IslamiCity.org Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Religion - Islam > Interfaith Dialogue
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - QUESTIONS ABOUT ISLAM  What is Islam What is Islam  Donate Donate
  FAQ FAQ  Quran Search Quran Search  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

QUESTIONS ABOUT ISLAM

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 1819202122 25>
Author
Message
Trident View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie

Joined: 22 March 2006
Location: Malaysia
Status: Offline
Points: 29
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Trident Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 March 2006 at 9:19pm

Originally posted by ak_m_f ak_m_f wrote:

I agree with "AhmadJoyia"

Of course I wouldn't expect anything less from a Muslim. The undeniable fact is that Mr. Ahmad has agreed to my allegation that Islam indeed allowed the rape of captive women.

Mr. Ahmad is right about leaving it to the readers to see through his explanation of this. The readers will see how Mr. Ahmad tries to justify the acts of the Muslim soldiers under Muhammad's command. And hopefully our dear readers will read the part where Mr. Ahmad actually agrees that rape indeed took place.

This gem of a Hadith (Muslim) further explains the "wonderful" treatment of war captives according to Islam.

Book 008, Number 3371:

Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa'id al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him): 0 Abu Sa'id, did you hear Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) mentioning al-'azl? He said: Yes, and added: We went out with Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi'l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing 'azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid-conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah's Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah's Mes- senger (may peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born.

We can see from these Hadiths how Muhammad himself endorses azl, or coitus interruptus.

Need I say more? I think the Hadiths are enough for strong evidence.

 

Back to Top
ak_m_f View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior  Member
Avatar

Joined: 15 October 2005
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 3272
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ak_m_f Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 March 2006 at 11:08pm

Trident were you personally trained by Billy Graham, did pat robertson taught you how to manipulate speech ?

I must know, tell me.
Back to Top
Trident View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie

Joined: 22 March 2006
Location: Malaysia
Status: Offline
Points: 29
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Trident Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 March 2006 at 12:37am

Originally posted by ak_m_f ak_m_f wrote:


Trident were you personally trained by Billy Graham, did pat robertson taught you how to manipulate speech ?

I must know, tell me.

No at all. I know that Pat Robertson is a Christian preacher. But who is Billy Graham?

Talking about speech manipulation, remember that I simply asked Mr. Ahmad something about that he himself said in one of the posts. I didn't put words into his mouth. It was a simple Yes or No question.

And the Hadith I quoted above is not imagined by me, but obtained from the extensive collection found in this website.

http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/

Now that it's proven I obtained this Hadith from authentic sources & not "trained by so & so", can anyone get down to business & prove that the Hadith Muslim Book 8, No.3371 is not talking about the rape of captive women?

Back to Top
Andalus View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group

Joined: 12 October 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1187
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Andalus Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 March 2006 at 10:21am
Originally posted by liberty liberty wrote:

I find it interesting that no one in here really discussed these facts listed by Manny40(below).  Is anyone disputing these as facts? 

I would also like to add that the leader of Iran has stated that his goal is to destroy the nation of Israel and the Muslim world has shown no outrage over this. 

Hitler also wanted to destroy all Jews and is now probably the most hated person in the history of civilization, but the Iranian president claims to want the same thing that Hitler wanted, Jews destroyed, and the Muslim world seems ok with this. 

There are no Muslims calling for apologize from this leader advocating the murder of millions or demanding laws to bar him from making statements such as this!

 

Greetings Liberty.

When we speak of "outrage", we are speaking of an emotional response. An emotional response does not prove if something is right or wrong, as emotion does not validate anything. In the west, it is "vogue" to show "outrage" as a way of obtaining validation from observers that your beliefs are strong, your love from some thing is strong, or that you are really dedicated to your cause. More times than not, responses of outrage are based upon "hot air" Example of this was the last two elections in the US, where the 18-25 MTV crowd was being accessed to pull the Dems man through the presidency. The problem is that this age group represented their beleifs through emotional presentation, but when it came down to actually voting, mall shoping and lunch with friends became more important. Displays of outrage are also "primal", and one may find animals and apes using "outrage" to show their feelings about matters. Once more, outrage does not prove if what the ape wants is right or wrong. Outrage rarely proves anything of substance, as your entire thesis that Islam is wrong is also based upon, "outrage", an argument by outrage proves nothing or invalidates nothing. We only can deduce that you have a great deal of discontent with Islam.

So when you ask, "where is the outrage", I ask you, "what conclusion does outrage necessarily prove"?

Given that you are a Christian, trinitarian, then from your perspective Jesus is co-equal and coeternal with the Father, though not the Father, same with the holy ghost, all three being distinct parts of Gd.

Where is the outrage of Jesus (assuming your theology) when the Gdhead he is a part of ordered the slaughter of men, women, and children, without mercy or choice to convert, and then allowing the chosen people to steal their property?

Can we be on record to read your outrage?

Where is the Christian outrage when ex-President Reagan,the Christian conservative white knight, instituted "terrorism" as a means to contain communism through the various groups he bolstered to control communist activity? Who armed and trained Bin Laden and the Taliban and the Afghan war lords? Christianity is false for not showing great outrage at these two events (I can give other examples, and if you want to see the real history of terrorism, you can read about the well documented events in 20th century Christian American history in the well written and researched work by Mahmood Mamdani:

  http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0375422854/qid=1143654769/s r=1-1/ref=sr_1_1/102-2160564-2999341?s=books&v=glance&am p;n=283155

Where was Christian outrage when Jews were being slaughtered in their own backyard during the rise of the Nazis? (research the topic well if you choose to seriously respond as it is a historical fact that Christendom ignored the events and writes it off with either admitting this fact or trying to obfuscate the issue with lists of excuses.

Another point that you push that has as its bases a huge gross assumption. You ask where is the outrage that Iran wants to destroy Israel. I ask, why should I, or anyone, including the US, give damn?

Let me ask a more pertinent question: Why should Americans have to send their soliders of to die for Israeli foriegn policy? Why should America have to give billions every year to Israel? Why should we Americans have to endure agression toward ourselves and create enemies for the interest in Israel? The founding fathers of the US would not be for this relationship, and as an American, I would like for the US to pull all of its foriegn aid and if countries like Israel cannot make it, then so be it. Not my problem.

Where was Christian outrage from June 8, 1967 when Israeli fighters brutally killed 34 service men while intentionally trying to sink their ship? Why is it that such a small insignificant colonial state has so much sway over the US that they could pull of an attempted sinking of a US ship and then have it swept under a rug?   http://www.ussliberty.com/

Where was Jewish outrage?

Where was Jewish outrage when Jewish extremists killed 92 people wounding 58 in a bombing in July 22, 1946 at the King David Hotel? The Jews loved it so much they put one of the top members of the extremist group as prime minister. Where is the outrage?

Where is Jewish and Christian outrage at the systematic destruction of Arab villages that took place in the late 40s? All traces of the villages wiped out. Can we hear an outrage from you?

Probably not, and I do not expect to see one from you. What I deduce from the lack of outrage from you and Jews and Christians concerning the errors of their adherents is not the invalidation of their or your theology, just misguided people who will commit the fallacy of special pleading as part of their propoganda.

Outrage does not tell us anything about a religion or ideology. If you want to learn about an ideology or religion, then one should approach its texts and writings. Trying to smear a faith because you feel there is not enough outrage is a bit juvenile, as no one can actually learn from the interaction and no real beneift can come from it.

Peace

  • Muslims fly commercial airliners into buildings in New York City.  No Muslim outrage.
  • Muslim officials block the exit where school girls are trying to escape a burning building because their faces were exposed.  No Muslim outrage.
  • Muslims cut off the heads of three teenaged girls on their way to school in Indonesia.  A Christian school.  No Muslim outrage.
  • Muslims murder teachers trying to teach Muslim children in Iraq.  No Muslim outrage.
  • Muslims murder over 80 tourists with car bombs outside cafes and hotels in Egypt.  No Muslim outrage.
  • A Muslim attacks a missionary children's school in India.  Kills six.  No Muslim outrage.
  • Muslims slaughter hundreds of children and teachers in Beslan, Russia.  Muslims shoot children in the back.  No Muslim outrage.
  • Let's go way back.  Muslims kidnap and kill athletes at the Munich Summer Olympics.  No Muslim outrage.
  • Muslims fire rocket-propelled grenades into schools full of children in Israel.  No Muslim outrage.
  • Muslims murder more than 50 commuters in attacks on London subways and busses.  Over 700 are injured.  No Muslim outrage.
  • Muslims massacre dozens of innocents at a Passover Seder.  No Muslim outrage.
  • Muslims murder innocent vacationers in Bali.  No Muslim outrage.
  • Muslim newspapers publish anti-Semitic cartoons.  No Muslim outrage
  • Muslims are involved, on one side or the other, in almost every one of the 125+ shooting wars around the world.  No Muslim outrage.
  • Muslims beat the charred bodies of Western civilians with their shoes, then hang them from a bridge.  No Muslim outrage.
  • Newspapers in Denmark and Norway publish cartoons depicting Mohammed.  Muslims are outraged.
[/QUOTE]
A feeling of discouragement when you slip up is a sure sign that you put your faith in deeds. -Ibn 'Ata'llah
http://www.sunnipath.com
http://www.sunniforum.com/forum/
http://www.pt-go.com/
Back to Top
Andalus View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group

Joined: 12 October 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1187
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Andalus Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 March 2006 at 10:36am
Originally posted by liberty liberty wrote:

The Muslim world is more outraged by a cartoon than one of their leaders advocating the destruction of Israel.

This I can not understand. 

I think your misunderstanding stems from an assumption you have placed on 1) what outrage proves, or lack of, 2) a false dichotomy you have put on the issue of Israel:if you are against it you are evil and your faith wrong; if you defend it you are right. This view is simply false on a couple of levels, 3) the actions over the cartoon at time may be uncalled for and this is from an anger that is manifested over issues greater in magnitude than this one event, and it is all coming out. the dislike of the cartoon is because images of the Prophet (saw) is forbidden, whether or not israel exists is not a matter of any strong belief in Islam.

Originally posted by Liberty Liberty wrote:

I can understand your wanting to defend your faith.  But you must understand that the Western world does value FREEDOM OF SPEECH.  If you begin banning certain speech everytime someone is offended there will soon be many ideas and thoughts that can not be expressed.

I understand you find solice in chaos you call free speech, from which the porn industry has been able to ravage the known world. What you are not understanding is that freedom of speech does not mean abuse wich free speech. With responsibility, free speech is simply some antagonistic mechanism one may use to humiliate and abuse various segments of their society. The Danish newspaper did what they did to purposely make a point in the face of thier small minority Muslim population. This backfired. The are as much responsible for the result as are any Muslims who have crossed the line in thie zeal to defend Islam.

Originally posted by Liberty Liberty wrote:

We can not change our laws everytime an offended group becomes violent or threatens more violence.

And we cannot change our religion as Christians and Jews have done the last 2000 years to suite their own conjecture and whims. If you purposely print something for the sake of offending people, then this is abuse of free speech, and the free speech is no longer a gift or freedom, but a tool to repress, and the gift becomes a curse.

I hope this helps.

Peace

A feeling of discouragement when you slip up is a sure sign that you put your faith in deeds. -Ibn 'Ata'llah
http://www.sunnipath.com
http://www.sunniforum.com/forum/
http://www.pt-go.com/
Back to Top
Andalus View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group

Joined: 12 October 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1187
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Andalus Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 March 2006 at 10:39am
Originally posted by liberty liberty wrote:

I understand that the one reason that GW Bush went into Iraq was for the oil.  Not all Americans supported him in this endeavour, and I am among them.

Let's assume that Israel gives Palestine their land back and pulls back within their borders.  Will their be peace between the Jews and Arabs?

What would it take for their to be peace between Arabs and the West?

To be quite honest I am not sure what the Muslim world wants from the West.

I say that the US should pull all of its foreign aid and let nations stand on their own.

A feeling of discouragement when you slip up is a sure sign that you put your faith in deeds. -Ibn 'Ata'llah
http://www.sunnipath.com
http://www.sunniforum.com/forum/
http://www.pt-go.com/
Back to Top
Andalus View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group

Joined: 12 October 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1187
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Andalus Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 March 2006 at 10:52am
Originally posted by Trident Trident wrote:

Originally posted by AhmadJoyia AhmadJoyia wrote:

Hi Trident, I don't know how and why your friend behaved as you have mentioned, but I don't think this verse 4:24 says anything about adultary. This verse along with some preceeding and the one immediately after this, are injunctions for Muslims who all can be allowed to marry with. These set of particular verses simply explain who all women are "not allowed" for Muslims to be married with (except the slaves) and who all are not allowed. In case of marrying slaves, verse 4:25 provides a direct answer. Here is the translation of the verse from three different translators. I hope this may clear the ambiguity, if any.

004.024
YUSUFALI: Also (prohibited are) women already married, except those whom your right hands possess: Thus hath Allah ordained (Prohibitions) against you: Except for these, all others are lawful, provided ye seek (them in marriage) with gifts from your property,- desiring chastity, not lust, seeing that ye derive benefit from them, give them their dowers (at least) as prescribed; but if, after a dower is prescribed, agree Mutually (to vary it), there is no blame on you, and Allah is All-knowing, All-wise.
PICKTHAL: And all married women (are forbidden unto you) save those (captives) whom your right hands possess. It is a decree of Allah for you. Lawful unto you are all beyond those mentioned, so that ye seek them with your wealth in honest wedlock, not debauchery. And those of whom ye seek content (by marrying them), give unto them their portions as a duty. And there is no sin for you in what ye do by mutual agreement after the duty (hath been done). Lo! Allah is ever Knower, Wise.
SHAKIR: And all married women except those whom your right hands possess (this is) Allah's ordinance to you, and lawful for you are (all women) besides those, provided that you seek (them) with your property, taking (them) in marriage not committing fornication. Then as to those whom you profit by, give them their dowries as appointed; and there is no blame on you about what you mutually agree after what is appointed; surely Allah is Knowing, Wise.

Thanks for the prompt reply. What I understand of adultery is sexual relationship with someone who is not our spouse, i.e. husband or wife. But all the translations you've provided says married women cannot be married EXCEPT our RIGHT HAND POSSESSION. How do married women become our RIGHT HAND POSSESSIONS?

Your understanding follows from Church dogma. Adultery is actually an act of having sex with someone "unlawful". The Torah with its oral tradition and the Quran with its oral (hadith) tradition give specifics as to what is lawful.

A feeling of discouragement when you slip up is a sure sign that you put your faith in deeds. -Ibn 'Ata'llah
http://www.sunnipath.com
http://www.sunniforum.com/forum/
http://www.pt-go.com/
Back to Top
Andalus View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group

Joined: 12 October 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1187
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Andalus Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 March 2006 at 11:05am
Originally posted by Trident Trident wrote:

Thanks for the prompt reply. What I understand of adultery is sexual relationship with someone who is not our spouse, i.e. husband or wife. But all the translations you've provided says married women cannot be married EXCEPT our RIGHT HAND POSSESSION. How do married women become our RIGHT HAND POSSESSIONS?

Similar to the situation in the Christian OT when Jesus as part of the Gdhead allowed Hebrew Soldiers to take women found amongst captives (when they were not being massacred). After a war, the females would usually become captives of Muslims. If the Muslim soldier wished to have relations, then he became responsible for her and this responsibility would become a right for the woman captive. It was war, and this was the method of clean up even presribed by the Christian Jesus as part of the Christian Gdhead. WIthout any nations, and formal treaties, or the UN, this would have been a rational solution.    

 

A feeling of discouragement when you slip up is a sure sign that you put your faith in deeds. -Ibn 'Ata'llah
http://www.sunnipath.com
http://www.sunniforum.com/forum/
http://www.pt-go.com/
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 1819202122 25>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd.