QUESTIONS ABOUT ISLAM |
Post Reply | Page <1 2021222324 25> |
Author | |||||
ak_m_f
Senior Member Joined: 15 October 2005 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 3272 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Dont post thge link from websites as "Why I Left Islam!", I thought that you came here to learn, but I see that you are keyboard-crusader. why dont you send an e-mail to some scholar who can accept your challenge. Why arnt we allowed to deny holocaust, are they also hiding something? Edited by ak_m_f |
|||||
Trident
Newbie Joined: 22 March 2006 Location: Malaysia Status: Offline Points: 29 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Why not? Muslims like to visit anti-Islamic websites & post links to pro-Islamic websites. I don't see why I can't do the reverse here. Why don't we let our readers themselves see two sides of the story, eh? ***Because we don't allows such behavior here nor do we condone such behavior here or on any other web site.*** I'm not a crusader. Anyway in the 21sy century, the crusades are the least of our worry, if they exist at all. I'd be more worried about terrorism. ***DO NOT link Islam with terrorism here, it will be not be tolerated. It is both slanderous and insulting.*** And who says you can't deny the Holocaust? Muslims do it freely, right? Anyway, I wouldn't deny that it took place. (admin: link has beed removed, see guidelines) - The Shocking Truth! Edited by Khadija1021 |
|||||
Andalus
Moderator Group Joined: 12 October 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1187 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Interesting. I find your appeal to discussion to be "disingenuous", and your contributions have offered nothing but the typical juvenile sophistry. Detractors and Islamaphobes always go on the offensive when they find that they have no real bases to provide a discussion of substance from which to critique Islam. The usual tautological dribble and missionary derived howlers.
Detractors try hard to find every aciton of the Prophet unjustifiable and when they dislike something, they simply appeal to some form ofa fallacy or simply "assert" it must be wrong because they dislike it. Not only did I provide you with your answers, but I also demonstrated a detractors common fallacy: special pleading. When I pointed out that the lamb of the west, Christian's version of Jesus, is guilty of far worse events then what Islam is accused of, (keep in mind that making a "valid" point about special pleading does not in anyway make any agreements with you or any other detractor about any of your false points and accusations, hence, nothing such as "ok, we did this but so did you" has been committed and I challenge you to show where this "act" was committed since you have brought it up), it was a demonstration of the wests double talk and hypocrisy. I find your sincerety that you wished for us to presume was but a charade.
FIrst, I find your lack of reply to what I provided to be yet another sign of your intended chicanery. I never stated that Islam decides what is right or wrong. Your appealing to relativism, which is extremely cheap, is a way to escape any reasonable contribution and direct discussion and is duly noted. Second, what Christians quote or do not quote is "irrelevant". What is relevant is that Jesus, as their Gdhead, would be guilty of worse atrocities than the emtpy accusations you hurl disguised as "innocent questions". Keep in mind, I am not affirming any accusaiton, I am not saying, "ok fine, but they are wrong also". This is a common response from detractors when they are faced with their fallacious position of special pleading. Muslims like me quote it, not to justify in the affimrative any accusation you bring forth, but only to measure your accusations with respect to the lamb of the west.
which explains your ignorance. Tell me, what kind of a person would learn about Capitalism from a Marxist? Or the talmud from an evangelcial Christian? Or Evangelcial Christianity from an athiest? An intellectual coward who has started with presumptions without any intention of learning.
Interesting. It seems Ali Sina is as bereft in the realm of thinking as he is in the realm of Islam. Regarding epistemological understanding: if it were possible to prove a given idea then the world would be one religion, one form of governement, and diverse thinking would not be found. Islam does not rest on a bet, as the millions of adherents know that it is the truth, which is something money can not buy. And I personally have been to the sight, and anyone who feels they can learn something constructive ther, has not real wit or sense of integrity. Ali Sina is bereft of scholarship or honesty. Instead of passing on your failed attempt at bad polemics here on to faitthfreedom, you should be more concerned with your lack of substance. Hope this helps. Edited by Andalus |
|||||
A feeling of discouragement when you slip up is a sure sign that you put your faith in deeds. -Ibn 'Ata'llah
http://www.sunnipath.com http://www.sunniforum.com/forum/ http://www.pt-go.com/ |
|||||
Trident
Newbie Joined: 22 March 2006 Location: Malaysia Status: Offline Points: 29 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
***I have removed this post because not only it is not true, it was insulting towards Islam.*** Edited by Khadija1021 |
|||||
Andalus
Moderator Group Joined: 12 October 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1187 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Yes, many Muslims were killed at the hands of detractors, and islam did suffer from violence. I will not deny that. I will not also deny, as an American, that the US had a very violent begining.
What truth that is being affirmed by you and denied by me that the primary texts also affirm? (please point out the truth I have denied in this thread?)
Not my problem. Though I do have a great deal of trouble at forums such as Catholic Answers. I do doubt your post was deleted simply because it was an argument against Islam. I am very sure if you contribute your material in a contructive manner with an actual point shy any red herrings and other trite howlers, the mods here would not bother with it. I for one am not affraid to put my faith out for criticism.
Hmm....Anecdotal. Which has little value in learning or for the sake of benefit. As far as yor last comment, that is your opinion which does little in the way of drawing sound conclusions or building a constructive discussion.
I beg you to gather your thoughts. Recieving what exactly? So you are suggesting that Muslims have not been atacked and taken as prisoners? Are you critical of the rules of engagement in Islam? Do you have some bases for deriving rules of enagement? Any particular cases? A universal ideal of a golden rule is meaningless without "particulars" in matters of society, war, crime, etc, etc. In other words, as a general maxim it is a "swell" idea, but in particulars it does not nor should it, prevent the right of going to war, punishment of crime, etc, etc. This is why in the Quran, like the Torah, this ideal is found, right along side statutes with bring down capital punishment if broken. [/QUOTE] |
|||||
A feeling of discouragement when you slip up is a sure sign that you put your faith in deeds. -Ibn 'Ata'llah
http://www.sunnipath.com http://www.sunniforum.com/forum/ http://www.pt-go.com/ |
|||||
Khadija1021
Moderator Group Joined: 30 June 2005 Status: Offline Points: 530 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Salam, Trident, I am sorry if some who call themselves 'Muslims' have posted horrible things on other websites; however, this is not a website that allows for such. This is an Islamic forum which was created as a forum for both Muslims and non-Muslims who are sincerely interested in coming here as a means to gain greater understand and knowledge of Islam. We do not allow "freedom of speech" here, but rather, we hold that the right to post here as a 'privilege' as long as the person posting follows the guidelines for this forum group. Rule # 1 is as follows: We manage here an Islamic discussion board, thus all members are requested to maintain the decorum as per the standards of an Islamic cultural society. Please note, it says �all members� and not just the Muslim members. That is, all members are expected to apply good adab (manners) in posting here. There is to be no: Slanderous, defamatory, obscene, indecent, lewd, pornographic, violent, abusive, insulting, threatening and harassing comments are not tolerated. ALL comments by the person who adopts such a manner may be removed and the person will lose the privilege of participating in the forums in future. We will try to block attempts from the same person to sign up with a different name as well. So, if you are not here to learn about Islam, but rather, you have only come here to show �Muslims� how wrong their faith is, it is best that you simply leave before you are removed. Yes, this is a warning. Your posts here have been nothing but Islam bashing without any true desire to look at credible information regarding Islam. Yes, you have the right to dislike Islam if you want to; however, you will have to take your blatant lack of respect for those who come here to learn and to help someplace else because it will not be tolerated here. Fredifreeloader, this message holds equally true for you. I have watched you now for quite some time and your views on Islam have not changed at all. In fact, the more others on this forum try to help you learn about Islam the harder your views against Islam become. This forum group was not started as a means for those who hate Islam to come here and try to convenience Muslims that their faith is wrong or invalid. So, either show us you really have some �positive� interest in Islam or please leave the board before you are terminated. PAZ Sister Khadija
|
|||||
Say: 'My prayer and my rites, my living and my dying, are for Allah alone, the Lord of all the worlds. (Qur'an, 6:162)
|
|||||
ak_m_f
Senior Member Joined: 15 October 2005 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 3272 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
***Brother AK, it is not okay to insult others even if you feel they insulted you first. Please reframe from making these types of posts.***
Edited by Khadija1021 |
|||||
Khadija1021
Moderator Group Joined: 30 June 2005 Status: Offline Points: 530 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Mr. Ahmad is right about leaving it to the readers to see through his explanation of this. The readers will see how Mr. Ahmad tries to justify the acts of the Muslim soldiers under Muhammad's command. And hopefully our dear readers will read the part where Mr. Ahmad actually agrees that rape indeed took place. This gem of a Hadith (Muslim) further explains the "wonderful" treatment of war captives according to Islam. Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa'id al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him): 0 Abu Sa'id, did you hear Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) mentioning al-'azl? He said: Yes, and added: We went out with Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi'l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing 'azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid-conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah's Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah's Mes- senger (may peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born. We can see from these Hadiths how Muhammad himself endorses azl, or coitus interruptus. Need I say more? I think the Hadiths are enough for strong evidence. Trident , no, you need not say more because what you have said it not correct. It would be nice if you could read that hadith and know what it means. The Prophet (pbuh) was not condoning anything; he was making a point which is �regardless of whether or not a man practices 'azl (coitus interrupt us), it will not determine if a woman would get pregnant�. The reason He said this to the men is because it says in the Holy Qur�an (see ayat below) that Allah is the one who controls who will conceive and have children so whether or not the man practices coitus interrupt us doesn�t matter. 42:49 To Allah belongs the dominion of the heavens and the earth. He creates what He wills (and plans). He bestows (children) male or female according to His Will (and Plan), Does this mean he condones it? Or that he condoned raping female captives? No. It was a hadith about conception and the effects of coitus interrupt us. There are other ahadith which speak of �azl and the following one shows that the Prophet (pbuh) not only did not know that the men were practicing it but that he did not approve of it once he found out. Volume 3, Book 34, Number 432, Buhkari: Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri: that while he was sitting with Allah's Apostle he said, "O Allah's Apostle! We get female captives as our share of booty, and we are interested in their prices, what is your opinion about coitus interrupt us?" The Prophet said, "Do you really do that? It is better for you not to do it. No soul that which Allah has destined to exist, but will surely come into existence. You might and probably will take the position that the Prophet (pbuh) only said �it is better for you not to do it� and not that he said �don�t do it�; however, if you know anything about Islam, then you would know that for the Prophet (pbuh) to say �It is better for you not to do it� was the equivalent of saying, �Don�t do it!� There is nothing in these ahadith which indicates that the Prophet (pbuh) condoned the raping of female war captives or that it actually took place and to say so is merely an assumption on the part of any who says otherwise. The Prophet said the following: Free the captives, feed the hungry and pay a visit to the sick. (Volume 4, Book 52, Number 282, Buhkari) Did he set them free? Volume 4, Book 53, Number 372, Buhkari: Narrated Nafi: 'Umar bin Al-Khattab said, "O Allah's Apostle! I vowed to observe Itikaf for one day during the Pre-lslamic period." The Prophet ordered him to fulfill his vow. 'Umar gained two lady captives from the war prisoners of Hunain and he left them in some of the houses at Volume 9, Book 89, Number 288, Buhkari: Narrated 'Urwa bin Az-Zubair: Marwan bin Al-Hakam and Al-Miswar bin Makhrama told him that when the Muslims were permitted to set free the captives of Hawazin, Allah's Apostle said, "I do not know who amongst you has agreed (to it) and who has not. Go back so that your 'Urafa' may submit your decision to us." So the people returned and their 'Urafa' talked to them and then came back to Allah's Apostle and told him that the people had given their consent happily and permitted (their captives to be freed). Yes, he did free captives and encouraged his men to do so for the sake of Allah (God). Furthermore, he did the following when his own, beloved, daughter requested a captive as servant. Volume 5, Book 57, Number 55, Buhkari: Narrated 'Ali: That is, he told them (Fatima and Ali) it was better to make dhikr (to praise God) each night than to own a captive as a servant. Trident, regardless of what you may think, the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) is not the person you and others like you want to portray him to have been. The only way you can even get close to accomplishing this is to distort history and defile information about him. What is your propose for doing this? Why do you want to make the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) look bad in the eyes of the world? PAZ Sister Khadija |
|||||
Say: 'My prayer and my rites, my living and my dying, are for Allah alone, the Lord of all the worlds. (Qur'an, 6:162)
|
|||||
Post Reply | Page <1 2021222324 25> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |