to tell you what to do, you can read Quran and Ahadith and follow. I have qualified my statement by the word everyday life meaning day to day living that encompasses salaat, fasting, our behaviour with each other, etc etc, majority of the information on this is available for Muslims in the Quran and Ahadith. No one is suggesting that by doing this you would derive a �legal ruling� as you have stated. 054.017, 054.022, 054.032, 054.040 �While the Quran sums up the highest philosophy of the inner life, its simple directions for conduct are plain and easy to understand and act upon. Is this not in itself a part of the Grace of God? And what excuse is there for any one to fail in receiving admonition?� Yusuf Ali 003.007 �This passage gives us an important clue to the interpretation of the Holy Quran. Broadly speaking it may be divided into two portions, not given separately, but intermingled; viz.(1) the nucleus or foundation of the Book, literally �the mother of the Book�, and (2) the part which is figurative, metaphorical, or allegorical. It is very fascinating to take up the latter, and exercise our ingenuity about its inner meaning, but it refers to such profound spiritual matters that human language is inadequate to it, and though people of wisdom may get some light from it, no one should be dogmatic as the final meaning is known to God alone. The commentators usually understand the verses �of established meaning� (muhkam) to refer to the categorical orders of the It seems you are unable to understand what others write and are totally confused. On the one hand you accept that people are allowed to ponder and reflect and on the other hand you say people have to refer to a �Mujtahid�, aren�t you confused? The first ayat that came down from Allah was �Iqraa� meaning READ and UNDERSTAND. This is what every Muslim is expected to do. The state of the UMMA is in a most pitiful condition only because most of us do not read and any free thinking person including some scholars are stifled. Today suicide bombing has become a tool to kill innocent people only because the scholars are not doing their duty. Dependency on scholars alone has led us to the condition that we are in today. My understanding of a facilitator�s duty is to only facilitate the project he/she is assigned to, but when the facilitator becomes a project participant, the facilitator becomes instrumental in killing the project. Please do not edit this in the interest of quality. Edited by Tasneem |
|
Post Reply | Page 123 4> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |