Gabriel: "Read" or "Recite?" |
Post Reply | Page <1 6789> |
Author | |||
Cyril
Senior Member Joined: 08 May 2006 Location: France Status: Offline Points: 176 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Ibnuarradi
I did not explain the meaning of Hanif because I expected it was known in a discussion on Islam. Hanifs are pre-Islamic Arabs who were attracted by monotheism or became monotheists without adhering to Judaism or Christianity. It is just a supposition of mine that Muhammad may have been in touch or belonged to a Hanif group, of course until someone proves that he did not meet such people. Your quote: "Where there is similarities between Quran and the Jewish or Christian scriptures, there are many dissimilarities....if the Quran was derived from the Jews or Christian, the Prophet would have agreed to Jews and Christian and will not be pointing out to them that they had deviated from their true teachings of Monotheism." Excuse me but that is not an argument. You can borrow ideas and words and modify them to your liking. Allow me to adopt the position of Islam drawing from Judaism and Christianity rather than directly from God. Those two religions being older and being around in Arabia, plain commonsense tells you that they are the origins of Islam. There are also elements from Arabic paganism that have passed into Islam, or folktales from Jewish or Christian legends, so I think it is more logical to stick to a borrowing scenario. That is only my opinion and that of non-religious scholars who study the Quran as an historical document. It is only when a problem cannot be explained by commonsense that an extraordinary solution may be considered. Abrah Most scholars believe that the Prophet could not read or write, so what? Was he deaf or dumb that he could not pick up discussions and repeat them afterwards? I believe he was a very intelligent person. |
|||
BMZ
Moderator Group Joined: 03 April 2006 Status: Offline Points: 1852 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Ibnuarradi and ABrah, Assalamo Alaikum I would say that Cyril is right on the point of Hanifs. Hanif or Hanifa means Most Upright, exactly like Abraham who has been called in Qur'aan as "Muslima Hanifa" the most Upright man in the sight of God. From his early chilhood, Abraham used to reflect and conclude that the sun, the moons, the stars and other idols could not be gods or Gods. Prophet as a young child was similar, a Hanifa. In that sense and also he must have been in good company of upright men or Hanifs. I am not addressing other points here but we are always asked why Qur'aan borrowed or copied from the Jews and Christians? God's words never change for the Good Lord said, "I never change"! The message from Adam to Noah and then from Noah to Muhammad has always been the same. Muhammad did not bring any new doctrine or any new fables. That is why the Qur'aan addresses mainly the Jews, the Christians and the idolators. Who is left out? No one. BR & Salaam Alaikum BMZ Edited by bmzsp |
|||
ibnuarradi
Newbie Joined: 26 April 2006 Location: Singapore Status: Offline Points: 11 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
I do know the meaning of Hanifs...it is just that I'm so use of asking for one source of belief (I do remember someone here ever mentioned that "...basing faith off of the words of a man who was not there to know is less than convincing....")...nevertheless, that supposition is fair enough if that is coming from you or from those of similar opinion
Again, a fair statement....I guess, the same logic would then also be applicable to teachings of Christianity and Judaism and thus one could wrongly claim that Jesus (Pbuh) was not a genuine Prophet (God forbid) and that he simply copied from the Old Testament.
Point noted, and again that is a fair statement coming from you...I guess such an opinion will make more sense and more convincing if we believe Arabs during the time have never thought to think the way you think Moving forward, I do believe that the day-to-day life of the Prophet was an open book for all to see. And the fact that the extremely prominent Quraish nobles who followed the Prophet and accepted Islam were wise and intelligent men who would have easily noticed anything suspicious about the way in which the Prophet brought the revelations to them; more so since the Prophetic mission lasted 23 years. Furthermore, it is worth to note that the enemies of the Prophet kept a close watch on him in order to find proof for their claim (that he was a liar or borrow a belief from Jews or Christian, etc) Anyway, Allah knows best
|
|||
ibnuarradi
Newbie Joined: 26 April 2006 Location: Singapore Status: Offline Points: 11 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Alaikum salam Br BMZ Appreciate the explaination....excellent statement and opinion (not to mention ... the approach ) Allah knows best
|
|||
BMZ
Moderator Group Joined: 03 April 2006 Status: Offline Points: 1852 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Ibnuarradi, From you: "Again, a fair statement....I guess, the same logic would then also be applicable to teachings of Christianity and Judaism and thus one could wrongly claim that Jesus (Pbuh) was not a genuine Prophet (God forbid) and that he simply copied from the Old Testament." That is a good rebuttal. Excellent! Even all the gospel writers copied from the teachings of Judaism and it's Holy Scriptures. It went to the extent that almost the entire Jewish Bible was copied and attached to the New testament. This was not some just little copying! IT is taking an entire book of others and attach instead of cut, copy and paste. BR & Salaams BMZ
|
|||
Cyril
Senior Member Joined: 08 May 2006 Location: France Status: Offline Points: 176 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Bmzsp
Thanks for the meaning of hanif حنيف . I cannot believe you when you say that God's Word never changes. God in the Quran is very similar to God in the Jewish Bible but much different from God in the New Testament. Saying that the New Testament is "copied" from the Jewish Bible (this is a Christian dogma, so I do not see the point) is not a rebuttal against the Quran being derived from different religious traditions from seventh century Arabia. Giving me some original elements in the Quran, not known at the time, would be a better way to prove your point. Ibnuarradi All you tell me about the Prophet is not from written diaries dating from before Muhammad's death, but, I presume, from oral traditions put to writing a long time after. Religions, in their early developments, do not not work like history. What people believe to be true mixes constantly with what is actually true. Legends become historical facts. Close to us in the nineteenth century, Mormonism, a new religion with similarites with Islam appeared. Its founder said he was a prophet of God that was given scriptures. Of course you and I do not believe in him, but when you go on Mormon sites you can see all the "proofs" of his prophethood. When one sees a new religion appearing with "proofs" in the nineteenth century and in the United States, that is in modern times, one can imagine the reliability of traditions from the seventh century at a time when there were no media as we have today. Edited by Cyril |
|||
ibnuarradi
Newbie Joined: 26 April 2006 Location: Singapore Status: Offline Points: 11 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Cyril From you: "I cannot believe you when you say that God's Word never changes. God in the Quran is very similar to God in the Jewish Bible but much different from God in the New Testament." I guess your original opinion here should stand too unchanged, that the Christians must have "borrow ideas and words and modify them to their liking"... As I had stated earlier, there are many original elements in Quran, but when discussing with "people of the books", we are encouraged to start with a common ground... We do offer a more logical conclusion...and trust that it was accepted from during the time of occurance (by the wise men of that era) and up to now (by the wise men of this era) - that the Quran comes from same source containing the same key message... Allah knows best
Edited by ibnuarradi |
|||
BMZ
Moderator Group Joined: 03 April 2006 Status: Offline Points: 1852 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Thanks for the comments, Cyril. Judaism 1,500 years B.C., Jesus 0001, Christianity 365 to 450 A.D. and Islam 680 A.D. With that in mind, Islam was the most modern of them all. But we can't compare Islam with those of the most modern times. Period. In terms of God's words, whether it was in the 7th Century or the First Century or a thousand Centuries before in Noah's times, the message and Commandments were the same. For the Jews, Jesus and Muhammad are both like David Koraish. Neither I can do anything about it nor can you. But you got to give it to Muhammad for he stands out among the crowd. Let us look at the commonality of God's message given to Moses: "Thou shall love only thy Lord the God with all your heart, mind and soul." Now, that is the key message repeated by Jesus himself and Muhammad. Noah, Abraham, Moses, Jesus and Muhamamd were the Hanifs and that is why God chose them. Best Regards BMZ |
|||
Post Reply | Page <1 6789> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |