So called "Bad Muslims" |
Post Reply | Page <1234> |
Author | ||||||||
AhmadJoyia
Senior Member Joined: 20 March 2005 Status: Offline Points: 1647 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||
Dear Sis firewall I am not very clear when you say "but i did found Quran verse supporting stoning as mentioned in my previous post." as which part of your previous post show this? If this is your evidence "....The Prophet said, "By Him in Whose Hands my life is, I will judge between you according to Allah's Book (Laws): As for the slave girl and the sheep, they are to be returned; & as for your son, he shall receive 100 lashes & will be exiled for 1 year. You, O Unais!" addressing a man from Bani Aslam, "Go tomorrow morning to the wife of this (man) & if she confesses, then stone her to death."The next morning Unais went to the wife and she confessed, & he stoned her to death.", and not from the Quran we have itself, then either we don't have the same Allah's Book or the narration is wrongly interpreted or this narration is just a fabrication. I don't know which out of these three possiblities you consider them to be true and which as 'false'?
|
||||||||
rahma2r
Guest Group Joined: 06 October 2005 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 17 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||
Hitler was a Christain A good one is this from Mein Kampf:
|
||||||||
rahma2r
Guest Group Joined: 06 October 2005 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 17 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||
I dont get it? Y did the guy got away with it and the wife was killed? can someone provide some info on it please PM me
|
||||||||
Begbie
Newbie Joined: 29 September 2005 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 31 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||
I reject it because I don't believe in any of it. But working with what's in front of me, it is still a very tenuous argument you make.
None of them are from the koram though are they (I only checked a couple of links.
If anyone has walls, it is yourself, you are surrounded by a wall of orthodoxy and dogma.
I am not twisting anything. I said my piece and that was that. How can you twist a fact anyway. The punishment for zina is clearly stated in the koran and it aint stoning.
I'm all for that. But anyway, we can agree to disagree and let the matter rest. Francis Begbie. Edited by Begbie |
||||||||
firewall
Senior Member Joined: 06 November 2004 Location: Malaysia Status: Offline Points: 215 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||
bismillahi rahmani raheem,
honestly, i'm sad how one cannot see i posted Quran, 4:59 & 24:51. clearly these Quran verses revealed that Allah supported Prophet Muhammad (PBUH), that the Prophet enacted Allah's Laws. for Allah to support the Prophet, it must mean that, muslims must also look into the Prophet conducts, as to support our understanding of the Quran. when we differ about stoning in the Quran, we must look for our supporting basis in the Prophet's conducts. this is what Allah states in the Quran -- the verses are many & very clear. Quran, 4:65. But no, by your Lord, they can have no Faith, until they make you (O Muhammad [PBUH]) judge in all disputes between them, and find in themselves no resistance against your decisions, and accept (them) with full submission. so the crucial answer we must now find -- did the Prophet (PBUH), or did he not, enacted stoning? answering this, you will see why i presented the Saheeh Hadiths. these are records that the Prophet of Allah did enacted stoning. if you bring me records that the Prophet rejected stoning, insha Allah i'll reconsider. but i've found many reputable records confirming this judgement (as in last posts), & none rejecting it. so pls understand, for me, i don't have any basis to deny it, thus i believe. i also read that stoning has been revealed by Allah since the days of Moses (its in the Torah). it was known by the Jews, by the Christians, by muslims. ask them wether Moses enacted stoning. I belive he does too. the trouble is, some people deny it this judgement. pls understand, i'm here not to quarrel with you. Allah will Ask me on Judgement Day. & i don't have a basis to deny stoning, so pls.. i must say i believe. Allah will Asks you too, & you will answer too. all & all i don't want to misled people, so you can judge yourself. may Allah Help us seek Truth. may we understand, insha Allah. wallahu a'lam. to rahma2r, its because the man is single, the woman is married. unmarried person is judged by 100 lashes, married person is judged by stoning. wallahu a'lam. Edited by firewall |
||||||||
Begbie
Newbie Joined: 29 September 2005 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 31 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||
I asked, very explicitly, what the punishment for zina is as stated in the quran. It is not stoning. My question has been answered. I am not interested in pursuing it. Regards, Francis Begbie. Edited by Begbie |
||||||||
AhmadJoyia
Senior Member Joined: 20 March 2005 Status: Offline Points: 1647 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||
Thanks sis firewall for your reply. However, I couldn't understand your reply to answer my question especially once you say "clearly these Quran verses revealed that Allah supported Prophet Muhammad (PBUH), that the Prophet enacted Allah's Laws." As we know that Allah's law is in Quran and its enaction is through Sunnah and not the other way around. So in such a mismatch situation, do you think would it be justified to rely on such a hadith which may seem contradictory to Quran? How reliable the collection of hadith may be, but the basic rule of understanding of such human work must be understood within the context of Quran only. Secondly, the hadith are the "snap shots" of the events in Islamic history. They don't have all the associated supporting literature, other than from within the narrated hadith, that would show as when, where and in what conditons such a narration could have possibly been done. Hence, on this very limitation, all the scholars are very cautious about quoting ahadith without learning them through proper education from a reputed scholar. It is in this situation, that I would always refrain quoting from ahadith directly. In this very notion, do we know if the narration of event in this hadith is before or after the revelation of verses in Quran? Thanks anyway for your efforts. Edited by AhmadJoyia |
||||||||
firewall
Senior Member Joined: 06 November 2004 Location: Malaysia Status: Offline Points: 215 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||
bismillahi rahmani raheem,
ok. if that's what ur answering to Allah, who am i to say. i know begbie will not understand this, even if i say it's in the Torah he doesn't understand the link between Torah, Quran & Hadeeths. so what he thinks is limited by his understanding. i thank AhmadJoyia, for his efforts. but i'm sorry, if i use this rule, i'd have to question many islamic rituals also, which are also not specifically stated in the Quran but is in the Prophet's sunnah. i.e. the Quran tells to pray*. but somehow, menstruating women do not have to pray*. if i use the contradictory rule, this does "seem" contradictory. but when we think deeper, taking into account both Quran & sunnah, it is not at all the case. thus creatively, there must be another rule of thinking to understand Islamic laws, which will judge: we all must pray*, but for menstruating women, she's not enjoined to until her period ends. this is the set of thingking i believe, which doesn't deny both the Quran & sunnah. still to be safe, i refer this to Allah, maybe its a blessing -- & thank AhmadJoyia anyway. still, we all seek guidance from Allah. wallahu a'lam. * 5 daily, obligatory prayers. but women can still du'a etc. Edited by firewall |
||||||||
Post Reply | Page <1234> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |